Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-03

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in March 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests

Caroline Rossini@pt.wikipedia

 Confirmed:

  • Caroline Rossini
  • John Alan Alves da Silva
  • Cyphorhinus Uradus
  • Jorge Luiz Thais Martins
  • O Mestre P-Sião
  • Wet12
  • Caroline Rossini
  • Rubber Ducky
  • Tomate Atômico
  • Draftholds
  • Hum Milhão
  • Katzeirms
  • São Silvestre
  • Cachorro Louco
  • Pepita Negra
  • WikiLord
  • Semiramis Marx
  • J.Cajuru
  • Gerson Nunes Pereira
  • Thulsa Subotai
  • Tomate Atômico
  • Pé Espalhado
  • Ilha de Vera Cruz
  • Veloster
Unrelated Unrelated: Peveratt

--Shizhao (talk) 07:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh great, it was almost the cluster I found some days ago and I had no time to fulfill an investigation. --Vituzzu (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Vituzzu, fiz essa mesma pergunta aqui, e a discussão foi arquivada. Depois que ocorreu verificação, aconteceu grande efeito: votações de páginas para exclusão tiveram resultados modificados e que alguns desses usuários tiveram estatuto de reversor e auto-reversor removidos. Quando for no dia 1º de março, vou colocar outra verificação pra você.
Translate to English: Vituzzu, made ​​this same question here, and the discussion has been archived. After checking what happened, great effect happened: votes for deletion page results had changed and that some of these users had auto-reverser and reverser status' removed. When the March 1, I'll put another check for you. Bruno Leonard (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
CheckUser is not for fishing??????????????????? Caroline Rossini (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Alguém pode bloquear a conta Caroline Rossini e entre outras verificadas no Meta???
Translate to English: Someone can lock the account and Caroline Rossini and others checked in Meta? Bruno Leonard (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

胡雪岩之思@zh.wikipedia

 Confirmed fr33kman 01:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Karyne Lira Dias@pt.wikipedia

  • Related requests:

--viniciusmc (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

 Confirmed
  • group1: Kascyo, Thallison Keiton
  • group2: Duduzimm, KIBCRU
  • group3: WikiGT, Mareshenrique
  • group4: PolyDisneyeNick,Jancen sergio
Possible Possible: group1, group2, group3, group4, Karyne Lira Dias, after the result of check

--Shizhao (talk) 07:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hy Shizhao! At ptwiki, we're having a little bit of trouble trying to guess what that "Possible" means and, 'cause of it, we'd like to have some expert opinion. Those users you listed in paired groups should be considered as related to Karyne (and, through her, to the enormous sock farm you guys just uncovered) or as innocent bystanders to be proven guilty by a thorough behavioral analysys? Thx for the help. José Luiz talk 01:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
From a technical point, these users is Possible Possible. These users use lot of dynamic IP, each group to use a different IP range, UAs is a small part of the same--Shizhao (talk) 01:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
UAs? José Luiz talk 02:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
I beg your pardon, Shizhao, but perhaps I did not make myself clear before: What do you mean by "UAs is a small part of the same"? Thanks again. José Luiz talk 23:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
UA => UserAgent--Shizhao (talk) 01:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated fr33kman 01:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Guru2001@pt.wikipedia

I want to do an addendum: all these accounts above are disruptive. Attempt to subvert the system of Wikipedia, try to put data with non-reliable sources, they try to discredit reliable sources as not to be. Prevent other editors move in the articles, watch for anyone tamper with their version of the article. They fight with everyone, never come into consensus, always cause problems. 186.205.20.49 00:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Declined Declined Please log in to request checkuser. MBisanz talk 00:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
I request this request be done on behalf of the Ip. Tough I think some accounts are not related with each other, (Dornicke and Luizpuodzius seem to be different people) there is certainly enough evidence to do the check. (and there is no way to know without a check if one of them is related to Guru). Chico (talk) 00:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Guru2001 & Peacekeeper are Stale
Al Lemos, Emerson Almeida, Dornicke, and Luizpuodzius are Unrelated Unrelated
Dominator Possible Possible match to Genaron
Tigre do oeste Possible Possible match to Jazzista, Artjodo, and Jebelmir
Waiting for second review given my new experience. MBisanz talk 01:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Looks okay from my side. — Tanvir | Talk ] 03:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Please confirm all the possible interconnections between these users. 189.106.124.34 12:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Just for the record: the IP who requested this check has been blocked dozens of times of editing in the Portuguese Wikipedia for vandalism, uncivil behavior, etc. He became such a a problem that a proposal of insight block for this IP has been made [1], with large support from the community, including administrators. He also has made a death threat against me [2]. Dornicke (talk) 06:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

186.205.20.49@pt.wikipedia

I really recommend to the steward that read this request to do not accept it. Not enough reason to check was shown here IMO. It is just fishing.” Teles (Talk) ███ 16:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
As Teles said above, you did not gave any valid reason to check these accounts. Plus I doubt that somebody here is ready to establish a link between the accounts of contributors and the IP they used. Please remember that Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

189.106.124.34@pt.wikipedia

I would recommend the same as Teles in another request (above), and i'd also recommend to ignore all requests from this user from now on. Just my two cents. CasteloBrancomsg 18:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done per above. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Thongkaka

Status:    Done

Trijnstel has recently CU'ed some accounts on MediaWiki.org, and locked Thongkaka28, Thongkaka27, Thongkaka26 and Thongkaka45. Today, Thongkaka50 spammed on that project. Please consider checking that account and blocking its underlying IP (perhaps globally). Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done blocked in MWW. --Jyothis (talk) 12:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

  • As an addition to this, I globally locked all known Thongkaka* accounts + some other confirmed socks. I can't globally block an IP address or range. Please keep reporting any new Thongkaka accounts. Thanks in advance for your effort! Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Vituzzu (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Kuailong@zh.wikipedia

I believe it is current practice that requests have to be made by registered users, please log in. Snowolf How can I help? 11:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Kuailong is a long term contributor who happened to do the same thing in a edit/reverting war on one article. No other overlap besides edits on that particular article. Bencmq (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
That is not only a edit/reverting war,but also a serious Vandalism, because what they added was huge blog information, just like advertisements. --Pangyanice (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
I do not see any reason to CU anybody in this case. Ruslik (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

ArikamaI@zh.wikipedia

If you could write your own reasons and not copy and paste exactly from User:Gakmo's request (the one about you) above. Bencmq (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
because this is a same problem, but those users continue attempting to remove link and information, eg: zh:點解阿Sir係阿Sir, zh:名媛望族etc.....therefore I need your help,thanks!--Rightpeople (talk) 04:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Not done at this time. A revert war is not a reason to run checkuser. If there is evidence of sock puppets, then the admins should bring that issue forward. This is a local issue and there are plenty of admins available to sort this out at zhwiki. billinghurst sDrewth 18:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Onetseneed@zh.wikipedia

I can confirm that Onesetneed, Angleasked, Uponhelpdd, Limitsouls, Moneygiven are all at two IPs, and would be considered associated. To note that there are also significant numbers of other blocked accounts at these IP addresses. I will leave these accounts to your management. Other stewards have already taken action against the IP addresses though I have tightened the block due to the existing circumventions. billinghurst sDrewth 13:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Noting that the request says to block confirmed accounts, now done. billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, billinghurst!! --Miroir (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

      • The following accounts are  Confirmed to be related to each other:
        Jordan Michael (already blocked)
        Arthur Chevailier (already blocked)
        Olávio Teixeira (already blocked)
        Frodo Bolseiro
        Pararatibum
        Cinthia gabrielle0
        Peregrin blocked
        Carl Carvalho
        Willer Mack (already blocked)
        Paulo salomao
        Liragabriel
        Legal Fiel
        Bilau6
        Bilau5 (already blocked)
        Evil land
        Olhares Daqui pra Nos
        Kamilaaah
        Arthur Fontaine (already blocked)
        Robert77
      • --Bencmq (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

아프리카산림영양@ko.wikipedia

I give you more users of showering abuses to Chugun.
  • 츄군꼬치애무해주기
  • Chugun's zazi is very thick
  • 항문성교의달인츄군
  • 국철옥색선과츄군의빠구리행각
  • 츄군꼬치에서나온좃물
  • 츄군자지졸라크네
  • 츄군민주화연대
  • 츄군덕스럽게

--RedMosQ (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I performed the check and the results are a bit complicated. I tried to explain the best I can below.
Notably, there are different groups of users and I found no relation between the different groups. Every accounts listed inside a group are  Confirmed.
Group 1
  • 츄군의존나띠꺼운만행도끝났다ㅋㅋ
  • 내가드디어츄군을운지시켰다ㅋㅋㅋ
  • 츄군셀프운지축하
  • 츄군꼬치애무해주기
  • Chugun's zazi is very thick
  • 항문성교의달인츄군
  • 국철옥색선과츄군의빠구리행각
  • 츄군꼬치에서나온좃물
  • 츄군자지졸라크네
  • Vipper
  • Kwonsoonhyun1
  • Kwonsoonhyun
  • 다케시마일본땅
  • 아이폰사랑
  • 권순현34564
  • 츄군좆
Group 2
  • 9시쯤뉴스
  • 비행청소년
  • ASDSong
  • Emme Moch
  • 아프리카산림영양
Group 3
  • 카라멜 마끼아또를 좋아하는 의무경찰
  • 츄군덕스럽게
  • 석장리
  • 중딩소년
  • 박틱스짱또7
Other comments
  • Chu is Unrelated Unrelated to other groups and I did not find other accounts related to it per CU data.
  • 츄군민주화연대 is Unrelated Unrelated to other groups but it may likely have been created by the recurrent vandal that created tons of accounts one month ago.
  • 34564soon is Possible Possible to belong to the group 1. I would advise you to analyse the contributions he/she did and to keep an eye on him/her.
I've blocked locally the accounts which were not blocked. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

      • The following accounts are  Confirmed to be related to each other:
        Jordan Michael (already blocked)
        Arthur Chevailier (already blocked)
        Olávio Teixeira (already blocked)
        Frodo Bolseiro
        Pararatibum
        Cinthia gabrielle0
        Peregrin blocked
        Carl Carvalho
        Willer Mack (already blocked)
        Paulo salomao
        Liragabriel
        Legal Fiel
        Bilau6
        Bilau5 (already blocked)
        Evil land
        Olhares Daqui pra Nos
        Kamilaaah
        Arthur Fontaine (already blocked)
        Robert77
      • --Bencmq (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

아프리카산림영양@ko.wikipedia

I give you more users of showering abuses to Chugun.
  • 츄군꼬치애무해주기
  • Chugun's zazi is very thick
  • 항문성교의달인츄군
  • 국철옥색선과츄군의빠구리행각
  • 츄군꼬치에서나온좃물
  • 츄군자지졸라크네
  • 츄군민주화연대
  • 츄군덕스럽게

--RedMosQ (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I performed the check and the results are a bit complicated. I tried to explain the best I can below.
Notably, there are different groups of users and I found no relation between the different groups. Every accounts listed inside a group are  Confirmed.
Group 1
  • 츄군의존나띠꺼운만행도끝났다ㅋㅋ
  • 내가드디어츄군을운지시켰다ㅋㅋㅋ
  • 츄군셀프운지축하
  • 츄군꼬치애무해주기
  • Chugun's zazi is very thick
  • 항문성교의달인츄군
  • 국철옥색선과츄군의빠구리행각
  • 츄군꼬치에서나온좃물
  • 츄군자지졸라크네
  • Vipper
  • Kwonsoonhyun1
  • Kwonsoonhyun
  • 다케시마일본땅
  • 아이폰사랑
  • 권순현34564
  • 츄군좆
Group 2
  • 9시쯤뉴스
  • 비행청소년
  • ASDSong
  • Emme Moch
  • 아프리카산림영양
Group 3
  • 카라멜 마끼아또를 좋아하는 의무경찰
  • 츄군덕스럽게
  • 석장리
  • 중딩소년
  • 박틱스짱또7
Other comments
  • Chu is Unrelated Unrelated to other groups and I did not find other accounts related to it per CU data.
  • 츄군민주화연대 is Unrelated Unrelated to other groups but it may likely have been created by the recurrent vandal that created tons of accounts one month ago.
  • 34564soon is Possible Possible to belong to the group 1. I would advise you to analyse the contributions he/she did and to keep an eye on him/her.
I've blocked locally the accounts which were not blocked. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

 Confirmed these two users correspond to the same person. Elfix 18:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

      • The following accounts are  Confirmed to be related to each other:
        Jordan Michael (already blocked)
        Arthur Chevailier (already blocked)
        Olávio Teixeira (already blocked)
        Frodo Bolseiro
        Pararatibum
        Cinthia gabrielle0
        Peregrin blocked
        Carl Carvalho
        Willer Mack (already blocked)
        Paulo salomao
        Liragabriel
        Legal Fiel
        Bilau6
        Bilau5 (already blocked)
        Evil land
        Olhares Daqui pra Nos
        Kamilaaah
        Arthur Fontaine (already blocked)
        Robert77
      • --Bencmq (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

아프리카산림영양@ko.wikipedia

I give you more users of showering abuses to Chugun.
  • 츄군꼬치애무해주기
  • Chugun's zazi is very thick
  • 항문성교의달인츄군
  • 국철옥색선과츄군의빠구리행각
  • 츄군꼬치에서나온좃물
  • 츄군자지졸라크네
  • 츄군민주화연대
  • 츄군덕스럽게

--RedMosQ (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I performed the check and the results are a bit complicated. I tried to explain the best I can below.
Notably, there are different groups of users and I found no relation between the different groups. Every accounts listed inside a group are  Confirmed.
Group 1
  • 츄군의존나띠꺼운만행도끝났다ㅋㅋ
  • 내가드디어츄군을운지시켰다ㅋㅋㅋ
  • 츄군셀프운지축하
  • 츄군꼬치애무해주기
  • Chugun's zazi is very thick
  • 항문성교의달인츄군
  • 국철옥색선과츄군의빠구리행각
  • 츄군꼬치에서나온좃물
  • 츄군자지졸라크네
  • Vipper
  • Kwonsoonhyun1
  • Kwonsoonhyun
  • 다케시마일본땅
  • 아이폰사랑
  • 권순현34564
  • 츄군좆
Group 2
  • 9시쯤뉴스
  • 비행청소년
  • ASDSong
  • Emme Moch
  • 아프리카산림영양
Group 3
  • 카라멜 마끼아또를 좋아하는 의무경찰
  • 츄군덕스럽게
  • 석장리
  • 중딩소년
  • 박틱스짱또7
Other comments
  • Chu is Unrelated Unrelated to other groups and I did not find other accounts related to it per CU data.
  • 츄군민주화연대 is Unrelated Unrelated to other groups but it may likely have been created by the recurrent vandal that created tons of accounts one month ago.
  • 34564soon is Possible Possible to belong to the group 1. I would advise you to analyse the contributions he/she did and to keep an eye on him/her.
I've blocked locally the accounts which were not blocked. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Jancen sergio@pt.wikipedia

Inclua outro (Translate to English: Add another): Camtasia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). Bruno Leonard (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

@stew, please read the advice I left on section below...” Teles (T @ L C S) 20:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done per Teles. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

"Not Done"? Teles e Quentinv57, apresentei novos nomes, inclusive aqueles já descobertos. Aliás o manipulador de maionetes de meias/peúgas já voltou com novos IPs (189.123.243.66 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser), 186.215.38.235 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser), 189.100.66.143 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser), 189.30.101.23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) e 189.106.177.159 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser).
(Translate to English: "Not Done"? Teles and Quentinv57, introduced new names, including those already discovered. In fact the handler maionetes of socks/stockings is back with new IPs 189.123.243.66, 186.215.38.235, 189.100.66.143, 189.30.101.23 and 189.106.177.159.) Bruno Leonard (talk) 03:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC).

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

 Confirmed these two users correspond to the same person. Elfix 18:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hans Zheng@zh.wikipedia

They look clearly unrelated. Elfix 10:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

PaoloNapolitano@en.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done, ask local checkusers here. --Luckas msg 01:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Changed to Yes check.svg Done en.wiki's checkusers asked their colleagues to perform further checks on several projects. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Pumalawor@zh.wikipedia

Without judging the validity of this request, Pumalawer and Luke7956 haven't performed any edits or actions in the past 3 months. It is therefore impossible to do any checks on them. Elfix 09:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
There is information about Luke7956 on the CU wiki. Ruslik (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
It is Possible Possible for 撲馬律師. Pumalawer's last edit was made too long ago, and cannot be checked. --Elfix 12:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated, but I'd like a second opinion because is my first checkuser. --Luckas msg 13:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Please keep in mind performing checks on your homewiki is strictly forbidden and is one of the most common reason for losing you steward bit. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Besides that, I'd like to ask for another check with the accounts discovered here and here. --viniciusmc (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Luckas' results; for Ângulo ótimo, it doesn't match AC's pattern. A relation is possible, but cannot be confirmed thanks to the CU information. Elfix 16:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated, but I'd like a second opinion because is my first checkuser. --Luckas msg 13:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Please keep in mind performing checks on your homewiki is strictly forbidden and is one of the most common reason for losing you steward bit. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Besides that, I'd like to ask for another check with the accounts discovered here and here. --viniciusmc (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Luckas' results; for Ângulo ótimo, it doesn't match AC's pattern. A relation is possible, but cannot be confirmed thanks to the CU information. Elfix 16:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

Possible Possible fr33kman 02:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Quintinense@commons and pt.wikipedia

  • The following, most mentioned, some not, are  Confirmed to be the same user: Deletista, Carnatiba, Keptauto, Sambalagoas, Sepmreavanteuimpério, Vembaixada, Loggosul, Carnaval9
  • Comparison between the abovementioned complex and the other five users mentioned, and to those five amongst themselves does not lead to anything conclusive. Most of the pairs would be Unlikely Unlikely based on back-and-forth jumping of ip addresses (might still be the same person on different devices of course). I'll go after the Commons CU later, if someone else would like to do that, be my guest though. This has already taken much more time than I was planning to spend :-( - Andre Engels (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
When this check is completed it would be important to specify the types of connections between each pair (of the 3 suspected meat/socks).
And to clarify, except 4 (Raimundo57br, DiegoAlvesBarbosa, Rcandre and Higor Douglas) all others are confirmed as being Quintinense (Higor Douglas being a confirmed meatpuppet). I listed the others because most data from the past socks is stale. Chico (talk) 03:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
I have made the appropriate request in commons. commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser#Quintinense. Chico (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Commons has given a result to that check, only it seems they used the respective commons users. Could a steward contact the commons CU and exchange the needed information in order to complete the picture? Chico (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Well, not much to say, is there? One of Quintinense's IP on commons was used by Palonvitas, which is blocked on ptwiki for abusing multiple accounts, and apparently is to be linked with Quintinense. Nothing else to report - the data associated with Rcandre is concordant on ptwiki and commonswiki. Elfix 18:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

Possible Possible fr33kman 02:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Thongkaka (2)

Status:    Done

Mapleho444@zh.wikipedia

The following accounts are  Confirmed:
Mighthappy
Mapleho444
Worryyear
Sensetones
Burstasked
Haveplot55dff
Guidekeeps
Shipneeds
Heardarmed
Dreamrate
Replyamong
Mainoffer
Signstomes
Wavesalert
Ruslik (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you!! Can you please check whether the following users are sockpuppets of KellyMok too? zh:user:Burstwings, zh:user:Alertkeep, zh:user:Suchclaim--Miroir (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
All three are  Confirmed. Trijnsteltalk 15:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! --Miroir (talk) 18:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Cruks@pt.wikipedia

Could you explain, with diffs, where there is abuse of multiple accounts? Did they both participate in a discussion? Voted twice? Deceived the community in any way? None of them is currently blocked. Seeing your 4 diffs, it seems perfectly clear that they're the same: why do you need a CU? Thanks. Elfix 22:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC) I assume you're suspecting a block evasion, could you confirm that? Elfix 22:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, open a thread lock on the lock.Érico Júnior Wouters (talk) 22:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes Elfix, block evasion and harrasing the same user... Chico (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
As the block log shows: Cruks was first blocked in oct 10th for 2 weeks. October 15th shatabisha is created, edits only a little. November 14 Cruks is blocked for 3 months - shatabisha starts editing heavily in December. Chico (talk) 22:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but someone could make or deny the request? For sooner would be better to provide new evidence for the discussion of locking.Érico Júnior Wouters (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

They're  Confirmed to be related. Elfix 22:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

무적로보트라이더@ko.wikipedia

 Confirmed

Group1:
  • 무적로보트라이더
  • 광속전신 알베가스
  • 닌자전사 토비카게
  • 성총사 비스마르크
  • 오랜만에돌아온를르슈비브리타니아
  • ルルーシュのギアス
  • Stmedic74
  • 머리에총겨누기
  • 스타어뷰저너무재밌다
  • 무적드론
  • 골리앗 100000부대
  • 빨리 안마해
  • Nuclear Launch Detected
  • BISMARCK
  • 이것으로 나의 승리다 하하하하하 진짜 끝이다
  • 위뷁 접고 가서 일이나 해
  • 이제 거의 다 끝난 거 같군
  • 평생 위뷁에 박혀 살아라 위뷁오덕백수들
  • Signcosign
  • Anoyn
  • 민주당이 반드시 정권을 잡야아 한다
  • コードギアス
  • HOTHOTHOTHOTHOTHOT
  • Anonymous the great group
  • Snk playmore
  • EdmondII
  • 특수메카자붕글
  • 전자전대메가레인저
  • 안녕하세요사이트블록커협회에서나왔습니다
  • Placelips
  • Animals
  • Helloimfromanonymous
  • 어나너머스는전지전능하다
  • 어나너머스는영원하라
  • Rptmtksogkflaslcotrlfme
  • Framejownfr
  • Laslcahsfme
  • Skgaltskgotlrfme
  • Lndlzroqkhrduqsltotlr
  • Caseclosed
  • Youareanidiot
  • Han12
  • 고고레드
  • 미래전대타임레인저
  • Bannedstarman
  • BLOCKMAN
  • ヴぃ
  • !토론을참고하도록
  • WWWIIIKKKIIIPPPEEEDDDIIIAAA
  • DkskdltlqkftoRLemfdltkfkaakfdlakfrkxwldksgsi
  • Dkskdlalclsqorrhktkwjsdldlrjtehqorrhktkwjsdlsi
  • TlqkfroalclstoRLemfwhsskwoaldjqtspdnlzlqorhkrozlqorrhktlqkfdk
  • TlqkfalclsdlsrksemfwhsskwoaldlTwlqudtlsemfdjelRKwlrkskqhwk
  • RotlqkfalclssusemfwoaldlTsiTIdsusemfdkwnrduqjfu
  • DnlzlqorrhkakdgoqjfufktlqkfsusemfelwufkrotoRLemf
  • Shipdukqudtlsdnlzltlqkfsusemfelwufk
  • Gnwkdwkfehvktlspglaemfwldksgsizz
  • Rotlqkfqudtlsqorrhkslemfdlekgoajrdjfk
  • 15dukdnlzlqorrhktlqkfsusemfelwufk
  • DnlzltlqdhxkzntoRLemfelwufk
  • 저승사자5
  • 저승사자4
  • 저승사자3
  • 저승사자2
  • 저승사자
  • !!2002년위키가그립습니다
  • Aoin12
  • 신규는절.대오지마라기존이지.존이다
  • 어째서환영합니다지'
  • 어나너머스는전지전능하다
  • 어나너머스는영원하라
  • Lndlzroqkhrduqsltotlr
  • 어째서환영합니다지
  • Cho electronic machine voltess V
  • 성전사단바인
  • 무적로보트라이더
  • 광속전신 알베가스
  • 닌자전사 토비카게
  • 오랜만에돌아온를르슈비브리타니아
  • ALBEGAS
  • 이것으로 나의 승리다 하하하하하 진짜 끝이다
  • 위뷁 접고 가서 일이나 해
  • 이제 거의 다 끝난 거 같군
  • 평생 위뷁에 박혀 살아라 위뷁오덕백수들
  • 민주당이 반드시 정권을 잡야아 한다
  • 야 거기 너
  • 홈런왕 미스터김
  • Fasfdsf
  • 카디12
  • 7thID
  • Iwillcomeback
  • Noblessrai
  • Abc gdo
  • Ok lets go play bb
  • Saintwar
  • Slideshot
  • Mr3
  • What calling
  • 내용정리
  • 실례합니다
  • 서울귀공자
  • Nobless112
  • 니 면상 찢어버린다
  • 오-란--씨받이
  • Octopus12
  • 위뷁은 매우 무서운 사전이다
  • 위뷁은 매우 섬뜩한 곳이다 프리메이슨의모임
  • 가수 김종국은 사용자 김종국으로 동일인물이다
  • 1950년생부터 1974년생까지 전부 다 쳐나와라.....
  • 1975년생부터 1999년생까지 다 튀어나와라
  • 우리들은 그저 하루하루 똥싸는 기계일 뿐이다
  • 위키백과도디도스공격을당해야한다'
  • 청와대를지배하는쥐
  • 씹불허전 좇불허전 명블허전 위퀴백과
  • 씹불허전 좇불허전 명부러전 위퀴백과
Group2:
  • 과학놀이터
  • 욕하는 민호
  • 엄꿀꿀
  • 누구세요
  • 부산0854
  • 오랜만에 돌아온 루루슈 비 브리타니아 2
  • 오랜만에 돌아온 루루슈 비 브리타니아
  • 음악실
  • 모기 앵앵거리네
  • 가수 김종국과 사용자 김종국은 동일 인물이다
  • Plus space
  • 꺼억
  • 명탐정 이명박
  • 피해가너무크다악
  • Sam9927

Stale

  • 올하일브리타니아
  • 루루슈비브리타니아가명령한다네놈들은죽어라
  • 사루루슈는 죽지않는다
  • 사용자:루루슈가킹왕짱
  • ルルシュビ ブリタニアが めじる 貴様達は死ね

Group1 and group2 Unrelated Unrelated. Group1 use many open proxy(have all blocked)--Shizhao (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

CondeVlad@pt.wikipedia

Please acrescent:

  1. Southstock (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  2. Raimundo57br (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  3. Luan borges (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  4. Veronykacosta (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  5. Othon Brando da Costa Monteiro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  6. Gustavo Siqueira (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  7. RodrigoGoMattos01 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  8. Violet.Langdon (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Based in the checkuser result. Stoker (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Be aware that some of those users were recently checked (Diego, Higor and Rcandre, Gustavo, Higor and Rcandre, Gustavo, Biantez and BauruEri, Raimundo57br). In all those cases, the suspicion was against Quintinense (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) or one of his known socks, especially Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). After a long debate and a lot of behavioral analysys, Higor confessed as meatpuppet, Douglas was blocked and Rcandre is still being debated. This user (Quintinense) also has a long and warring history with Biantez ([19]). And this "Stoker" is a complete unknown at ptwiki. José Luiz talk 23:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I`m registred in pt.wiki (view my contribuitions).Stoker (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok, sure. All 38 of them. And the very first, a RfB... IMHO, this check is unwarranted. José Luiz talk 22:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Please, ignore this request. I've just blocked Stocker per block evasion as he uses to create mistaken checkuser and block requests such as this one (see old request). Thanks.” Teles (T @ L C S) 01:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Declined DeclinedMarco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

PokerFace3@pt.wikipedia

But what is it?????

  • last edition - Vih 14 - 19 de julho de 2011
  • Margaridabraga - no editing
  • PokerFace3 - no editing
  • Diogomauricio3 - blocked from - 29 de outubro de 2009

which the argument for this action? 189.34.88.181 22:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Please, ignore this request. I've just blocked the user above per block evasion as he uses to create mistaken checkuser and block requests such as this one (see old request). Thanks.” Teles (T @ L C S) 01:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Declined DeclinedMarco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Stoker @pt.wikipedia

I'm not Quintinense. I'm from São Paulo. Stoker (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Please ignore this one too, as well as this and this. Stoker has just been blocked for being a sock of ElectroStatic Jolt. José Luiz talk 01:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Ingore the comment, right? Not the request by Érico. Chico (talk) 01:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
There now is no longer necessary. Since the user has been blocked after the application.Érico msg 20:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done then. Trijnsteltalk 20:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

P.S. I love you@ko.wikipedia

i give more user

Group1
Group2

--분당선M (talk) 08:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh. Group 1 and Group 2 are not same (we think)Users. --Trainholic (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

From a technical point:

 Confirmed

Group1
  • 정현규
  • 별이 빛나는 밤에
  • 피자헛
  • 별이 빛나는 밤
  • RedWosQ
  • P.S. I love you
  • 짜장면 배달왔습니다
  • 일본은병신
  • 사무라이 블루
  • Kevin1108
  • 닥쳐
  • 경복궁
Group2
  • 살충제
  • Eirmp
Group3
  • 고종황제
  • 폴리토프
  • Newiki
  • 4대썩은가람살리기
  • 국민변방당
  • 식충식물
  • 우이령
  • 친박연합
Group4
  • 남태령
  • Gaeho77
  • Jaehwa98
Group5
  • 201407kk
  • 201407lee
Possible Possible: Group2, Group3
Unlikely Unlikely: 201507lee, Group5
Stale: Ybj19550415, Lee807050, 이병재5504, 이병재55, 이병재570816, Lee570816, Lee550415, Lee530303, 이땡보, Ybj1265, 경북궁
Other Group and users is Unrelated Unrelated

--Shizhao (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Ericgordo@pt.wikipedia

Possible Possible Elfix 08:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Manyranch@zh.wikipedia

Sorry for interrupting. I've edited Naivandsilly's request, though I don't know if that is allowed. I've removed the last three, because Estherkay, JasonTan96 are not related. Alivetype is blocked already. I've added three new related usernames as replacement of the last three (Intotwice, Drewagent, Holdsinput). And I've found three other accounts too: zh:user:Clubmotor, zh:user:Edgeindex, zh:user:Newlypitch. Is it possible to check all these accounts? Sorry for the inconvenience! --Miroir (talk) 10:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
The following accounts are  Confirmed and blocked:
Manyranch
Novelknown88
Loansupper
Scaleswung
Placedream
Clubmotor
Brokeable
Alertkeep
Suchclaim
Paththeir
Thinkweek
Getsserve
Scaleswung
Intotwice
Spacerates
Holdsinput
Carrycited
Newlypitch
Edgeindex
Setsninthdg
Drewagent
Ruslik (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
The vandal cannot sit still and has created new accounts: zh:User:Phonedealt, zh:User:Noisethey, zh:User:Enjoyhelpff, zh:User:Angleglad. Can you please check these four accounts and block them if confirmed? Thanks in advance! --Miroir (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed and blocked. I'm wondering if protecting some pages may partially solve this issue (it might work in case it is related with a few articles). Regards.” Teles (T@ L C S) 00:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Some of the articles have already protected. Protection for the rest isn't applicable in my opinion since some are still in progress and IPs probably contribute most. --Naiveandsilly (talk) 04:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh, there's one more reported Hong123456 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). Thanks for your help! --Naiveandsilly (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
I can't understand what was written by this last account. Can you, please, clarify why it should be checked?‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 06:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Hong123456 is not related, sorry for the mistake. The vandal in question (KellyMok) has created over 200 sockpuppets already and probably will not ever stop. He's active in multiple articles which are all still in progress, i.e. lists of TVB dramas, so it's almost impossible to protect them all. Thank you for checking and blocking these accounts.--Miroir (talk) 10:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
No problem. Hong123456 won't be checked then. Thanks for your support.‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 18:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Justdre36‎@zh.wikipedia

 Confirmed and blocked including additional accounts fr33kman 03:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. But there seems still more additionals not blocked yet. like

--Zhxy 519 (talk) 04:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

 Confirmed 082kobecnwts, Boewsdre496 and Realgifts888. Hgkh8182 shares some datas, but I still need a second opinion before saying anything.‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 07:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Hgkh8182 and Qinhaid8 have similar patterns and apparently they are more close. Their relation between others is possible, but can't be confirmed.‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 18:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
There are some similar users:

--Makecat (talk) 01:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Results:

 Confirmed

Andnsan7 is confirmed with Elsebeth9
Cogrtbeats68 is confirmed with Cogrtbeats19

Likely Likely

Andnsan7
Cogrtbeats68
Wdweq23df
Xiaos9268
082kobecnwts (previously checked)
Boewsdre496 (previously checked)
Realgifts888 (previously checked)

Unrelated Unrelated

Caoyue58424

‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 17:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Мәңгілік@xal.wikipedia

Selena Gomez fan - there is no user with such a name. Ruslik (talk) 08:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
It probably means to check if Мәңгілік is Selena Gomez fan (xwiki vandal). Bencmq (talk) 08:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed Ruslik (talk) 09:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Spambots on small wikis

Status:    Done

I've blocked the following accounts locally, based on the filter log:

Please consider investigating them. Mathonius (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Vituzzu (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Potential spambots

Status:    Done

The following accounts have been created recently (on various small wikis) and match the obvious pattern. I'm afraid we could be expecting another spambot attack:

On na.wikipedia
On bxr.wikipedia
On ik.wikipedia
On ki.wikipedia

Please investigate those as well. Mathonius (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done on ki.wiki and bxr.wiki --Vituzzu (talk) 22:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you both very much. Mathonius (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Titleturns@zh.wikipedia

Possible Possible. It is certain that Titleturns = Downviews = Onceburst; their CU data concords with what I can see from the older sockpuppets, but their geographical localization differs from them, although it is likely that they used an open proxy. Elfix 12:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Since the contributions of these users are exactly the same as KellyMok's, I believe all should be the same person. He may be trying new ways to avoid getting caught. Here's a list of new users which we believe are sockpuppets of him: zh:User:Wentideas, zh:User:Thateggssgs, zh:User:Learndelaydvs, zh:User:Plussign, zh:User:Localrules11, zh:User:‎Overweekan, zh:User:Noiseidea. And I've one more that was checked once in the past, but there is some confusion about the result, is it possible to check again whether the following user is related to KellyMok? zh:User:Belovekk. The confusion is that the previous CU result [25] show that Belovekk is unrelated, but there was allegedly another request that show that Belovekk uses the same IP and User Agent as KellyMok. Thanks again. --Miroir (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevalier @pt.wikipedia

Apparently it should be Arthur Chevailier. They are  Confirmed to be the same person, and also the following accounts
Rochele sousa
Anonymouslovesu
Plus a dozen of other socks that's already been blocked. Bencmq (talk) 00:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Hoferaanderl@bar.wikipedia

 Confirmed:

Megatherion
Hoferaanderl
ToMegaTherion 666
As always no comments on the IP. Bencmq (talk) 08:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Ah, I didn't know about this IP-rule, I'm sorry. Thank you very much. Kind regards. --Holder (talk) 09:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

GalaxyNexus‎@zh.wikipedia

Likely Likely. Elfix 14:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Another one who edits the same topic in similar way:
Unrelated. Elfix 12:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, here's another one:
Some slight similarities but, Unrelated Unrelated --Vituzzu (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

龙子孙四光光@zh.wikipedia

Possible Possible: they contribute from the same geographical region, but each account does not seem to use the same machine as the others. Do you have any recent accounts from User:Kleuske/Huang Xianfan? Elfix 15:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
OK, could you check these accounts (already blocked) from the 4th? --Zhxy 519 (talk) 06:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Yep, there are two groups
龙子孙四光光, Mordsou, Phạm Hưng2012, S-tashiguo, Zhuang2012, Chaocao, Gouzhalanyin, BaiciSkyfiler, 覃伟雄 and Lan-gou-qu-si
玻璃人, Markerter, 王泽一, Derfsxc, Cderker1, 韦荣光 and maybe 龙龟孙
--Vituzzu (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Chevailier@pt.wikipedia

Comment Comment: I've blocked four of them due to insults and due to creation of an offensive account (with this pattern).‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 18:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed for all of them + for Éricofat. Elfix 20:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

RedMosQ, Shut up!@ko.wikipedia

All users except Russ, Unypoly, 정현규 and 김경민 are too old to be checked, I'm on the other ones.
--Vituzzu (talk) 13:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
싸랑 is Unypoly
클라우드제로 is 김경민 and *maybe* Dealtsamsi
정현규, and Unypoly seem to be related to Russ and surely to RedMosQ, Your Bastard!
--Vituzzu (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

懂心心@zh.wikipedia

The following accounts are  Confirmed:
王小美
Uyhji
Keisre889
懂心心 is Unlikely Unlikely from CU point of view. Ruslik (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your important answer.--Jusjih (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Tudosobreatv@pt.wikipedia

Declined Declined - Sorry, but we don't link usernames to IPs. If it is a Duck-case, then block the IP. -Barras talk 10:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

乌啦跨基氪@zh.wikipedia

just to add a note, please check carefully if 李煌老师, last one in the first list, is related to them at all. He claims that other vandal accounts are not his (because some of their usernames attack/insults 李煌老师 himself) Bencmq (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed
  • BoldIP
  • 乌啦跨基氪
  • 苏中好机油
  • Li Huang is 250
  • 丁環是對的
  • Jsbjsbjsb1111
  • Cdkey518
  • Cat600
  • 李火皇
  • Asdfghqwerty
  • 支持乌拉跨氪
  • 季煌老师
  • Soapsgoal
  • 临时问个问题
  • Awayknown
  • Inputcosts
  • Oncetooth
  • Poemsmagic
  • Jsjbjsb1111
  • Rolewhilerangehumor
  • 化学专家
  • 乌拉跨氪是个人才
  • 反对乌拉跨氪
  • 支持数学研究
  • Symplectopedick
  • Makepig
  • 鸟拉夸克
  • Xxlney
  • VeryStupidCat
  • Makemouse
  • 支持创新学术!
  • 李煌老师王七蛋
  • Makedog
  • 李煌大师
  • 李煌老師是個人才
  • Professator
  • 李煌老师一
  • 李煌的老师
  • 李煌老师
  • 李煌是学术骗子
  • Kongqingdong is a dog!
  • (SYS)2
  • 黄志松
  • Panelequal
  • 伟大的韩国
  • 气功研究
  • 反对民科
  • 宇宙第一大国
  • 李彦宏女士
  • 银钨锗
  • 苏州工业园区第三监狱
  • Stupidcat
  • 鹦鹉者
  • 看黄片上北大
  • 王存臻
  • Zhxy 516
  • 丁環是正確的
  • Historyexpert
  • FcukSihtSxe
  • 杨启彪教授
  • TBAccountable
Likely Likely
  • 乌龟跨氪终将下台

‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 03:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, what's meaning of those empty lines between confirmed users? --Makecat (talk) 09:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Accounts were separated for being closer to each other from a technical view. They all can still be confirmed though.‴ Teles (T@ L C S) 02:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Hilim Goztar@lez.wikipedia

 Confirmed and locked, thank you for reporting. Bencmq (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Please, check user GNA 847, he requests this articles too. Saint Johann (ru) 11:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed --Luckas msg 15:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Please, block this user too (long-term abuse, SGF, virtual). Saint Johann (ru) 18:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
It's already globally locked. --Luckas msg 18:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)