A committee member provided the following comment:
Currently, proposals for simple projects are not accepted for general reasons. I am declining this request as no good reason is given to revisit the original decision. --Sotiale (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
I’d like this to be here, for complicated words would just be dumbed down to maybe a 4th or 5th grader level of Spanish. Any ideas on the website name?SikiWtideI (talk) 19:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment am I not mistaken that "simple" projects are now discouraged by LangCom? If so, I oppose the creation of a Simple Spanish project – I remain skeptical that this project won't become an identical copy of eswiki. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 06:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]