Nigeria National Funding Program/Committee/Applications
Who can apply?
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
Who is not eligible?
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
Roles and responsibilities
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
General selection criteria
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Some desired, but not all required qualities we are looking for in committee members include:
| ||
What more to know
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
Instructions for applicants
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
To apply for the Nigeria National Funding Program Committee, please review the open call and then submit your application by providing a statement below with the following information. Applications are currently open
You are required to post your application strictly on Meta-Wiki alone, for a more transparent application process. | ||
Application template
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
You may use the following template for your application: {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}}
* Which Nigerian state are you based in?
:*
* Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
:*
** What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
:**
** How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
:**
** How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
:**
** How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
:**
** How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
:**
** What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
:**
** How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
:**
** How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
:**
** Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
:**
between local contributors and the wider Wikimedia ecosystem. Through these efforts, I contribute to building an inclusive and sustainable environment for free knowledge creation.
I also have practical experience with coordinating projects, organizing edit-a-thons, and fostering collaboration, which can contribute to fair and effective grantmaking and committee decision-making. My background equips me to support sustainable initiatives that empower communities and strengthen the impact of grants.
I want to join the NNFP Committee because it provides an opportunity to serve, contribute ideas, and support meaningful programs that align with my values. I am eager to work with other dedicated members to strengthen the committee’s objectives, promote fairness, and ensure sustainable development. I am ready to learn, take responsibility, and dedicate my time and skills to help the NNFP Committee achieve its goals.
Through my experience as a volunteer within the Wikimedia movement, I have gained practical exposure to structured governance processes, community engagement, documentation, and collaborative problem-solving. These experiences will enable me to contribute to clear communication, timely execution of committee tasks, and adherence to established procedures and policies. I am prepared to actively participate in meetings, support consensus-building, and assist in implementing committee decisions in line with NNFP’s strategic objectives. I also value respectful dialogue and inclusive participation, and I will work to ensure that diverse perspectives are considered in the committee’s deliberations. Overall, my contribution will focus on strengthening the committee’s effectiveness, supporting its mandate, and ensuring that its work is carried out efficiently, transparently, and in the best interest of the NNFP and its stakeholders.
In addition, I possess the ability to work effectively in diverse teams, manage responsibilities with discipline, and contribute constructively to policy discussions and oversight functions. I am attentive to detail, open to feedback, and committed to accountability and ethical standards. These skills and experiences will enable me to support the committee’s work in strengthening participatory decision-making, improving grantmaking impact, and ensuring that NNFP initiatives are implemented efficiently and in alignment with the organization’s strategic objectives.
I want to join the Nigerian National Funding Programme (NNFP) Committee because I believe sustainable community growth depends on equitable access to resources, transparent decision-making, and a contextual understanding of local realities. Through my on-ground experience organising trainings, edit-a-thons, and capacity-building sessions for queer and allied communities, I have seen how funding decisions directly affect participation, safety, and long-term impact. Serving on the NNFP Committee would allow me to contribute a perspective that centers inclusion, risk awareness, and community care, particularly for groups that face legal, social, and structural barriers in Nigeria, while helping ensure that funded projects are impactful, accountable, and aligned with Wikimedia's mission of free knowledge for all.
My participation goes beyond individual edits. Through my work with Wiki for Human Rights Nigeria, I support the design and facilitation of edit-a-thons, virtual and in-person trainings, and community engagement activities, especially for queer and allied contributors who are often excluded from traditional knowledge spaces. I help new editors understand Wikimedia policies, safe participation practices, and the importance of reliable sourcing, drawing directly from my background in journalism and fact-checking. I also contribute to Wikimedia Commons by supporting ethical documentation and media uploads, and to Wikidata by improving structured data that strengthens discoverability and global access to Nigerian and African narratives. Overall, my participation is rooted in a strong belief that free knowledge must be inclusive, locally grounded, and protective of vulnerable contributors, and that Wikimedia projects can be powerful tools for social memory, representation, and human rights documentation in Nigeria.
I would bring a grassroots perspective to funding deliberations. Having worked directly with editors and organisers from marginalised communities, particularly LGBTQ+ contributors, I understand the practical realities behind proposals: safety concerns, participation barriers, capacity gaps, and sustainability challenges. This enables me to assess funding requests not only on technical merit, but on realistic impact, risk awareness, and community benefit, ensuring decisions are sensitive to Nigeria's social and legal context. Also, I would strengthen the committee's review and accountability processes. My background in journalism and fact-checking equips me to critically read proposals, ask clarifying questions, and support transparent evaluation frameworks. I value clear documentation, measurable outcomes, and learning-oriented reporting, and would advocate for feedback mechanisms that help applicants improve whether or not their proposals are approved. Finally, I would contribute to a collaborative and inclusive working culture within the committee. I have experience facilitating discussions across diverse groups and am attentive to power dynamics, especially where newer or less visible communities may feel excluded. I would support ways of working that prioritize respectful dialogue, shared responsibility, and consensus-building, while remaining aligned with Wikimedia values and NNFP guidelines. Overall, my contribution would help the committee function not just as a funding body but as a steward of equitable growth in the Nigerian Wikimedia ecosystem, ensuring resources are distributed in ways that are fair, strategic, and responsive to community needs.
I also believe impact increases when grants are assessed through a local-context lens, including understanding safety concerns, internet access, language barriers, and social risks affecting participation in Nigeria. Supporting projects that prioritize community care, documenting local knowledge, and retaining contributors will strengthen the ecosystem over time. Ultimately, impactful grantmaking is not only about funding projects, but about growing confident, resilient communities within the Wikimedia movement.
Greater impact can be achieved by prioritising capacity building and sustainability, not just short-term activities. Grants should encourage skill transfer, documentation, and mentorship so communities can continue the work beyond the funding cycle. I also believe impact improves when grantmaking is context-sensitive, recognising security risks, infrastructural limits, and burnout, especially for marginalised communities. Flexible funding models, realistic timelines, and support for community care can significantly strengthen outcomes and retention. The committee can influence impact by setting clear expectations around learning, reporting, and shared growth, rather than only outputs. Encouraging grantees to document challenges, lessons learned, and best practices helps strengthen the entire Nigerian Wikimedia ecosystem. The committee can also act as a bridge connecting grantees to mentors, experienced organisers, or relevant Wikimedia affiliates. By fostering collaboration rather than isolated projects, the committee helps ensure that grantmaking contributes to a stronger, more resilient movement, not just to individual events.
I bring a background in journalism, fact-checking, community organizing, and human rights advocacy, along with hands-on experience with Wikimedia projects under the username Obinna Tony on Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, and Wikidata. I am skilled in research, proposal review, ethical storytelling, and community facilitation. Importantly, I also bring lived experience navigating restrictive environments, which allows me to assess risk, sustainability, and inclusion with nuance—ensuring that funding decisions are not only effective, but responsible and people-centered.
I would approach equity by advocating for context-aware evaluation, recognizing that not all communities start from the same place or face the same risks. This means supporting emerging groups, regional communities, and marginalized identities with fair consideration, mentorship, and flexibility rather than holding them to the same expectations as long-established groups. Equity, to me, also involves transparency, while clearly explaining decisions, and ensuring that funding reaches communities that are often excluded from knowledge production but have strong potential to contribute meaningfully to the Wikimedia ecosystem.
I am the Founder and lead organizer of the Bole Wikimedia Community, leading efforts to develop and sustain the Bole language Wikipedia, currently hosted in the Wikimedia Incubator and approaching readiness for approval as a standalone site. My role includes coordinating editors, training, mentoring new contributors, and overseeing content creation that documents indigenous knowledge, culture, and history. Beyond content development, I support community growth by organizing edit-a-thons, workshops, and outreach activities that expand participation from underrepresented language communities. Through these contributions, I actively support the Wikimedia Movement Strategy by advancing knowledge equity, strengthening linguistic diversity, and building sustainable, locally led Wikimedia communities.
Which Nigerian state are you based in? Kwara State, Nigeria.
I am a Wikimedia community organizer, educationist, and Research Assistant at Summit University, Offa, with hands-on experience that directly aligns with the responsibilities of the Nigeria National Funding Program (NNFP) Committee. My work spans community-led knowledge initiatives, institutional research, and structured grant review systems, equipping me to contribute effectively to committee operations, proposal assessment, and collaborative decision-making. At Summit University, I have served and continue to serve as a Research Assistant on funded academic and development projects, where our team successfully secured and implemented multi-million-dollar grants supporting research, education, and institutional capacity building. This role required sustained committee-style work, including proposal development and review, budget assessment, compliance monitoring, reporting, and evidence-based evaluation. These experiences directly support the NNFP’s need for members who can sustain committee processes, support proposal review, and make informed funding decisions. I also serve as a Grant Reviewer for Rotaract International District 9125 and 9126, the largest Rotary district in Nigeria, covering over eight states. In this role, I routinely review grant proposals, scrutinize budgets, assess feasibility and sustainability, and participate in collective decision-making that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and community impact. This mirrors NNFP responsibilities such as sharing regional context, supporting grant officers and applicants, and making funding decisions that address representation, resourcing gaps, and power sharing. Within the Wikimedia movement, I am the Founder and Director of the Yoruba Wikipedia Fan Club Offa and the Offa Youth Impact Initiative. Through these platforms, I support grassroots Wikimedia communities by organizing trainings, edit-a-thons, mentorship programmes, and partnerships focused on indigenous knowledge, education, and cultural heritage. This work reflects a strong understanding of Wikimedia programs, lived experience in underrepresented language communities, and a demonstrated commitment to knowledge equity, diversity, and capacity building. In addition, I currently serve as the President of the Rotaract Club of Offa Metropolitan CB, and have previously served as Director of Projects, International Service Director, and Club Secretary. These roles strengthened my ability to work within committees, respect diverse perspectives, communicate across teams, give and receive constructive feedback, and support ethical governance—qualities essential for effective NNFP committee participation. Overall, my combined experience in participatory grantmaking environments, academic and NGO governance, Wikimedia community leadership, and regional grant review positions me to contribute meaningfully to NNFP’s mandate of equitable, transparent, and high-impact grantmaking across Nigeria.
I am an active Wikimedia organizer and contributor, leading trainings, edit-a-thons, mentorship programs, and community partnerships focused on education, indigenous languages, and cultural documentation. My work prioritizes editor retention, leadership development, and community ownership, while supporting emerging organizers to navigate Wikimedia processes responsibly and sustainably.
I would support effective committee operations through rigorous and consistent proposal review, collaborative deliberation, and clear documentation of decisions. Drawing from my experience in academic and Rotary grant review systems, I can provide constructive, evidence-based feedback, share regional context, support applicants and grantees, and strengthen cross-committee knowledge sharing.
By institutionalizing early-stage engagement through proposal clinics, open information sessions, accessible guidelines, and structured feedback mechanisms that allow communities to understand funding priorities and participate meaningfully in the process.
By aligning funding with sustainability, capacity building, and learning. Grantmaking should prioritize initiatives that develop local leadership, strengthen partnerships, and generate long-term community value beyond short-term outputs.
Through clear strategic direction, supportive yet critical evaluation, adaptive monitoring, and systematic sharing of lessons learned across funded projects.
Grant and budget review expertise, academic research experience, education and youth programming, governance experience from Rotary International, community mentorship, and strong understanding of Wikimedia’s cultural, educational, and language-focused programs.
By applying context-sensitive evaluation, balancing support for established and emerging communities, prioritizing underrepresented languages and regions, and pairing funding with guidance and capacity-building support.
By applying clear evaluation criteria, documenting deliberations, managing conflicts of interest, ensuring collective review, and providing constructive feedback to all applicants.
Yes. I fully understand the responsibilities of the role and can consistently commit to meetings, proposal reviews, evaluations, and follow-up activities. My Diff/blog publications to justify my experiences
Inclusion, The goal is to move from a model where the committee informs the community of decisions, to one where the community is consulted, collaborates, and in some areas, has delegated authority.
Inconclusio, the committee can make meaningful impact using the above few points.
I am one of the pioneer committee members of the Nigeria Usergroup Micro grants team (2022/2023). The Nigerian National funding program aims to bring resources closer to the communities while ensuring effective distribution and meeting of set targets by volunteers in the committee. The opportunity to be one of the volunteers who will ensure that these resources are fully utilized leading to realization of the movement strategic goals, improved contribution from editors, volunteer retention, and expansion of the Wikimedia movement goals in Nigeria is a driving factor behind my choice to apply for this position. Joining the NNFP committee will help to improve my leadership skills in terms of evaluation and writing of grant winning proposals. I have been privileged to serve on the pioneer micro grant committee for the Nigeria community in 2022 and this helped to sharpen my critical thinking skills, evaluation skills, and also decision making skills. The NNFP will be a bigger shoe and i am confident that joining the NNFP will improve my skills in the aforementioned areas. I also want to expand my network in the Wikimedia community in Nigeria and beyond. Serving under committees provide that privilege to learn from diverse set of people, listen to the views of others and also work as a team to meet the committees goals. Finally, i want to join the NNFP because i am passionate about supporting capacity building in the different committees through efficient distribution of resources. As a librarian and Wikimedian, i have been involved in various capacity building training on and off Wikimedia space and one of the reasons why some of these trainings do not yield adequate result is because of the absence of effective support in terms of resources. The NNFP is well positioned to identify impactful proposals, discover grey areas, and also approve proposals that will ensure expansion of the movement goals in Nigeria.
Under these groups, i have actively contributed to the group campaigns and other activities geared at improving the movement goals, visibility of the movement and retention of new editors in the community.
Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
XTools]). I am a sysop (administrator) on Hausa Wikipedia, listed on the administrators page ([2]). I want to join the NNFP Committee because I work closely with local communities and understand their needs. I want to help make grant decisions that are fair, clear, and useful for community growth.
Meta-Wiki]. Clear rules and open communication will help communities feel included.
Meta-Wiki] will help future grantees.
Meta-Wiki] so everyone understands how and why decisions are made.
I currently serve as the Campaigns and Partnerships Lead for Africa Wiki Women, an initiative dedicated to addressing gender gaps through the Wikimedia projects. In this role, I support the design, coordination, and evaluation of community programmes and campaigns, while providing guidance and support to contributors. My journey with Africa Wiki Women began as a fellow, during which I worked within the communications team and supported technical research efforts. Over time, this experience expanded into responsibilities that include proposal and grant writing, developing streamlined programmes that respond to community needs, and working intentionally across English- and French-speaking communities, with respect for cultural values and diversity. I am interested in joining the Nigeria National Funding Program Committee because I am deeply committed to strengthening community-led initiatives through inclusive, accountable, and participatory grantmaking. My experiences have given me a practical understanding of how well-structured and equitable funding processes can empower communities, address representation gaps, and support sustainable impact. I believe this positions me to contribute thoughtful, context-aware insights that support fair and impactful funding decisions across Nigeria.
I also serve as Programs Manager for the Wikimedia Nigeria Imo State Network, supporting local initiatives, trainings, and contributor coordination. These roles have given me hands-on experience in sustaining program operations, coordinating with regional hubs, and supporting grantees and applicants directly aligning with the responsibilities of a committee member in the National Funding Program. Additionally, I have served as a jury member for Wiki Loves Africa “Farm to Plate”, where I evaluated proposals and images in a structured, fair, and transparent process. This experience strengthened my skills in decision-making, contextual evaluation, and balancing equity with program goals, which are critical to supporting productive committee work and fostering sustainable impact across Nigeria.
My experience in coordinating programs, mentoring contributors, and managing multi-lingual campaigns equips me to support committee operations, communicate effectively with applicants and grantees, and share contextual knowledge that strengthens decisions. In addition, my community-based communication skills—including facilitating discussions, bridging diverse perspectives, and engaging contributors respectfully—allow me to translate grassroots feedback into actionable insights, ensuring that committee decisions are inclusive, well-informed, and responsive to the needs of diverse Wikimedia communities.
All reference links are available on my user page, Aminwa 21
I am based in Borno State, Nigeria.
My name is Abubakar Umar Sadiq, Mr. Snatch a telecommunications engineer, language advocate, media professional, and long-standing Wikimedian from Borno State. I currently work with Radio Nigeria Sunshine FM Potiskum 104.5, where I actively support public information access and community education. Over the years, I have contributed to and coordinated multiple Wikimedia initiatives focused on Northern Nigeria, with particular attention to minority languages, cultural heritage, and underrepresented communities. I am seeking to join the NNFP Committee because I believe sustainable and equitable grantmaking requires decision-makers who understand local contexts, community realities, and structural barriers to participation. My goal is to ensure that funding meaningfully empowers communities, strengthens capacity, and advances knowledge equity across Nigeria.
I am an active contributor, organizer, and campaign lead across several Wikimedia projects.
I have led and supported major documentation and community campaigns.
In addition to content creation and campaign coordination, I have contributed at the movement governance and quality assurance level by serving as a jury member for wiki Loves Africa and Wiki Loves Earth 2025, where I participated in evaluating submissions based on quality, relevance, and impact, in line with Wikimedia Commons standards.
I would contribute by bringing my close connection to local communities and my understanding of how the Wikimedia movement works in practice. Because I work directly with contributors in Northern Nigeria, I understand the real challenges people face, including language barriers, security concerns, and limited resources. I would support grant assessments that take local context into account, rather than using one approach for everyone. I also believe funding should encourage new ideas, while still helping communities build something that can last beyond the grant period. Within the committee, I would support clear documentation, open discussion, and shared learning, so decisions are well understood and lessons are carried forward. Most importantly, I would always look at proposals in terms of their long-term value to communities, not just short-term outputs or numbers.
Decision-making can become more participatory when communities feel heard before, during, and after funding decisions. This can be done by regularly engaging communities through simple consultations ahead of funding cycles and by checking in with them once decisions are made. There should also be open and friendly feedback channels, where applicants and contributors can share their thoughts and learn from the process, even if their proposals are not selected. Bringing regional and language perspectives into committee discussions is important, so decisions reflect the diversity of communities involved. Finally, sharing clear and easy to understand explanations of decisions helps people understand how and why outcomes were reached. When communities can see the process clearly, it builds trust, accountability, and a stronger sense of shared ownership.
The committee can make grantmaking more impactful by focusing on building the skills and capacity of communities, not just funding individual projects. This includes supporting mentorship, training, and documentation efforts that help communities grow stronger over time. It’s also important to support new and emerging communities, not only the ones that are already established, so everyone has a fair chance to contribute to the movement. Encouraging collaboration between different communities helps share knowledge and ideas, making projects stronger and more sustainable. Finally, grantmaking should include follow-up support and learning, so communities can improve from experience and continue to grow after the grant ends. Success should be measured not just by outputs, but by how communities develop, retain contributors, and become more resilient over time.
The committee can make grantmaking more effective by guiding funding decisions to focus on real community needs. This means setting clear priorities that align with the movement’s goals, and intentionally supporting underserved regions and minority languages. It can also share lessons learned and best practices from past projects, helping applicants design stronger proposals and make the most of funding opportunities. Finally, the committee can encourage creative approaches while making sure decisions are fair, transparent, and sustainable, so that grants have a lasting impact on communities.
I bring a combination of practical experience, technical skills, and community engagement expertise that can benefit the committee. I have years of experience contributing to and coordinating Wikimedia projects across Northern Nigeria and Africa, I have also led campaigns such as Wiki Loves Folklore, Wiki Loves Monuments in Northern Nigeria, Wiki Loves Africa, and served as a jury member for Wiki Loves Earth, where I evaluated submissions for quality and impact. Beyond content creation, I have a background in telecommunications, media, and technology, which helps me approach problems analytically and find practical solutions for community challenges. I am skilled in mentoring new contributors, facilitating collaborations, and translating knowledge into local languages, which strengthens inclusivity and participation. Most importantly, I have deep grassroots knowledge of Northern Nigerian communities and an understanding of the barriers they face, including language diversity, limited resources, and security challenges. This experience allows me to evaluate proposals with empathy and long-term impact in mind, ensuring that funding supports sustainable growth and meaningful community development. With this combination of technical expertise, movement experience, and community insight, I am confident I can contribute effectively to the committee’s work and help guide grantmaking in ways that are fair, strategic, and impactful.
I would ensure equity by making sure every community has a fair chance to access funding, taking into account their unique circumstances. This means supporting smaller, emerging, or underrepresented communities, as well as established ones, Equity isn’t about treating everyone the same, it’s about providing the support each community needs to succeed and grow.
To ensure transparency and fairness, I would make sure that every step of the decision-making process is clear and understandable. This starts with using consistent and well-defined criteria so that all proposals are judged by the same standards. I would also declare and manage any conflicts of interest to avoid bias. I believe it’s important to explain decisions in simple language, so applicants know why their proposals were accepted or not, and what could be improved next time. Regular and respectful communication with all applicants helps build trust and shows that their efforts are valued. Finally, I would encourage open documentation and shared learning within the committee, so everyone can see how decisions were reached, learn from past experiences, and improve the process over time. This approach not only makes funding decisions fair, but also strengthens trust and engagement across communities, ensuring that everyone feels included and respected.
Yes, I can fully commit to the expected time requirements. I am organized, reliable, and motivated to dedicate the necessary time to participate actively in the committee’s work, contribute thoughtfully to discussions, and support decision-making processes. I understand the responsibilities involved and am prepared to prioritize this role to ensure meaningful and consistent engagement. Saifullahi AS
The contribution goes beyond editing and community organizing; however, I advocate for health content creation and literacy within and outside Wikimedia projects. This includes mentoring new editors, organizing workshops, and encouraging community members to contribute health-related content online, while also promoting awareness of Wikimedia and the free knowledge movement. Through these activities, I aim to strengthen access to trustworthy health information, build contributor capacity, and support the broader goal of knowledge equity in the Wikimedia movement. I am an advocate for knowledge equity, actively working to bridge gaps in underrepresented communities, including women and youth. My contributions have been recognized within the Hausa community, where I was awarded a scholarship to attend the 2025 Wikimania conference in Nairobi, Kenya.
Through my work with underrepresented communities, particularly the Wikimedia projects I have volunteered in, I have developed a strong understanding of the challenges faced by emerging community leaders, including resource limitations, capacity gaps, and project sustainability. This perspective will enable me to support funding decisions that prioritise knowledge equity and meaningful participation, especially for marginalised groups, women, and youth. I will also contribute to transparent and accountable committee processes by applying best practices in proposal review and clear documentation. My previous experience as a volunteer Data Support Grant committee member in the Hausa community has equipped me to uphold inclusiveness and build trust in funding deliberations. Additionally, I will prioritise projects that demonstrate learning, sustainability, and reusability, supporting initiatives with realistic goals and openly documented outcomes that can benefit the wider Wikimedia community.
A key approach here is to establish regular community consultation and feedback mechanisms, such as open calls to gather input on funding priorities. Sharing assessment processes, eligibility criteria, and timelines openly like through Meta pages, community channels, and local-language communication platforms, would allow diverse communities to meaningfully influence decisions and benefit the whole Nigeria Wikimedia community. Transparency is also essential to participation. Publicly documenting decision-making processes and sharing summaries of proposal assessments can help community members understand how decisions are reached, reducing distance and building trust in the committee’s work. Finally, participation can be strengthened through capacity building. Providing mentorship for first-time applicants and clear, accessible guidance will enable more community members to engage confidently and meaningfully in the national funding process.
One key approach is to prioritise proposals that address knowledge gaps and expand participation from underrepresented communities or where alternative funding is not readily available. This includes supporting local-language content creation, leadership development, and contributor capacity building, particularly in regions with limited access to resources. Such an approach directly advances the movement’s knowledge equity mission. In addition, the committee should assess proposals based on the scale and quality of impact rather than activity counts alone. Evaluating projects on long-term outcomes, sustainability, contributor retention, and content quality will encourage applicants to design initiatives with lasting value. Grant-making impact can also be strengthened through closer monitoring and learning-focused evaluation of funded projects. Clear impact indicators and structured follow-up will help ensure alignment between approved proposals and project implementation, while also generating insights for future funding cycles. Additionally, the committee can increase impact by encouraging collaboration and resource sharing as core funding criteria. Supporting initiatives that foster partnerships across user groups and communities will reduce duplication, improve quality, and extend the reach and accountability of funded activities.
First, the committee can shape impact by defining and communicating funding priorities that align with the Wikimedia Foundation 2030 Strategy, particularly around knowledge equity, underrepresented communities, and community sustainability. Clear priorities guide applicants to design proposals that address real gaps rather than isolated activities. Second, the committee can influence impact through strong evaluation frameworks. By emphasising long-term outcomes, such as contributor retention, content quality, leadership development, and reusability of outputs, the committee can shift grantmaking away from activity-based metrics toward sustainable movement growth. The committee can also increase impact by embedding learning into the grantmaking process. This includes encouraging documentation of lessons learned, sharing successful models across communities, and using insights from past grants to inform future funding decisions. Finally, the committee can strengthen impact through accountability and trust-building. Transparent decision-making, clear feedback to applicants, and responsible conflict-of-interest management will improve confidence in the process and motivate higher-quality proposals, ultimately increasing the effectiveness of funded initiatives.
I have also served previously on the Hausa community Data Support Grant Committee, where I participated in proposal review, assessment, and funding decision-making. This experience has equipped me to evaluate proposals critically, assess potential impact, and ensure alignment with community needs and Wikimedia values. Additionally, my work in training, content development, and leadership development has strengthened my ability to support Wikimedia capacity building and empower contributors, particularly women and youth. I am confident that these skills and experiences will allow me to contribute effectively to the Nigerian National Funding Program Committee by promoting inclusive, fair, and impact-driven funding decisions. 9. How will you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities? Ensuring equity in funding allocation is essential to advancing the Wikimedia 2030 mission. I will focus on addressing structural imbalances that limit participation by less privileged communities, prioritising proposals that serve underrepresented language groups and marginalized populations. My approach will emphasise fairness over strict equality, allocating resources based on need, capacity, and potential impact. This ensures that communities with less experience in grant writing or limited access to resources are not disadvantaged by the processes. Additionally, I will advocate for reducing language and accessibility barriers by simplifying application requirements and, where possible, providing guidance in local languages. These measures will help ensure that diverse communities can participate meaningfully and benefit equitably from Wikimedia funding.
To promote fairness, I will encourage collective decision-making within the committee, ensuring that proposals are assessed collaboratively against transparent, community-informed criteria. Whenever possible, the authority to approve or decline proposals should be distributed across multiple committee members, reducing bias and reinforcing accountability.
To promote fairness, I will encourage collective decision-making within the committee, ensuring that proposals are assessed collaboratively against transparent, community-informed criteria. Whenever possible, the authority to approve or decline proposals should be distributed across multiple committee members, reducing bias and reinforcing accountability.
As an administrator I'm focused in checking vandalism, grammatical errors and making sure articles are fully referenced and cited to be able to stand on their own. I decided to look this way because nobody in the community is paying attention to these small tasked. as a Peace and Conflict Analyst I'm also involved in conflict resolution in the community. whereby I leads groups to results communication gap and conflict in the community. I have also given my energy to up skilling our community with relevance skills needed in the community to foster development and makes project effective and efficient and also filled out gaps where members of our community where left behind. this is the background of Hausa Community skill up initiative.
additional,I will be bringing deep knowledge and experience from the project I lead and facilitate,by bringing community driven decision making approach and also aligning the Wikimedia movement strategy mission to it. I will be a actor and supporter for transparency, community involvement, community engagement at the committee's end and also, effective feasibility, sustainability, community impact, real execution plan and realistic budget from the community's end. Moreover, an inclusive, community driven and transparent ways will be adherent as part of the successful ways for the NNFP committee. as we ensure equity fairness, and commitment to the roles of the committee.
1. Selecting the right minds for the job, where people will felt represented this will boost participations. 2. engaged people with experience of grant processes and leaders in the community. 3. a transparent, active means of communications that sends clear information, that will help the community understand what the program wants. 4. Organised a campaign to educate committee's on the campaigns in the grant circle to come and also what the campaign or the project needs to be successful. 5. send a clear message that promotes collaboration and coordination. 6. highlights key factors of a successful project. 7. hold a session before every circle, telling what's required from every grantee at the circle and what campaigns are expected. 8. Demonstrate an example of a successful project every circle to give people hope and directions on what they need for a successful project. let's everyone knows in mine that this is what's expected from them for a successful project. 9. take hard decisions: make it very clear how many project can be funded everyevery circle and how much funds are available for each circle.
the committee need to identify: 1. the amount of reasonable experience one must possess to apply for a grant. 2. the skill sets needed and required before applying for a grant. 3. the number of collaboration needed for a grant. 4. how many times an individual will apply for a grant in whole calendar year. 5. an avenue for grantees to seek support on and even after their grant making process. 6. a support staff for each grant circle for easy flow of communication between the grabtees and the committee. 7. a learning process for a complete impactful project. 8. the need to fill gaps necessary needed from each community.
Moreover, the idea of having representative from each community is a great deal here. This will help to identify the gaps needed to be filled among each community. Beyond funding the committee can also set grand engagement ideals of collaboration and and coordination to help bring grantees together to work hand in hard for impactful project in other to avoid, waste of resources and overlapping for better accountability and resource management.
I have also an academic background and experience of possessing HND in Mass Communication, PGD and Master in Conflict Resolution and Peace building which Is paramount in decision making and best in conflict of interest matters. Beyond that, I'm also a content creator, whom I'm good at strategic communications and information flow to bridge disinformation and and solved misinformation across sectors I work with. I'm also a Public Relations practitioner, creating images and providing factual information, keeping records and starting the obvious in a conflict situations. I'm also privilege to be part of teams that discuss with grant admin team years back and having first hand experience and knowledge of grant process and what's required form grantees and community's.
I will also focus on giving emphasis on underrepresented community's that lack access to resources, gender support and inclusion and adhered to basic principles of fairness and accountability. Finally, I will encourage inclusive decisions making process, for everyone to feel among in the decision making process and smooth method of communication for keeping up-to-date with the community to ensure no one is left behind.
First of foremost if been selected to serve in this committee. I will gladly adhered to the ideals of this initiative of carrying everyone along from the beginning. This is ideals were the pillar of building trust from the initiative to the community. I will build trust as the sound pillar of engagement and transparency by engaging with the community since from pre circle to circle and post circle. By stating clearly and communicating effectively the priorities of this committee and what's expected from community's. I will also emphasize on creative a conducive atmosphere that create avenue for two ways communication for communities. And a system that listen and understand the needs of community by highlight vividly the prospect of funded project and also the shortcomings of rejected ones by also creating a learning process of correcting shortfalls of the unsuccessful one. So as the community to feel among in the decision making of the grants and also to feel well represented as whole.
Yes! I'm a freelancer and a content creator. I have enough time to engaged in this assignment.
| ||||||||
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Lagos State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
I am a graduate of Mass Communication with a strong passion for community engagement, knowledge sharing, and cultural preservation. I have been contributing to Wikimedia projects since 2022 and have grown to be an active member of the Igbo Wikimedians User Group and Wikimedia User Group Nigeria. Over the years, I have served as a Wiki Loves Folklore ambassador and as a member of the Wiki Loves Monuments international team, supporting campaigns that document and celebrate heritage around the world. I also serve as Communication Lead for Africa Wiki Women, where I help empower volunteers, promote inclusion, and encourage more people, especially women, to contribute to Wikimedia projects. Outside Wikimedia, I work as a social media manager, which has helped me develop skills in communication, outreach, and content promotion.My work focuses on community empowerment, closing the gender gap, and promoting cultural heritage through Wikimedia projects.
I want to join the NNFP Committee because I care deeply about how resources are shared within our communities. I believe funding should be fair, transparent, and responsive to real community needs. Being part of this committee will allow me to contribute my experience, listen to community voices, and help ensure that more people and regions have access to funding and other opportunities within the Wikimedia movement.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
I am actively involved in the Wikimedia movement through leadership, mentorship, and content quality roles across multiple communities. Within Africa Wiki Women, I currently serve as Head of Communications, where I handle publicity and support campaign coordination across the community. In the Igbo Wikimedia User Group, I serve as Project Lead for the IG Commons Hub, leading projects such as WPWP IG 2025, Say It Right Campaign, Wiki Loves Africa 2025, and Wiki Loves Folklore 2025. These initiatives help strengthen Igbo language representation and build capacity within the community. Mentorship is something I am deeply committed to. I guide contributors through programs like the Africa Wiki Women On-Wiki Skills Mentorship Program, the Leadership and Mentorship Program, and Igbo Wiki Days 2025, and continue to provide one-on-one guidance to new and existing contributors. I also contribute to content quality as a jury member for Wiki Loves Africa, Wiki Loves Folklore, and Wiki Loves Monuments campaigns. I serve as a Wiki Loves Folklore Ambassador and as a member of the Wiki Loves Monuments International Team. Through these roles, I help ensure content meets licensing and quality standards while empowering underrepresented communities to participate confidently in the free knowledge ecosystem.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
I can contribute to the committee by bringing my experience in leading projects, mentoring volunteers, and coordinating community activities. Through my work with Africa Wiki Women and the IG Commons Hub, I have learned how to support contributors, understand their needs, and help them participate confidently.
I can help the committee communicate clearly with applicants and grantees, support decision-making processes, and make sure that funding is allocated in a way that is fair, inclusive, and meets the needs of different communities across Nigeria. My experience in organizing projects and mentoring volunteers will allow me to contribute to the committee’s work effectively and support its goals.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
The committee can make decision-making more participatory by involving the wider community at different stages. For example, they could ask volunteers, project leads, or regional representatives to give input on proposals before decisions are finalized. They could use surveys, group discussions, or open meetings to gather ideas and feedback from contributors. The committee can also share draft decisions or updates and invite comments from the community, so people feel their voices are heard and considered. By listening to different perspectives and making the process transparent, the committee can ensure decisions reflect the needs of diverse communities across Nigeria.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
The committee could improve grantmaking by connecting new grantees with experienced ones who can guide them through implementation and reporting. It should fund training programs that teach communities how to manage projects and sustain their work, not just fund one-time projects. The committee should regularly talk to Nigerian Wikimedia communities to understand what they actually need, so grants solve real problems. Making the application process simpler for small grants would help more grassroots communities participate. Encouraging user groups to work together on proposals would help them share resources and create bigger impact across regions.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
The committee can influence grantmaking by pushing for flexible funding that lets communities adjust their plans as they learn what works. Sharing decision criteria and examples of good proposals publicly would help people understand how to apply successfully. The committee should check funding patterns to make sure grants reach different parts of Nigeria, including underrepresented regions and language communities. Connecting Nigerian grantees with regional and international Wikimedia groups would create opportunities for learning and collaboration. Finally, the committee should value community-building and mentorship work, not just count edits and uploads, because these create long-term change.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
I bring experience in leading projects, mentoring volunteers, and coordinating community initiatives. Through my work with Africa Wiki Women and the IG Commons Hub, I have organized campaigns, trained contributors, and guided volunteers to create high-quality content. This has helped me understand how to support people, communicate clearly, and manage projects effectively. I also have experience reviewing contributions as a jury member for Wiki Loves Africa, Wiki Loves Folklore, and Wiki Loves Monuments, which has taught me how to assess quality, fairness, and impact. My background in mass communication helps me explain ideas clearly, write reports, and share information in ways that are easy to understand. All of these skills and experiences will help me support the committee in reviewing proposals, guiding applicants, and ensuring that decisions benefit the community.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
I would ensure equity by making sure that funding reaches communities that are often underrepresented or face barriers to participation. This means looking at proposals not only for their quality, but also for the potential to support projects that fill gaps and meet real community needs. I would also make an effort to understand the context of different communities, including their size, location, and resources, so that funding decisions are fair and inclusive. From my experience mentoring contributors, I have seen that people participate more confidently when they feel supported and their voices are considered. The committee can do the same by listening to different perspectives, balancing funding across regions and communities, and prioritizing projects that create meaningful impact for everyone.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
I would ensure transparency by making the process clear and open to everyone. This means explaining how decisions are made, what criteria are used to review proposals, and how funding priorities are set. To ensure fairness, I would advocate that all proposals are reviewed without bias. This means looking at the project's merit and community impact rather than favoring familiar names or well-established groups. I would also make sure we actively consider applications from different regions, languages, and community sizes across Nigeria, not just the most visible communities. Drawing from my experience as a jury member for Wiki Loves campaigns and my work coordinating projects across diverse communities, I understand that fair decisions require listening to different perspectives. I would encourage the committee to discuss proposals collectively, bringing our different experiences and regional knowledge to avoid individual biases.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
Yes, I can commit to the expected time requirements.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Gombe State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- I’m a librarian, campaign/event organizer, trainer, and community leader based in the Northeast region of Nigeria. In the past few years since joining the Wikimedia movement through the Wikipedia in Africa Libraries Project
I’ve organized and facilitated Wikimedia outreach, training, editing, and campaign events across Nigeria including during major campaigns such as Wiki Loves Africa, Wiki Loves Monuments, WikiForHumanRights and many edit-a-thons. My work spans community building, mentorship, inclusive engagement across linguistic and regional lines, and empowering new contributors through coaching and workshops. I want to serve on the Nigeria National Fund Program Committee because I believe in equitable, transparent, and participatory funding processes that reflect diverse community needs across Nigeria especially for under-resourced regions, minority languages, innovative initiative and emerging campaign organisers across Nigeria.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I coordinate community programming through Wikimedia Gombe Network I founded after graduation from the Wikipedia in Africa Libraries Project in 2020 and co-founding and/or supporting other to establish Wikimedia community in their state/region that reaches hundreds of contributors annually, including edit-a-thons, edit-a-thons enhancement sessions, and digital skills workshops through the Knowledge Circle. I’ve trained and supported dozens of new editors and organisers and helped strengthen outreach across regions in Nigeria and Africa at large.
I was recognised by Wikimedia User Group Nigeria as Community Builder of the Year 2025 and identified as a WikiVibrance Youth Mentor 2023 for mentoring youth and new editors to meaningfully engage with Wikimedia projects. Furthermore more, I was recognized by the African Library & Information Associations & Institutions (AfLIA) Country Champion for the 4th African Librarians Week 1Lib1Ref campaign in 2023 Open Knowledge promotions in Nigeria.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I strongly believe I bring contextual knowledge of regional teams, hubs, and linguistic communities across Nigeria, plus experience facilitating training and mentoring new contributors and organisers. I have regularly supported outreach partnerships e.g., Wikipedia training for student groups, fan clubs, and civic organisations and worked collaboratively with community leaders to strengthen participation. I will apply these skills to support applicants with contextual feedback and increase the reach and equity of funded projects.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- Run pre-review regional proposal clinics to help refine drafts before formal scoring.
- Publish anonymised shortlists for community feedback before final decisions.
- Include rotating regional advisors during review rounds to ensure local context is weighed equitably
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
Pair small pilot grants with capacity building packages e.g., budget planning workshops, proposal coaching, and mentorship cycles so that funded projects are sustainable and can expand beyond initial funding.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
To maximize impact, the committee should actively shape the grantmaking process. This includes mandating strategic funding priorities, restructuring application stages to foster collaboration, and requiring grantees to share documented learnings. By moving beyond selection to actively designing and connecting, the process cultivates higher-impact outcomes.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
I bring community organising, outreach coordination, extensive mentorship, workshop facilitation, and contextual knowledge and experience of the Nigerian Wikimedia landscape. I understand local challenges connectivity, language diversity, awareness gaps and have experience supporting new organisers and editors through training, content sessions, and hands-on support.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
Prioritise under-resourced regions and languages with earmarked microgrants. • Provide budgeting and translation support for applicants using local languages or with limited English fluency. • Use context-sensitive criteria in reviews to balance resource gaps.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
I will adhere to the Universal Code of Conduct, Friendly Space expectations, and clearly document and publish selection criteria and brief rationales for funding decisions. I will declare conflicts in advance and follow a transparent scoring rubric available publicly.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
Yes, I can commit to committee meetings, review cycles, applicant support, and collaborative coordination throughout the grant rounds.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- I am Based in Oyo State, Nigeria
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Abiodun, a volunteer editor from Nigeria with the username Oludegun. I joined the Wikimedia Movement in 2020 and has been an active contributor to the open knowledge through the English Wikipedia with contributions to Wikdata and Wikipedia Commons.I have also been priviledged to successfully anchor several projects funded through the rapid grants as well as the micro grants scheme. Owing to my believe in preserving our heritage and preserving the African history for generations unborn,i was priviledged to recently coordinate a project titled WikiHeritage aimed at telling the african stories from pre-internet era.
- I want to serve on the Nigeria National Fund Program Committee because I believe the funding process should be inclusive,partcipatory and transparent with the the needs of diverse communities across the country adequately catered for with all commnuities and groups adequately recognised. ** Also, working on this committee is an invaluable opportunity at being of service and applying skill sets and experiences at my disposal to furter the course of the open knowledge movement thus achieving the goals of the founding fathers.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I am currently working on the WikiHeritage and Wiki Inclusion project while aslo supporting the Wikimedia movement as a contributor.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I believe I have over time in executing projects and equally participating in organized project by the movement,come to understand the needs of various communities as regards funding and this i hope to bring to bear on this committee. I intend to equally engender an inclusive,robust and transparent grant making decision makimng process that will bring about a more bute a better understanding of the process by members of the community.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- The grant making decision could be made more participatory with workshops and briefing sessions to enlighten members of the community on what is expected for a successful grant proposal and application while also putting in place a prompt and efficient feedback with proposal support on grants requests.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- The committee can improve grantmaking impact by making the process seamless and providing clear and strategic direction,which takes into cognizance the needs of the varous groups and individuals in the community while not losing sight of the goals of the funding program.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- Coordinating and collaborative skills,communication skills,people skills and community engagement skills aquired over the years in participation in several Wikipedia projects and personal endeavors as well as interaction with the rapid grants team over time are skills that i hope to apply to this role.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- To ensure equity in funding, it’s important to recognize the diverse needs of the various communities within the nigeria Wikipedi ecosystem. With this understanding, one can now apply the principle of inclusiveness by ensuring that underrepresented groups and communities as well as every other members of the community are adequately taken care of.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- To ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making, i will advocate for a clear and objective evaluation of proposals without bias in line with laid down guidelines and processes.I will also ensure review outcomes and committee decisions are well documented and communicated. This will ultimately bring clarity,engender trust and increase confidence in the community.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I am committed to dedicating the necessary time for whatever assigned task that might be given to committee members from time to time.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- FCT-Abuja.
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Chinonso Chidi. I'm a Medical Laboratory Scientist, researcher, Wikimedian since 2020, dedicated to promoting free knowledge, and an advocate for cultural heritage and indigenous language preservation. Having benefited from and supported numerous Wikimedia funded projects, I'm interested in joining the NNFP Committee to help ensure that Wikimedia funding in Nigeria remains mission-aligned, impactful and equitable, meeting the needs of communities. My motivation is to strengthen a more transparent and inclusive grantmaking system.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I am an administrator on the Igbo Wikipedia and Igbo Wiktionary, and a rollbacker on Wikidata. I belong to the Igbo Wikimedians User Group, Wikimedia User Group Nigeria, WikiProject Medicine, Wiki Mentor Africa, Small Wiki Monitoring Team (SWMT), and a Liaison of the Volunteer Support network (VSN). I'm also on the Wiki Loves Monuments International (WLM-i) team; a Wiki Loves Africa 2026 Ambassador, and a member of the Wikidata Weekly Summary Team. I serve as Programs Manager in the Igbo Wiki Fan Clubs (IMSU & ALVAN) and in the Wikimedia Abuja Network. As a volunteer editor with over 200 article creations on the English Wikipedia, I'm also a technical contributor to Wikimedia tool development and technical documentation. I've served as a jury member in several photography contests. I remain an event organizer with several impactful projects including the Igbo Wiki Days 2025, The 72 Hours virtual marathon edit-a-thon, Nigerian Legislators Translation Project, Wikidata 12th and 13th birthday celebrations in the Igbo community, and SheSaid 2025 in Nigeria. My work is defined by volunteer editing, event organizing, community capacity building, youth engagement, and promoting both regional and global collaborations.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- By offering my deep understanding of Nigerian communities. I'm also great at clearly analyzing grant proposals and adopting a collaborative approach to make decisions. I'd support the committee in making sure we uphold accountability, while also providing support for grant applicants (both old and new).
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- By establishing clear communication systems, and regular feedback sessions or surveys with local communities at different grant cycles. This ensures a better understanding of funding priorities and guidelines, and in turn, provide an opportunity to learn about the diversity, address challenges, and gain information that could inform funding decisions going forward.
- How do you think the committee could improve grant-making so it has a greater impact?
- By placing huge priority on quality over quantity. Mentorship, capacity building in grant application and reporting, project sustainability and clear documentation should be greatly emphasized to obtain greater impact. Also, I recommend the committee to support projects focused on documenting and promoting Nigerian indigenous language and culture.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- The committee could consider supporting proposals focused on capacity building, with clearly defined and mission-aligned goals, and measurable outcomes. Sustainability is key, therefore, more long-term projects should be encouraged rather than one-off projects. Also, impact can be amplified by encouraging more local community collaborations and supporting underrepresented groups.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I bring a wealth of experience in program design, grant implementation and reporting, global community facilitation, and effective communication. My background in research, project evaluation, and community leadership, combined with a strong knowledge of Wikimedia policies, language and cultural diversities in Nigerian communities, would be valuable to the committee.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- Not all communities have the same level of resources, experience, or visibility, so in addition to a well-thought proposal, I'd like to focus on the realities behind it. I would advocate for funding decisions that recognize first-time applicants, structural barriers, build local capacity, and genuinely meet community needs. Opportunities and resources would be spread across communities, not just a particular group or region.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- By being intentional, open to give and receive constructive feedback, abide to committee guidelines, and maintain accountability at every stage of the process. I value honesty and will be more than willing to openly declare conflict of interest at any point. Fairness for me also means clear communication (even to unfunded applicants) to build respect, trust, and encourage growth.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I confidently can.
1. Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Based in Kano State, Nigeria.
2. Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Bashir Sani Gwanki UserM Bash Ne, a Hausa Wikimedians User Group contributor and community organizer from Kano State, Nigeria, a vice chairman of Wikimedia User Group Nigeria Kano Network with several years of experience supporting Wikimedia projects and community development initiatives across Northern Nigeria. I have been actively involved in content creation, campaign coordination, and grant-supported projects, particularly those focused on language preservation, gender equity, environmental documentation, and human rights. I have worked on and led initiatives such as
Wikipedia at 20 in Kano, Wikimedia Promotion in Hadejia, Hausa Wiktionary Editathon in Kano, Wikipedia Awareness in Dutse, Wikipedia Workshop at Bichi Emirate and Currently Working on Wiki Green in Northern Nigeria:Documenting Hausa Native Plants Through Photo Walks, women-focused documentation projects, and Hausa language contributions, collaborating closely with volunteers, affiliates, and community stakeholders. I am interested in joining the Nigeria National Funding Program (NNFP) Committee because I strongly believe in equitable, transparent, and community-driven resource distribution. Having applied for, implemented, and reported on Wikimedia grants, I understand both the opportunities and challenges faced by community members seeking funding. This experience positions me well to fairly assess proposals, provide constructive feedback, and support applicants in strengthening their project ideas while ensuring alignment with Wikimedia movement goals and local community needs. Serving on the NNFP Committee will allow me to contribute meaningfully to strengthening Nigeria’s Wikimedia ecosystem by supporting impactful, inclusive, and sustainable projects—especially those from underrepresented regions and communities. I am committed to upholding the values of accountability, neutrality, and collaboration, and I am motivated to help ensure that funding decisions empower volunteers and advance free knowledge across Nigeria. 3. Consider responding to each one of the five questions below. Please keep your statement under 500 words.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- My current participation in the Wikimedia movement and the Free Knowledge Ecosystem includes active content contribution, community organizing, and campaign coordination, with a strong focus on addressing knowledge gaps related to Northern Nigeria, Hausa language content, gender equity, environmental heritage, and human rights. I regularly contribute to Wikimedia projects and support initiatives such as Currently Working on
Wiki Green in Northern Nigeria:Documenting Hausa Native Plants Through Photo Walks, women-focused documentation campaigns, and language-based projects aimed at preserving and promoting local knowledge. In addition to editing, I am actively involved in capacity building and community development, including organizing edit-a-thons, photo walks, and training sessions for new and existing contributors. I also mentor volunteers and collaborate with community leaders and affiliate members to encourage sustainable participation. Furthermore, I engage with the grant ecosystem by applying for, implementing, and reporting on Wikimedia-funded projects, which has strengthened my understanding of project management, accountability, and impact evaluation within the Free Knowledge Ecosystem.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I believe I can contribute to the NNFP Committee’s role and ways of working through a combination of practical experience, local knowledge, and a commitment to transparency and collaboration. My experience managing and reporting on Wikimedia-funded projects has given me a clear understanding of grant evaluation, accountability, and project impact assessment. I can help ensure that funding decisions are fair, equitable, and aligned with Wikimedia values, providing constructive feedback to applicants and supporting them in strengthening their proposals.
Additionally, my work in community engagement and capacity building equips me to bring diverse perspectives to the committee, particularly from underrepresented regions and groups. I can help facilitate communication, encourage collaboration among committee members, and contribute to developing fair and efficient processes for reviewing applications, monitoring projects, and promoting accountability. By combining practical knowledge with a strong understanding of community needs, I aim to support the committee in making decisions that maximize both impact and inclusivity within the Nigerian Wikimedia ecosystem.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- I believe the committee can make decision-making more participatory by fostering open communication, transparency, and inclusive engagement with both applicants and community members. This could include sharing clear guidelines for proposal evaluation, providing constructive feedback to applicants, and actively encouraging input from volunteers and stakeholders across diverse regions. Regular consultations, collaborative review processes, and knowledge-sharing sessions among committee members and the wider community can help ensure that decisions reflect a broad range of perspectives. By promoting inclusivity and actively engaging communities, the committee can strengthen trust, enhance accountability, and ensure that funding decisions support projects that are relevant, impactful, and aligned with community needs.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
I believe the committee can improve grantmaking for greater impact by focusing on strategic support, capacity building, and ongoing engagement with grantees. This includes providing clear guidance during the application process, offering mentorship to strengthen project design, and establishing mechanisms for monitoring and sharing lessons learned. Encouraging collaboration among grantees and facilitating knowledge exchange can help scale successful approaches and amplify outcomes. By prioritizing projects that are sustainable, inclusive, and aligned with community needs, the committee can ensure that funding decisions not only achieve immediate results but also foster long-term growth and strengthen the Wikimedia ecosystem in Nigeria.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- The committee can influence the grantmaking process for greater impact by promoting strategic, evidence-based, and community-centered decision-making. This includes setting clear priorities aligned with Wikimedia values, ensuring transparent evaluation criteria, and fostering collaboration between grantees and community mentors. By encouraging the adoption of best practices, monitoring outcomes, and sharing lessons learned, the committee can guide applicants toward more sustainable and high-impact projects. Additionally, actively engaging underrepresented communities in the process ensures that funded initiatives address diverse needs, maximize reach, and strengthen the long-term growth of the Wikimedia ecosystem in Nigeria.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I bring a combination of practical experience, community engagement skills, and local knowledge to the committee. My background includes several years of active contribution to Wikimedia projects, coordinating campaigns such as Wiki Loves Earth, WikiForHumanRights, and language-focused initiatives, as well as mentoring volunteers and organizing edit-a-thons and photo walks. I have experience applying for, managing, and reporting on Wikimedia grants, which has strengthened my skills in project evaluation, budgeting, accountability, and impact assessment. Additionally, my understanding of Northern Nigeria’s communities and challenges allows me to provide valuable insight into inclusive and equitable grantmaking, ensuring that resources support projects with meaningful local and national impact. These skills and experiences position me to contribute effectively to the NNFP Committee’s work, helping it make informed, fair, and impactful funding decisions.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities (languages, regions, demographics, thematic groups)?
- To ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities, I would prioritize inclusive representation, transparency, and outreach throughout the grantmaking process. This includes actively identifying and encouraging applications from underrepresented regions, linguistic groups, and thematic communities, while providing guidance and mentorship to help them submit strong proposals. I would advocate for clear evaluation criteria that consider community needs, potential impact, and sustainability, ensuring that no group is unintentionally disadvantaged. Additionally, monitoring funded projects and sharing lessons learned can help refine future allocations, supporting a balanced distribution of resources that strengthens participation across all communities and promotes knowledge equity within Nigeria’s Wikimedia ecosystem.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- I would ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making by implementing clear, consistent, and publicly accessible processes for reviewing grant applications. This includes establishing objective evaluation criteria, documenting committee deliberations, and providing constructive feedback to all applicants. Encouraging collaboration and discussion among committee members while actively seeking input from diverse community perspectives can help avoid bias and ensure equitable consideration. Regular communication with applicants and the broader community, along with sharing lessons learned from funded projects, fosters trust and accountability, reinforcing confidence in the committee’s decisions and promoting a fair, transparent, and participatory grantmaking process.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements (meetings, proposal reviews, evaluations)?
- Yes, I can fully commit to the expected time requirements, including attending committee meetings, reviewing proposals, and participating in evaluations. I understand that consistent engagement is critical for fair, timely, and effective decision-making, and I am prepared to dedicate the necessary time and effort to uphold the committee’s responsibilities. My prior experience managing Wikimedia projects and grants has equipped me with the skills to balance multiple tasks while maintaining attention to detail, accountability, and collaboration, ensuring that the committee functions efficiently and delivers high-quality outcomes.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- FCT ABUJA
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Okpanachi Gabriel Zakari, a Wikimedian and an active member in the Igala Wikimedia Community. I am an Accounting graduate with over 10 years experience in Accounting, Auditing, Budgeting, Project Management, Funds Utilization and Financial Analysis.
I am also a dedicated person who gives attention to detail before making any decisions. I work with integrity and play actively in any team whether as a team lead or member. I possess a high level of interpersonal relationship with everyone from diverse walks of life. Having worked with different individuals from various backgrounds, I am capable of going along with people.
With my leadership experience both on and off campus, I have developed skills in human resource management. I am good at man, materials, and money management.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I am an active member in the Igala Wikimedia Community. I attend meetings and participate in projects. I came as the third best in the Wiki Loves Africa 2025 in the Igala Community.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I will contribute by making sure the committee maintains transparency and observes WMF rules and community guidelines in discharging our duties. Also, I will maintain to be an active listener and contribute with problem solving opinions which are capable of improving WMF activities.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- Firstly, there will be individual review and secondly general review or collaborative review by the committee.
Every member of the committee should be given a listening ear to express their opinion on why any proposal should be approved, rejected or moved to another grants cycle.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- By thoroughly reviewing every application for grant and making sure every proposal is in line with WMF vision and goals for the diverse regions and communities without being biased which will make the system to be sustained in the future.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- The committee being the gatekeeper to WMF and the diverse regions and communities will ensure there is a high level of transparency and accountability to every proposal and application for grant.The committee can further influence the grantmaking process through thorough reviews to ensure that every region and community is well represented through fairness and transparency.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- With my over 10 years experience in practice as an Accountant and Auditor, I will be a team player to make sure there is a high level of control in approvals before fund disbursement. Also, I will bring my experience in project management, budgeting, and funds control to the committee.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- First, I will consider the importance of the project to WMF and the diverse regions. Also, the community where the project is coming from to enable equitable approvals without being biased or treat any community with less consideration.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- I will ensure transparency and fairness by observing the laid down rules that guide the NNFP operations. As someone coming from the Accounting background, integrity is one of our core ethics that I am practicing. Also I will review how funds were managed in the past and how successful the project was executed. If the applicant is a first timer he/she must provide the necessary assurance of optimum fund utilisation. The project must also align with WMF vision and goals.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I will commit to the expected time to attend to proposals, meetings and evaluations.
.Godiva Kajhyung (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Application for the Nigeria National Funding Program (NNFP) Committee
1. Which Nigerian state are you based in? I am based in plateau state, Nigeria.
2. Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee. I am a linguist in training and digital editor with the tyap wikimedian user group deeply committed to the principles of knowledge equity and open collaboration. My work with tyap wikimedian user group,in Kaduna state a region celebrated as the "center of learning," is centred on leveraging digital tools to document our rich cultural heritage, diverse languages, and complex history. I want to join the NNFP Committee to directly bridge the gap between strategic funding and impactful, community-led initiatives on the ground. I am motivated by the NNFP's core mission of enabling timely and flexible funding decisions by people who intimately understand the Nigerian context. I believe my grassroots experience and understanding of our unique socio-cultural landscape will be valuable in ensuring the committee’s grantmaking is both equitable and effective, truly serving the underrepresented communities within Nigeria's Wikimedia region.
3. What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem? My participation is firmly rooted contributing free knowledge by editing article and also in activating local communities. I co-found and facilitate training workshops for new editors in Jos and surrounding communiti during tyap community outreaches, focusing on creating and improving Wikipedia content about Kaduna state geography, notable personalities, and indigenous festivals. I actively collaborate with local historians and cultural custodians to document oral histories and translate key articles into local languages. This hands-on involvement provides me with a clear, practical understanding of the opportunities, challenges, and resource needs of growing the free knowledge movement from the grassroots level in Nigeria.
4. How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working? I would contribute a community-centric perspective, ensuring that the committee’s deliberations remain connected to the realities of grant applicants. I can help assess proposals not only for their strategic merit but also for their local feasibility, cultural sensitivity, and potential for sustainable community impact. I am a firm believer in the "wiki way" of working—collaborative, transparent, and built on constructive dialogue. I would strive to foster a committee culture where respectful debate and empathetic feedback are standard practice, ensuring our final decisions are robust, inclusive, and clearly communicated.
5. How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory? The committee can institutionalise participation by moving beyond a closed review process. Firstly, we can host structured community consultations prior to finalising grant rounds to understand regional priorities. Secondly, we can adopt a model of transparent, public commentary on Meta-Wiki for shortlisted proposals, allowing the broader community to offer insights, similar to global Wikimedia Foundation processes. Finally, we can proactively share summaries of our decisions and the reasoning behind them, creating a feedback loop that builds trust and demonstrates that community input directly shapes outcomes.
6. How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact? To maximise impact, grantmaking must be empowering, not just transactional. The committee should prioritise funding that builds long-term capacity, such as projects that include mentorship components or skill-building for new organisers. We should also encourage and support innovative pilot projects that test new approaches to content gaps or community engagement, with a focus on learning and sharing results. Crucially, we must work with grantees to define clear, realistic metrics for success that measure tangible outcomes—like the number of newly trained, retained editors or the quality and reach of created content—rather than just activity outputs.
7. What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee? I bring direct experience in grassroots community mobilisation, project management for cultural preservation, and navigating the diverse ethnic and religious landscape of Kaduna State with sensitivity and respect. My background includes managing volunteer-driven projects, administering modest budgets, and mediating community discussions to find common ground. This is complemented by a practical understanding of knowledge equity as the active process of including marginalised voices and narratives in the digital record.
8. How could you ensure equity in allocating funds? Ensuring equity requires intentional design. I would advocate for the committee to establish and publish clear equity criteria—such as prioritising first-time applicants, specific geographic regions, or underrepresented language projects—alongside standard evaluation metrics. We must conduct proactive outreach to communities less familiar with Wikimedia funding, simplifying application materials and offering support. Furthermore, the committee’s own composition and review process should mandate conscious consideration of these equity lenses during every decision.
9. How would you balance equity in sharing funds based on religion or ethnicity? In a diverse nation like Nigeria, fairness means being consciously inclusive while focusing on the universal mission of free knowledge. The committee should allocate funds based on demonstrable need, community capacity, and project merit, not on religious or ethnic quotas. However, we must actively identify and dismantle systemic barriers that may prevent certain groups from applying or succeeding. This involves ensuring our outreach, communication, and support mechanisms are accessible and welcoming to all, thereby creating a level playing field where the best ideas from every community can thrive based on their contribution to knowledge, not their demographics.
10. Can you commit to the expected time requirements? Yes, I fully understand and can commit to the expected time investment for committee meetings, thorough proposal review, and related duties for the duration of the term.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Kaduna State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- I am an undergraduate student of Kaduna State University and I live in Kaduna State. I am a member of the Wikimedia community in Nigeria. I respect and appreciate diversity, including differences in culture, language, and gender. I am willing to volunteer and support the foundation by contributing to effective committee work through sharing my knowledge, experience, and understanding of the local context during the grants process. I am also ready to help identify opportunities that meet the needs of the community.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I am a Tyap Wikimedian. I am part of the Wikimedia community and I support the sharing of free knowledge in my language and community. I am still growing my participation, and I am willing to learn more, volunteer my time, and contribute actively to Wikimedia projects and community activities.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I can contribute to the committee by being an active and reliable member who supports how the committee works. I can help in reviewing proposals carefully, taking part in discussions, and supporting fair and transparent decision-making. I am willing to respect and follow the committee’s roles, principles, and processes so that its work runs smoothly.
I can also help with communication, especially by sharing information between the committee and community groups such as regional hubs and campaign organisers. As a Tyap Wikimedian, I understand the local environment and can share useful cultural and language context that may help the committee make better decisions.
I am ready to support the Grant Officer, applicants, and grantees by sharing my knowledge and regional experience throughout the grants process. I can help point out opportunities where support is needed, especially around resources, representation, and fair sharing of power. I value diversity in all its forms and will bring this understanding into discussions and decisions that affect the region.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- The committee can make decision-making more participatory by actively involving community members, encouraging open discussions, and considering local perspectives before final decisions are made.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- The committee can improve grantmaking by focusing on real community needs, giving clear guidance and feedback to applicants, and supporting projects that are sustainable and have long-term impact.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- The committee can influence the grantmaking process by setting clear priorities, listening closely to community needs, and making sure funded projects are practical, inclusive, and able to create lasting benefits.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I can bring a good understanding of my local and regional context, especially as a Tyap Wikimedian. I have experience working with diverse communities and I value inclusion, collaboration, and shared learning. I am willing to learn, contribute my time, communicate clearly, and support fair decision-making that reflects community needs.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- I would ensure equity by listening to different communities, understanding their specific needs, and supporting fair access to funding, especially for underrepresented groups, while making decisions based on clear and transparent criteria.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- I would ensure transparency and fairness by following clear guidelines, documenting decisions properly, encouraging open discussions, and treating all applications equally without bias.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I can commit to the expected time requirements and I am ready to manage my time responsibly to meet the committee’s responsibilities.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Kaduna State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- I'm a Laundryman, a Tiler, currently attending a Computer Academy, a | Wikimedian since 2022, dedicated to promoting free knowledge, and believe in respecting everyone's differences, no matter their culture, language, or background. I'd love to volunteer with your foundation, to help ensure that Wikimedia funding in Nigeria continue to her purpose-driven, relevant and beneficial, meeting the communities needs. I'm happy to help find opportunities that fit the communities needs.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I'm a Tyap Wikimedian I contribute in both the Tyap Wiktionary, Wikidata Lexeme, Wikipedia incubator and more events in the Tyap Wikipedia community: Tyap Wiki Bootcamp, Mentor Me!, etc. I also contribute in the English Wikipedia in both Wiki Commons, Meta-wiki and Wikidata Items, | See Global Account Information. I am still growing my participation, and I am willing to learn, give my time, and contribute actively to the Wikimedia project.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I will be an active member of the committee, helping to make fair decisions and ensuring things run smoothly. I will review proposals, join discussions, and follow the committee's rules.
I can help share information with community groups and bring local knowledge to the table. As someone from the Tyap community, I understand the local culture and language, which can help the committee make better decision. I am happy to support applicants and grantees, sharing my experience to help them. I will also look out for opportunities to promote fairness and inclusivity. I believe in respecting everyone's differences and will bring this to the committee's work.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- The committee can connect decision-making more participatory by involving community members in the process through surveys, open forums or focus groups. They can also share information about proposals and decision with the community and asking for feedback can also help. Creating a platform for community members to share ideas and suggestions is another way. Ensuring representation from diverse groups, including regional hubs and campaign organizers, and using inclusive language and communication channels can reach a wider audience. Providing opportunities for community members to participate in committee discussions, either in person or online, can also make decision-making more participatory.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- The committee can make grantmaking better by focusing on what the community really needs, providing clear guidance and feedback to applicants, and supporting projects that last and make a long-term difference.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- The committee can prioritize projects addressing community needs, provide clear guidelines, and ensure sustainable impact. The can also engage with local communities and promote transparency.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I can bring experience working with community groups, knowledge of the local context, and language skills. My background in the Wikimedia and understanding of local culture can help inform decisions. I'm also willing to learn and support the committee in any way I can
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- I'll make sure funding is fair by listening to different communities, being open about decisions, and checking how fund are used. I'll also talk to grounds that don't usually get funding to make sur they get a chance.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- I'll make sure decision are transparent and fair by explaining them clearly and being open about how they are made. I will also listen to feedback and be willing to adjust decisions if needed.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I'll do my best to support the committee.
(user @sunnyavong)
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Kaduna State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Marcus Sunday Avong (user @sunnyavong). I hail from an from Zangon Kataf Local Government area but born and bred in Kaduna South Local Government Area of Kaduna State. I am an active member of the Tyap Wikimedian User Group. In addition, i have been actively involved in promoting the sustenance of my local dialect and it's identity in a world where it is seemingly going extinct. I have opened a Facebook forum named "History, Culture and Traditions of the Atyap People of Southern Kaduna'. The group is aimed at sharing to the world what the Atyap nation is, what it stands for and the history of same. It has since gathered about 6,000 members from around the world. I advocate also for the promotion of local contents in a sustainable manner because I firmly believe that the future generation must not be made to lose out of touch with history.
My intention to join the NNFP Committee is borne out of my desire to unlearn, learn and relearn. I have discovered that as a Nigerian, I must understand the complexities that exits in the country. Such complexities includes tribal differences, ethnic differences and religious differences must be taken advantage of to foster unity in diversity. Therefore, I am fully convinced that giving the opportunity to be in the NNFP Committee would give me the opportunity to meet people of like minds to share knowledge and promote national unity through collaboration. In addition, I am interested in getting trained as stated on the advertisement of this program. Also, I do believe that I have a lot of positive contributions to make that would be beneficial to the committee and the country at large drown from my large scale experiences gained over the years. Most importantly, I desire to volunteer in order to give back a little to the country from the much it has give to me.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- Currently, I am an active member of the Tyap Wikimedians User Group. Here, we work to develop and promote the Tyap language. In developing the Tyap language, I have participated in discussions around translations and creating of new words that were not in existence during the times of our parents, grandparents. We work both remotely and physicaly to make sure that the Tyap language gains sustainability among the young people in urban areas who find speaking the language difficult. Also, in the Free Knowledge Ecosystem, I have been active on the social media in promoting everything the
Atyap culture and Tyap language stands for. Thus, I created the the Facebook Forum known as "History, Culture and Traditions of the Atyap People of Southern Kaduna" as a means of disseminating free, precise, trustworthy information about the Atyap people freely to the world. Also, I have volunteered with DeBranch farmers, an agro-based company in Kaduna to help promote modern agricultural practices around some Atyap and not Atyap villages. My participation here is basically translation in Tyap language during training and seminars organized by the organization. Debranch farmers recently received an award of excellence from the Kaduna State Government. As a result of their giant strides, the present minister of Agriculture and Food Security, Senator Abubakar Kyari paid a visit to the orgnisation's factory in Kaduna in November, 2024.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- In my opinion and humble thinking, I can contribute to the committee's role and ways of working in the following ways
1. I have worked and served as a volunteer where I contributed immensely in their operations. I have gained experience that would be good for me to easily adopt to the tasks I may be required to perform by the committee. 2. I can contribute my vast knowledge on social media to promote the activities of the committee as the case may be. 3. The committee can be sure to have my strong mobilization skills as a key contribution. While working with DeBranch Famers, and strategically mobilized both within and without for the achievement of certain organizational function effectively 4. In the Tyap Wikimedians User Group, we were trained on active and effective participation, development and promotion. I will help the committee to develop strategies that focuses on key policies, strengthening contents and sustainability as key indicators for national development 5. I will make researches, in addition to my experiences and make proposals to the committee in aspects of collaboration with relevant stakeholders for effectiveness in value chain attainment 6. As a team player, i would ensure that I fulfill every given task within time limit without complain and without supervision in line the the committee's goals and values
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- Effective participation in decision making in every organization is key to the possibility and ability of the organization to achieve set goals and objectives as the case may be. Therefore, the committee can make decision-making more participatory, through the following ways;
1. The committee must ensure that every member understands what it stands for. There must be a clear definition and statement of Mission for every member to understand because this helps performance and participation. 2. Also, members of the committee must be made to understand that they are a team working towards the attainment of the same goal. Efforts must be made to avoid discrimination of whatever kind and every member must be seen as important as the other. When people feel they are appreciated and accepted, they participate well in decision making especially in a multi-ethinc committee of this nature 3. For members to participate effectively in decision making, they must be given the chance to participate in policy making. During policy making, members happen to effectively give in their opinions. This gives a foundation for future contribution when decisions are to be made 4. In addition, for the committee to make decision making more participatory, the roles must be distinctively shared for effective participation. When people effectively participate in roles, they understand constraints and strengths therein and conveniently say what affects them and how they can be made better
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- In my previous volunteer work with DeBranch farmers, I interacted closely with locals and people down the agricultural value chain. Many have benefited from grants from different organizations and in my opinion, the committee could improve grantmaking to have greter impact in the following ways;
1. For grantmaking to be effective, it must be used for the purpose it is given for. Most Nigerians see grant as their own part of the national cake, thus, when they receive, the use such for unproductive ventures. Therefore, the committee could organize seminars and trainings. Here, participants would be made to provide feasible and viable business plans. These plans must be scrutinized and found worthwhile before grants are provided. In addition, there must be strict supervision on implementation 2. Grants should not be given to individuals or organizations in a lumbsum. It should be given in trenches depending on the beneficiaries strict adherence to their business plan as may be advised by the supervisor. 3. The committee can do well to also scrutinize applicants for grants. There are some people that do not necessarily need these grants but want to get same for selfish reasons. As such, the committee can partner with banks structures to factor out those that need such grants and those that do not. The easiest way is through the use of the Bank Verification Number. it the BVN reveals that the applicant's income exceeds a certain range, such grants should not be given to them. 4. The committee can also reward hard work and productivity. Once investigation shows that there is a significant improvement by certain applicants, they can be encouraged with grants as a means of telling them that their efforts are recognized and to tell others that there is reward for hard work 5. For grants to be impactful, also, the committee should ensure that every part of the country benefits without discrimination. This pushes, to a high degree, the confidence of the people on the ability of the committee to deliver
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I have the following skills and experiences that I could bring to the committee
1. I have a strong analaytical ability that would help the committee in solving complex situations 2. I am computer literate and as such, I can be used for certain computer related assignments 3. I have had an experience working with DeBranch farmers where I leant a lot about volunteering 4. i lean very fast, for instances I am put to learn, it will be quick. I can also learn quickly on the job 5. I am good with the social media. The committee may need need my experience in handling social media issues 6. I have a good relationship with people of different backgrounds and can suit effectively to different environments and people without much problems. Adopting the the working environment is usually easy for me 7. I see my self as a team player. I often put the goals of where i am above mine. Therefore, the committee would be proud to have me to be an effective team player 8. I can also help the committee to achieve targets and goals. I see myself as a goal getter. When a duty is to be peformed, I lift up the team spirit to ensure we get the goals within the expected time with no or limited supervision
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- Complexities and diversities are to make us united and problem solvers. This is one of the issues I have encountered on field and have tried to proffer solutions. To ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities, i would adopt the following strategies;
1. I will operate, strictly, within the committee's rules, guidelines, principles and policies 2. I would ensure I promote national unity by given all equal and fair chances 3. I would ensure that I operate with a high sense of transparency enough to be seen and promote same. 4. I will ensure i follow due process in all my dealings as a committee member 5. I would ensure that strategies are developed to be all inclusive in nature. In allocation of funding, every community concerned must be represented effectively and fairly
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- To ensure fairness in transparency and fairness in decision making,
1. I would ensure that my personal sense of reasoning does not over ride the committee's goals 2. I would ensure that my every decision i take falls within the policies of the organization by following laid down rules 3. I would ensure that i give fair treatment in every file i have to handle. Every or any for of sentiments must be buried 4. I would ensure that I do not influence others, negatively,to act in favour of one against the other 5. I all fairness, i would ensure that I carry my team members along in every decision to be taken. 6. I would ensure proper and accurate documentation of every decision to reflect their true nature as they occur
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I can and would be committed to the expected time requirements. I have always ensured that I give all the commitment required of me in every endeavor find my self.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Lagos State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- I am Qudus Ojikutu, a Nigerian writer, cultural advocate, and Wikimedia-aligned contributor with strong interest in knowledge equity, language preservation, and community development. My work focuses on promoting Yoruba language and culture through writing, translation, and educational engagement.
I want to join the NNFP Committee because I believe funding decisions should reflect local realities, cultural diversity, and community needs. Serving on the committee will allow me to contribute to fair, thoughtful, and impactful grantmaking that empowers contributors across Nigeria, especially those working in underrepresented languages and communities.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I actively engage in knowledge creation, translation, cultural documentation, and advocacy for indigenous language representation. i am a fellow of Wikiheritage that sees to documentation of Lagos State culture and governance on Wikipedia and a member of Wikimedia group in Lagos State University. I have edited few articles too. My work supports open knowledge values by promoting access to culturally relevant content, encouraging accurate documentation, and supporting community-based learning. I also participate in discussions, learning activities, and collaborations that align with Wikimedia’s mission of free and open knowledge for all.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I would contribute by bringing a balanced, culturally sensitive, and community-oriented perspective to grant reviews. I value dialogue, fairness, and accountability, and I would support collaborative decision-making processes that respect diverse viewpoints. I would also encourage clear communication between the committee and applicants to build trust and understanding.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- The committee can increase participation by engaging community feedback, organizing open consultations, and ensuring that applicants clearly understand evaluation criteria. Including voices from different regions, languages, and experience levels in discussions will also make decisions more inclusive and representative.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking, so it has a greater impact?
- Grantmaking can have greater impact by prioritizing sustainability, capacity building, and community ownership. Supporting projects that train new contributors, strengthen local communities, and document underrepresented knowledge will ensure long-term benefits beyond individual events.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- The committee can influence impact by setting clear priorities, encouraging innovation, and mentoring applicants to refine their project ideas. Constructive feedback and follow-up evaluation can also help grantees improve future projects and strengthen the overall ecosystem.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I bring strong communication skills, cultural knowledge, writing and editing experience, and a background in community engagement. My work in Yoruba language promotion, education, and documentation has taught me the importance of accuracy, inclusion, and respectful representation. I also have administrative and organizational experience that supports accountability and teamwork.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
I would support equitable funding by giving fair consideration to applicants from underrepresented regions, languages, and communities. I believe in assessing projects based on impact, relevance, and community benefit rather than visibility or popularity alone. Equity means ensuring everyone has a genuine opportunity to contribute to free knowledge.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- Transparency and fairness can be ensured through clear criteria, documented decisions, open communication, and accountability among committee members. I would support collective responsibility, respectful disagreement, and honest justification for all funding outcomes.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I would.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- I am based in Kwara State, Nigeria.
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
My name is Akintunde Daniel and I am an active member of the Wikimedia community in Nigeria and a product of the Wikimedia Ilorin community, where I have contributed to community growth, coordination, and program delivery. My involvement over the 3+ years of volunteering has gone beyond individual contributions to include leadership and governance responsibilities within the group.
I served the Wikimedia Ilorin community in two leadership capacities: as General Secretary and as a Vice President in two different tenures. In these roles, I supported committee operations, coordinated communication among members, documented decisions and processes, and helped ensure continuity and accountability in community activities. I also worked closely with other leaders to support volunteers, align initiatives with community goals, and create an environment where both newcomers and experienced contributors could participate effectively.
Through my experiences, I developed a strong interest in structured decision-making, collaborative leadership, and the importance of clear processes in sustaining volunteer communities. I have been involved in discussions around planning, prioritization, and resource use, which has given me practical insight into how governance and funding decisions directly affect participation, equity, and impact at the community level.
My reason for applying to join the NNFP Committee because I want to keep serving the Wikimedia community in Nigeria at a stewardship level, with one key motivation, which is to keep supporting fair, transparent, and context-aware funding decisions that strengthen Wikimedia communities in Nigeria.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
I am currently an active Wikimedia community organizer, contributor, and coordinator, with practical experience supporting community-led projects and inclusive participation across Nigeria. My involvement includes working closely with volunteers to plan, coordinate, and sustain programs that lower barriers to entry and encourage meaningful participation from both newcomers and experienced contributors.
Alongside community organizing, I remain engaged as a contributor and advocate within the broader Free Knowledge ecosystem, with a growing interest in how resourcing, governance, and inclusive decision-making can strengthen Wikimedia communities at scale.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
I believe I can contribute to the committee’s role and ways of working by bringing a strong balance of community context, structured thinking, and collaborative decision-making.
From my experience as a community organizer and coordinator, I am accustomed to working within committees where listening, clarity, and respectful disagreement are essential. I approach discussions with an openness to different perspectives, while grounding my contributions in evidence, regional context, and the stated goals of a process. This allows me to support thoughtful deliberation rather than rushed or subjective decisions.
I can also contribute by helping bridge understanding between applicants, grantees, and grant officers. Having supported community-led projects directly, I understand common challenges around planning, communication, and sustainability, and can help the committee assess proposals not only on intent but on feasibility and potential impact.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
One important approach that I have observed over the years that would work is to create consistent feedback loops with applicants and community groups, especially during and after grant cycles. This could include clearer guidance before applications are submitted, transparent communication around decision criteria, and constructive feedback that helps applicants improve, even when proposals are not approved.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
The committee can improve grantmaking impact by prioritizing clarity, sustainability, and learning across grant cycles.
This includes funding proposals with clear goals, realistic plans, and measurable outcomes; providing constructive feedback that helps applicants strengthen their work; and using insights from past grants to inform future decisions. Stronger follow-up, shared learning, and attention to regional context will ensure resources translate into lasting community capacity, not just short-term activity.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
By giving clear priorities, applying consistent decision criteria, and grounding decisions in the community context. The committee can influence impact by guiding applicants early, asking the right questions during review, and favoring proposals that build capacity, address real community gaps, and show potential for long-term value. Transparent feedback and shared learning across grant cycles further strengthen outcomes.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
I bring a combination of Wikimedia community leadership, project coordination, grant writing, and grant proposal research. Having served as General Secretary and Vice President of Wikimedia Ilorin, I am skilled in governance, committee operations, and collaborative decision-making.
My practical experience in supporting community-led projects, mentoring volunteers, and promoting inclusive participation has given me insight into regional needs, effective processes, and strategies to make grants more impactful.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
I would ensure equity by making decisions in context, assessing proposals based on need, potential impact, and inclusivity rather than familiarity or popularity. I would actively consider underrepresented groups and provide guidance and feedback to help all applicants compete fairly.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
I would ensure transparency and fairness by applying consistent criteria to all proposals, documenting deliberations, and clearly communicating decisions and rationale to applicants.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
Yes. I can commit to the expected time requirements, including initial training, quarterly application reviews, and ongoing communication and mentorship
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- I am from Kaduna State and currently based on Nassarawa State.
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- I am Zachariah Samuel Bature and username is Ryok Kundyi2912 a graduate of Sociology who became a Wikipedian under the umbrella of Jju Wikipedia Community outreach 2025.
I am interested in joining the NNFP Committee due to my facenation and understanding of what Wikipedia vision and the role the NNFP Committee to ensuring it achievement and am sure I could be of great help to NNFP in carrying out it functions as an editor that understands the need of under presented communities.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I am an editor in the Jju Wikipedia Community outreach and event organizer in which I organized the Jju Wikipedia Community outreach Zonkwa December 5-7 2025 where by new editors were trained. I've contributed I the Jju Wikipedia incubator and more events in the Tyap Wikipedia community for example; Mentor Me! Program, community meetings, Tyap Wiki Bootcamp and online programs. also contribute in the English Wikipedia, Wiki Commons, Meta-wiki and Wikidata Items. I am available to learn and teach others by giving my time, and contribute actively and whole heartedly to the Wikimedia project.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
Through the activity of the Jju Wikipedia Community outreach sharing information within the community groups by increases and advocating local knowledge to the table. As someone from the Jju Wikipedia community, I've a grabs of the community culture and language, which can help the committee make better decision. It's my pleasure to support applicants and grantees by sharing my experience to assist them in making a better decision. It will be my perogative to promote fairness and inclusivity and respecting language and cultural diversity and promises to advice the committee adequately as chance present itself.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
To make the committee decision-making more participatory is by inclusiveness and members of the community members involved in the process through in-person information sharing,focus groups surveys and getting feedback to help understanding where community need help. A platform could be created for community members to participate, express ideas and suggestions in their own perspective to ensure representation.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
I suggest the committee to investigate and ensure the reality of the community need, also ensuring they get needs adequately and appropriately within the shortest possible time.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
I suggest the committee know exactly their vision and what they want to achieve and stick to it and ensure sustainability with promoting transparency as a key.
What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee? My background and knowledge of the community group regarding the local issues, culture and language I can bring experience working with community groups, knowledge of the local context, and skill in the language can assist in informed decision making. I'm available to assist the committee in anyway I can to achieve their goal.
How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities? By removing sentiment in decision making and making sure the NNFP and entire Wikipedia outreach program achieve their vision and goal.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
Through knowledge and experience as civil servant for sometimes, working with State Department. Skills of getting things done ,monitoring, evaluation and taking responsibility of your actions and other ideas could help in different ways.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
Just by being responsible, removing sentiment and being transparent.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
I ensure transparency and fairness by adhering to the code conduct of the NNFP, Wikipedia Foundation vision and goals
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
Yes by the grace of God I will do more than my best making myself available to contribute my quota.
[User: Weyham Sylvester|Weyham Sylvester]
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Kaduna State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Weyham Sylvester Danborno a member of Tyap wikimedian User Group.
I am a confident person who has a good work ethic, interpersonal skills, mutual trust, and committed to knowledge acquisition. I take responsibility of my workloads and deliver on time to my highest ability and aim to exceed expectations. I believe my knowledge and experience have provided me with an awareness to work in diverse environment.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- Through enhance effective and efficient service delivery in consonance with present day challenges where distinction, hard work and integrity are recognized for the betterment of the organizational vision and goals.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- by engaging members to contribute their quarta.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- effective and efficient service.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- by hard work for the betterment of the organizational vision and goals.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- Am a civil servant, work with the Ministry of education Kaduna State Department of higher education. Skills of monitoring and evaluation and other ideas that will come in due course.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- By being transparency.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- By effective monitoring.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes,for the betterment of the organization as time permits. By the grace of God.
- Which Nigerian state are you based in?
- Anambra State
- Tell us about yourself and why you want to join the NNFP Committee.
- My name is Ngozi Scholar Okafor, a volunteer editor with the Igbo wikimedia User group , I am a Nigerian , a community orientated development and education professional with a background in Geography and Education. I have experience in supporting community initiatives, learning program and collaborative projects. I'm an active contributor to open knowledge through the Igbo Wikipedia with contributions to Wikidata, wikipedia, WikiCommons , wikivoyage, wikiquote.I have also been privileged to successfully anchor project funded through the rapid grant. I am passionate about inclusive development , bridging knowledge gap through wikimedia projects, and also believe in preserving our culture, heritage and African history for generations , I was privileged to recently coordinate a project titled "Telling our own Story" on Igbo wikimedia.
I want to serve the Nigerian National Funding Programs (NNFP) Committee because I believe sustainable community growth depends on equitable access to resources. I strongly believe in the mission of community led initiatives and ensuring that funding reaches groups that are creating meaningful impacts. I have also seen how funding decisions directly affect participation, safety, and long-term impact. If selected, I will work to support funding decisions that expand opportunities for underrepresented communities, sustainable and impactful projects, encourage capacity development, and ensure that national resources are distributed in a way that reflects both local contexts and Wikimedia’s long-term goals.
- What is your current participation in the Wikimedia movement or the Free Knowledge Ecosystem?
- I am currently an active participant in the Wikimedia movement, contributing to the Free Knowledge Ecosystem through editing, community organizing, capacity building, education related activities and support for initiatives that promotes access to information and learning.
Under the username Ngozi Scholar Okafor on Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wikiquotes, wikivoyage and Wikidata, my work focuses on improving the visibility, accuracy, and quality of content related to free knowledge movement, my contributions have been visible within the Igbo Wikimedia groups. I help new editors understand Wikimedia policies, safe participation practices, and the importance of reliable sourcing.
- How do you think you could contribute to the committee's role and ways of working?
- I would contribute to the NNFP Committee's role and ways of working through bringing a structured community focus approach to reviewing proposals, engaging stakeholders and supporting transparent decision making. I value collaboration, respectful dialogue , documentation and would work with other committee members to ensure processes are clear, inclusive and effective.
- How do you think the committee could make decision-making more participatory?
- The committee could make decision-making more participatory by actively engaging community voices through consultations feedback mechanism, and clear communication criteria, creating structured channels for community input beyond formal grant applications. This could include open listening sessions with active Wikimedia communities, anonymized feedback windows during funding cycles, and post-decision explanations that help applicants understand how criteria were applied.
- How do you think the committee could improve grantmaking so it has a greater impact?
- To improve grantmaking impact, I think the committee can prioritize community led proposals providing clear guidance to applicant and offering and offering post grant support such as mentoring and monitoring. Emphasizing learning, documentation and shared best practices will also help funded projects achieve substantiable outcomes for Wikimedia projects.
Impactful grantmaking is not only about funding projects, but about growing confident, resilient communities within the Wikimedia movement, so clear priorities will have to be set.
- How can the committee influence the grantmaking process to have a greater impact?
- Greater impact can be achieved by prioritizing capacity building and sustainability, setting transparent evaluation standards, encouraging innovation and ensuing funds are allocated to initiatives with clear goals, measurable outcome and community relevance.
Greater impact I can also be achieve by regular reflection on past grant, recognizing security risks, infrastructural limits, especially for marginalized communities. Flexible funding models, realistic timelines, and support for community care can significantly strengthen outcomes and retention.
- What skills, background, or experience could you bring to the committee?
- I will bring skills in program coordination, communication, report writing and community engagement. My academic background in Geography and Education gives me a strong understanding of development issues, learning process and community dynamics, which are valuable in accessing proposal and supporting grants.
My experience as a church coordinator (Junior Church) and experience with Wikimedia projects has enable me to contribute strategically to the community ensuring transparent and impactful funding decisions, which I will also bring to the committee.
- How would you ensure equity in allocating funding to diverse communities?
- I would advocate for equity funding by ensuring proposals are accessed fairly based on impact and need and community context, rather than visibility or location alone. I would support outreach to underrepresented and encourage proposals, that address regional, gender and capacity gaps.
This means supporting emerging groups, regional communities, and marginalized identities with fair consideration, mentorship, and flexibility rather than holding them to the same expectations as long-established groups.
- How would you ensure transparency and fairness in decision-making?
- Transparency and fairness can be ensured by clear criteria, documenting agreed decisions clearly, declaring conflicts of interest and communicating outcomes openly.
I will ensure that applicants understand why decisions were made and deliberations can be improved, with consistent feedback. Fairness is not only about outcomes but about trust—and trust is built when processes are open, respectful, and accountable.
- Can you commit to the expected time requirements?
- Yes, I can commit to the expected time requirements, and actively participate in multiple Wikimedia projects, community activities, and freelance work. Below are links to the training coordinated by me
https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Igbo_Wikimedia_User_group/Bridging_the_knowledge_gap_and_writing_our_own_stories_on_Igbo_wikimedia._(11th_October)?enroll= https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136980506 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Group_Nigeria/Community_Support_Fund