This proposal has been rejected. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy based on the discussion on this page.
A committee member provided the following comment:
This proposal is rejected because the proposed ISO code(kgz) is invalid and cannot be considered unique if it differs only in the written alphabet. Also, no other sufficient reason was given. --Sotiale (talk) 06:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Enable uploads
no
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
It’s a Latin verse of Kyrgyz language. We have a Latin script for a 1926 year, but we still use Cyrillic script. There is the new Kyrgyz Latin alphabet.
Oppose I would say that such requests are harmful, creating a separated wiki just for another scripts would not give any benefits for any remote users, but rather outdated contents and lots of splittism bedrooms, I would urge kywiki users to instead discuss introducing language conversion system. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
