A committee member provided the following comment:
According to the article Reforms of Portuguese orthography, Portuguese and Brazilian philologists and institutions support unified language. Consequently, the basis for the request doesn't exist. --Millosh (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
135x135 PNG derivative from a decent SVG image (instructions)
So, what is the real future of Portuguese? To the best of my knowledge, there have two parties, one Support spliting pt: to a Portugal one, and a Brazillian one, another Oppose it, and may supports implementing Language Converter (see phab:T28121). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)