Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-02

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 February 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

唐三好@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 14:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

  •  Confirmed 許問水, 白涎安, 가을11001, 唐三好
  • Vicky2019000 Unrelated Unrelated but Vicky2019000  Confirmed with Marrymark2018
  • 郭淇玉 Unlikely Unlikely

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 14:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Pafsamias@ro.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 19:34, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

 Confirmed Patsanias, Paraidis1, Pafsamias


Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 19:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Anar Məmmədov@az.wikipedia

MoreInfo Additional information needed It is not clear to me why this check is requested. The use of multiple accounts is not prohibited unless they are used abusively. Could you please clarify and/or identify instances of policy violations or abusive use of multiple accounts? Thank you. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello @MarcoAurelio: , I also was planning to address about this issue. Maqamed has voted here for the article Anar Məmmədov introduced to laboratory. I worry that there is a trick. Please, help us in this issue.Thanks.--Turkmen talk 18:39, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Please, somebody help me. I haven't got a reply in 4 days. Why do the authorities here not respond?--Turkmen talk 20:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 14:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

  •  Confirmed Anar Məmmədov, Maqamedd
  • Possible Possible Anar Məmmədov, Hüseyn706

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 14:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear @علاء: thanks. --Turkmen talk 19:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I was ill all these days. Apologies for not being able to handle this in due time. Thanks to Alaa for taking care of this one. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Iswjy1mcb@zhwp

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 16:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

 Confirmed 3GFRIENDSNSD, 2pvr2, MTR 553892, Un1pjvr, Iswjy1mcb


Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 16:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Ucv1948@ro.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done. WikiHelp2198 and WikiHelp21 are  Confirmed. The rest are unrelated from a technical standpoint. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Çim Çen In@azwikipedia

As the second user has not edited within three months, CheckUser cannot be used to find a connection here. I looked at this, and turns out I ran a check two years ago on this user. The results of the check can be found at Special:Diff/17341213. There was not definitive technical evidence to make a connection.
Also, in the future, if you suspect that an account is a sockpuppet of a WMF-banned user, please report it to ca[at]wikimedia[dot]org. Thanks, – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Giteshs78@hi.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done - Both accounts  Confirmed. I've blocked both on Wikidata, and am considering global action. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks--आर्यावर्त (talk) 07:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Regularcelibrity@hi.wikipedia

user created anurag maurya's article on hiwiki, after he arguming on talk page of article. User uploaded two anurag maurya's photo on commons, in this pic he listed seft as [[User:Regularcelibrity|Anurag Maurya Actor]]. see this. In english wiki anurag maurya's other fake account is here. One of other account is in hi wiki named anurag maury in devnagri script.--आर्यावर्त (talk) 04:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 05:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

  • Stale अनुराग मौर्य (last edit on May 2018)
  •  Confirmed Regularcelibrity, Rajapraja584

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 06:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks.-आर्यावर्त (talk) 07:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

De Patre Romuli@zh.wikipedia

Completed..

  • 南方的小鳥 and all of socks are Stale
  •  Confirmed De Patre Romuli, Njsgdsza
  • Likely Likely De Patre Romuli, Scottmacs

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 06:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

@Cohaf: no, as I checked De Patre Romuli globally, so you can found it here --Alaa :)..! 13:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
@علاء:. That's what I'm thinking also, I knew there is an SUL account. Thanks, all reported back. --Cohaf (talk) 13:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

User-4488@vi.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done We do not accept checkuser requests from unregistered users --Alaa :)..! 06:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Kurdisk kultur@no.wikipedia

 Confirmed (in sense that they belong to the same person). Ruslik (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

User-EAV204@sk.wikipedia

Check cannot be performed. Bronto (talk • contribs • block • x-wiki • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) is Stale because they have not editted for a long time, thus there will be no data avalaible to make a comparaison.  No comment with respect to IP address(es). We do not run checks that would have the effect of directly or indirectly linking a registered account with IP addresses. If the IP or IP range is being disruptive, feel free to block it. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

MeritTim@zh.wikipedia

At first I was going to decline this, given the lack of behavioural evidence. It seems reasonable to me that in a country where people often connect through VPNs/proxies that there would be some overlap. But then I noticed the previous check from January, so I redid those results. I did find that MertTim and CAMCAD shared one IP and the same useragent on that IP, but I consider this to be a Possible Possible match. If the accounts were socks, I would expect more overlap than one IP out of many. The useragents are also very common. If you do take action here, you should consider behavioural evidence first. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
CAMCAD is a single purpose account that was trying to game the system in order to vote in DYK. They were blocked as such. MeritTim has perviously applied for IPBE and was declined due to the lack of evidence. Four days later, CAMCAD appealed and triggered the autoblock and MeritTim cited that autoblock for the IPBE application. Were both accounts using proxy the entire time? -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
I've done some more extensive checks than I did the first time. MeritTim and CAMCAD have edited from one large range, and one common IP, over the last two month time period. Their useragents match. There is also overlap between both accounts and the IPs/useragents used by Responsibility330. Looking at this again makes me think all three are Likely Likely the same person. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:48, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz, Mys 721tx, and WQL:Likely Likely Confirmed. As a user who wants to improve the community, I only have one sentence to say: This kind of behavior does not have any benefit to me. Moreover, Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust, and the result can only be known as Likely Likely. It is impossible to prove the relationship between the user and me. Therefore, it is very unreasonable. Finally, I am really in the public library for editing, so I feel sad about the banning order.--MeritTim (talk) 07:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Asd01471aaa@zh.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done - Unblocked sleeper accounts: Jack881215ss, Qaz01471q. – Ajraddatz (talk) 07:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks and I have reported them to sysops. --云间守望 08:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)