Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-09

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 September 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Luckydayapple@zh.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done - inconclusive results, please evaluate behavioural evidence. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

FoooSoooooa@zh.wikipedia

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

瑪卡 (顓如) @zh.wikipedia

  • Please set this request to onhold for pending local discussion. Thank you.--SCP-2000 (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

教學組動三甲班蕭明㛢導師 (蘇俞安) @zh.wikipedia

Comment Comment: This is not a request that has sufficient local consensus. MCC214 brought this request to meta when it was still under discussion. As MCC214 mentioned, stewards may decide whether to do the CU. However, I think we should focus more on those requests that will affect local blocks on users.--Tiger (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Please set this request to onhold for pending local discussion. --Hamish 11:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  • IAR on hold pending further discussion. --Cohaf (talk) 12:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

徐昌昌 (小昌) @zh.wikipedia

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Naughtycaique (愛莎) @zh.wikipedia

Adding Target:

And here are some other recently created that still have data available,steward can choose will do/will not do this request in adding target,thanks.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 08:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

I suppose MCC214 wanted to ask stewards to decide on your own whether or not block the IPs they used to create accounts. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 08:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
typesetting at this section was carried out.--Hamish 12:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
@MCC214: please rewrite Naughtycaique request + 坦帕灣光芒460 request! as it's kind of mess, and I can't understand exactly what you ask/want! and please avoid such mess in requests! --Alaa :)..! 11:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
علاء,Yes check.svg Done.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
To make it plain simple: Check all the users named (2nd list are checked last month per Steward_requests/Checkuser/2019-06#劉曉程@zh.wikipedia but needs rechecking) + block underlying IP if there are any + sleepers check. These should be what MCC214 wants Stewards to do. --Cohaf (talk) 12:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
علاء,Reason(s) is Request 1,1. is Request 2,2. is Request 3,3. is Request 4.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 07:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
What on earth did you mean?? --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 23:43, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
MCC214, could you please stop forwarding local CU discussions onto Meta? Personally speaking, I can't understand neither of your local request nor what you said on meta. I am seriously considering a ban on you for CU-related discussions on zhwiki. --TechyanTalk) 03:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Dragoon17cc@zh.wikipedia

Adding Target:

And here are some other recently created that still have data available.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

坦帕灣光芒460@zh.wikipedia

Adding Target:

And here are some other recently created that still have data available.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 05:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Since I found multiple vandalism in the range of his confirmed IP, I have blocked the range 223.137.161.187/16 at zhwiki. And I noticed this range was used by KAGE, an xwiki LTA, so I request to check that range to decide if the block should be prolonged, or apply blocks at your discretion if the information can't be disclosed.--Hamish 15:31, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Declined without prejudices: This is merely a cleanup for the outdated messy requests. Re-file if this is still of interest. — regards, Revi 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

CX 466 (3GFRIENDSNSD) @zh.wikipedia

Collapsed, treat as per there is local consensus please. Thanks much. Appreciate it.--Cohaf (talk) 12:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

  • As a zhwiki's sysop, I have declined its local request for no consensus, then any steward may close this request under the same reason. Thanks.--Hamish 17:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

KlaraBenedict@ro.wikipedia

@Andrei Stroe: Yes, it looks both accounts are related. In addition it looks DiaDrops could be related as well. Regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Tccj22@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing...--Wim b 11:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Users share the same ISP and operating system, but no common IP and browser--Wim b 11:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Ionel 019@ro.wikipedia

Robbie SWE: Same ISP and user agent. If the edits are similar, imho can be  Confirmed --Wim b 19:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Wim b! Can someone block this page globally or do I have to request it? --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Global blocks are for IPs, Global locks are for accounts, but both are only done when there is a proven case of cross-wiki (which means two or more wikis) abuse by that user. You can always determine on your own and block them locally. — regards, Revi 01:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

哀悼中國共產黨竊國70週年@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... — regards, Revi 10:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Completed Completed

  • 松本信弘: Stale as of the SRCU submission: "Last edit was on 24 April 2019 at 12:27", stale as of July.
  • For the rest, "Louis Obama", "中國騙子韓國瑜", and "百田良子" were not on VPN. (The rest were on VPN.)
  • VPN ranges which weren't already gblocked are now gblocked.
    • Global blocks already in place for certain ranges, but local admin disabled the global block before the sock appeared. The global block was later re-instated by another local admin after this SRCU was filed.
  • 大江信義 and 百田良子 were on same ISP but there's no solid proof, so I'd just say Possible Possible borderlining Unlikely Unlikely. "Louis Obama" was on a different ISP than those two.

— regards, Revi 10:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

AakashAH120@ta.wikipedia

 Confirmed as well as AshwinAsh22, Lina Merlin and possibly Uksharma3. Ruslik (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Thank you! Does user GangadharGan26 Stale or confirm? --AntanO 18:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, it was confirmed. Ruslik (talk) 15:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: //possibly Uksharma3// can you please confirm this. AntanO has suspended our long term Tamil Wiki contributor Uksharma3 on the basis of your statement, without seeking any explanation from the said user.--Kanags (talk) 14:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
I said "possibly" but behavioral evidence should be taken into account. Ruslik (talk) 15:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
@AntanO: Can you explain (here) the reason for your action, please. Thanks.--Kanags (talk) 05:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
As above result. --AntanO 05:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
@AntanO: Mr Uksharma3 has stated that he has only one account. As User:Ruslik0 said, to take any action (for "possibly" result), //behavioral evidence should be taken into account//. Did you take any action to find out the evidence. I checked. But couldn't find any evidence.--Kanags (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
If he say so, how could you accept? Do you have any system like CheckUser? If so, tell me. You keep asking me here as well as in ta.wiki. What is your problem? --AntanO 12:09, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello people, please limit the comments on this completed request to clarification request and take your discussion about "what should be done about this" to your wiki. This page is a request for CheckUser investigation, not a place to discuss local CU business. Thank you! — regards, Revi 13:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

MarikkaBoon@ro.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done the accounts are Likely Likely, though no IP blocks are likely possible in this case due to collateral damage. – Ajraddatz (talk) 02:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)