Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-04

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 April 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

PSK SkySon@zh.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done - PSK SkySon and 天子想要女朋友 are  Confirmed; evidence for Lmcty is Inconclusive Inconclusive. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, reported back.--Cohaf (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Crystalpanyf@zh.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done - one of the two accounts is Stale, so there is nothing to compare the other against. Please address using behavioural evidence. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Noted and reported back. Thanks and apologies. --Cohaf (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
No need for apologies! The other account had edits from December, but the limit is unfortunately three months. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Albert20009@zh.wikipedia

Autoblocks aren't configurable through wiki interface; it is configuration settings. — regards, Revi 07:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Let me try to explain it in a clearer manner. This user is socking prolifically, the list of socks are found here. Based on local Checkuser policy [1], a CU can be conducted to find out the underlying IP / ranges of IP of all the accounts and then do a CU block (which must then be oversighted) to prevent new socks accounts to be created from the IP / ranges. This is what we are requesting. Anymore details do co-ordinate with Techyan. I am here to just explain on behalf what exactly is needed in more details. Best Regards, --Cohaf (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

References

  1. 检查已封禁的账户所使用的IP,便于延长自动封禁
    translation
    Check the IP addresses of blocked users, so as to extend the autoblock(s) accordingly
@Techyan: can you list the most recent 2 - 3 socks this user is using, sorry I am not that well to go through the list. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Not stale:
Alberteffendy22333 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy40555 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy70335 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy89995 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy90551 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy92996 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy92999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberteffendy95881 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Albert20229 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
On hold pending some related internal discussions. — regards, Revi 03:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
@-revi and Cohaf: Ctrl+F on this page and look for keyword "Albert". All recently discovered socks edited this page. Please block their IPs if what they are using are concentrate enough, or more ideally, all of them are using the same IP, and immediately oversight block logs - that's what we have always been done on zhwiki. --TechyanTalk) 03:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
It is allowed to block the underlying IP or range of IPs to prevent abuse, as specified in the Access to nonpublic personal data policy s.4(b)(v) - "the public, when it is a necessary and incidental consequence of blocking a sockpuppet or other abusive account". It is more complicated in this case because it is against our policies to take actions that a sysop could take (local blocks) when there are local admins who could perform them. This request is still on hold for the time being, as it is still under discussion. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Question Question: It seems that "extend the auto block" means "check the IP and enforce the CU block (if possible)". I have checked the log and I've found out that some stewards had done something similar before (though some of the logs have been removed). --云间守望 13:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz and -revi:Any updates? Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 07:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Ajraddatz and -revi,↑?It was put here two months ago.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay. Our internal discussions wrapped up a while ago, but I haven't had much time to complete this. There are no underlying blocks that can be made in this case. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Ajraddatz. Reported back. --Cohaf (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

James3333@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 18:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

  • Possible Possible (nearer to unlikely) James3333, Jesoneejan, 許幻, Second-tone Nong, 蘇泓宇

There's no enough data. This is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 18:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Thanks and notified.-- CreampieGolden State Finals Champion 05:05, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Aloesiodys@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 17:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

  •  Confirmed 保護劉創馥條目, Aloesiodys, Seicoaite, Trapsophie, Modorcimsatte, Trugspram, Enosalvan, Siprohusx, Aryahchalese, 妍太金, Toqueuser, Eoateo, Waßnok, 仇思達博上位, Haffieros, Heigongfansssas, Mosionale, Wassnoce

This is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 17:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Hactlcpslaat@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 09:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Completed..

 Confirmed Hactlcpslaat, Pearsonint, Eason2020, Justnewaccount, Teychanissabotage, Nonvandelism


This is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence --Alaa :)..! 09:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Asybaris01@ro.wikipedia

User's last edit is too old, however we do not associate specific IP addresses with user accounts. If the IP is being disruptive, feel free to block it. --Wim b 16:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

AYCU@zh.wikivoyage

Users appear technically unrelated. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Jon Kolbert.--Cohaf (talk) 07:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)