Requests for new languages/Wikipedia South Korean

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

South Korean Wikipedia[edit]

main page Requests for new languages (Wikipedia South Korean)
submitted verification final decision
Process-stop.svg This proposal has been rejected.
This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy based on the discussion on this page.

The closing committee member provided the following comment:

A Wikipedia in this language already exists. There is no linguistic evidence that this is a separate language. We will never create a South Korean Wikipedia unless we also allow for American English, Brazilian Portuguese, Finland-Swedish and the like. Jon Harald Søby 12:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Proposal summary
  • Language details: South korean (대한민국 표준어, ko ISO_639-1)
  • Editing community: WonYong (NP), (N)
    List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your
    name if you are a native speaker of this language.
  • Relevant pages: development wiki project
  • External links:
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Language information[edit]

  • South Korean is the language of South Korea.
  • North Korean language is so much different.
  • South Korean means Seoul dialects.
  • South Korean laguage people numbers are about 50,000,000.
  • Korean Wikipedia is aleasy exists. It is for South and North korea. (Korea = South + North) Korean Wikipedia is not for South Korean.
  • This South Korean version is only for south korean official language.

Arguments in favour[edit]

Arguments against[edit]

Now, whilst I am not an expert on any variety of the Korean language, this request seems superfluous. Surely 99.9% of the native speakers on Korean wiki will be from the South? How many North Koreans have access to the internet? I don't see how anything productive can come from a split. If there is a South Korean wiki and a general Korean wiki, there will be a lot of repetition, and one (almost certainly the new one) will fail to survive. If there is a North Korean and a South Korean wiki, the North Korean one will have only a few editors (very patriotic emigrants and people in North Korea who are very brave and very techno-savvy), due to the regime there. Either that, or it will be filled with propaganda from Kim Jong Il's computer hackers. LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is a ridiculous idea. The 99.9% the Korean Wikipedia users are from South Korea, and even the 0.1% of foreigners are now using “South Korean”, not “North Korean”. So this is a useless thought. --Hnc197 12:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ridiculous? you insult me? Korean wikipedia says it is south Korean wikipedia and also north Korean wikipedia. Requests for new languages/Wikipedia jeju is what? Korean wikipedia insist they are all korean lagauge wikipedia. -- WonYong (talk contribs count logs page moves block log email) 14:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

General discussion[edit]

다음은 이 버전을 신청한 취지입니다:

국적 불명의 위키백과를 거부하고, 대한민국 위키백과를 추구합니다. 설마...다 남쪽 사람이 쓰는데, 무슨 국적불명? 초보 사용자시군요. 실상은 그렇지 않습니다. 매우 어리둥절 할 거라고 봅니다. 이제는 그 곳에서 바꾸는 것도 지겹고 해서, 새로운 시도를 해봅니다.

대한민국의 법률에도 분명하게 표준어를 쓰라고 나와있는데, "한국어 위키백과"는 대한민국 표준어와 북한 표준어를 모두 쓸 수 있어야지, 대한민국 언어를 써야 한다는 것은 중립 위반이라면서, 국적 불명의 해석을 하고 있습니다. 대한민국 법률을 중립성 위반이라고 지적하고 있기에 수용 불가합니다. 위헌도 아니고 중립성 위반이랍니다!!

그래서, 이 위키백과 대한민국 표준어 버전을 새로 만들었습니다.

본 위키백과는 매우 개방적이면서도, 합리적인 정책을 추구하여, 훨씬 혁신된 위키백과를 구성해 나갈 것입니다.

특히 대한민국 법률이 중립성 위반이라는 식으로 대한민국의 헌정질서를 무시하는 태도는 금지되면서도, 매우 민주적이면서 효율적인 프로젝트가 될 것입니다.

관리자도 1년임기로 일부씩 나눠서 새로 선출될 것이며, 입법, 사법, 행정의 3권이 분리되어 여러 사용자들이 크게 다투지 않으면서도 매우 합리적으로 운용될 것입니다.

무엇보다, 국적불명을 배격합니다.

분명히 지적하는데, 이 위키백과는 북한의 위키백과가 아닙니다. 조선족이나 재일교포나 재미교포의 위키백과도 아닙니다. 주체는 서울말을 쓰면서 대한민국의 헌정질서를 존중하는 사용자입니다. -- WonYong (talk contribs count logs page moves block log email) 10:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So rapid conclusion... w:Korean language North-South differences -- WonYong (talk contribs count logs page moves block log email) 14:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am aware of that page, yes (and also was when rejecting). I am also aware of w:American and British English differences, and that doesn't change the fact that English, or Korean, each is one language with several varieties. Jon Harald Søby 20:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]