Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-01

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 January 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Picksve@zh.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done, For Picksve, 反赤共復民國, Topsun888, Choasppp, Cynthia liu123 the CU evidence is inconclusive. All other accounts confirmed. No other unlocked sleeping account. Linedwell [talk] 19:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks User:Linedwell. Reported back.--Cohaf (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
@Cohaf: No problem. I checked but I can't link it to any of the previous accounts. Regards, Linedwell [talk] 19:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
@Linedwell:. Thanks much!--Cohaf (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

珍珠鮮奶茶@zh.wikipedia

TLPG@en.wikiquote

X mark.svg Not done Do not see any reason for checkuser. If an account misbehave, just block it. Ruslik (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Umm...Ruslik...Is there some reason to perform a CU other than someone abusively and obviously using multiple accounts? GMGtalk 01:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Haled R@ro.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done - no check needed here. That account hasn't edited in nearly a month, so checking it would not assist in preventing any abuse. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

MTR 558391@zh.wikipedia

  • Comment Comment. No local consensus to check, they have clear editorial disputes with the rest and send the 2 to zhwiki AIV but was declined and ask to engage in village pump discussion. However, they don't wish to engage in meaningful discussion at village pump and wow, here they are. Forumshopping indeed.--Cohaf (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment No, we have local consensus to chack because some administrators in zh RFCUHAM agree to check due to their editing habit are similar and we are already discussed in the disscussion page. Iswjy1mcb (talk) 22:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Comment Comment@Iswjy1mcb:. May I understand which zhwiki administrator agreed to the check? And may I know what consensus there are. In addition, it'll be wise to use the preview button rather than editing a sentence 10 times. Best Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
      • Let me make this clear: No administrators were involved in local discussion, and forum shopping is not allowed at Meta. Your request is likely to be rejected. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 00:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
    • @Cohaf: Sanmosa agreed to check Iswjy1mcb (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
      • Sanmosa is NOT an administrator.--Cohaf (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
      • Comment Comment @Cohaf: It is suspected that MTR 558391 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing, checking for sleepers is needed. It looks like a duck to meIswjy1mcb (talk) 03:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
        • My goodness. You reported to AIV and an administrator told you to start a discussion at Village Pump and determined it as a content dispute but you didn't. And now you are at meta saying the same. What grounds are there for a sleepers check? I will strongly encourage you to drop the stick before I push for sanctions for forumshopping at zhwiki. If you want the check, fine go ahead, but I request the steward to check this account also to make sure it isn't a good hand bad hand account and they seems to have very similar interests to the above 2 as well as editing tendencies. --Cohaf (talk) 03:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
        • Why on earth are you so stubborn, Iswjy1mcb? Stewards will not check until a local consensus comes into being. Why not follow zh.wiki administrator's advice? Do you think you are superior to admins or what?! Stop your rudeness. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 09:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Could a steward or meta admin close this request as premature and lacking consensus from local discussion? Alex Shih (talk) 09:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
    • @Alex Shih:. I would rather the closing reason being invalid, forum shopping, SNOW and disruptive checking. But yes, this needs to be closed by a steward as soon as possible. I'm not sure whether a meta admin could do it or not.--Cohaf (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done - checkuser isn't a weapon to use against the other side of a content dispute. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Andyccr@zh.wikiversity

  • @Bbb23: as enwiki CU who conducted the check that this is a crosswiki issue. Possibly commons also, see SUL of accounts.--Cohaf (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Well, even if it is not zhwiki, local discussion is always preferred since we are not expert on all the local projects and your fellow editors might be able to detect new CU target. Will do in few minutes after I am done with other stuff. — regards, Revi 12:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
I duck blocked all and had discussed this case with community members offline so I think we did all we could here. The rest really require a CU to ensure all is taken care off. If there is a range, do feel free to do a checkuser block. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I request that a CU block should be imposed at the same time because of Autoblock #31 concering User:AndyUSWCAX. Since he has a history of copyright violation on zhwikiversity, I would argue thet it is necessary. --Mend My Way 05:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Now my fellow sysop had concurred a check is necessary, I hope we can have the results soon. Thanks!--Cohaf (talk) 06:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - all three accounts are  Confirmed, no sleepers. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz:. Thanks, is there any range to be blocked?.--Cohaf (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
At this stage I think the account blocks should cover it. There has been no further abuse since the request was filed. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz: Thanks so much, appreciate your help for this. Will go through the accounts to see any SRG requests need to be filled or not. Thanks anyway --Cohaf (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

‎AryaHindu@hi.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done there is inconclusive technical evidence. Please use behavioural evidence to evaluate next steps. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

MeritTim@zh.wikipedia

 Confirmed. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks MarcoAurelio. Reported Back.--Cohaf (talk) 18:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

X028887@zh.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done all accounts are  Confirmed, no sleepers found. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

MTR 553891@zh.wikipedia

  • I'd throw swear words at you if not for urbanity's sake. This is a repetitive request. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 01:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I would like to find out whether MTR 553891 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing or not due to frequent editing on such articles.  It looks like a duck to me Iswjy1mcb (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Sorry for disturbing, as this is a disruption made by Iswjy1mcb, per IAR, I should rapidly close it. Explanation is made in zhwiki RFCUHAM. Sæn 03:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Side note: this one is a repeated report of the above one. Sæn 03:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Please view it as a withdrawal. Many thanks. Sæn 03:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Not disruption Iswjy1mcb (talk) 03:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
    • BOOMERANG, OP block for DE locally.--Cohaf (talk) 04:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Side note: Iswjy1mcb is blocked in zhwiki for 24 hours. Sæn 04:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

A few time@zh.wikipedia

  • Sorry for disturbing, as this is a disruption made by Iswjy1mcb,per IAR, I should rapidly close it. Explanation is made in zhwiki RFCUHAM. Sæn 03:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Please view it as a withdrawal. Many thanks. Sæn 03:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Not disruption Iswjy1mcb (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
    • BOOMERANG, OP blocked for DE locally.--Cohaf (talk) 04:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Side note: Iswjy1mcb is blocked in zhwiki for 24 hours. Sæn 04:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Side note 2: Techyan turned down the request locally per zh:WP:DISRUPT. --Mend My Way 04:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
    • And Techyan is also the one who blocked Iswjy1mcb. Sæn 06:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)