Requests for comment/Global ban for Taksen
The following request for comments is closed. With so little participation in almost 3 weeks, poor handling of notifications, and no clear reason why the user qualifies for a global ban (other than merely being blocked on 3 projects), it's safe to say there is no consensus for a global ban. //shb (t • c) 23:27, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Taksen (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) The user has been permanently blocked in the three largest sections: English, German, and Dutch. Участник заблокирован бессрочно в трёх крупнейших разделах: английском, немецком и нидерландском. de:Spezial:Beiträge/Taksen, en:Special:Contributions/Taksen, nl:Speciaal:Bijdragen/Taksen. In Russian Wikipedia he has problems too (deleting of sources): https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Косоротов,_Дмитрий_Петрович&diff=prev&oldid=152268763 https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Лазоверт,_Станислав_Сергеевич&diff=prev&oldid=152269193
Discussion: w:ru:Википедия:Форум администраторов#Taksen
I request a global ban for Taksen. Запрашиваю глобальный бан. Lesless (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- Спасибо за замечание. Я понимаю требование ВП:ПРОВ и в дальнейшем буду сразу приводить источники для нетривиальных утверждений.
- Удаление или сокращение некоторых сносок было связано с заменой на более надёжные источники (в частности, современные исследования, такие как Smith и Nelipa). В дальнейшем буду делать это более явно и аккуратно, без удаления проверяемой информации без замены.
- Если есть конкретные замечания по источникам, готов обсудить.Taksen (talk) 20:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Lesless as per global bans policy you need to inform the user about the discussion on all wikis where they are active and the community on all wikis where the user has edited as you have not yet done this. Thanks, A09|(pogovor) 21:31, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Lesless: I have now done this for you, though it's filer's burden to notify the affected communities. A09|(pogovor) 11:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- Comment nlwiki: This was before my time but this account and their alt account T. Tichelaar (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) have been blocked for a privacy violation on nlwiki, the edits have since been removed by oversight. This is the original request with two links to the edits that the request was based on: nl:Wikipedia:Verzoekpagina voor moderatoren/RegBlok/Archief39#Taksen. Elphie (they/them) (Talk) 11:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
- TacoTichelaar (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is another alt according to the block on dewiki. Elphie (they/them) (Talk) 11:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Weak support per above. Tendentiousness will not be tolerated. Just listen to advice. Ahri Boy (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per above. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 20:22, 24 March 2026 (UTC)- Support per above - Squasher (talk) 10:02, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose a global block is better in this situation Cyberwolf (talk) 16:20, 25 March 2026 (UTC)- Tentative oppose. Probably a language barrier, but I'm having trouble understanding the grounds of the request. From what I see, the user is banned on two wikis for seemingly different reasons, and is causing some unclear issues on Russian Wikipedia - that's not grounds in itself for a ban. The request needs to be considerably refactored in my opinion, demonstrating how the user's actions meet the conditions for a global ban - past requests can help there. Leaderboard (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Neutral per language barrier Another Wiki User the 3rd (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)- Support per above- TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose No demonstrated need for a global ban - simply being blocked on multiple projects isn't enough. If there is minor-level cross-wiki disruption going on, a global block could be applied instead. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
