Steward requests/Permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Permissions) latest archive
This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived by a bot. Click here for a list of archives.

  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions | Unexpired temporary access

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page[edit]

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]").

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement[edit]

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests[edit]

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

 and also mistakes. Thank you. 
}}

Administrator access[edit]

See administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests. Approved temporary access requests are listed at SRAT. Requests are moved to that page by a bot.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

For permanent adminship, please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary adminship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.

Alp Er Tunqa@azbwiki[edit]

This wiki also has only one active admin--Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Three support, two oppose. I am not sure that there exists a consensus to grant you even a temporal adminship. Ruslik (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done Discussion open sufficient length of time with significant opposition. The link in request is old; current opinions are even more opposed. Even though some of the opposition seems to be "newer" members who may have only edited to partake in the discussion, the oppositiion of established users is significant enough to demonstrate there is no consensus to allow Alp Er Tunqa access to the administrative toolkit on AzbWiki at this time. Thank you for volunteering. -- Avi (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Tarawneh@arwikinews[edit]

The request since 1 March. Thanks--Alaa :)..! 19:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Is this request for temporary one permanent ? please read my comments below Mardetanha talk 22:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@Mardetanha: As I saw he not mention that in his request, but in wikinews community we prefer permanent -if can- because there is no administrators there! Thanks--Alaa :)..! 22:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Again as I said before we can not grant permanent access for small projects Mardetanha talk 08:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Mardetanha: okay for 6 month please, because User:Tarawneh wanna to work in subproject to develop arwikinews. Thanks--Alaa :)..! 15:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
What is the purpose of asking such unhelpful questions instead of acting on the request? --MF-W 23:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-21. --MF-W 23:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Atcovi@viwikibooks[edit]

Requesting sysopship Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-22. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. Please remember to translate the interface at translatewiki.net only and preferably upload images to Wikimedia Commons. To prolong your adminship, please come back a few days before the status expires or hold a local election if the community grows. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Note: already one month sysop, so term extended. -- Avi (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Why don't you remove the temporary admin rights and then immediately assign them again as other stewards are doing? Stryn (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
I think that's unnecessary, unless the idea is to have a log of the most recent discussion? Otherwise, what's the point? -- Avi (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Joined the "cool kids" and double flipped :). -- Avi (talk) 19:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
We should do this, because the temporary user rights feature is not live yet. Also, if you are not aware of Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary... Stryn (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access[edit]

See bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access[edit]

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • Temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by stewards.

Cgt@dawiki[edit]

Cgt (talk) 20:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Oversight access[edit]

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by stewards.

  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.


Removal of access[edit]

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted user from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

Xoser@diq.wikipedia[edit]

This sysop not active. Xarpêtıj (talk) 07:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Is this backed up by an inactivity policy? --MF-W 09:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
I dont know, but inactivity policy near 2 years. He has been inactive since 19.09.2014. Xarpêtıj (talk) 13:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
A request for removal has been opened on diq.wiki. Are there any local policies regulating these type of requests? Savhñ 15:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
AAR will hit the project shortly so unless this is covered by a local inactivity policy or consensus is achieved meanwhile I'd suggest to close this as not done and wait either for us for AAR or for the consensus. —MarcoAurelio 10:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: diq:Wikipedia:Portalê cemaeti/Sysop Removal of access requests. Savhñ 11:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

长夜无风@zh.wikipedia[edit]

User:长夜无风 has been inactive longer than 6 months that local policy prescribed, and still be inactive after notified over 1 month. As a local Bcrat I hereby request for removing both of its sysop and bcrat flag, Thank you. --Kegns 17:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. Defender (talk) 17:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

和平奮鬥救地球@zh.wikipedia[edit]

I would be no more active on Chinese Wikipedia for maybe a long period of time. To prevent my account being hacked and misused the right of admin, I request for removal of my admin access. Thanks.- Peace1 (talk) at 12:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24h. einsbor talk 13:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

和平奮鬥救地球@zh.wikinews[edit]

I would be no more active on Chinese Wikinews for maybe a long period of time. To prevent my account being hacked and misused the right of bureaucrat and admin, I request for removal of my bureaucrat and admin access. Thanks.- Peace1 (talk) at 12:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24h per standard practice. einsbor talk 13:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Nemo_bis@itwikisource[edit]

Please remove my importer flag, which I got for a one-time import some years ago. There are no such new imports in sight, I'll ask the flag again if needed. Nemo 18:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Done. According to the rights log, it should only have been temporary for 6 months. Savhñ 19:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests[edit]

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

Importer on test.Wikipedia and test2.Wikipedia[edit]

I am importer of it.wikiversity and administrator of it.wikiversity beta.wikiversity test.wikipedia and test2.wikipedia. I would need the flag of test.Wikipedia and test2.Wikipedia to do various tests with the use of the XML file import tool for it.wikiversity to practice some import duties and to have sufficient practice to request the flag Importer on new wikis in the future to help out at communities who want to open a new wiki and finished the incubation stage (in particular new wikiversity). I ask the flag in both test wiki to test import with the various extensions installed, especially with: Extension Translate (test.Wikipedia) and Extension Education_Program (test2.Wikipedia). Thanks Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

On test wiki you should probably request the import right locally and then come here if there is a consensus. Ruslik (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC) On test2wiki the page is test2wiki:Wikipedia:Administrators_and_bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes thank you I had not made the request to them because they still need the intervention of a steward and considering they are the test wiki I have not made the request there, but I do now. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Before you play around with the translation tool on even more wikis, you should maybe fix this. Also, if by "the flag Importer on new wikis" you mean that one I think about, testing something with the Translate and Education Program extensions will be of no help. --MF-W 10:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
I re-explain better I need to flag impraticirmi with imports in general to be able to make the best use of the tool properly and it.Wikiversity. I should also testareg effects of an import them to pages that relate to the extension because of Education_Program it.Wikiversity we are considering to install the extension and would like to see if the import of pages of this extension imports the pages as the other, or has something different. Also I need to force the flag on test.Wikipedia translate extension of already translated pages because at this time the extent of test.Wikipedia has problems (I have already done so to report it on Phabricator) and whereas I am by installing the extension translate even on beta.Wikiversity I would need to do tests to import pages already translated from Meta-Wiki and I need to test this thing without the risk of doing damage on beta.Wikiversity. sorry if my English is not good </ small> --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 15:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
What does "impraticirmi" and "testareg" mean? --MF-W 20:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment Comment I believe that a consensus in this situation is unnecessary. These are not community wikis or content, they are test wikis and therefore there is no risk that any significant damage can be caused with the permits. The user that requests them is well established in several projects and I believe that I do not see any problem in granting them (at least temporarily). At some point when I asked them to also request a test wiki, I was not asked for a community consensus as it is being done here. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 16:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

In fact, significant damage can be caused with this group even on testwiki. --MF-W 20:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Indeed - you can really mess things rather badly with importupload. —MarcoAurelio 21:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
But I have no intention of doing damage. I know how the importupload and I have already used this feature many times on it.wikiversity so I do not run the risk of doing damage And if I had to do some damage I could still delete massively imported pages. And then the amount of pages that put them in a subpage user:Samuele2002/test import so as to avoid possible problems. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


See also[edit]