Meta:Requests for adminship/~riley

~riley

~riley (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.

Ending 11 January 2020 04:45 (UTC)

Hello, I have been around Wikimedia since 2012 but have been more active on Meta since returning to help on the SWMT and becoming a global rollbacker. My home wiki is Commons, where I am an administrator of 4 years, but I am found just about anywhere there is vandalism. I believe in the revert, block, ignore principle, which I practice well on my home wiki, but without the block abilities, rollbacking just gives LTA's the attention they are looking for. As someone who sits in #wikimedia-stewards and watches requests pop up for LTAs actively vandalizing here, I would like to be of use in situations where no Meta admin or steward is available. For those curious about numbers, I have just over 1,000 edits here on Meta with 110 of them being deleted edits. ~riley (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clear need and use for the tools. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - trusted user with a use for the tools here. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 05:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support! He knows what he is doing. No concern here. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support More admins are always welcomed, as long as the candidate have competency and can be trusted (with a record to support), why not?--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support useful work and no concerns from me. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Turkmen ^talk 15:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems fine. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support trusted sysop elsewhere. Should be granted on request. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support why not --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 22:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for your helping :) --Sotiale (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Minorax (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --94rain ^Talk 06:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sgd. Hasley 20:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted and active user, so why not? Ahmad^talk 20:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support_𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 20:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support trusted user —Eihel (talk) 03:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -J. Ansari Talk 16:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DannyS712 (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 20:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure--MrJaroslavik (talk) 09:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Excellent candidate.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support competent, experienced, highly active user. He will be an asset. Masum Reza^📞 03:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- CptViraj (📧) 15:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 22:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vermont (talk) 03:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Matiia (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]