Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in September 2013, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.
Reason(s): WP:DUCK --DannyChan (talk) 05:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
If it is WP:DUCK, why do you need a CU? Ruslik (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
No valid reason presented, and no indication of the value of running checks. You can deal with the accounts for their actions, without confirming with checkuser data. — billinghurstsDrewth 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Reason(s): Obviously the same, by virtue of their deleted edits. Cross-wiki spammer.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
These are a duck but were confirmed by the CU. There are numerous accounts that look like sleepers but the technical evidence is not conclusive so there's little more that can be done at this time. Thanks for the report QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)