टिप्पणी के लिए अनुरोध/वैश्विक दुर्व्यवहार फिल्टर/प्रस्ताव

Hello. As you probably know, AbuseFilter is a MediaWiki extension which is used to prevent vandalism and spam. More specifically, admins and other privileged users create "filters" which detect a certain pattern of abuse. The admin can make any filter "public" (where anyone can view the source and the log of all hits) or "private" (only privileged users can view the source and log). Abuse filters can match edits or other actions. From this point on, they may simply be referred to as "edits", so they are not confused with the action that the filter triggers. The admin can choose among the following actions to be triggered when a matching edit is found: tag the edit, prevent the edit, warn the user, or block the user (or none of these, or a combination). Whenever an edit trips the filter, it is logged. It is also possible to only rate limit certain patterns of editing using filters, but this is not the default.

AbuseFilters are a good tool for local admins to deal with spam, but what about cross-wiki spam/abuse? The work to create global abusefilters started in 2009, but was not completed for several years. In 2012, a proposal to create a "Global AbuseFilter" was created. A vote was held on the talk page, with a majority of supports, but it was not well-advertised and had little participation. For almost two years, the proposal was mostly dead, but the technical implementation continued (slowly). In 2014, Global AbuseFilters were enabled on a limited set of wikis (metawiki, specieswiki, incubatorwiki, testwiki, test2wiki, mediawikiwiki, and "small wikis"). This was the beginning of the trial phase. Global filters have recently been activated on "medium sized wikis" (list) as well. Some rules about global filters were proposed, but never completely accepted.

मुझे लगता है कि हमारे वैश्विक फिल्टर के बारे में कुछ नीतियां और दिशा-निर्देश होने चाहिए, इसलिए मैं निम्न में से किसी भी बिंदु पर चर्चा का प्रोत्साहन करता हूँ।

इसके अलावा, नए विचारों को प्रस्तावित करने के लिए स्वतंत्र महसूस करें, विशेषकर आरएफसी की शुरुआत में (इसलिए उन पर चर्चा करने का समय है)। अंततः, यह टिप्पणी के लिए एक अनुरोध है, वोट नहीं।

--PiRSquared17 (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

क्या क्रॉस-विकी फ़िल्टर मौजूद होना चाहिए?

मुझे ऐसा लगता है। यह क्रॉस-विकी दुर्व्यवहार (विशेष रूप से स्पैम) से निपटने में मदद करता है, और स्थानीय व्यवस्थापक के काम को आसान बनाता है।

वैश्विक दुरुपयोग फ़िल्टर और दुर्व्यवहार लॉग को बनाने/संपादित करने/देखने की अनुमति किसे होनी चाहिए?

Currently stewards and abuse filter editors can create, edit, and view global filters, and Meta admins can also view global filters. It is also possible for stewards to globally enable filters created by local Meta admins, because Global AbuseFilter is controlled from Meta-Wiki. Should there be a process to request abuse filter editor rights? Should global sysops be granted this right by default? Should local admins be allowed to view filters and disable them locally on a case-by-case basis, or at least view the abuse log?

उन्हें किस लिए इस्तेमाल किया जाना चाहिए?

वर्तमान में: क्रॉस विकी स्पैम और बर्बरता। जो दुरुपयोग केवल एक या दो विकी को प्रभावित करता है उनके लिए स्थानीय फ़िल्टर का उपयोग किया जाना चाहिए। वैश्विक फिल्टर का उपयोग स्पैमर्स या बर्बरता के लिए किया जाना चाहिए जो वास्तव में कई विकीओं को प्रभावित करते हैं। और कुछ?

किस कार्रवाई की अनुमति दी जानी चाहिए?

Previously proposed: Filters which do anything other than tagging should have the non-tagging actions removed after 1 week of no valid (non-false-positive) hits of the global filter.

The blocking function is available because Meta decided to use it locally and global filters depend on the AbuseFilter interface of Meta. It was previously proposed that global filters should not get the block function set until a real policy about using it has been created, but this proposed guideline has been ignored a few times; for example, there was very recently a blocking global filter (although there probably weren't many false positives on that one). Some possibilities: no blocking, blocking but only after warning, allow blocking in specific cases, always allow blocking. Should local admins be able to control which actions of the global filter apply to their wiki?

मौजूदा फ़िल्टर की समीक्षा

Perhaps stewards and Meta admins should review the last 200 hits of each active global abuse filter (as of this RfC), and count the number of false positives.

In the future, maybe stewards should disable filters with no hits after a certain time, or disable non-tagging actions (see previous section).

डिफ़ॉल्ट रूप से किन विकी पर इस को लागू करना चाहिए?

Proposed: Maybe small and medium sized wikis by default, but allow opting out or in. More specific?