This language has been verified as eligible. The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page.
Once the criteria are met, the language committee can proceed with the approval.
If you think the criteria are met, but the project is still waiting for approval, feel free to notify the committee and ask them to consider its approval.
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.
"Wikiversity talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Enable uploads
no
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
"Continent/City", e.g. "Europe/Brussels" or "America/Mexico City" (see list of valid timezones)
Additional namespaces
For example, a Wikisource would need "Page", "Page talk", "Index", "Index talk", "Author", "Author talk".
Additional settings
Anything else that should be set
submit Phabricator task. It will include everything automatically, except additional namespaces/settings. After creating the task, add a link to the comment.
Simple vote? Are you sure you saw my argument below? --Ali 13:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Here, it's the vote, there it's the discussion, a discussion may be not a argument, so duplicate here your argument to make counted the vote and to make easier the work of the language subcommittee.Crochet.david 15:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i can teach gilaki grammerfarshid 07:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
we are intrested in survey on gilaki language213.217.32.90 07:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)alborzReply[reply]
This is one out of 5 proposals for a Gilaki wiki. Though Limburgish has so many proposals too there's a difference. There's no activity and Gilaki does not seem to be ready get for a Wikibooks, a Wikinews, a Wikiquote, a Wiktionary nor a Wikiversity. Maybe this will change in the future but not now. If there's any activity shown, I'll become in favour of this request. --OosWesThoesBes 15:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
--Ilaria - scrivimi 19:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Gilaki wikipedia has only 1500 articlesReply[reply]
Although i support this project and i hope to having separate sub-domain, but i'm not sure to having at least 10 native & active contributers. --Ali 13:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
