A committee member provided the following comment:
Language code represents Carribean Hindustani; "Hindustani" (meaning Hindi and Urdu taken as one effectively seamless whole) actually does not have a langcode of its own. It's a good question in theory whether or not to have combined Hindi-Urdu projects. But in truth we already have established Hindi and Urdu Wiktionaries. So unless the members of those two projects tell us they want to merge, this is not going to happen. For LangCom: StevenJ81 (talk) 18:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wiktionary talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
There are already Hindi, Urdu, and Fiji Hindi (incubator) Wiktionaries. Please explain why you think they should be merged — should this apply to the Wikipedias in these languages as well? πr2 (t • c) 22:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)