A committee member provided the following comment:
It is not a language, no ISO 639-1 or 639-3 code has been assigned, and it is difficult to think that it is a valid request. --Sotiale (talk) 11:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
This would be a Wikipedia that anyone could understand (not that it would be easy at first) and that anyone could edit. This Wikipedia might also make the first widespread standardized use of emoji (however that is not one of the reasons I am proposing this). Also the only reason the name of the language is in Unicode is because apparently you can't use emojis on Wikimedia. --2007Gtbot (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No. It's not a language. It's not LTR; it takes the directionality of its embedded text. Communicating any complex sentence is impossible without grammar.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]