Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Tibetan Wiktionary

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

I propose to close this discussion within seven days from now, unless there are objections. --Johannes Rohr 06:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ending per discussion. Result: Delete --Johannes Rohr 18:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the Tibetan Wiktionary are only NO articles (bo:wikt:Special:Allpages - without spam and Main Page). Active users don't seem to exist and there also occurs some spam (1). There's really NO activity; in the last 300 days there were only deletions. --MF-Warburg(de) 17:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support closing[edit]

  1. --MF-Warburg(de) 17:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per nomination. However, since there is a moderately active Tibetan Wikipedia, one should at least notify them, to give them the chance to re-invigorate the project. --Johannes Rohr 11:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I notified them: [1] --MF-Warburg(de) 14:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support We should close EVERY Wiktionary. Wiktionary sucks! --Node ue 12:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support --A. B. (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support -- Andre (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support There no articles. Even the Limburgish Wiktionary has 250 articles! --Ooswesthoesbes 06:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Per nomination; no articles and no activity. Cbrown1023 talk 04:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose closing[edit]

Hi Everyone out there who are supporting to close the proposal of tibetan wiktionary... i am Tsering Phuntsok and i am tibetan i really wanna hava a tibetan wiktionary. as you have with other language... so what is the reason of closing the project of having a tibetan wiktionary when you have other language...we are also in this world.. same as you please please help me to oppose the proposals for closing projects of Tibetan Wiktionary... Help and support my request... thank you — The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) --Johannes Rohr 16:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a Tibetan Wiktionary, the best you can do is start contributing to it. If it remains empty it will be closed. And this may happen fairly soon. --Johannes Rohr 16:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is already closed... Visit Requests for new languages for request to reopen it. --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 16:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opposeབོད་ཡིག་ཝེ་ཁེའི་མིང་མཛོད་ཅིག་དགོ་ཐག་གཅོད་རེད་འདུག དབྱིན་རྒྱ་བོད་གསུམ་ཤེས་པའི་དྲ་གྲོགས་རྣམས་ཀྱིས་གྲོས་གནང་བར་མཁྱེན། ང་རང་དབྱིན་ཡིག་ཤེས་གི་མེད།

General discussion[edit]