Steward requests/Checkuser/2015-08

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



please also check Ebrahimi-amir that i think he is owner of this accounts.--Koroğlu (talk) 11:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I already checked the first five users. From them I could not see a connection to Ebrahimi-amir. --MF-W 11:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Closed Closed as per MF-W's noted check with results and commentary at Stewards' noticeboard.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

শামসুল আরেফীন@bn.wikipedia

@Moheen Reeyad: If you believe that it is just link spam, then you can manage that without resorting to a checkuser. What value do you see in having a checkuser?  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They try from different account to established only one thing and adding promotional information about a person named Shamsul Arefin who is not notable. And they have no interest in any Wikipedia article without this. So I want to be sure whether they are the same person. --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Billinghurst: We had a deletion discussion at w:bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা/শামসুল আরেফীন (২য় মনোনয়ন) where above users actually supported each other to establish শামসুল আরেফীন. As far as I can see, most of the users have the same interest related to শামসুল আরেফীন. We also have a discussion on w:bn:WP:AN about this issue and it's getting worse. ~ Nahid Talk 06:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Given the complicated nature of this check me and steward billinghurst did the through check together and results are:

বর্ষা and শাহীন সৈকত and শ্রাবণ and মঈনুল ইসলাম and মহীবুল্লাহ and তৌহিদুল আলম are  Confirmed sockpuppets and শামসুল আরেফীন is Unrelated Unrelated and user লাকি is Stale and also user:Pritom rudra is Likely Likely to be suck master Mardetanha talk 16:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


But we can not report the IP address. Ruslik (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Obaid Raza: Please take note of Ruslik's. If we decide to check the accounts we won't be able to tell you the IP or IPs they used to edit. —MarcoAurelio 13:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They are all related within IP range, though whether they are spambot is to be determined. If they are problematic, then block them. There are other users within the range, and I would be hesitant to block though we could look to apply a soft block if necessary in that it is spamming deriving.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ambulance chæiser@no.wikipedia

I have blocked Ambulance Chæiser based on his latest edits clearly identifying him as a sockpuppet of Sju hav. - 4ing (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@4ing: What are you wanting stewards to do with this matter? It seems that you have it resolved.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
After the block, I think this case can be closed. - 4ing (talk) 07:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, closing per your request. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 14:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

دوستی بزرگ@fawikibooks

@Mardetanha: --Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 16:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 It looks like a duck to me , no need to CU Mardetanha talk 11:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sonia Sevilla@fa.wikiquote

This is an influential request, both in Persian Wikipedia and Persian Wikiquote. Sonia Sevilla had been banned in Wikipedia before, and ع م گ is a known sockpuppeter. On the other hand, the result of the RfD in Persian Wikiquote is very dependent to this CU request. Please do this appeal ASAP then. Thanks in advance. ● Mehran Debate 16:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have found several overlaps between Sonia Sevilla and ع م گ who edited from different access points at the same time [2] [3] [4] [5]. Also many overlaps between مژگان 74 and Sonia Sevilla [6] [7] [8] [9]. Therefore, it is:
  • Unrelated Unrelated for Sonia Sevilla / ع م گ and Sonia Sevilla / مژگان 74
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive for مژگان 74 / ع م گ who never contributed the same days, except 13 August (ویژه until 14:12 UTC and مژگان 74 from 16:28 UTC, so enough time to move from one place to another).
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive for Alinowe and all the other accounts.
The only relation I could find was in that مژگان 74 and مهتاب آشنا (not mentioned in this SRCU) are  Confirmed sockpuppets. Elfix 07:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Elfix: Are "مژگان 74" and "مهتاب آشنا" are sockpuppets of "Sonia Sevilla"? "Unrelated" and "Confirmed"? Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 12:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mjbmr: I meant that there is most likely only one person behind "مژگان 74" and "مهتاب آشنا". Elfix 16:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Elfix:Oh, I got it, thank you! Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 16:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


 Declined. Since the accounts are new, have very few edits and the requesting user asserts that they behave similarly, I think that this is best handled applying the duck test and blocking the accounts based on edits, since copyright infringement is per se a reason for block. —MarcoAurelio 12:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Stale. Not possible to check since the user data of the above named accounts has expired. Do you have any previous checks or results of this user? Do you also have any new suspected accounts? —MarcoAurelio 12:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@AntanO: : மூன்று மாதங்களுக்கு மட்டுமே CU தரவு சேமிக்கப்படும். மேல் குறிப்பிடப்பட்ட கணக்குகளில் இரண்டு கணக்குகள் தொகுத்தலை நிறுத்தி/தடை செய்யப்பட்டு மூன்று மாதங்களுக்கு மேல் ஆகி விட்டது. எனவே பயனர் சோதனை செய்ய சாத்தியமில்லை. இது தொடர்பான முந்தைய சோதனை முடிவுகள் எதுவும் இருப்பதாக எனக்கு நினைவில்லை. இது தொடர்பான வேறு கணக்குகள் ஏதாவது உள்ளதா?--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They were similar COI edits time to time, but I don't remember them. Anyway, I have added fourth name. Thanks Shanmugam for addition clarification. --AntanO 16:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry, but I still can not compare the users as there's no data stored for them, nor past checks were performed to even make an assumption.  Declined. —MarcoAurelio 17:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for clarification. --AntanO 17:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No problem. I am sorry that I could not be of any help here :-( —MarcoAurelio 10:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


 Declined - Sorry but we can not link accounts to IP addresses per the privacy policy. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 10:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I came here to submit the same request. I have blocked user:مریم_ایلامی for one week because of her/his personal attacks. I'm pretty sure that there are some sockpuppets in this conversation and it is important for us to find them. MRG90 (talk) 07:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
all listed here are  Confirmed, I found also user:ایلام اصیل which uses the same network and soft. einsbor talk 14:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think this checkuser is not necessary anymore. User:Musicpresent and user:مکری16 are both blocked infinity and the dispute is somehow controlled. MRG90 (talk) 16:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So I'm closing as withdrawn. einsbor talk 17:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Kruusamägi Since the user has 50k edits and is a sysop on etwiki, could you notify the local community (village pump, sysops' noticeboard, etc.) of your request? Elfix 20:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Technically, thous comments in question are already in the village pump. I'd make the question there, even thou I don't see this as a very suitable place, as that might fuel thous nasty comments, that should not be there in the first place. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. We just need some community review on this. We usually don't check well-established users without a good reason. Elfix 07:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC) Note: independent of the validity of your SRCU, I have added the IP in the request. Elfix 08:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
User decided to take a wikibreak. So I guess that there is no need to go one with that. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]