A committee member provided the following comment:
The ISO codes given are for other languages. No evidence could be found that a language called Tsukurian exists; and neither seems the text below in #Proposal be a valid language. --MF-W 23:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
I think I can guess some of the meaning of the text. πr2 (t • c) 23:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It seems to mention en:Inuinnaqtun, Finland, and Greenland. However, it seems to use several uncommon Latin letters, like German Eszett "ß" = "ss", thorn "Þ" = "th" (used in Old English to Icelandic), engma [?] (user probably meant to write an engma, not an eta, based on "Filandinii" and "Innui[n]aqtun"). I can tell you this is not Tswana after working with local users on the tn:already-existing Tswana Wikipedia, and learning some basics of the language. It looks nothing like a Bantu language (like Tswana). πr2 (t • c) 23:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(sigh) I apologize, folks. I was ten years old and wanted to have Wikipedia in my own made-up language so badly. Guillermo2149 (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]