Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Research Fund/Exploring How AI Can Interpret Discussions Through an Insider Lens to Support Future Mediation
Add topic | Thank you for considering providing your input for the proposal. Although many applicants are not actively monitoring these pages and are unlikely to respond here, we will share your feedback with every applicant to help them improve their research. Please write your feedback in a constructive and supportive manner and note that Community Resources team's behavioral expectations as well as UCoC's expected behavior apply to this space. |
If possible, please keep your input concise. We'd particularly like feedback on the following questions:
- From what perspective or in what role are you providing your input? (For example: a Wikipedia editor, a representative of a Wikimedia chapter, a member of a regional committee)
- In what ways do you think this research can support members of the Wikimedia communities in their work on Wikimedia projects?
- Is there a particular project or affiliate in your country/region/project that can benefit from the result of this research and/or you recommend that the applicants seek to coordinate or collaborate with? If so, please provide details including the name of the project or affiliate and a short description of the relevance of the proposal to the needs of the affiliate or project.
- Do you have any other comments or feedback you would like to share with the Research Fund chairs?
Discussions get too long and need mediation
[edit]Great proposal and great concept.
There are some recurring discussions which seem to repeat, and which may even have the same outcome in many iterations, but which happen so much that humans have trouble detecting trends on the outcome. Any perennial topic has collections of such discussions, but here is a list of discussions on one topic
I am curious if your process would 1) have the same insights on different instances of discussions on a common topic, in which humans would perceive as similar 2) could combine many different discussions on one topic, and interpret the collection as a whole.
Thanks for making the proposal. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC)