Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media/Candidates

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a list of organizations that frequently re-use Commons media, identified through word of mouth or simple Google searches.

Please add additional sources of which you're aware to the bottom of the table!

org name website notes (optional)
The Outline
The Conversation
Atlas Obscura
Alliance for Networking Visual Culture
Social Networks and Archival Context
Smart History
Creative Commons
Ars Technica
The Stroud Courier
Hoodline Example: [1] Missvain (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
The Star Example; [2] Missvain (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Inquisitr They used two of my images but failed to credit me, just credit Commons. [3]
Mega Sports News Example: [4][5]
SiriusXM Example: [6]
Across Virginia Example: [7]
Culture Trip Example: [8]
NOS crediting comes and goes in waves. Many more media organizations do the same.
Medscape Example: [9]
The Patch Could be exclusive to DC Patch. Example: [10]
Only In Your State Example: [11]
Zielony Ogrodekopl Example: [12]
Phoenix Business Journal Example: [13]
WETA Example: [14]
Nevada Public Radio Example: [15]
National Park Service Example: [16]
USports Example: [17]
The Scientist Example: [18] They did credit correctly at one point in time, but at the moment they only credit the creator by username, no mention of site or license.
Encyclopaedia Britannica example Here's an image they've imported from commons, they credit the photographer by name, but that's all
Web Archive Example - they link authors to Wikipedia articles
Goethe Institut example They did use several of my images and always credit me with the username