Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-08

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in August 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests

Kelle5D@jawikiversity

Status:    Done

Pattern accounts on ja.wikiversity:

ja.wikiquote:

and ja.wikisource:

Please investigate these pattern accounts. Mathonius (talk) 07:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please also take a look at the following account(s). Mathonius (talk) 08:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, spambots. All locked--Shizhao (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Hhhordzvto@oldwikisource

Status:    Done

The following accounts match this pattern and are probably related to these groups of spambots (Jxtzpqfge@simplewiktionary and Hqqurdgbmn@bxrwikipedia). Please consider investigating them.

There are probably more on other wikis. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 08:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Elfix 09:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Jgeof6o8@mediawiki.org

Status:    Done

Are these pattern accounts related and could they be spambots? Mathonius (talk) 08:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Elfix 09:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

2f7xo22a@enwikiversity

Status:    Done

Please investigate these accounts. Mathonius (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Elfix 09:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

AlineDav@nl.wikiquote

Status:    Done

A few more suspected spambots. Please consider checking them. Mathonius (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

And the following might also be related:

Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Please also take a look at ZandraCgv (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser). Mathonius (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Done including ZandraCgv. I've locked most of them. Not sure about a few and I'm asking a second opinion.‴ Teles «Talk ˱@ L C S˲» 05:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Left Kendrick too, others locked. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Miaobai1061@twwikipedia

Status:    Done

I suspect these are related to those checked by Pundit here (Elias7414@oldwikisource). I think Teles also checked some of these accounts. The following have actually spammed and are now blocked locally. They don't seem to have been locked and/or investigated yet.

Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 04:41, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

done — billinghurst sDrewth 14:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Moneycnd@strategy

Status:    Done

Please investigate accounts. --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 01:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I think Teles already investigated some of these. Mathonius (talk) 01:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Add the pattern --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 02:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Done.‴ Teles «Talk ˱@ L C S˲» 02:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Jamyi754Haros@en.wikiversity

Status:    Done

Please investigate these pattern accounts. Mathonius (talk) 23:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

And also:

Mathonius (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Possible Possible

All were made from the same IP within a few minutes. Will email the CU-L for the rest. --Jyothis (talk)

Thank you very much. Mathonius (talk) 02:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
@Jyothis: I never got your email you (allegedly) send to CU-L. Did you send it or did you forget to do so? And is this request closed or not? Trijnsteltalk 19:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Closed. Nothing else needs to be done here. — MA (audiencia) 19:52, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
    • Not really. Jyothis promised me via IRC to still send the results and/or check it again. So it would be nice if we could give him the opportunity. :) Trijnsteltalk 20:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay. Sent to CU-L and Thanks to Trijnstel for the reminders. --Jyothis (talk)

is this complete? — billinghurst sDrewth 10:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Looks like it, marked as done. -Barras talk 08:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Donegroup@zh.wikipedia

 Confirmed are:
Toucherrorshear
Gyroalert
Toothmajor
Donegroup
Shownready
Beenkeep11
Laughadded
Shipunits
Showbrownqw
Worrylove1124ff
Shipsheads33
Talksongs
Newssales333
Madeblind111
Toldeager33
Work321into
Hitskept432
Picktwice333
Quickcrazy
Giftchief768
Rockitems12123
Imagewhen444
Wentideaschan
Cent989stones
Dancemade2134
321undertable
Dozendelay2134
Smilemeans
Saidonly33
Noblealso
Studyarmed
Drewitem
Entryprior
Avoidtraildd
I also blocked a few IP addresses. Trijnsteltalk 17:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thx!--Shizhao (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Costas78@el.wikipedia

Nevermind, dear stewards. He admited that the ips are his, so the check-user is pointless now. Thank you for your time. --Το αλλήθωρο οπόσουμ 12:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. Request withdrawn, but we can't link IP addresses to accounts either. Trijnsteltalk 16:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Vikulay1978@nrm.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please investigate accounts --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 00:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

These are probably related to this group (Miaobai1061@twwikipedia). Mathonius (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Definitely  Confirmed. More socks are: Vovikrai2016 (@nrmwiki) and Skat1997 (@rnwiki, already locked). IP blocked IP blocked. Trijnsteltalk 18:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Tashh@fa.wikipedia

 Confirmed all and بام (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)--Shizhao (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Kolega2357@sh.wikipedia

More than 3 months passed since the last edit from one of the accounts. Pundit (talk) 14:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Velimi Ivanovic was very active on serbian wiki but he is blocked for infinitely. Here is contribution from sr wiki for Velimir [1] last change was made on april 19th 2012. Account for Kolega2357 is created in april [2]--Zarathushtra (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Since the logs are kept for 3 months, and the last change was made on April 19, 2012, the window of CU investigation expired 10 days ago. Pundit (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Really? That is pitty. Can this be usefull? [3] [4][5][6] There are some logs in May.--Zarathushtra (talk) 14:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I also found this Special:Contributions/93.86.243.134 and this [7] (Oliver Nedeljkovic is proved sockpuppet account from Velimir Ivanovic at sr wiki) --Zarathushtra (talk) 22:41, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Possible Possible There is enough prior evidence available to make some comparisons. Same IP range, though quite a busy set of ranges in use; and some other evidence would seen as similarly indicative. Also made comparisions with data for "Jezdimir Uskokovic". — billinghurst sDrewth 07:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hkcordhczy@oldwikisource

Status:    Done

Please investigate accounts. See the pattern --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 01:02, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Investigate.. what? es:Magister Mathematicae 01:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Please investigate those suspected spambots (see this request (Hhhordzvto@oldwikisource) for related groups) as well as the following patten accounts:
Mathonius (talk) 03:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
done — billinghurst sDrewth 08:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Jhhknhfgj@crwikipedia

Status:    Done

These pattern accounts are probably related to the above-mentioned groups. Please consider investigating and locking them. Mathonius (talk) 03:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Donebillinghurst sDrewth 08:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

LoraVelez5@gotwikipedia

Status:    Done

These accounts are probably related to the following locked accounts:

Please consider investigating and locking them. Mathonius (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

 Confirmed. Trijnsteltalk 10:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Haccpdq@zh.wikipedia 3

add another one. --Mys_721tx(talk) 09:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
MoreInfo Additional information needed Is this relating to other older request? — MA (audiencia) 09:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Yup, they are. See the first and the second one. Trijnsteltalk 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

As an addition to the previous requests.  Confirmed are (some accounts are already blocked, but not all). A few unblocked accounts must've been missed.

Acd567oeaok
Badgoodeoky
Cattatk8
F8518kkbgob
Glyaac
Hfeesc
Kfeiyangfei
Pgapn12
Rdamoonr9
Sjyh
Ttskhtt
Wchuh79abc
Wuvipp
Yshchfg1k

I made a list of all sockpuppets, so you can check whether you have them all. I hope it's complete.

List of confirmed sockpuppets
  • 8181811b
  • Acadeerd
  • Acd567oeaok
  • Addrya
  • Airsky1
  • Ambcak
  • Atmn5a
  • Badgoodeoky
  • Bakeyer
  • Bapagjdjd
  • Bcdcaj
  • Builinkyogf
  • C11819155
  • Cap299s9
  • Capcatw
  • Cattac8
  • Cattatk8
  • Cd593aw468
  • Cfabic
  • Ctchkjpm
  • Ddtceh
  • Deerider
  • Dfhgtoa1
  • Eeodtipaz
  • F8518kkbgob
  • Faacatk
  • Flachon
  • Gattpm
  • Gh66ke
  • Gh66keey
  • Glaywho8
  • Glyaac
  • Greeyat
  • Haccpdq
  • Hfeesc
  • Hkcnsgt
  • Kfeiyangfei
  • Kworkthk
  • Lgpabce
  • Meneopg12
  • Nambab779
  • Openeopk
  • Pabdktt
  • Pgapn12
  • Qglogaz
  • Qk5432hello1
  • Qwmzna
  • Rdamoonr9
  • Rqlget
  • Sfilines
  • Sjyh
  • Ssart3y
  • Swortyk
  • Tqacminf
  • Ttbadk
  • Ttskhtt
  • Univityeed
  • Vtpacv
  • Wchuh79abc
  • Wuvipp
  • Yamaaholo
  • Yorktchany
  • Yshchfg1k
  • Z19yk88

I locally blocked a few underlying IP addresses/ranges. Trijnsteltalk 17:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! All 65 accounts also have been blocked locally. -Mys_721tx(talk) 02:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Ankakh.@hy.wikipedia

 Confirmed --Bencmq (talk) 03:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

SusieTyl@is.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Please investigate this pattern accounts --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 03:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Unrelated Unrelated

  • SusieTyl
  • RoyaoXpd
  • LeolaBgb

Not related on a technical standpoint. Will email CU results to CU-L for commons and meta --Jyothis (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Those are actually all locked by now, and looking at the pattern and also the other information, I think they are spambots. Just letting you know. -Barras talk 20:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Fernandoe@pt.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done. The Portuguese Wikipedia has now local CheckUsers. General requests should be made to those at pt:Wikipédia:CheckUser/Pedidos de verificação. Thanks for your understanding. — MA (audiencia) 16:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

ZulmaJac@cs.wikisource

Status:    Done

Please investigate this pattern accounts --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 23:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - at least most of it. -Barras talk 23:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Huyuhuyuy@mediawikiwiki

Status:    Done

See log of automatic abuse filter blocks. This Chinese blogpost spammer has been at it for months.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Dynamic IP address. Range/IP blocking won't help I'm afraid. Just let the abuse filter take care of them (for now). --Bsadowski1 (talk) 03:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

揭露某人真相@zh.wikipedia 2

one more user:林浩生是谁? (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)--2011wp (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Strong oppose: no evidence for this (there's some evidence for the one above though). 2011wp wanted to check 揭露某人真相 only because this user oppose him.--Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 06:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
    • For Jsjsjs1111:[8][9]--2011wp (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue vandalize meta wiki, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. --Angelasidedog (talk) 05:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
      • That's interesting. Do you think real sockpuppeteer will admit it? That's just in response to your assuming bad faith. --揭露某人真相 (talk) 07:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
        • Meta is not another battleground for you two to spit on each other. This is a request page. Bencmq (talk) 12:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
          • I withdraw this request per this.--2011wp (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

FilipVtori@mk.wikipedia

 Confirmed--Shizhao (talk) 12:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Bcsurgery2@Mediawikiwiki

Status:    Done

Please investigate this accounts. --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Below sets are Possible Possible

Set 1

  • Bcsurgery2
  • Delilah arayan
  • SaltCure
  • Apiwat12
  • Agromo
  • Motivostanley
  • Uahmedbd

Set 2

  • HelenYH
  • SammieR4
  • TammaraJ6
  • SusieFce

Below set is Likely Likely

  • Rjones40
  • Salmone williams
  • 7734mrobert54
  • Jarrans

Yes check.svg Done --Jyothis (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Uggboots22@beta.wikiversity

Status:    Not done

Please investigate this accounts. The pattern is Uggboots[1-9]{2}. --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 02:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

 It looks like a duck to me, X mark.svg Not done -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Domenico@es.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

1) User Domenico in Spanish Wikipedia has been blocked twice by making changes without consensus [10]. He recently participated in a lengthy discussion without getting consensus, and again, he began to make changes to different articles. After receiving several warnings ([11] [12] [13]) Domenico decided to withdraw from Spanish Wikipedia [14].
2) User 83.34.153.98 made ​​similar changes to those that longed Domenico, but in English Wikipedia [15], and in Simple English Wikipedia [16]
3) In English Wikipedia, user Santos30 was involved in an edit war, precisely, with the same subject [17] (The subject is about the use of the Cross of Burgundy flag to identify the Spanish Empire and its territories in America, but Domenico, IP 83.34.153.98 , and Santos 30 refuse this flag because they believe that is a Carlist or Fascist symbol). We have been discussing this issue in the page talk of the Spanish Empire article in English Wikipedia, but while we are performing this discussion, Santos began to remove the flag of the Cross of Burgundy in other articles, this time with another argument, with the same argument about Carlism, or just without argument [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24].
4) Even more, Santos asked to change the name of some files in Commons [25] [26]. I do not understand why, but when these names changed, these files can not be seen in articles in Spanish Wikipedia, probably neither in others wikipedias.
The behavior of these accounts is very similar: long absences, impose a point of view without consensus in several articles (in this case, the target is to eliminate the Cross of Burgundy flag), and edit in the same type of items. Jaontiveros (talk) 03:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I have passed this to the mailing list. Regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done here. Please go to each project and ask for a CU query there (you have links to the request pages in the header of this page above). They preferr this way. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Itsupportbirminghamr35@betawikiversity

Status:    Done

Please consider investigating these pattern accounts. Could they be spambots? Mathonius (talk) 10:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Itsupportbirminghamt35 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) on commons probably also belongs to this group. Mathonius (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Done.‴ Teles «Talk ˱@ L C S˲» 23:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

揭露某人真相@zh.wikipedia

more users:

--2011wp (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Obviously, it is malicious retaliation.--揭露某人真相 (talk) 11:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

See the above request (Spanagain@zh.wikipedia - specifically the large group). -- Avi (talk) 18:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Jvsgkafgw@bxrwikipedia

Status:    Done

These pattern accounts are probably related to these groups (patterns: J[a-z]{5}fg[a-z]{1} and H[a-z]{3}rd[a-z]{3}). I've only listed the accounts that are probably related but haven't been locked or blocked yet. Please consider investigating and locking them. Mathonius (talk) 10:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

And also:

--Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 03:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by Billinghurst. Trijnsteltalk 13:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

不能编辑自己的讨论页@zh.wikipedia

  • Bencmq said: "Meta is not another battleground for you two to spit on each other. This is a request page.". 14.150.0.0/16 is an IP range for China Telecom in Guangzhou. More than 10 thousand people use it. Blocks should not be punitive. Checkuser should not be punitive too. --2011wp (talk) 04:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I just think that if 2011wp didn't vandal on wiki then he/she shouldn't afraid of being CU. 2011wp was recently blocked because of violation of 3RR and sending large amount of unreasonable article to AFD. This two have been a counter vandalism to wikimedia wiki (zhwiki). 2011wp also revert some of the vandalism edits by GZIP. I think that a check is necessary due to possible sock-puppet or using multiple account (IP & user). I know that WMF privacy policy shows that IP cannot be given out. If possible, please check that whether 2011wp's IP range have register or use other account for edits and give out a list (or the result "no sock-puppets"). Thank you. --HWChat - zhwp 09:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


See results for Spanagain@zh.wikipedia above. -- Avi (talk) 19:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

DomingaNnf@ca.wikiquote

Status:    Done

Please investigate this pattern accounts. Are probably related to this group. --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done and cleaned up all the other excreta found at the respective wikis — billinghurst sDrewth 07:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Lujianping@zh.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done Similarity is confirmed by same IP. Pundit (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Bruno@fa.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated, Nersy Stale--Shizhao (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Spanagain@zh.wikipedia


One of the responsibilities that checkusers, and thus stewards, have, is to protect the various Wikimedia projects from disruption. Often, when "groups" of editors file and counter-file checkuser requests against one another, that is an indication that there are multiple farms, and the CU in question has to make the determination of whom to check and how far to go. In this case, it was my opinion that there was potentially multiple groups of editors that were acting in concert, or were really one. As such, I will provide the following for the ZhWiki community, who should take this information and use it to protect their project from further disruption and violation of Wikimedia policies.

-- Avi (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

    • note: I fixed a potential typo above: [28]. Liangent 16:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

LeanneL4@vi.wikiquote

Status:    Done

Please investigate this pattern accounts. --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Partially Yes check.svg Done. I think these are several groups of spambots. Will continue later. Trijnsteltalk 22:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
At this point in time, I have just locked the remainder, generally the bulk of the IP are collected within this time — billinghurst sDrewth 10:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Paullukluk@zh.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done We don't grant CU requests by anonymous users generally; and the lack of evidence and required information in this request is another reason. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Uponblameuponblame@zh.wikipedia

  • Test1122d and Test1122e are my accounts, but Spanagain, Meenewa17 and so on aren't.--2011wp (talk) 04:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Strongly oppose, 2011wp wants to check me only because I oppose him. In addition, himself isn't a truster user at all (see the first request above). Thank you. Maybe you should block 2011wp for trolling. --Uponblameuponblame (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Uponblameuponblame is probably zh:WP:LHLS and is a vandalism-only account in Chinese Wikipedia.--2011wp (talk) 04:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
      • 2011wp uses this account to do normal edits, but sockpuppets to vandalize Wikipedia. See zh:WP:GZIP for details (his IPs). Regards. --Uponblameuponblame (talk) 04:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Note: 219.136.62.148 was used for vandalism on Chinese Wikipedia, and 2011wp used it on meta wiki (see above). --Uponblameuponblame (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
        • 219.136.0.0/16 is an IP range for China Telecom in Guangzhou. More than 10 thousand people use it.--2011wp (talk) 04:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
  • All local accounts are on indef now, check is not necessary. I suggest this request can be closed. The above users are reminded again that their discussion should be relevant to the request. Bencmq (talk) 12:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

See Spanagain above. -- Avi (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

WilfordYY@en.wikinews

Status:    Done

Please investigate this pattern accounts. Pattern: Name + [A-z]{2} and Name + [A-z]{3} . --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I've added an account to the list above. Mathonius (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Isn't this.. hmmm... fishing? es:Magister Mathematicae 22:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
They're suspected spambots (at least they follow the pattern) however given that in the most majority those are always on OPies I've found that checking those is near to useless (and since we don't truly know that those listed above are indeed spambots, we risk to check innocent users for no reason). -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, locked as necessary — billinghurst sDrewth 10:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Lowe5@lt.wikipedia

Seems like this request has been overlooked... --Homo (talk) 10:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Likely Likely that all users are the same person, though as no checkuser evidence exists for Brox which is Inconclusive Inconclusive. All users utilise the same ISP, though major provider with many users (busy range), though some indicators that same user. No smoking gun. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Supplementary, I have located data for Brox/Dendrolo, and it is Likely Likely that it is the same person, right ranges, other similarities. Originally stated issues exist due to busy ISP, so no ability to confirm. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Azload@zh.wikipedia

  • Two users listed above are admins of zhwp, and they and the others come from different geographical regions. The mere fact that many users oppose you in discussion does not justify a checkuser. Mewaqua (talk) 03:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose for this CU because some of the user in this list are sysop on wiki, they won't abuse. --HWChat - zhwp 14:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done - Smells like a fishy attack against zh.wiki users. -Barras talk 14:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
This is the most ridiculous CU request I have ever seen.--Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

吉米许万人坑@zh.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed--吉米许万人坑 (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Striking out some nonsense. -Barras talk 14:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
  • PS: If 吉米许万人坑 is not a sockpuppet of 2011wp, may you please try to give out a list of sockpuppet of 吉米许万人坑? It is because heavy vandalism on zhwiki is in progress (zh:WP:GZIP). 2011wp are not necessary as the list is already given out in the Spanagain's check. --HWChat - zhwp 14:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Likely Likely

  • Wangxuan8331800
  • Waihorace
  • Jimmy xu wrk
  • Makecat

--199.19.105.253 14:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Striking out some nonsense. -Barras talk 14:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

  • The user above seems to edit from open proxy.--Makecat (talk) 14:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
False statement? --HWChat - zhwp 14:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Currently working on this, btw. -Barras talk 15:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, 2011wp and 吉米许万人坑 appear to be Unrelated Unrelated. However, I sent some details to Bencmq and here now a list of socks of 吉米许万人坑:

 Confirmed

  1. 吉米许万人坑 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  2. Dozestendsaafasdfsfsolongnkeeps (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  3. महाभौममहाभौम (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  4. Pp-dispute (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  5. Uponblameuponblame (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  6. 做猫是个人才 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  7. 한어어국국어 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  8. 锑锑的水大了 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  9. 基米许万人坑 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  10. Codename Protest (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  11. 令现正进行 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  12. 朱海军 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  13. CivilagainIII (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  14. Ideal gas equation (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  15. אנסאנסאנס (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  16. Đài Loan Mỹ Việt lợn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  17. 超级理科生刘朋 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  18. 赵明毅教授 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  19. Guke9527 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  20. 方滨兴院士 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  21. 反网特 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  22. Kage-bot (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  23. 高考成绩要公布了 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  24. WP:LHLS (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  25. 氪跨拉乌 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  26. 英文(简体) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  27. 挡的政策亚克西 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  28. Goe Juna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  29. 苏州中学每况愈下 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  30. Atomsgivenanti (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  31. VeryVitalPerson (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Hope that helps. -Barras talk 16:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Seems the account is the other VIP, (seems like fishing xD) thanks anyway. --DS-fax 12:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

IngaKaiser5@gotwikipedia

Status:    Done

The following pattern accounts have recently been created on got.wikipedia. I'm afraid they might be spambots.

Please consider investigating them. Mathonius (talk) 22:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Both got.wikipedia and hif.wikipedia are wikis where many pattern spambots are being created. Please check MerrillAngel4 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) as well. Mathonius (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Also new.wikipedia:

Mathonius (talk) 22:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

And sn.wikipedia:

Mathonius (talk) 22:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

New pattern accounts keep being created on these wikis, so please take a look at the Special:RecentChanges as well. Mathonius (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Being dealt with. Elfix 08:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Hqzqrdufbg@crwikipedia

Status:    Done

A few more accounts matching the H[a-z]{3}rd[a-z]{4} pattern. Please consider investigating them. Mathonius (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done{ thx — billinghurst sDrewth 11:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

रायबा@mr.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done, we cannot undertake fishing exercises Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. This request simply does not fulfil the requirements to allow stewards to undertake a CU, and I don't know what it would show even if it was undertaken. If there are issues on the wiki, then they may be best by starting something at Requests for comment. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Ohmamamiya@zh.wikipedia

Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. Personal attacks is not a reason for checkuser but for a block. Abuse of multiple accounts might be a reason to use CU. However MoreInfo more information is needed as I currently see no details, diffs, evidences, etc. as required by policy. Please show us why do you think those three users are sockpuppets and they if so which policies they are violating with their actions. Otherwise I will reject this request. — MA (audiencia) 16:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Alright. First, both 2D-2R and Chunyin2003 edited this [29][30], then 2D-2R rolled Wkpxcw's edit, and later Ohmamamiya appeared to abuse Wkpxcw [31].--Zhxy 519 (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
closed as X mark.svg Not done, impetus seems to have passed. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Proofservice17@en.wikiversity

 Confirmed and Yes check.svg locked. — T. 03:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
All are in same lot. All locked and the IP is gblocked. — T. 05:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Fadams@bg.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated, no other sockpuppets--Shizhao (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Wermi@fa.wikipedia

 Confirmed:

  • Wermi
  • Diegou
  • Gigabite
  • Wildfire <- see [37]
  • Sistemus
  • Nurani <- see [38]
  • Bijangerd
  • Bozorgan
  • Lujali
  • Shfarshid
  • Ahmadbahmani
  • TuiJiani
  • Tuijian
  • Tupbashi
  • Arhamorrahemin
  • Politicus
  • Mohamadsajjadizadi
  • Ramshini
  • Kouroshzaim
  • Sistemos
  • Hillocuper
  • Sajjad heidari
  • Shelman8
  • MDORBIDI

--Shizhao (talk) 14:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much, and thanks for blocking those open proxies. -- Dalba(talk) 2 Shahrivar 1391/ 15:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

益熙@zh.wikipedia

Fadams@bg.wikipedia

  • Likely Likely: Fadams, Yasen igra
  • Stale: Human anatomy, 6. клас (no data)

--Shizhao (talk) 15:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

  • The first two accounts (Fadams, Yasen igra) do show a similarity (same IP for some edits). The other two fall beyond the time range of the possible check. Pundit (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Petr Tomasovsky@eo.wikipedia

Only the first two accounts fall into the window of possible past CU check. While there is an affinity in the same major Internet provider, OS differ. Pundit (talk) 15:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

XsucIvsyc8@beta.wikiversity

Status:    Done

Suspect spambots, please investigate these pattern accounts. --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Xys7kNch, Xys3eAch and AsucWbsyc5 spammed and have now been blocked locally. Mathonius (talk) 22:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • All locked, those I could CU have been cued. -Barras talk 20:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Louisa5490@mediawikiwiki

Status:    Done