Requests for new languages/Wikisource Belorussian

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

See also second request (approved)

Belorussian Wikisource[edit]

main page Requests for new languages (Wikisource Belorussian)
submitted verification final decision
Process-stop.svg This proposal has been rejected.
This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy based on the discussion on this page.

The closing committee member provided the following comment:

The Language Committee members refuse to invest their time and work on any of the two Belarusian Communities until they start to peacefully co-operate with each other as all wmf entities are expected to do. --Bèrto 'd Sèra 21:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal summary
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Arguments in favour[edit]

  • Belorussian language has a developed culture, including literature, and should have its own Wikisource. This Wikisource will also be useful for studies of Belorussian cuture, laws, language, and I hope this project can unite all Belorussians despite of their political views, and work with this project can lessen the contradictions in Belorussian Internet-society. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 14:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments against[edit]

  • {{oppose}}: Please start inserting new texts at the and categorize it properly; See also 555 11:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • We already do this, see RC of But we use this place too, for attract more attention to the Belorussian problems and maybe gain more contributors to the test Wikisource. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 12:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yes, I see it. But please remeber to categorize all of these pages using a category specifc to the belorussian language. I'm removing the oppose due to this (I don't have anything against this language, I only need to all going to be done orderly) 555 23:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General discussion[edit]

  • Since this wikisource edition should be a collection of original text in whatever orthography they have been originally written, I sincerely hope that this project will unite the two camps which currently run separate wikipedia editions (be: and be-x-old:) --Johannes Rohr 22:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • PS: I don't know about Belarusian copyright law - Are the works of Janka Kupala already in the public domain? IIRC, according to German law, this takes 70 years after the author's death. What are the regulations in Belarus? --Johannes Rohr 22:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]