Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/"Boosting Nupe Wikipedia:Expanding Articles in Incubation" (ID: 22825796)

Endorsement from 197.210.53.197

As the project highlights its impacts to Nupe language advancement, it will be of paramount importance if more articles are created which in turn lead to more visibility of the language. I give a total endorsement to the project.

--197.210.53.197 22:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Endorsement from Umar Ahmad2345 (talk)

A good approach but I suggest when boosting the articles notability and females articles should be put into considerations. I support the grants proposal

--Umar Ahmad2345 (talk) 17:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Endorsement from Aliyu Sadiq081 (talk)

A dedicated team with zeals to uplift Nupe language, it's crucial to support this wonderful project Grants. I support this project

--Aliyu Sadiq081 (talk) 10:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Endorsement from Fauziya isa (talk)

The project aims to promote language diversity and visibility is highly recommended. Boosting the language in Wikipedia incubator stage will elevate the status of the Nupe Wikimedians to actualization towards getting their site. I endorsed the project 100%

--Fauziya isa (talk) 07:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Endorsement from 787IYO (talk)

A project worthy of community expansion as stated in plans written and expected outcomes. I support this project and hope it will be impactful to the community

--787IYO (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Endorsement from Jameel35 (talk)

The project highlights strong commitment towards boosting Nupe language currently in incubator. It's will be of paramount support to ensure the achievement is gotten. I support the proposal

--Jameel35 (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Rapid Fund Request : Not Funded

Hello , thanks for submitting your Rapid Fund request. We appreciate your willingness to contribute to the Wikimedia Movement.

We have completed the initial review of your application and we decided to not fund it. We made this decision considering several factors:

• Completeness of the grant application, including amount of AI generated content.
• Clear goals, objectives, and impact aligned with the requested budget, activities and metrics.
• On-wiki experience of the main applicant and the team.
• Completeness of the proposed budget, including alignment of the proposed expenses with local costs.
• Additionally, this project seems to it lack impact against the fund requested. The first project of creating 94.83% contents on translate.wiki for Nupe Wikipedia could have been completed at the planned time. It's inappropriate to split a project into two while it could be done once. There is no need to have spend much on the second half part compared to the impact it would have. In the reviewers view, the last part could be done without requesting for funds if they so desire volunteer supported free knowledge.

On behalf of the Sub-Saharan Africa regional review team. VThamaini (WMF) (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)