Meta:Requests for bot status/SpBot

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

SpBot[edit]

Bot: SpBot (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
Operator: Euku (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Rationale: I was asked here. This bot is for archiving resolved discussions and working queues, that are tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}}. For example see the German "quality assurance": de:Wikipedia:Qualitätssicherung/4. April 2016. For more details, please see commons:Template:Autoarchive_resolved_section. It is based on the Pywikipediabot framework and runs nightly. My SUL bot account has more than 769.000 edits at all - most of them made in the German Wikipedia. This archiving task is running almost non-stop since 2007. It is also running for de.wiktionary, de.wikisource, ja.wikipedia, ko.wikipedia, wikidata and commons as well. Euku (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Euku for offering your services here! As I was the one who asked you, I indeed Support this request. I know SpBot archival from commons and other places and I like it, specially since it's compatible with MiszaBot/ArchiveBot archival service as well, and provides some archiving methods not otherwise avalaible by archivebot.py code. Which templates should we import/create? Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 14:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems just a couple of templates are needed. Somebody may wish to adapt to Meta c:Template:Section resolved and c:Template:Autoarchive resolved section. They're full of autotranslate stuff that confuses me. Regards, —Marco Aurelio 21:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --M/ (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support and will use it on my talk page :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns.--Syum90 (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Courcelles 17:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey @Steinsplitter - can you help reviewing/importing {{section resolved}} and {{autoarchive resolved section}}, so that @Euku can run the bot? I'm turning mad importing them from commons :) Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 14:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Imported. ~~Categories must be checked.~~ --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done :) —Marco Aurelio 17:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Hello. Can a bureaucrat (preferably none of which voted, which leaves @Barras, MF-Warburg, Matanya, and Thehelpfulone) consider approving this request and flag the bot? The task is totally uncontroversial and widely supported. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 11:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Matanya (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]