Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

←Requests and proposals

Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

Archives (current)→

Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. Before posting to this page, make sure your comment doesn't belong at one of these specific request pages: Requests for adminship on this Meta-Wiki Requests for CheckUser information on this Meta-Wiki Requests for oversight of edits on this Meta-Wiki General requests for permissions on other wikis Requests for CentralNotice banners and campaings Import is currently enabled in this wiki from some projects. From other wikis, you will need to copy and paste your materials by hand but please remember to add a link to the permanent link and the history of the page being imported in the edit summary to avoid copyright violations. To report vandalism please click here. See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic information policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies

General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map

Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · an account on WMF wiki · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation · logos

Meta-Wiki maintenance announcements [edit] General maintenance announcements:

(as of 27 July 2017)

• Cooperation on Meta-Wiki maintenance is always welcome.
• Many files without license or source await being processed.
• Many files awaiting review for basic {{information}}, source and license.

---

Discussions:

(as of 27 July 2017)

• RFC on the update of Meta:Deletion policy (2016-07-27).
• Proposal to modify Meta:Administrators/Removal (2016-12-24).
• Discussion on translations by unregistered contributors (2017-01-23).

(Last updated: 2017-05-03)

Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

• About Meta
• Discussion pages
• Request pages
• Policies and guidelines
• Information and statistics
• Categories
• Help pages

Participate:

• How to edit a page
• Meta-Wiki discussion page
• Meta-l mailing list

Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} and sections whose oldest comment is older than 10 days.

special:AbuseFilter/6

I feel that the filter is not working correctly. I have more than 50 edits and I'm getting ratelimited by it often. I had to add this but the editcount flag seems that the filter is not working well either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:49, 25 July 2017‎ (UTC)

I batch tested the filter without that last addition out against your name/edits, and got zero hits, so maybe it is a systemic fault rather than the filter itself. The < 50 is a clear step that could not be ignored.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: [1] - how can we make sure that this is an extension error before reporting to Phabricator to avoid later being shouted "NO BUG!!!11"? :) —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Interesting. Test https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/examine/log/312159 with filter 6 loaded. You'll get that the filter matched the change but if you look at the list below of parsed variables, neither user groups nor user editcount are there. Maybe that's the reason? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Fixed, | overlooked during cleanup. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

 This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

To me it is more interesting that running the check against your last set of edits failed to trip the test mode, yet it trips if you run the specific filter on the edit through examine mode. Something to bear in mind.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Report concerning [[User:|User:]]

[[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] · contribs. · moves · block · block log) — Reasons: 174.255.204.218 00:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)