Meta:Requests for deletion/Archives/2006

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut:
WM:RFD/2006

Deleted

Articles

Untranslated messages

Previously tagged as speedy, with the comment "Pretty obsolete". Korg + + 12:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Strong delete: This article has no explanation on what it is about. It may be useful for the technies, but nearly useless for general readers, not to say it lacks proper presentation and structure.--Wai Wai 10:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --Swift 00:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete 06:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Test-WP/wen/Wendenkreuzzüge

This doesn't seem like legitimate content. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Clemson Triathlon

Not relevant to meta, IMHO. --Paginazero 16:22, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fifa World cup Germany 2006

Created and emptied by an anonymous user, not relevant to meta. --Paginazero 16:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Movement Mod for HoI2

Not relevant to meta. Previously tagged as speedy. WhiteNight T | @ | C 23:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • 'Delete7 --Aphaia 07:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Should have remained a Speedy delete since it is a personal essay and not even something that can be moved to Wikipedia. --Pmsyyz 05:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete Page is a soapbox for an opinion and cannot move to English Wikibooks. --Kernigh 00:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --Snowdog 14:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete this is not project related. Xaosflux 03:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MUZMA

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 09:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Non-meta content --Walter 11:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TWEN

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 09:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Not meta related. WhiteNight T | @ | C 00:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mandarin High School

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 09:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Not meta related. --Mdangers 09:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

History of the Ninja

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 09:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Not meta related. --Mdangers 09:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why no channel 20 & 21

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 09:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Not meta related. --Mdangers 09:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Bitter Medicine of a Sheeana Future

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 09:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Do not know what it is but it does not look it it belongs here --Walter 01:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Autograph collecting do's and dont's

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 03:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Autograph collecting do's and dont's. An orphaned page that has nothing to do with meta and is leading to off-topic press enquiries. Angela 02:49, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Archive as historical page instead? +sj | Translate the Quarto |+ 19:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Archive as historical page instead - Blockinblox 05:15, 24 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, maybe it can be useful on en.wiki, as an appendix to en:Autograph. --M/ 12:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • archive as historical on meta'. I'm sure this could be useful somewhere, but as Wikipedia is explicitly not a how-to guide it isn't there. Would fit on Wikibooks or Wikisource? I don't know too much about what they take and don't take. Thryduulf 23:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete You mean, if I post something irrelevant to Meta, and no one notices it for three years, then we can keep it because it is now a "historical page"? Not only is this page irrelevant to Meta, it is also of poor quality. I have copied it to Wikibooks:en:Transwiki:Autograph collecting do's and dont's, in case someone at Wikibooks wants to write a how-to for it. --Kernigh 00:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. I know, I know, it's old, someone put it in userspace or transwiki it somewhere or something, but it doesn't really belong here. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

XAT-ATx

Closed as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 03:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC) non-meta stuff, article --Walter 18:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete Meta-Wiki is not an encyclopedia. --Kernigh 05:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --Snowdog 14:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete as per all above. xaosflux Talk 02:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Transwiki to Wikipedia. I'm going to transwiki it.
    • I don't blame you for transwiki-ing it, since it certainly doesn't belong at meta (that's delete if we're keeping score), but I listed it for deletion there too per en:WP:MUSIC. Sorry. Chick Bowen 14:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DOS Run Commands

Close as Delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 03:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC) This is a list of computer commands not related to the wiki. Xaosflux 03:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DOCSIS 3.0

made by anon in one edit, no links to it. technical, see no conncection whit Wikimedia/Mediawiki --Walter 21:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Кыргызтан, Әрәсә, Элст, Хальмг Таңһч, Кит, Моңһл, Хальмг

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not meta related, created by anonymous User:203.240.254.231, probably by mistake. --Paginazero 07:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep: created for the Kalmykian Wikipedia --Taichi - (?!) 23:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Shouldn't they be at the test wiki at Test-wp/xal then? Chick Bowen 15:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Probably better to move to that as a part of test wiki. --Aphaia 06:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agreed. My vote is move to Test-wp/xal/?????????, Test-wp/xal/?????, Test-wp/xal/????, Test-wp/xal/?????? ???h?, Test-wp/xal/???, Test-wp/xal/???h?, Test-wp/xal/??????, respectively. Chick Bowen 00:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Strike that; they seem already to be there. Delete or redirect. Chick Bowen 00:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete Concur with Chick Bowen. --Aphaia 06:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Page d'accueil de la wikipedia francaise

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC) Copy-and-paste of an old version of the French Wikipedia's main page. Useless, orphan and obsolete page. Korg + + 10:40, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete - fr.wikipedia.org now uses editable templates behind their main page. (Note: I do not edit French-language wikis.) --Kernigh 23:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WebSports Radio

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC) Non meta-related. Been sitting with a transwiki request tag for a month. xaosflux Talk 02:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete; would probably not survive at Wikipedia. Chick Bowen 16:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete or transwiki, if necessary. --Aphaia 06:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CGAP

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 20:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unrelated with meta, orphan page. --M/ 15:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aardman

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 02:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia-article --Walter 09:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Homeodynamics

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 02:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC) Unrelated to meta, could it be useful somewhere else, at least cleaned and wikified? --M/ 22:23, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jutur Jarlson

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 02:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC) No idea what it is. Does not look very wiki --Walter 20:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eriko Imai

And also Image:Eriko.jpg. Article, non-meta stuff. Waring given to user. --Walter 09:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, you did not give the warning to the user! You put the warning on User:Bakaneko3; it should go on User talk:Bakaneko3. --Kernigh 07:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LanguageIs.php/old and LanguageIs.php/old2

I am cleaning/arranging LanguageXx.php pages, which they are not used on meta anymore. So these are old subpages of an obsolute Language page. So keeping just the main LanguageIs.php page should be enough for that warning purposes fir this language. --Dbl2010 06:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposal. Parameter Reader.

Appears to be the readme of a program called "par_reader". Does not appear to be at all related to MediaWiki or Wikimedia. Jude(talk,contribs) 07:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Star Wars Wiki

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 11:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ad, unnecessary proposal? (See talk page). Previously tagged as speedy. Korg + + 01:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LBlog

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 11:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

encyclopedic, non-meta article. oscar 02:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quest

This is a hybrid of oddity and advertisement. I don't think I can say anything else about this one. -.- // Pathoschild (talk) 08:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Wikiversity/Archive

I've copied the content of this page into Talk:Wikiversity/Old - I don't know where the content had come from, but there is only one version of the page in the history, so it was obviously copied and pasted from somewhere else in the first place. It's not a big deal, but it's just reducing the amount of archived talk pages we have for Wikiversity. Cormaggio @ 10:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems best to just leave it where it was and delete the new page you created. One is worth keeping, but there's no pressing need to change the name. - Taxman 20:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, just to explain, Talk:Wikiversity/Old and Talk:Wikiversity/Archive existed already - I didn't create a new page or a new name, I've simply merged them. I want the one which had no history (ie which had itself been copied from somewhere else) to be deleted. Cormaggio @ 07:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete; it's a simple housekeeping task, and doesn't really need much discussion. // Pathoschild (talk) 21:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Alphons

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC) non-meta article. oscar 14:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mike Shaboigan

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC) non-meta article. oscar 14:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • move to Wikipedia. Linuxbeak 18:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. Unless there's some verification of the claims made. If there is, only then move to Wikipedia. No sense in wasting time on two deletion discussions. - Taxman 20:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete and don't move to Wikipedia since it's unverfiable. Possibly a hoax article. Angela 04:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, per Angela's reasoning. --Pmsyyz 09:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete per Angela. // Pathoschild (talk) 22:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

DarbarSahib

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC) just an image, non-meta. oscar 14:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Added the contents. how it looks now?

  • It looks fine, and is a good image, but it's still not appropriate. If the image is one you've taken then take it to commons and put a proper image license tag on it. That's what commons it for, not meta. And you should see there is already a really nice article on it at w:Harmandir Sahib. Delete. - Taxman 20:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. Nice image, but the article is encyclopedic and doesn't belong on meta. Jude(talk,contribs) 07:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikitopia

Closed as delete. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Currently under deletion at en wikipedia and en wikibooks. The author is using meta to publish his own work. Others articles include:Reply[reply]

  • Delete all Infinity0 21:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
    • I am not using meta to publish my own work. I created an outline of a project which will be sincerely collaborative. It's a candidate for deletion at wikipedia because somebody flagged it as a suspect neologism. The discussions at wikibooks indicated that this project would be best at home on the Meta. I sincerely believe that this project will be right at home here, that it is not simply "original work." --Wikitopian 21:39, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • You call this an anarcho-capitalist project. I don't think that sort of project is appropriate for a neutral website such as wikimedia. You say discussion at wikibooks? Really? Then why does the talk page not exist? Infinity0 21:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
        • I will respect a concensus that this doesn't belong here if it doesn't belong here. You need to settle down and avoid flatly accusing me of deception when you haven't done your research. The conversation at wikibooks which I mentioned was under the deletion log, not in the talk page. It was suggested that I move the project to mediawiki. I'm not trying to "pull a fast one" and would appreciate it if you didn't make this a personal attack. Thanks. --Wikitopian 22:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • Well, the person who made the suggestion did not know the project was anarcho-capitalist in nature, as you have only explicitly stated so on the talk page of anarcho-capitalism. Infinity0 22:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete now that creator has set up it's own home. - Taxman 20:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete all per above. // Pathoschild (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all. MaxSem 17:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Corporation SOS

Who forgot to close this? Closed as delete. MaxSem 10:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an essay about a rock band, which should be incorporated into any relevant Wikipedia article and deleted on Meta. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 06:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

The Magnificent 5

This is an essay about a Wikipedian's teen rock band, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Clearly meta-unrelated, delete. IMHO speedy deletetion should be considered, in clear cases like this. --Mdangers 22:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Antifeminism rant

This seems to be discussion from Wikipedia:Talk:Feminism, moved to the Meta-Wiki because it was unwanted there. As a user on that page stated, "The meta is not a place to spout off on any subject you like, but exists to discuss Wikipedia related issue." // Pathoschild (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. It seems to be just some unwanted rubbish that was dumped here. The original material is presumably still in the history of the relevant talk page on en, and can be retrieved and userfied on that wiki by anyone who finds it of value. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Actually, it is excerpts from the talk page moved to Meta to continue the discussion about what should not be allowed to happen in articles: the over-simplification of an article topic splitting into two opposing views, rather than collaborating to present both views within the article. The original events occurred in 2001, and for the next 3 years people added to the discussion on meta. Over-simplification is apparently still an issue on WP - Amgine / [1]] meta 06:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Talk:Benjamin Netanyahu On Terrorism

This seems to be a discussion from Wikipedia about an article that has since been deleted, probably predating the last loss of deleted revisions. This has nothing to do with the Foundation or any wiki, with the exception of one probably-deleted article. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk about Christianity

This is a discussion about Christianity, and has no relation to the Foundation or any wiki. We could archived somewhere on Wikipedia, perhaps w:Christianity. In any case, it doesn't belong on the Meta-Wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

A definition of Philosophy

This is an essay about various philosophical fields, and has no relation whatsoever to the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. It may be historical, but it doesn't relate to Wikimedia. --Pmsyyz 13:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stupid Republicans

This is a rant about biased media attention in the United States, and has nothing to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. There is plenty of external referenced material on this subject that can be used as a resource, and it seems to have only a glancing relevance to any Wikimedia projects. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Investigator as Philosopher

This is a essay which has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. If it's notable, it should be moved to Wikisource before deletion. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Cow

Not project related, alerady on every other wiki. xaosflux Talk 02:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted. Sj 02:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Framework

Seems to be a definition only. en:Framework and wiktionary:Framework already exist. - brenneman 10:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiBuchAktion

German, a book review or more likely just an outline of a book to be written. IMHO nonsense, author is looking for a place to publish/gather interested parties -> mentioning of the term "wiki". No meta relation, delete. --Mdangers 10:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Xbox

Spanish. Article about Microsofts Xbox. No meta relation, delete. --Mdangers 10:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ap. Miguel Ângelo

Spanish. A biography. No meta relation I can see, delete. --Mdangers 10:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Srw164

Bio, not meta related. Just another star in the night T | @ | C 19:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Media Bias

This is a general discussion about media bias which has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Pre-automatic dictatorship

This is an encyclopedic page about a non-notable neologicism, and has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

An Anarchist's Creed

This is a manifesto of Anarchism moved to Meta because Wikipedia didn't want it. It has nothing to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

What is reality

This is a collection of one user's opinions about reality, and has nothing to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Middle East Reconciliation

This is one post cut out of context urging participants of an edit war to discuss on an inexistant subpage. This not at all Meta-worthy content. // Pathoschild (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Peace treaty with Israel is a temporary measure

This is an essay about Israel-Palestinian politics which has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 08:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Origins of Everything

This is a discussion that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 08:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete The image that was included is redlinked, and without it, there really is no content. Naconkantari 21:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Drawbacks of Philosophical Understandings

This is an essay that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Foundation or any wiki. // Pathoschild (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Pokus

Quite honestly, I have no idea what this is. It looks like a misplaced sandbox with random content copy and pasted from other pages. // Pathoschild (talk) 08:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

He is the one who laughed, and called foul jeers... Til Eulenspiegel 22:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Introducción

An article in Spanish about an MBA program run by a University. Is not related to Wikimedia. Jude(talk,contribs) 08:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Internet

Is a copy of the page w:fiu-vro:Internet. Does not belong on meta. Jude(talk,contribs) 08:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:20030713 091355 fruechte.jpg

This is not appropriate for Meta. It would be more appropriate for Commons or Wikipedia. // Pathoschild (talk) 09:11, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Don't move elsewhere if the source and license status remains unknown. Angela 14:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Code coverage howto

Doesn't look meta-related to me, but maybe it is? Just another star in the night T | @ | C 01:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Turkish pages?

The Ohio University Marching 110

Should be moved to English Wikipedia. Informed creator via user talk page. --Pmsyyz 10:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arteriitis temporalis Horton

Looks like some medical stuff (in Germen?) unrelated to meta. Just another star in the night T | @ | C 21:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is indeed German, no proper article, though. Moving to de: would require total rewrite. delete --Mdangers 22:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gigomma

I suspect that this article is covering some sort of computer game for the C64. I am quite sure it is in Italian. I am immensely sure it doesn't serve a purpose in meta. --Mdangers 22:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Incidentalist Manifesto

I fail to see the relation of this manifesto to meta. --Mdangers 22:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Player Connector

Unrelated to meta. Not sure if it should be transwikied. Originally speedied it myself, but maybe it is useful to someone... Just another star in the night T | @ | C 22:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Skjold "shield"

Looks like Swedish or so. Does not like it is Meta or Wikimedia related, have inforemd anon who created it. --Walter 13:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of annoying things

A list of annoying things, unrelated to the project. Naconkantari 02:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A day in the life of an ordinary Canadian

This is a short story about life as a (very rich and media-awash) Canadian which has no relevance whatsoever to the Foundation or any wiki. There is no historical significance that I can see. // Pathoschild (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:It

These category titles are inconsistent—Category:IT also exists. I suggest eliminating this category and all categories that have just one letter capitalized and instead use the categories with both letters capitalized. Alternatively, Category:IT could be deleted and this one used, but we should be consistent. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 19:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jesse Pittsley

Short biography, not project related. xaosflux Talk 02:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kappa Chapter of Phi Kappa Tau

Should be on en: if anywhere. Sj 02:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikiversity/Thinktank

Is a straightforward question about Wikiversity, which I have moved to Talk:Wikiversity. We don't need an infinite number of Wikiversity pages - there are already enough! Cormaggio @ 06:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adding Users

This looks suspicious to me; created by an anon almost a year ago. --Spangineer[en] [es] (háblame) 02:28, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Virtualization SIG

I do not see relation to meta, seems to be HP internal stuff. delete. --Mdangers 10:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anders

This article does not appear to have any meaningful or relevant content. I cannot identify the language to translate it and verify. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 18:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete -- The IP address who created it is registered in Norway (querry), so I'd say Norwegian. Other than that, I agree that there is no purpose in keeping this entry. Redux 05:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bayle

This page was created by an anonymous user. The content was edited that one time only, at which point it was down; "The reasons are ... and ...". The content hasn't been updated in the roughly fifteen months since creation. // Pathoschild (talk/map) 01:01, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikiproyecto:Libertad de expresión en wikipedia

Seems to be just a furious logorrhea. villy ♦✎ 20:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

IDXPROD msg overwrites user screen

I can't make head nor tails of this, it seems to be an account of some technical problem, let me know if this page belongs on meta, as I am just starting to edit it and don't fully understand it yet. (from Wikipedia) Prodego talk 00:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Project Code Format

This article does not seem relevant to the Wikimedia Foundation or any wiki. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 19:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ang.wikinews Héafodsíde

This article has absolutly the same content as Ang.wikinews Hēafodsīde. I've chosen Ang.wikinews Héafodsíde because there were more than one author. --Red Baron 20:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spellchecking Wikipedia

I don't see the use of this page. It seems to be a discussion consisting of a user's question, a brief answer, and a thanks. The talk page consists of a link to Category:TechSoup Surveys. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 23:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Move to suitable talk page; perhaps Babel. Sj 23:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Leave for later expansion, or move to a talk page (but not Meta:Babel, because the goal of that page is to link to other talk pages). --Kernigh 01:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Deleted and merged to Meta:Babel (which routinely hosts such discussion, and rarely links elsewhere). // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 18:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oceanography

I really wanted to speedy, but i don't think it meets any of the criteria. I guess it could plausibly be merged into the project proposals, but it really isn't one. Best to delete. Tuf-Kat 07:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Test-wp/diq/cografya

This doesn't seem like legitimate content. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Test-wp:Seeltersk/Huuslook (Sempervivum)

This doesn't look like legitimate content, unless it's a particularly small sub-substub. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 20:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anarşiye

Article in Turkish, seems not meta-related. MaxSem 20:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blank Skanwiki pages

The following Skanwiki pages were blanked by Boivie when they moved the content to another page, but are still transcluded to Skanwiki/Utvalgte artikler/December, 2006. I'm not sure whether or not they're still useful.

// [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 15:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Meine erste Notiz

Somebody thought it's a userpage? MaxSem 20:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mistakes in textbooks in America

Not meta-related. MaxSem 07:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

NT permissions overview

Not meta-related, no point of emulating MSDN here. MaxSem 09:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Native American Affairs

Not meta-related ancient page. MaxSem 10:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perl

Not needed on Meta. MaxSem 11:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Persuasion technology

Encyclopedic article, copied from WP. MaxSem 11:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Орлов Михаил Викторович

This orphan, unrelated to meta, (auto)biographic article is not present in russian language Wikipedia, and it doesn't appear in the list of deleted articles. Transwiki before deleting? --M/ 08:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Evangeline Heaton

Funny bio of a future senator, delete. MaxSem 05:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help:Study Guide for CFA Exam Level 1

Closed as delete, content copied from [2]. MaxSem 10:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Previously tagged as speedy, with the comment "irrelevant for Meta, wrong namespace". Korg + + 02:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

日本語版ウィクショナリーの整備/見本/Template:Ja

No consensus reached - closed as keep by default. MaxSem 19:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this a legitimate page? it looks rather short. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Keep - This page is now wiktionary:ja:Template:ja. It is why this is so short, and this should keep as a record of ja.wikt. Kzhr 02:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Could you explain why this page is needed on Meta, if it has been moved to Wiktionary? I don't understand what you mean by 'keep a record of ja.wikt'. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 18:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, not needed here, superceded by {{#language:ja}}. MaxSem 09:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Truly historical page. Pathoschild, jawiktionary was once closed and meta hosted refugees. This page is a part of those exile and attempt to reconstruction. Not the page itself is important, but its history is important. For further information, see wiktionary-l of February 2005. --Aphaia 10:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Please define the history; a blank page with no information attached (preferable using the standard header) is meaningless and can't be added to the historical project. I'm willing to do so research, but it'd help if you'd write down what you know first. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 15:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I claimed 日本語版ウィクショナリーの整備 and its all subpages deserve since histories and diffs of their pages (you can see from "history" tab) indicate how the project had been developped in its very early stage. I don't expect you have a sympathy to those pages as deeply as the Japanese Wiktionary community members, but it is not meaningless for us. I ask you to retrieve your word on the above. Personally I feel disrespected and dishonored. You now declare our attempt to revive an endangered project and its relics "meaningless". --Aphaia 10:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I apologize for any offense you may have taken over my personal opinion. I do not believe that anyone's efforts are meaningless; however, historical pages are essentially meaningless if the community is not aware of any meaning. The Meta-Wiki does not only belong to Japanese Wiktionarians, just as it does not only belong to English Wikipedians. Pages should not be kept simply because they mean something undefined to a tiny part of the community; on the other hand, I see no reason they can't be kept if their significance is explained for the rest of the community, and they are integrated into the Historical project. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 05:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I think I explained on the above. If you are not satisfied, please read related wiktionary-l discussion, and some related pages. I don't expect you delete because my explanation is insufficient to you. Please try to understand the history of community before quesrtion. Meta pages does not only belong to English Wikipedians but we allowed to keep pages which are principally related to them and them alone. I don't understand and agree on that those pages created after lingual divisions need to be "grobal" attention and worthy to keep, but other language pagees not. --Aphaia 02:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

EditPage.php

Closed as delete, made dated soft redirect to SVN. MaxSem 19:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Outdated and useless. Korg + + 01:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help:Wikitext basic embedable

Closed as delete. MaxSem 14:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reasons for deletion:

--Wai Wai 21:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Keep This page doesn't hurt anything. You are not required to put effort into maintaining it. Simplicity is a good feature, I am appalled by the complexity of some of the other wikitext examples., also, "after all, This is Meta, not wikipedia!" AaronPeterson 20:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, as it is redundant with Help:Editing and Help:Wikitext examples. Those pages could definitely be overhauled, but I don't think forking is the right way to go about it. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 02:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete Redundant. This belongs at mediawiki.org anyway. --Swift 09:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete Redundant. Voice-of-All 02:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

KRIYA REIKI,Vishitao Reiki

Not relevant. --Aphaia 11:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sample Research

Is this original research or something? It's not Meta-related and does not seem to fit Wikipedia's purpose too. MaxSem 10:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete per criteria for speedy deletion G7 ("Pages clearly irrelevant to the Wikimedia Foundation, unless they have a known and definable historical context"). // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 02:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --Swift 08:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment - It does seem to be original research - it could possibly be transwikied to Wikiversity when that is set up (ie very soon). What about contacting the author, User:Slehar? Cormaggio @ 08:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I've mentioned it on his talk page. I wouldn't get my hopes up, though — he hasn't been active on Meta since December 2005. --Swift 09:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. Voice-of-All 02:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Move and merge - It is probably not original research. It seems to illustrate how scientific research should be implemented, how a research should be done in order to examine or prove the brain's capacity to process images. Some of the skills or methodology like "Perceptual Modeling" is not a new thing (see this and this). However the presentation and the structure makes it look like an essay rather than an encyclopedia. Some contents of this article might be helpful to some topics in Wikipedia but amendments and merges are required. --Wai Wai 10:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted. Feel free to contact me if you'd like to retrieve the content. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Namespace proposal

This is an excerpt from a user talk page concerning a proposal that doesn't seem to have gone anywhere. I propose it be archived back into the user talk page, or moved to the community discussion archives. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 03:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Archive back --Swift 00:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Moved and soft redirected. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is discussion related to International logo contest. I propose the content be merged and redirected into that page's discussion page. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 05:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merged and soft redirected. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ترجمه

Farsi version of Translation or its attempt ... no substantial content, and could be a deletion candidate.--Aphaia 18:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete Unless Farsi translators restart translation of this page. --Aphaia 18:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete as per Aphaia. --Swift 08:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 00:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipaedians who do not speak Chinese

deleted MaxSem 16:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

...but delete this one. +sj | help with translation |+ 06:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  1. Delete. I see no purpose or humo(u)r in this list. It is little more than a sandbox. - Tangotango 09:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Delete I cant see the purpose either. --Dbl2010 15:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Delete, no meaningful purpose. // [admin] Pathoschild (talk/map) 16:05, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Delete --Swift 16:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Delete, no meaningful purpose. --Tone 14:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Delete. — Timichal 08:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  7. delete Exclusive categories tend to become unwieldy because of the universality of negation operator. drini ☎ 14:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ShoeBox demo

Seems to have no relation to Wikimedia projects. --Swift 08:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eu/Itzulpen eskaerak

Closed as delete. MaxSem 08:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seemed to be created by an anon as Eu(Basque) version of TR, but there is only one line and no update since then.

  • Delete: Unless Basque speaker(s) show interested to revive it, then it would be better to rename it as Itzulpen eskaerak according to our page naming convention. --Aphaia 10:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete: I agree, it seems not much use and not going anywhere. --Dbl2010 15:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Richiesta di traduzioni

Closed as delete. MaxSem 08:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Italian version of TR, the anon editor who created seemed to misunderstand what was/is TR though. The page seems not to have been used since then.

  • Delete: Unless Italian speaker(s) show interested to revive it. --Aphaia 11:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete: Real last edit was on 31 August 2005, it seems they left it. --Dbl2010 01:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chapters May 2005

Closed as delete. MaxSem 08:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems like a notion that should've been placed in the village pump. Is useless now. I don't see the historical value as the process went different at the end. (First real meeting was on sept 11th 2005, association set up in march '06) -- Effeietsanders 06:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SQLscripts

Closed as delete. MaxSem 08:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Previously tagged as speedy, with the comment "Original author seems to have left this page, no context or description of any kind". This page seems unrelated to Meta or MediaWiki. Korg + + 17:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete. There is a vague description on the talk page. Seems the person wanted to document his installation of the MediaWiki software. If at all, this should belong on http://www.mediawiki.org/, but there simply isn't anything there to transwiki. --Swift 00:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete; doesn't seem to serve any purpose any more. Flcelloguy (A note?) 14:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Music:Lilypond example

Closed as delete. MaxSem 08:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just an image and a table around it with a play button, has no real links to it, seems to be replaced by Template:Music:Lilypond example. --Rory096 20:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Also

Useless in its current state. MaxSem 18:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete -- A Manual of Style or similar on the project namespace will (or should) contain instructions on the proper use of the "See Also" section in each particular project. We would have to do something different on Meta in order to make it worth keeping. Redux 20:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • delete --Dario ^_^ (talk) 23:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Ditto, Slade ♠ 17:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --.anaconda 23:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Expecta

Speedily deleted as a broken redirect. — Timichal 11:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

non sense redirect imho --Dario ^_^ (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of Wikipedian monarchs

Speedily deleted as offtopic/test. — Timichal 11:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

non sense page --Dario ^_^ (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Plone

non sense page --dario vet (talk) 10:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Speedily deleted as non-sense by Timichal. --.anaconda 01:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ProjectX

Closed as delete --Dbl2010 05:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Serves no purpose in its current state. Dmcdevit 08:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disaster Recovery

No meaningful content for Meta, since it apears to be an encyclopedia article. Dmcdevit 19:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete per Dmcdevit. --Egg 22:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Move to Wikipedia (assuming topic is solid), then delete from Meta -- Assuming that it is serious research, we need to move it to Wikipedia. If Wikipedia already has this entry, then simply delete. Redux 23:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete as Wikipedia already has this entry. - Tangotango 09:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Ditto, Slade ♠ 17:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • keep --Dario ^_^ (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, not appropriate for Meta, and Wikipedia has an article on disaster recovery already. --Coredesat 07:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --.anaconda 23:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep --Sir James Paul 00:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delenda--Aphaia 14:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete -- If transwiki-ing... before moving the content to en:wp, maybe it should be checked for copyvio. ++Lar: t/c 01:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Ams:

Closed as delete --Dbl2010 05:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nonsense article in a made-up language. 90.240.59.7 22:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PR/*

The following pages don't seem to have any usefulness, though I could be wrong; I've notified the contributor. They seem to be a forgotten part of Category:Press. There is no relevant content at PR.

—{admin} Pathoschild 22:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete all. I'm not sure how these could still be useful, as they're not linked from anywhere and have not seen any significant activity in as long as two years for some of them. The Washington Post and Red Herring pages are already mentioned on Responses to the press. --Coredesat (en.wp) 22:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Moved to User:Sj/PR and deleted. They have historical relevance, as records of old communication; not needed in the main articlespace. Thanks for helping keep meta clean and beautiful :) I believe there are some external links to the washpost page, so I left it as a redirect. +sj | help with translation |+ 01:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Closed, moved to the user namespace. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The Internet and Virtual Reference

Off-topic. This serves no purpose here; it's someone's personal essay. Dmcdevit 07:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedily deleted, Criterion for speedy deletion G7 (clearly irrelevant to the Wikimedia Foundation). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Eurodicautom

Appears to be advertising for an unrelated project. Dmcdevit 05:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy delete. Also its talk. --Aphaia 13:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedily deleted, Criterion for speedy deletion G7 (clearly irrelevant to the Wikimedia Foundation). —{admin} Pathoschild 02:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Production Assistant duties

I don't know what this is about. It doesn't refer to any Wikimedia position (I think) and so is irrelevant to the project. Dmcdevit 05:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete Per nominator. And this page is the only contribution of the author here. --Aphaia 14:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Already speedied by Anthere. Not sure if I can close already-deleted VFDs here, so I'll just add this note for now. --Coredesat (en.wp) 20:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Closed per Coredesat. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Academia pro Interlingua Wikimedians

This unwatched list was created in March 2006 and contains only one user. It does not seem to have any particular historical or social value. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Closed as delete --Dbl2010 06:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Association of Wikipedians who like Speedy Deletions but Majorly dislike Regular or Slow Deletions

This page is orphaned, unwatched, virtually unused, and I fail to see any usefulness or relevance. —{admin} Pathoschild 01:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Closed as delete --Dbl2010 04:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anti-French Wikipedians

A mini-essay with no relevance to the Wikimedia Foundation; I propose that it be moved to the author's user space. —{admin} Pathoschild 01:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Closed as delete --Dbl2010 04:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upstanding Wikipedians Who Used To Be Vandals

A page for bragging about one's past exploits. It is unwatched, orphaned, uncategorized, virtually empty, and I see no usefulness, relevance, or historical significance. —{admin} Pathoschild 01:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, Slade ♠ 02:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I was going to RFD this myself earlier but never got around to it. --Coredesat (en.wp) 02:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --.anaconda 12:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Perhaps if there were more people in this category it would be arguably worthwhile (but even then a bit of a stretch)... I can see the merit in celebrating that people have come in from the cold, perhaps, but this probably is not the way. Delete ++Lar: t/c 12:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Dbl2010 01:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, per nom.--Shanel 06:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --dario vet (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Closed as delete --Dbl2010 04:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Users in Defense of Userboxes and Individuality on Wikipedia, Userbox speedy deletions

Pages intended to bring a dispute about userboxes on the English Wikipedia to Meta. They are unwatched, orphaned, uncategorized, and I see no usefulness, relevance, or historical significance. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, that dispute seriously doesn't need to be on Meta. --Coredesat (en.wp) 02:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete both --.anaconda 12:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for the former and Symbol support vote.svg Support for the latter (useless snippet from a deletion log)! All those groups, associations, etc. have to be treated under a common criteria.
    I can only say that the userboxes controversy is popping up here and there. At least it got rather inflamatory debate on bg.wp, although not so hot as after Kelly Martin's action. IM(nsh)O the debate has to be brought on Meta, all arguments to be sorted in order to be readable and understandable, and to come out with a recommendation across all WMF-projects (chances for consensus for a policy a negligibly slim). Actually I am not sure whether this avalance can be stopped, it had to be dealt with years before I joined WP. -- Goldie ± (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete both, since these are likely to cause more harm than good, and are imported from another project for no potential community-building purpose (and oddly, still containing language like "object to rampant, mass unilateral deletion of Userboxes" which doesn't apply to Meta). Dmcdevit 23:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, not meta related. --Dbl2010 01:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, disputes on the English Wikipedia are not relevant here.--Shanel 06:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete --dario vet (talk) 12:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Closed as delete --Dbl2010 04:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consequentialist Wikipedians

This list is ancient, unwatched, orphaned, uncategorized, virtually unused, and I see no usefulness, relevance, or historical significance. —{admin} Pathoschild 04:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Closed as delete --Dbl2010 04:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Directory/Wikis

This nomination was successful and the page is deleted. Dmcdevit 09:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Subpages have been deleted as well. --.anaconda 00:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These pages (see prefix index) seem to be far out of date and redundant with Special:Sitematrix. The information on the few created subpages only include such trivia as "unused", "Main page created 7 July 2005", and "Medium-sized Wiktionary", and is almost certainly far out of date as well. —{admin} Pathoschild 04:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Anti-American Wikimedians & Anti-Anti-American users

(Nominating these as suggested above.) These pages have no relevance to the Wikimedia mission, and are only serve a divisive purpose. As well, I would point out that for a community that aims for the neutral point of view, partican pages like these are only counter-productive to community-building. Dmcdevit 13:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]