A committee member provided the following comment:
In general, Vicipaedia (Latin Wikipedia) if anything favors classical Latin over Vatican Latin, all other things being equal. If you don't think that is being done correctly, comment at la:Vicipaedia:Taberna. For LangCom: StevenJ81 (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
This is a proposal for a new Latin Wikipedia which does NOT use Vatican Latin. If ang: and en: are separate, Roman Latin should be separate from la-va: --KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]