Steward requests/Checkuser/2016-09

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



X mark.svg Not done We do not associate users with specific IP addresses. Ruslik (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Mpb eu@bg.wikipedia

+ Avantir: same as for Simeon denkov. — Luchesar • T/C 14:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Adding one more to this case as the above: Scalana.--The Wiki Boy (talk) 19:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Avantir is  Confirmed as a sock of Simeon denkov. Other accounts are also Likely Likely - the user edits through many proxies. Ruslik (talk) 12:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Ruslik. This is really helpful! — Luchesar • T/C 12:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Ruslik, sorry to bother you again, but another likely sock popped up today, with the same personal attacks, etc.:

Could you check it as well, please? — Luchesar • T/C 16:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Here's one more, which is active only on the English Wikipedia. It was used to circumvent the protection here by recreating the deleted page under a different name. I already notified a sysop/CU there, but since this is already a case of cross-wiki abuse, I thought it's good to mention it here as well.

— Luchesar • T/C 22:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure about Sieminehn. Ruslik (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Ruslik, it might be a meatpuppet indeed. Could you please just tell whether the edits were from a (likely) open proxy or not? — Luchesar • T/C 18:28, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Another one which looks more like a sock than a meatpuppet. Apologies for constantly bugging you with these cases. I'll see to have the proposal for local CUs finalized in the next days (most of the work is already done), so hopefully this will be the last case from us.

— Luchesar • T/C 16:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

LugerP08 is Unlikely Unlikely. Mpb_bg does not seem to edit through proxies (the IP locates to Sofia). Ruslik (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks again, Ruslik. Really appreciate your help. — Luchesar • T/C 18:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


This user check request has been rejected once early in Meta and in PersianWikipedia about 20 minutes ago. MohammadtheEditor (talk) 07:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

When we have local (active) CUs, stewards can't do checkuser. This request is automatically rejected. Amir (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Rejected Rejected Farsi Wikipedia has local CheckUsers (cf. CheckUser_policy#Access_to_CheckUser). You should fill the request here. Thank you. —MarcoAurelio 08:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Is this a prank? They played the game to take control of the Persian Wikipedia
Cut! off my access: why? Because I said something.
All killed!
--Iranian Shahـــ☫ـــ(talk) 09:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
hey, (All killed) ??? , Wikipedia:No legal threats --AFlorence (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
what? --Iranian Shahـــ☫ـــ(talk) 10:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
This request is X mark.svg Not done since local Checkusers exists. For other issues see Steward requests/Miscellaneous. -- Tegel (Talk) 13:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
One other option is a RFC. -- Tegel (Talk) 13:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tegel:What do you know? They block a lot of users. See my account: I do not have access to @fa.wikipedia!--Iranian Shahـــ☫ـــ(talk) 13:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Please don't change the status. That you don't have access to the local wiki doesn't change the fact that there is local Checkusers and it's these people that should do the check and not Steward. You still have access to Steward requests/Miscellaneous and RFC since these pages is here at Meta. If you continue to remove the status on this case here you might loose the possibility to edit Meta, so don't do that again. -- Tegel (Talk) 14:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
oops!... Third admin Where?--Iranian Shahـــ☫ـــ(talk) 14:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


Yes check.svg Done Ruslik (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
New sock: Jebstarad (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser).
Locked. Ruslik (talk) 18:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Probably is necessary to block his IP. --Usuário utente (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
To identify new socks, check periodically log of new userpages created here on meta - seems that creating a userpage here - is a common behaviour for this farm of clones. --Usuário utente (talk) 14:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


Yes check.svg Done, you are right. Now locked. --Stryn (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


I strongly support the above request. Please add the account Rotattif (new entry) to the list of suspected sockpuppets. --Pafsanias (talk) 07:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Aliuorgio and Certeffy are Stale. Vollatyll and Liniste16 are  Confirmed as well as Verticalla and Rotattif. Ruslik (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Νεοκλής και Νικοκλής@el.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done. user: Η Θάνου της Βικιπαίδειας is Likely Likely. I can see that user:Νεοκλής και Νικοκλής is, according to CU data, the same user as blocked: Ο ΣΕ ΘΕΛΩ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΕΛΙΟΣ, + Α Γ Υ Ρ Τ Η Σ +, Νικόλας Παπετοστόλου. There are also two more accounts, not blocked, but not used since August: Στέλιος Θ. and Βενιαμίν Ζερβάκης. Please compare their edit pattern, etc. I cannot see connection between the rest of accounts you listed. einsbor talk 23:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 Confirmed. You can also block that range as there are no other users on it. Ruslik (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


Comment Comment first: User:Derakhshan has already announced that آتروپات & بهمنیار are both his alternative accounts. second: We have a local CU in FaWiki and third: User:Iran9 has been blocked indef for Sock puppetry (See the list of his socks).--Arian Talk 20:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Rejected RejectedMarcoAurelio 10:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

@Ruslik0:.@MarcoAurelio:*see...... is Sock puppetry and: bahmanyar(بهمنیار) is block. to farsi wikipedia
Iranian admins do not know the other accounts (Derakhshan)
He(Derakhshan) is friends inspector ( local CU!)--Iran9 (talk) 10:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
We won't undertake this request. FA and EN has local CUs. Please don't change the status of this request. —MarcoAurelio 10:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
no problem.@Mardetanha: (Steward persian) come here fa: با اطیمنان می‌گویم درخشان 80تا زاپاس دارد. مردتنها اگر مردی به اینجا می‌آیی و درخواست بازرسی می‌دهی هرچند ان قدر رفتار منفعل بودن در مقابل خودی ‌ها و غیرخودی‌ها را دیدم که به شما هم شک دارم. سپاس--Iran9 (talk) 11:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)