Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Xhosa Wiktionary

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to CLOSE the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed: Closed: no activity — VasilievVV 16:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to close this discussion in seven days from now, on May 11VasilievVV 19:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only 10 actual content pages exist. Recent changes only shows a spam bot creating /w/index.php pages. There is no local sysop either.

Xhosa Wiktionary Sr13 08:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support closure

  • Support Majorly (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support almost no content + no sysop + no activity = no wiktionary. --Ooswesthoesbes 15:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No local sysops, which means nothing can be properly maintained. No activity or content. Sr13 08:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Nothing there. Cbrown1023 talk 21:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Concordo Slade 22:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The last content activities were in September 2007. --MF-W 11:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose closure

  • Oppose -- 07:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Try to give óne reason why we shouldn't close this one. --OosWesThoesBes 11:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose because of recent activity. -- Prince Kassad 14:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No activity anymore. --OosWesThoesBes 14:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose There seem to be about 30 pages now, some created in September. Drini seems to have admin privileges there and has been cleaning up spam. Therefore, the reasons for closure are not valid. Lack of activity for a period of time is not in itself a reason for closure, if the project is being maintained and I see no reason why the people who added content previously might not come back at any time to add more. --Coppertwig 18:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    As per above nothing of activity. Just two valid edits. Incubator it. --OosWesThoesBes 18:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]