Meta:Requests for adminship/Vogone 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Vogone (2)[edit]

Vogone (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
Ending 19 October 2014 11:26 UTC

Vogone has been around Meta for a few years already, having often proven to be helpful and knowledgeable in areas in which expertise is often required, such as CN or translations. Adminship would also allow him to participate in routine maintenance tasks. He is active here on Meta and an administrator and bureaucrat on wikidata and some other projects. He is also a global rollbacker, global sysop and global renamer. I thank you for your time, and hope you will agree it is in the interest of Meta to have Vogone as an administrator. As you might know, Vogone has had a previous RfA over a year ago, in which some bureaucratic issue which is no longer in place now caused him to withdraw. Cordially, Sa vh ^ñ 11:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your nomination and in case the community is willing to see me doing maintenance tasks on this wiki, I would not refuse. Regards, Vogone (talk) 11:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per my nomination statement. Sa vh ^ñ 11:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? — revi ^☏ 11:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yes! Alan ^(talk) 11:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Savh forgot, Globally trustworthy..--Ste moc 11:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I enjoy working with this user and would have no problem with him having the sysop tools. --Eurodyne (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course. Should have been an admin last year if we had bureaucrats capable of doing their job. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rs chen 7754 16:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --Jasper Deng (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Munjanes (talk) 17:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Please use edit summaries more often. I also wonder if all edits after 11 September 2014 should have been "minor". Please check Special:Preferences under editing and see if "Mark all edits minor by default" is checked.--Jusjih (talk) 00:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 08:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose JurgenNL (talk) 09:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
support —DerHexer (Talk) 21:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Glaisher (talk) 03:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aren't you admin in here? I thought you are--DangSunM (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Courcelles 03:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- User is very experienced, and along with that the user is very helpful; no doubt he'd make a great admin. Go Vogone! (signature removed, see history) 12:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Support Why not? -FASTILY 23:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --///EuroCarGT 01:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clear consensus, successful. -Barras talk 11:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]