Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/Digital Inclusion:Enhancing Student Skills with Wikimedia at Federal College of Education (Technical) Bichi (ID: 22755987)
Add topicI strongly support this project
--Smshika (talk) 06:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Endorsement from Usmanmaifada (talk)
[edit]--Usmanmaifada (talk) 07:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)This project will greatly contribute to the people and awareness in our community, it help the people to develop their skills of learning. I strongly support this project.
Endorsement from Hauwau sulaiman (talk)
[edit]--Hauwau sulaiman (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC) support this proposal.the Project is much important in this college. Because, the college consist of youth both male and female, students and lecturer's, the event may help our students to know what wiki means, what are the wiki activities, how can they be part of the organization and at end how can they contribute to the wiki activities. The project will empower the students to have some work to do using their phones/laptop. The project will lead the students to achieve a common goal in their life and also the wiki organization at large.Hauwau sulaiman (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Endorsement from Lawan Bala (talk)
[edit]I strong support this project because The proposal to enhance awareness, dispel doubts, and encourage participation in Wikimedia projects at Digital Inclusion:Enhancing Student Skills with Wikimedia at Federal College of Education (Technical) Bichi. is commendable. By creating awareness, providing training, improving local content, and fostering a community, this initiative has the potential to bring positive change.The well-structured plan, combining workshops, online campaigns, and mentorship, ensures sustainable impact and active participation. Experienced trainers promise high-quality results. This initiative aligns with the Movement Strategy 2030 and addresses digital access needs in underrepresented communities.Lawan Bala (talk) 22:21, 3 August 2024 (UTC) --Lawan Bala (talk) 22:21, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
This proposal is vital for bridging knowledge gaps, promoting linguistic diversity, and fostering community engagement within the Hausa Wikipedia ecosystem. With a focus on inclusivity, collaboration, and evidence-based evaluation, it has the potential to empower individuals and drive positive change.
--Mahuta (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Endorsement from Ummun Sultan (talk)
[edit]I 
Strong support this project
--Ummun Sultan (talk) 10:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Endorsement from Mr. Snatch (talk)
[edit]I, Mr. Snatch, am delighted to express my unwavering support for a groundbreaking project that seeks to equip students at Federal College of Education (Technical) Bichi with the essential digital competencies necessary to navigate the online realm with assurance and proficiency. By leveraging the vast array of tools and resources offered by Wikimedia, these students will develop a comprehensive understanding of how to source, evaluate, and create engaging online content, thereby emerging as skilled digital contributors and active participants in the global online community.
--Mr. Snatch (talk) 19:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Endorsement from A Sulaiman Z (talk)
[edit]I fully endorse this project. As a facilitator, I have seen the significant potential this initiative has to empower students with digital literacy and content creation skills. This project will not only increase student participation in Wikimedia projects but also contribute to building a sustainable community of editors at the institution. I believe it will have a lasting positive impact on the students and support their engagement in the global digital landscape. --A Sulaiman Z (talk) 05:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Rapid Fund Request : Not Funded
[edit]Thank you for submitting your application. After a thorough review of your proposal, we have made a decision not to fund your proposal. See the notes speaking to the rationale of the decision below;
- The project is unclear. What exactly is the objective here. There is a lot happening that does not seem to be well thought out. For instance on day 1 you have editing wikipedia and gender inclusive programming. Given how long it takes to equip newbies with basics including understanding of policies this is not objectively ambitious.
- We also notice the application is heavily AI written, and could have benefitted from a human context correcting review.