Grants:Project/MSIG/WikiFranca/Francophone Hub Research Grant/Report
Under review
Please review the notes below before submitting your report.
Your draft implementation plan document should address the following questions clearly:
- What movement strategy initiative or goal are you addressing?
- What activities will you be doing to address that initiative?
- What do you expect will happen as a result of your activities? How do those outcomes address the movement strategy initiative?
- How will you measure or evaluate your activities? What tools or methods will you use to evaluate your activities?
To create a draft implementation plan, we recommend the use of a logic model, which will help you and your team think about goals, activities, outcomes, and other factors in an organized way. Please refer the following resources to develop a logic model:
- Overview of logic models on Meta-wiki
- Example logic models for reference for other movement activities (such as partnerships and edit-a-thons)
- Blank logic model template on Google Drive
Outcomes
[edit]Please respond to the following questions below:
Where have you published your draft plan? Share the link to it here:
- The report is available on Meta at this link.
What Movement Strategy initiative is this draft plan supporting?
- This research grant supported initiative 26 on regional and thematic hubs, initiative 30 to "enhance communication and collaboration capacity with partners and collaborators" and initiative 32 on "global approach for local skill development - gathering data, matching peers, mentorship, recognition".
What activities have you completed to produce this draft plan?
- In producing the report, 25 semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives of WikiFranca-affiliated members, their communities, and former board members to gather diverse perspectives on current needs and challenges. A community survey was aldo carried out and widely distributed across various WikiFranca communication channels, focusing on demographics, training needs, capacity building, and open feedback. Additionally, an online community conversation allowed participants and board members to review preliminary findings, discuss the development of the francophone hub, and explore strategies to address key issues like volunteer retention and support needs.
In which community channels have you announced your draft plan?
- The report has been announced during a WikiFranca community conversation, and further circulated through mailing lists and other messaging channels.
Finances
[edit]Grant funds spent
[edit]| Category | Amount (€) | Percentage of total grant |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis & production of results | 6,120.00 | 30.6 % |
| Project coordination & management | 3,630.00 | 18.2 % |
| Research & data collection | 3,270.00 | 16.4 % |
| Technical costs & tools | 1,024.49 | 5.1 % |
| Meetings & community interactions | 870.00 | 4.4 % |
| Unspent funds | 5,086.00 | 25.4 % |
| Total | 20,000.00 | 100 % |
- Analysis & production of results (30.6%) The largest share of the budget, covering data consolidation, analysis, report drafting, and translation.
- Project coordination & management (18.2%) Includes administrative tasks, project management, and preparation for implementation.
- Research & data collection (16.4%) Covers preparatory work, interviews, desk research, and survey design.
- Technical costs & tools (5.1%) Internet and Zoom subscriptions required to carry out the project.
- Meetings & community interactions (4.4%) Engagement with Wikimedia Foundation staff, WikiFranca partners, and community members.
- Unspent funds (25.4%)
Remaining funds
[edit]Do you have any remaining grant funds?
There are €5,086 in unspent funds. We can either return them to the Wikimedia Foundation or use them to initiate the implementation phase of the recommendations.
Anything else
[edit]Anything else you want to share about your project?