Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-06

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 June 2020, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Angel X@hy.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Angel X, Մալիա Հեյլ

From a technical point of view. @Sigma'am: I haven't done it all yet, but I'd like to ask you if the users' edit type and behavior pattern in the result below match. The result below is for reference only.

  •  Confirmed Group 1: Angel X, Մալիա Հեյլ, Լիդիա Մարտին, ԱրմինեՄնիկ
  •  Confirmed Group 2: SilViePink, Արեն Ձավարյան, Մարիամ Էվոյան, Դավթյան Դավիթ 13, Ֆավորիտ
  •  Confirmed Group 3: ArmSirius, Gevorg Ghazaryan, Nooberella, Sembeot
  •  Confirmed Group 4: Մուշեղ Մովսիսյան, Մարիետա Մովսեսյան, Անահիտ Ափինյան, Անետա Արզումանյան, ԱՆԷԴ Յան

  •  Confirmed Group 1, 2 and 3.
  • Likely Likely Group 2 and 4.

This is only technically confirmed. It may be that they are the same user, or there are other possibilities for this to happen. If the behavior patterns or edit types of these accounts match, I will investigate further. I guess there are more of these accounts. Please let me know after analyzing in your community. --Sotiale (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:, thanks a lot, users in Group 2, Gruop 4 are from same wikiclubs. Users in Group 3 were in Wikicamp at same time. Please investigate Group 1 users, specially first 3, maybe all. There are behavior patterns or edit types of Group 1 accounts match:--Sigma'am (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
P.S. Please check also this edits.--Sigma'am (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I thought it was odd because the data was complicated, but it was also group editing. I will focus on users in Group 1 and let you know. --Sotiale (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Angel X, Մալիա Հեյլ, Լիդիա Մարտին, ԱրմինեՄնիկ, SilViePink, Ժենյա1

  • If 'SilViePink' is not related to users in Group 1, it means that ISP's IP allocation criteria are very confusing and complicated, or that they edited together at the same time and place. As far as possible, only the users who are most relevant to group 1 users are shown in the result. When determining whether it is sockpuppets, be sure to base on editing type and behavior pattern, not just checkuser information.

@Sigma'am: From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

AgroDan@ro.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Zgaba, TerciRO
  •  Confirmed Group 2: AgroDan, AleKJV, Barecode, EnergyPulse

  • Possible Possible Group 1 and Group 2 / Likely Likely Group 1 and Avram25.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. In the case of Possible Possible, it is recommended to decide based on the editing type and behavior pattern. If the edit type or behavior pattern matches, it is likely that the user. --Sotiale (talk) 00:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

GeluOltean@ro.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed GeluOltean, Groot2020, VanessaYouNess

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 16:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you @Sotiale: can we have a confirmation on the following account as well? It is very likely a sock (WP:DUCK). Berry2020 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) Gikü (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
As well as Bluemoon Sky Sand (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) Gikü (talk) 20:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
See below--Sakretsu (炸裂) 21:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Alinm90@ro.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Possible Possible Alinm90, Nicholasd2

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. In the case of Possible Possible, it is recommended to decide based on the editing type and behavior pattern. --Sotiale (talk) 10:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 10:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Berry2020@ro.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Bluemoon Sky Sand, Berry2020

--Sakretsu (炸裂) 21:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

(You may already know that they are the same user) I will leave it for reference when someone checks the record. They are the same users as the accounts confirmed in the request above. --Sotiale (talk) 00:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Beatboy16@el.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Unrelated Unrelated Beatboy16, Adratiatic20

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Sarno Popilw@fr.wiktionary

We do not publicly or otherwise connect IP addresses with users. Doing so would be a violation of the privacy policy. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Could we at least check if those accounts are linked? — Automatik (talk) 11:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Symbol wait.svg In progress... Sure. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 Confirmed few other accounts were locked/ranges blocked that are confirmed with those three. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Side notes:
  1. I know that French Wikipedia's CUs do publicly connect usernames with IP addresses of disruptive users. Does that mean that different privacy policies apply across Wikimedia projects, or should we understand fr.wikipedia is violating the privacy policy by applying that policy?
  2. We all know the saying "the freedom of some stops where that of others begins". Where does the freedom of disruptive users stop, if we cannot match their IP addresses with their accounts (considering that they use pseudonyms and not real names)? — Automatik (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Spammer@outreach.wikimedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Completed Completed These are common SOCKS proxies spambot friends, so I couldn't find bands to block separately. All of the proxies they exploited are blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 06:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 08:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

夏夜雨纷纷@zh.wikipedia

I'd appreciate it so much if anyone who deal with it kindly run an lwcheckuser, they're suspected to be cross-wiki abuse. --Hamish 16:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: え06, 6t84gh5tfy124
  • Possible Possible Group 2: 夏夜雨纷纷, DReamxis07

  • Possible Possible Group 1 and 2.
  • These users used proxies or VPN.

From a technical point of view with the help of enwiki. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.-- DRIZZLE (Talk 17:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

MarieVirtuElle@fr.wikipedia

Hi. We cannot conduct investigation through SRCU on wikis where local checkusers exist. Local checkusers have a network that can collaborate with checkusers from other wikis, so ask them to contact. If local checkusers are available for investigation, we will not be able to do so according to policy. --Sotiale (talk) 12:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
While technically this falls under "In emergencies, or for multi-project CheckUser checks as in the case of cross-wiki vandalism, stewards may perform local checks." and we are technically allowed to perform the check, it is much more preferable for the checks to be handled by local CUs. Hence closing this as not done. --Base (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Sotiale and Base:, an thanks for your answer. I am a bit surprised, as @Linedwell: explained me that a request for cross-wiki CU is to be addressed to Stewards on meta. So are fr.wikipedia CUs allowed to directly contact he.wikipedia and en.wikipedia CUs in order to cross their data? Thanks --Pic-Sou (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Pic-Sou, yes. One way to do it for them is by putting the results of their check on CU wiki and contacting hewiki and enwiki CUs via CU mailing list for them to do the same. --Base (talk) 12:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
All right, thanks again. --Pic-Sou (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, dear Stewards! I ask you to perform a verification that users request or to help them with advice. I hope that as a result, they will change their bias towards me because of my non-French nationality, which can be assimilated to racism. And I only know Wikicode at the level of what I learned in 7,5 months, because the attentive users gave me advice on this subject. I mainly use the visual editor, because Wikicode is really more difficult for me. I love what I do and I don't see any problem as I learn something new and develop myself by contributing to Wikipedia. Sincerely, MarieVirtuElle --MarieVirtuElle (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

768a137d49t@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 57we394, 768a137d49t, 47go81e39, 6821er571, 560ad9580W
  • Unrelated Unrelated Ahri6279

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 04:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --DRIZZLE (Talk 04:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

A0953258578@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: A0953258578, Bleacxh5x6a, Qaz01471
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Jordannn02, Asdfg5416, CarolHoHo
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Baron913, Gweexueer
  •  Confirmed Group 4: Calvin chang88, Calvin chang1963

  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 1 and 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1, 3 / 1, 4 / 2, 3 / 2, 4 / 3, 4

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 17:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --DRIZZLE (Talk 18:06, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
@DrizzleD: Oh, sorry. I copied the general instructions(From a technical ~ ... ) and put enwiki part incorrectly. Please take that part out. For reference, the reason another group came out was an additional finding while investigating the band of group 1. --Sotiale (talk) 01:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. --DRIZZLE (Talk 02:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Kfish2001@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
As the initial nominator of the local CU, I added Matt Zhuang, who shares similar behavior with 殲10 on [2] and both focus on the traffic population of soutehrn Taiwan railway stations.--淺藍雪 (talk) 06:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Kfish2001, 爾風, 銀河風雲, 世界上只有一個武漢肺炎, 挪威人, 習帝, 封鎖, 而坐
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 濰雞襬棵, 堅春爽三姐弟, 黃麻地
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Errrrrrrrr, 殲10
  •  Confirmed Group 4: Ohohoh312, 就在地上, 武漢コロ
  •  Confirmed Group 5: 巴餔, 胡甲漢, 楷狗, 交給
  •  Confirmed Group 6: 藍田玉, 旺角狗屋, I have a dream that one day
  •  Confirmed Group 7: Sanmosa, Dukawana (looks like ALT)

  •  Confirmed Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 / Likely Likely Group 1 and 6 / Possible Possible 藍絲 and Group 1
  • Possible Possible Noonelikewiki and Group 1 / Possible Possible 自由的百科全書(笑)and Group 1
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 7 and Group 1/2/3/4/5/6 and other accounts
  • Unrelated Unrelated 寒吉 and Group 7(Sanmosa)
  • Unrelated Unrelated 寒吉 and Group 1/2/3/4/5/6 and ohter accounts

  • Note Note: I didn't investigate Matt_Zhuang, because Matt_Zhuang wasn't in local consensus initially, but Matt_Zhuang didn't appear in related ranges during the investigation.

Whoa.. it was really complicated investigation. From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. In the case of Possible Possible, it is recommended to decide based on the editing type and behavior pattern. --Sotiale (talk) 07:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale: Dukawana is really my ALT, and actually I have claimed it a long time ago. I will report the CU results to zhwiki. ΣανμοσαThe Trve Lawe of free Monarchies 07:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito@meta

Oh, @CptViraj:, I got it. I've made the request through TW. I'll move to the correct page. EVinente (talk) 16:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Then kindly allow me to close this. --Hamish 18:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes, not done with locally handled. --Sotiale (talk) 10:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

King0910851996@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed King0910851996, UDD0902108888, Pppp00090001, WOps123456789, King09020810, Kopilg09021115546

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --SCP-2000 10:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Sanmosa@zh-classical.wikipedia

Please explain in detail which voting and what suspicion you had. --Sotiale (talk) 02:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
First, Sanmosa had used more than 1 account in zh wikipedia (Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-06) recently. Second ,There are many new users who only discussion and vote but never edit articles in this discussion.--WAN233 (talk) 02:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Dukawana is his alternative account, which is a generally accepted use if he has already stated that his ALT is his account. Why do you think Sanmosa is related to new users? --Sotiale (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
@WAN233: I guess User:高文海 put the discussion link in Chinese Wikipedia, so there are some new user voting in lzhwiki. --SCP-2000 03:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Because he had been ban many times because user more than 1 account in zh wikipedia.I think twice and I agree the opinion of SCP-2000.You can close this request. I will not pull a request until I have fuller reasons.--WAN233 (talk) 03:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

In accordance with your opinion, it is marked as withdrawn. If you have evidence and doubts at anytime, please ask freely. --Sotiale (talk) 03:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

黄冰楠@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 齊家須修身100, 都市传说, Yrdm, フィリピン空軍の軽飛行機が島の上空を旋回しながら, 昭和二十七年の二月, 梓希是就讀大學的單親家庭女生, 生年月日不明である, Zaza eastbrook1, 多位注册用户非编辑战, 不知為甚麼 看耿爽不爽....就覺得好可愛 哈哈哈哈哈, Namuwiki betterthanever3
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 仝卓, 林一一我喜欢你, 미기 (가수), 西方模式有问题, 台独分子周子瑜, 架空の鉄道駅であ, 封茗囧菌, 若松幸禧, 刘小备刘晓波, (小马哥1
  •  Confirmed Group 3: 郑爽(1991), 黑色天下, 陈柯宇, 古力娜扎, 韓總最強鐵衛隊隊長2, 彭十六, 姜贝贝, Andy Wong China, Georgesmithe1, 姑苏晚报, 囧菌, 微微一笑很倾城 (电视剧), 张靓颖, 98李煌老师, 崔文龙, 空の宮本武蔵, (小马哥19971019, 4月26日最適合斬支3, !一想到你我就, $128餐蛋飯影舞者, 我吃冰激凌2011, 大紀元1, $128餐蛋飯数论和人瑞类条目破坏
  •  Confirmed Group 4: 愛野みなこ, Fffyuyfuyfu, 经济学是研究人的学科, 164巅8, 日本の美术に関する学科设置高等学校, 夏雨潇潇1, 开垦牧场面对最大的敌人就是自然, 我吃冰激凌
  •  Confirmed Group 5: 法轮大法好99, 但都未能动摇他继续战斗的决心, DavidHuai1996, 两度进行大规模的搜索活动和数以百计的围剿, 我在德国修炼法轮功, 孙笑川1, 法轮大法好98, Zzxxhjghdgf, Hgghch, 法轮大法好96, 世界這麼大還是遇見你, Fffhhkhhj, 精日陈一发, 大阪七野爹, 0相爱穿梭千年
  •  Confirmed Group 6: 韩导1最强破坏者, Mjpa44666, 浪人琵琶, 人型鱼雷1, 1huang1996426, 专攻艺人条目, 专攻艺人条目1, 孙露1986627, 韩总最强铁卫队队长1, 其他的同伴好像还没有打到猎物, 森下くるみ
  •  Confirmed Group 7: 小生的花伞还落在你家, 你美眷如花 我浪迹天涯, 李煌老湿, 法轮大法好97, 母亲节快乐, Commuist Andy, 虎龙街, 003f031g7, $128餐蛋飯离心力青蛙, Bigbullfrog1969, 楼主傻屄, 难以忘记初次见你, $128餐蛋飯亲子节目破坏者, RISING SUN China
  •  Confirmed Group 8: $128餐蛋飯李煌老师, $128餐蛋飯违法广告破坏, 冰之沧月2, 诸葛孔明丞相, 法办江泽民
  •  Confirmed Group 9: Wknet1998, 生僻字, 陈柯宇, 100李煌老师, 香港獨立萬歲2020, M801226colin, 奇门遁甲 (2020年电影), 赵小棠, 99李煌老师, 仝卓父亲仝天峰, 曉紅歆1998, 太阳升起来了, 他们以战败投降为最大的羞辱, 裕仁天皇颁布终战诏书
  •  Confirmed Group 10: 李蝗老师1, 仝卓事件, 蔡恩雨, 政治家林则徐, 最強高校生, 洛公子, 夏夜雨漫漫, 耿爽不爽了, 李子柒, 这不是选择题,两者并不对立, 漢服運動, LumHoTsing1
  •  Confirmed Group 11: 观视频, 三顾茅庐, 空恨别梦久, 苏嗣淇, 半抹烟熏, 冰之沧月1, 我浪迹天涯
  •  Confirmed Group 12: 能够在年轻气盛的时候全身心地投入战斗,我认为是一种幸福, 穷开心 花儿乐队, Commuist Aaron
  •  Confirmed Group 13: 韩导2最强破坏者, Namuwiki betterthanever2, 陈一发大战影舞者, 朝鲜战争能速胜则速胜,不能速胜则缓胜,不要急于求成
  •  Confirmed Group 14: 426huang, 纵使世界已经不断的改变, 法轮大法好100
  •  Confirmed Group 15: 啪啪啪被孩子撞到怎么化解尴尬, 血染岭战斗
  •  Confirmed Group 16: Make134, Shigetaka Ōmori, 西加勒比海航空, 程以一, Hope Anne Keng-Wei Lee1, 是农民无法建立全新的政治制度
  •  Confirmed Group 17: 郭采洁, 战斗机驾驶员
  •  Confirmed Group 18: 纳粹德国妄图夺回一战中失去的殖民地
  •  Confirmed Group 19: 胡66, 太阳的后裔

  •  Confirmed Group 1~19
  •  Confirmed 黄冰楠 and Group 1~19
  • Likely Likely 准尉, 纳粹德国妄图夺回一战中失去的殖民地, $qazrr, 心忠院宽誉滋济居士 and Group 1
  • Possible Possible 190418472ntf and Group 8 / Possible Possible Lifanghua and Group 8
  • Possible Possible Nhkbbc and Group 6 / Possible Possible IGogoing and Group 4

  • This user used VPN in some cases.
  • Note Note: Duplicated or non-existent accounts: Ignore it or check if the account has a comma

Perhaps this is a tough enough to be one of the worst checkusering best 10 since I started checkuser in 2013. Ugh.. from a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your work. Stang 02:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I dont know =o@ro.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed I dont know =o, Jejdjdjfj

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 09:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Maybewinter@zh.wikipedia

南侠@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Possible Possible 南侠, 北侠

  • These users used VPN.

From a technical point of view. Sad, but not enough information to judge for confirmed or unrelated. It was based on existing information. --Sotiale (talk) 10:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, --Spring Roll Conan ( Teahouse · Contributions ) 10:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

ColinPan1999@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 08:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: ColinPan1999, Tutorzzz, Ambition Wilde
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 柯西演崔南, Heiwainu, Gia Pollich, 桐山英樹, OedjoeiOedjoeMandan, 人型鱼雷, Yurin Wilde, Ajiman Anggriawan, 步宜彥, 鹿島聖
  •  Confirmed Group 3: 东北大海豚, 祁媛
  •  Confirmed Group 4: 伊特夫, 乌朱伊乌朱曼丹, 罗温博赫, 苏珀旺, 佐林潘1999

  • Likely Likely 勿追无助曼丹 and Group 2
  •  Confirmed Group 1, 2 and Group 1, 4 / Likely Likely Group 1/2/4 and Group 3

  • This user used VPN.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 09:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --DRIZZLE (Talk 09:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Openview30@el.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Openview30, Adratiatic20

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

ASGHOLAM@mr.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 07:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed ASGHOLAM, वास्तुअनंत

  • घोलम अनंत is an account that is not registered on mrwiki, so not investigated.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 07:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Ohknhgg@hi.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Unrelated Unrelated Rmjtha, Rakshit Rathod

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Klonoa1997@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: No any local consensus for this request. --Wright Streetdeck 06:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
@淺藍雪: Can you explain what happened? --Sotiale (talk) 06:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: I have replied to all users on local wikipedia, and I did not see any efficient opinion that aginst me after my final reply. Streetdeck did not articulate any oppositional arguement in that discussion. --淺藍雪 (talk) 06:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
As I can see, there has oppose in the discussion. --Wright Streetdeck 06:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Are you saying that local consensus means no oppositional argument at all? The only person (i.e. DRIZZLE) voted for aginst was saying that he found Klonoa1997 and SteveJeb were using diffrent editing tools, and as I said in that discussion, of course they would not share the excatly same behavior, otherwise  It looks like a duck to me, and there is no point to do user-checking.--淺藍雪 (talk) 06:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale:--淺藍雪 (talk) 07:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I decide to withdraw my Oppose Oppose, but I keep some reservations about this request. --DRIZZLE (Talk 09:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Note Note: It has been customary for zhwiki to make requests after viewing consensus on the investigation. I see users who want to reserve the processing of this request, and such a reservation request is not common. I think it is difficult to proceed with the current request, and I am also dissatisfied with the current situation. Please re-establish the consensus in your community, or let the bureaucrat confirm to me that the consensus of your community exists. If no action is taken by the 25th, this request will be considered not done. --Sotiale (talk) 13:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:, "users who want to reserve the processing of this request", you mean @DrizzleD:?--淺藍雪 (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I may have caused some misunderstanding. I mean I withdraw my opposal (and change to Neutral Neutral), but I still have a feeling of doubt about the request, which is "reservations". I'm not asking for a reservation request. --DRIZZLE (Talk 13:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
It's not just your expressions that have influenced this request. At this point, I need one thing to handle the request: Whether your community has agreed to this investigation. Because I don't know your language very well, I have no choice but to be sensitive to the claim that there is no consensus. I hope you understand my position. In the end, what I want is to confirm the consensus that your community has agreed to this investigation. Please confirm it to me. I also don't want to hold this request. --Sotiale (talk) 13:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. --DRIZZLE (Talk 08:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: We can't reach consensus regarding checking Oscar1003, and now I can only confirm we have reached consensus about the rest two, so I remoeved Oscar from the list, can you please only checck them and see if there are any sleeperes as well.--淺藍雪 (talk) 09:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: SteveJeb, Andrew Tong 6894, Hongkongtyranny
  •  Confirmed Group 2: JusticeforAll1989, Jj1231234
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Monmoo811, Moonmoo811
  • Unrelated Unrelated Klonoa1997

  •  Confirmed Group 1 and 2 / Possible Possible Group 1 and 3 / Likely Likely Samng13200 and Group 2
  • Some users used VPN

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --DRIZZLE (Talk 14:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Vnfjovjbo@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Okmokmkm, Vnfjovjbo, Iamonthesky, JhihJiaJhang, Bensalttaiwan, Perakmalysia1575, Oliverong1201, Liuchicheng5665

  • I couldn't find any accounts with sufficient grounds for sleeper.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. --DRIZZLE (Talk 15:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

北侠@zh.wikipedia

Oh, I handled this user's case a few days ago. I will process it in 30 minutes.. --Sotiale (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
At that time we didn't find solid evidence of similar editing type between 南侠 and 北侠, but these 3 users are now found to behave almost exactly the same. --DRIZZLE (Talk 09:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 雅典娜计划, 北侠, 9527计划
  • Likely Likely 南侠

  • This user used VPN.

His/her additional editing helped make the declaration :D From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 10:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --DRIZZLE (Talk 10:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

PicturesOfTheWorld@commons

@Krakkos: Hello. Currently, the latest activity in his/her account is only on commonswiki, there is no activity/log action on metawiki. Therefore, even if we perform checkuser on meta, we cannot get information. However, I will forward your request to the commons checkuser team. If he/she is actually Tirgil34, there will be appropriate action. --Sotiale (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
I understand. Thank you for your help. Krakkos (talk) 10:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
I have now filed a request for checkuser on Commons. Krakkos (talk) 10:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
It has now been confirmed on Commons that PicturesOfTheWorld is a Tirgil34 sock. Krakkos (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Kellychanhiutung@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 20:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Completed Completed No Sleepers ----Alaa :)..! 20:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, results brought back to local community. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

芄蘭@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 中国上校, 顶级生态位
  • Unrelated Unrelated 芄蘭

  • Some user used VPN.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 02:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you. --SCP-2000 03:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Lovehksingers@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 17:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Unlikely Unlikely Stupidbuteasytoremember, Andy05100510, Lwm2002
  • Unrelated Unrelated Carterlou

Reminder: this is 100% technical analysis and does not include behavioral evidence

--Alaa :)..! 17:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you.-- Little Thor () 20:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

大大中嬅@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Unlikely Unlikely 1: 美芯, LTLP2020
  • Unlikely Unlikely 2: 大大中嬅, Betty0099, 東廣
  • Unrelated Unrelated Kkwhat, Lee canon

  • Unrelated Unrelated 1, 2, Kkwhat, Lee canon

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.-- Little Thor () 00:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Stevencocoboy@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
I'll pause and start again in 3 hours and let you know the result. --Sotiale (talk) 07:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Stevencocoboy, 黑社會大佬, 北極企鵝觀賞團
  •  Confirmed Group 2: ドラえ, 洛愚蒙聲, VVVTV

  • Possible Possible Summerholiday2020 and Group 2
  • Possible Possible LTLP2020 and Summerholiday2020
  • Possible Possible Group 1 and Group 2

  • Note Note: This is based on technical grounds, so judgment on whether they are the same user should be made on local.
  • Note Note: If the edit pattern doesn't match, consider the possibility that they have used a public place PC in some cases.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. --Sotiale (talk) 12:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Thank you. --SCP-2000 12:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)