Reports:Wikimedia UG Nigeria Grants/Wikimedia User Group Nigeria Community Support Fund/Report/Mr. Snatch/Wiki Loves Monuments in Maiduguri
Goals
[edit]Did you meet your goals? Are you happy with how the project went?
- I met my goals and I'm happy with how the project went.
Outcome
[edit]Please report on your original project targets. Please be sure to review and provide metrics required for Rapid Grants.
| Target outcome | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
| Number of events - 2 | 2 | |
| Number of participants - 20 | 20 | |
| Number of new editors - 10 | 13 | |
| Number of of articles improved - 50 | 180 | |
| Number of of images uploaded - 150 | 118 | https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Wikimedia_User_Group_Nigeria/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_in_Maiduguri |
Learning
[edit]Projects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future. Help the movement learn from your experience by answering the following questions:
- What worked well?
The Wiki Loves Monuments project in Maiduguri found success through several important factors:
- Community Involvement.
Local residents actively engaged in the project, which helped create a sense of pride and connection to their cultural heritage. This participation was crucial for fostering a collective ownership of the initiative.
- Raising Awareness.
The project effectively brought attention to Maiduguri's historical sites, emphasizing the importance of cultural preservation and education. This awareness encouraged community members to learn more about their local history.
- Variety in Contributions.
A diverse array of photographs was submitted, significantly enhancing the visual documentation of local monuments. This influx of images enriched Wikipedia's resources on Nigerian heritage, allowing for a broader representation of Maiduguri's cultural landscape.
- What did not work so well?
The Wiki Loves Monuments initiative in Maiduguri encountered significant obstacles due to severe flooding. Heavy rainfall caused many sites to become submerged, complicating access for participants who intended to document these monuments. This situation not only impeded photography efforts but also raised alarms about the preservation of cultural heritage, which is increasingly threatened by environmental challenges.
- What would you do differently next time?
Finances
[edit]Grant funds spent
[edit]Please describe how much grant money you spent for approved expenses, and tell us what you spent it on.
- Hall for one day event - 30,000
- Refreshments for participants - 2000×20=40,000
- Transport for organiser (this is for two organisers and two invited photographers transport expenses for all three days) 10,000×4=40,000
- 4 Designed T-Shirts for 2 Participants and 2 Photographers trainers, 7000×4=28,000
- Banner for the event - 15,000
- Contingency - 10,000
- Total - 163,000
Remaining funds
[edit]Do you have any remaining grant funds? No
Photos from Event
[edit]Photos of event activities should be shown here. (This is different from Wiki Loves photos)
-
Participants
-
participants
-
Participants
-
participants
-
participants
-
participants
-
organizer
-
participants
-
participants
-
organizer
-
participants
Anything else?
[edit]Anything else you want to share about your project?