Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Checkuser) latest archive
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Symbol wait.svg Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}: Duck It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  1. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  1. Make sure there are no local checkusers or policies.
  2. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    

    For example:

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests[edit]

Ortografonazi@pt.wikt[edit]

@ValJor: Do you have a list of recent confirmed sockpuppets so, in case we accept this request, we can compare? Best regards. —MarcoAurelio 11:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Not recent, no. The last time he attacked pt.wikt was in 2013
ValJor (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Asif@ps.wiki[edit]

Could you please elaborate why you think Khangul is behind this? I see that many other people are also opposing the last vote. Remember that Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. —MarcoAurelio 22:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
he (Asif/Watanwal) is using the same language in his comments as Khangul used in other discussions.--94.99.231.138 00:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Ahsoous@et.wikipedia[edit]

Kruusamägi Since the user has 50k edits and is a sysop on etwiki, could you notify the local community (village pump, sysops' noticeboard, etc.) of your request? Elfix 20:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Technically, thous comments in question are already in the village pump. I'd make the question there, even thou I don't see this as a very suitable place, as that might fuel thous nasty comments, that should not be there in the first place. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

See also[edit]