Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Min Nan Wikisource 2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it.

This is a proposal for closing and/or deleting a wiki hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. It is subject to the current closing projects policy.

The proposal is rejected and the project will be kept open.

  • Explanation by the closing Langcom member: The project is inactive (like many others), but there seem to be no additional problems. The pages that exist have some volume. Also we should take into consideration that a Wikisource does not need so much maintenance/changes on existing pages once they're good. Of course, having active users would be better, but it should be prefered to keep a wiki open. --MF-W 03:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Type: 1 (routine proposal)
  • Proposed outcome: closure
  • Proposed action regarding the content: transfer content to Oldwikisource
  • Notice on the project: [1]
  • Informed Group(s): (Which chapters, wiki projects, and other community groups have been informed, if any.)

No content, no activity and some spam Also see the furst proposal [2] here. TheChampionMan1234talken-wiki 10:40, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

There's no spam: the page you've linked was only a copyright violation. There is, indeed, very little content and I don't think any new content will be added, which is why the lack of activity is a problem. I agree with TheChampionMan1234 that this wiki is better off closed. Mathonius (talk) 03:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
  • oppose -- Why closing it if there is no spam? It should rather be kept open for editing. And no, I think it has some kind of content in Min Nan (some of them are quite long pages, presuming they are full texts/chapters), there are not many pages, but I think there are enough to keep the wiki open for editing. Jagwar grrr... 23:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • strongly oppose. that is the normal project.--Gubin (talk) 08:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.