Logo for Wikimedia Strategic Planning wiki

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
  • Wikimedia Strategic planning currently has no logo associated with it aside from the meta logo. This vote is intended to establish a logo for this wiki.
  • Please update the vote counter as you cast your vote.
  • PLEASE use the talk page for discussion.

Type 01 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 02 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 03 (1/0/0)[edit]

Support Support This one skilfully combines the round thingie shared by many of the Wikimedia projects with chess, meant as a metaphor of strategy. --Isacdaavid (talk) 03:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Type 04 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 05 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 06 (0/0/0)[edit]

  1. Support Support. Even though it would be much better for a potential Wikimedia upload-service ;-) Allrounder (talk) 19:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Type 07 (1/0/0)[edit]

Support Support. --Allan Aguilar (talk) 02:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Type 08 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 09 (2/0/0)[edit]

  1. Support Support, it is a good visualisation of what Strategy wiki is about. Although the road kind leans towards the right, so I'd prefer a more centred version. But nevertheless, a nice logo --Tobias talk · contrib 20:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support But I'll like a centered version too. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support Very representative of the strategy wiki .--Deathlaser (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Type 10 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 11 (1/0/0)[edit]

  1. Support Support Kinda neat, too. My second preference --Tobias talk · contrib 20:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Type 12 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 13 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 14 (1/0/0)[edit]

  1. I love this one. --Turn685 (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Type 15 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 16 (0/0/0)[edit]

Type 17 (0/0/0)[edit]

Keep current logo (2/0/0)[edit]

  1. Support - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 11:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - In line with the longer-term ambition of merging StrategyWiki into MetaWiki. James F. (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Absolutely no reason to change. Much ado about nothing. --Philippe (talk) 17:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]