A committee member provided the following comment:
A fictional constructed language without native speakers. --Millosh (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
Quenya is the most popular of Tolkien-created languages; in enwiki there is more than 100 users who know quenya and, maybe, can egit this wiki. In ruwiki there is a user that speaks natively. --Cat of the Six (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeOne can't have a Wikipedia with an ISO 639-3 language code, period. Even after that, qya is a valid ISO 639-3 code. Still, the only artificial languages to get Wikipedias have languages designed for human communication, not for artistic reasons. The Klingon Wikipedia was moved from Wikipedia to Wikia; see History of the Klingon Wikipedia. Quenya would suffer the same problems, including I believe an even more incomplete grammar and vocabulary.--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, but support in the future. --188.8.131.52 04:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, there is a Wikia for this, which I support. Elenire (talk) 15:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is no recognition nor a valid ISO language code. Does it even have a complete grammar? This is a artistic-purposed language, not intended for human communication. --Zerabat (discusión) 13:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
qya is a valid ISO 639-3 code for the language.--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]