Jump to content

Reports:Wikimedia UG Nigeria Grants/Wikimedia User Group Nigeria Community Support Fund/Report/Kwara State Wikimedia Fan club WPWPCampaign Report

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Goals

[edit]

Did you meet your goals? Are you happy with how the project went? Yes, the project met most of its goals. The campaign helped enrich Wikipedia articles with visuals and improved digital literacy on Wikipedia project. We are pleased with the level of participation and quality of contributions, even though a few targets (like Commons uploads) were not fully achieved.

Outcome

[edit]

Please report on your original project targets. Please be sure to review and provide metrics required for Rapid Grants.


Target outcome Achieved outcome Explanation
Number of events 3 3 All planned events (2 online, 1 physical) were successfully held.
Number of participants 30 29 Almost all targeted participants engaged actively. Execpet to those that their account was block and those that were not able to open an account.
Number of new editors – 10+ 21 New editors joined through KWASU community forums and WhatsApp group
Number of articles improved – 200+ 1,060+ articles edited Articles were enriched with photos.


Prize Winners

[edit]

For events that involve giving out prizes, Usernames of the winners should be listed

Below are the top contributors:

  1. 🥇 User:Pet002 – First Place
  2. 🥈 User:Grace0011 – Second Place
  3. 🥉 User:Obapeace – Third Place

Learning

[edit]

Projects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future. Help the movement learn from your experience by answering the following questions:

  • What worked well?
  • What did not work so well?
  • What would you do differently next time?


Lessons Learned

[edit]

Projects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future.

What worked well

[edit]
  • We had a large turnout of members who showed great interest and participated actively in the program.
  • The event was very successful, and the planning and coordination went smoothly.
  • Team members worked together effectively, which made the program run well overall.

What did not work so well

[edit]
  • Some participants found Wikipedia editing quite complex, which limited their level of contribution.
  • A few members needed more time and practical support to fully understand how to edit and add images correctly.
  • We could not secure a very comfortable venue for the participants. The hall we planned to use had no electricity supply, which made the environment hot and uncomfortable.
  • We had to go the extra mile to get ventilation and equipment to make the venue a bit more comfortable, which increased stress and effort for the organizing team.


What I would do differently next time

[edit]
  • Secure a more comfortable and well-equipped venue ahead of time to ensure a better environment for participants.
  • Arrange for a reliable power supply or backup generator to avoid issues with electricity.
  • Provide more hands-on training and practical guidance to help new participants understand Wikipedia editing better.
  • Prepare logistics and materials earlier to reduce last-minute stress for the organizing team.
  • Assign specific roles to team members to make coordination smoother and reduce workload pressure.
  • Plan a follow-up session or mentorship program to help participants continue improving their editing skills after the main event.

Finances

[edit]

Grant funds spent

[edit]

Please describe how much grant money you spent for approved expenses, and tell us what you spent it on.

Remaining funds

[edit]

Do you have any remaining grant funds?


Photos from Event

[edit]

Photos of event activities should be shown here. (This is different from Wiki Loves photos)

Anything else?

[edit]

Anything else you want to share about your project?