Steward requests/Checkuser/2017-07

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Please don't copy the reasoning from the above request. We need to know the reasons of why a check is needed on azbwiki. —MarcoAurelio 10:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Declined DeclinedMarcoAurelio 10:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


Thanks. I've found a few accounts, you can find them here. They are now locked and their IP addresses globally blocked. Matiia (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


Has the user been abusing the multiple accounts? Just having them does not violate any policy. Ruslik (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
User clearly said he has 6 accounts and failed to declare which are they. Ta.Wiki policy about Sock puppetry clearly say that user should not have multiple accounts. If they have reasonable circumstance, they should declare such connections. Read: கைப்பாவை which is similar version of Sock puppetry. Also, I have seen some editing pattern that indicate user could engage in disrupt discussions. --AntanO 01:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done Ruslik (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Reason?--AntanO 01:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
A user engaged in disrupt discussions that has similar editing pattern of these user IDs, and user failed to declare connections. I already made many CheckUser as per policy and general policy, and I am aware of Check User. If you reject my request, you should tell the reason. @Vituzzu and Trijnstel: --AntanO 11:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
You have not present sufficient evidence that the user used multiple accounts in abusive way. Ruslik (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I have already told you that a user engaged in disrupt discussions that has similar editing pattern of this user, and user himself told he has six user IDs and failed to reveal those. According to policy, users should/must declare all user IDs. (Read or translate policy of Sock puppetry) Isn't sufficient evidence? --AntanO 03:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
@AntanO: "Similar editing pattern" - how? Please supply diffs. Stewards will not action requests worded as vaguely as this.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
@AntanO: As Jasper said, you need to provide specific links, also i dont see anywhere that PARITHIMATHI declared that he had created six accounts, all i can see is that he asked 'isn't six accounts allowed' ஆறு கணக்குகள் உண்டல்லவா?--PARITHIMATHI (பேச்சு) 04:48, 9 மே 2017 (UTC). Could you please provide some more links to the discussions--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
I have requested for two reasons. First is using multiple account and failed to reveal them which is against policy, and second is about similar editing pattern. At the moment, I am going to stick on first issue. I already gave link for policy. PARITHIMATHI told me "அன்டன்! ஆசிரியர் பயிற்சிக்காக ஆறு கணக்குகளை உருவாக்கினேன்." which could be translated as Anton! I created six accounts for teacher training. --AntanO 11:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


Μαχητής, Χριστάκος, ΥΕΝΕΔ, ΕΡΤ 3 and Google Map Maker are Likely Likely the same user. Other accounts as well as Εσάτ Τζεμήλογλού, Κ16 and Ντιναμό are Possible Possible. Ruslik (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

GongLove Esooptron MCOO@el.wikipedia

Likely Likely Ruslik (talk) 20:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)



Note Note: @Dispenser: Wikimedia Commons has their own CheckUsers which can be requested at c:COM:RFCU. Is there any reason why they cannot handle this themselves? (ping @Krd, Elcobbola, and Trijnstel) Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Request withdrawn Sorry about that, new to the process of check user. Dispenser (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
No need to be sorry. This WP Zero abuse is new to us and maybe crosswiki input was required. Hopefuly they can deal with this locally. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Request at c:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Albertoburiano --Dispenser (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)