Research:Committee/Areas of interest/Subject recruitment
How to submit a request for subject recruitment
Please refer to these instructions
How will researchers reach potential subjects? So far, we've discussed:
- Talk page: good for researching experienced editors since it fits within community norms. Not as good for researching new editors as new editors may not be aware that they even have talk pages. Aaron's SubjectRecruitmentBot
- Email: good for researching novice editors, probably not as good for researching experienced editors. Used for Former Contributors Survey. Open question (as described in Mani's mail) is what percentage of registered users actually have email addresses.
- Central message notice (or something similar): good for reaching a broad base of users (including readers), though UNU-Merit survey had a disproportionately high percentage of users from Russia
Each method should have a way for users to opt-out of receiving future communications
How do we target users to ensure:
- Researchers reach the right users for the study (e.g., to minimize bias that would be detrimental to the research)
- Editors don't get bombarded with survey requests
How will approvals be granted for survey projects? Aaron has been working on SRAG, a community-involved approvals group approach. This group would have purview over not only activities of the SubjectRecruitmentBot, but also other methods of contacting users.
What software would researchers use to conduct surveys? Currently, the following two options are being used (though others should be considered):
- Mediawiki Survey System: See the next version of the survey system.
English Wikipedia Attempt
- Create an official mechanism for mass subject recruitment to take place
- Protect the community (and individuals) from the disruption that mass recruitment could cause
Along with these two official documents, a few essays were drafted with the intention that they be used as tool for educating Wikipedians:
- en:WP:What are these researchers doing in my Wikipedia
- en:WP:Don't bite the researchers
- en:User:PiperNigrum/Research_study_recruitment_of_Wikipedians (in progress)
- Oct., 2009: PiperNigrum, EpochFail, Staeiou, Phoebe, et al. meet to discuss subject recruitment @ WikiSym
- Nov., 2009: work begins on what will be en:WP:Research and en:WP:SRAG
- Mar., 2010: an RFC is started by EpochFail to upgrade en:WP:Research to policy and en:WP:SRAG to guideline status
- Apr. 7, 2010: RFC to upgrade en:WP:Research to policy and en:WP:SRAG to guideline supported (consensus determined by uninvolved editor)
- Apr. 8, 2010: Both pages nominated for deletion, but kept.
- May, 2010: Downgraded to draft proposal after lengthy discussion and disputed policy status.