Steward requests/Checkuser/2020-11

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



@MadriCR: Hello. Have you tried to email some of the local checkusers to get their attention to this matter? Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Verification already done by local CU, ty very much! Please disregard this request --MadriCR (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a steward, and I toggled status to "local handled". If any steward objects, they can roll my edit back and toggle by themselves. Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many users@hr.wikipedia

X mark.svg Not done while I understand your concern, this shouldn't lead to any further inappropriate check. It'd be pointless anyway.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 16:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Martin Urbanec (talk) 03:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes check.svg Done  Confirmed Walter Grassrooot, Marxxistfounder, 沙漠之狐隆美尔, Jacklmaf1d14, 샤오잔, Flooriing101, Geraldine Edwards hoax from San Diego, 五星上将麦克阿瑟, 十一五, 人民曰报社  Confirmed 风犬少年的气球, 影琉之珠, 考場之星, Piccolo Latte Fresco, 好好写条目有错吗, 李建老师, 江以琳, 乡下妹, 小鸟游雏田, 北见纱和子, SCP-458 (and with this group Possible Possible Throwingbohe) Unlikely Unlikely those two groups between each other --Martin Urbanec (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, --Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 04:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment Group 1 is 黄冰楠, another LTA on zhwiki. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 04:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider locking all accounts in Group 1 that have yet to be locked, as they belong to the LTA of 黄冰楠, which is known for making cross-wiki vandalism. These accounts are currently not locked: Geraldine Edwards hoax from San Diego, Walter Grassroootl, 人民曰报社. --TechyanTalk) 10:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Ykc1235, Yhc1681, Erpss123, Eryeap123

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale: Thanks a lot. By the way, is that the result that including sleepers checking? --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ykc1235 is not the account on the above list. --Sotiale (talk) 12:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. (I haven't read the list carefully yet, sorry) --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Spinyclew, Midasevian, Artsmonet, Creamhans, Sorturks332, Vicesbobbi, Ayersgully, Jasonlong22, Murkypawl, Troysigbal, Lookcolscrol, Campcroom, Skulkchid, Swaysgolfs, Wormwisps, Lordblast, Cantochars, Manicburma, Midgebiddy, Heirsbland, Visitshula, Giftinner

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  • Inconclusive Inconclusive G6m3

  • It is close to Unlikely Unlikely compared to the technical information of 影武者 that has only recently appeared.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 08:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 使用 == JY1314520, Nhcwkt
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Sun239018, 12owow2, JoeLi1997
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Dilraba0603, Kiwi000K, Laylay1111

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1, 2 and 3
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 2 and ドラえ

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:Hello!There are duplicate data in group 2. Is this a clerical error?--LClightcat Talk 12:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the same account was copied twice. It is now fixed. Please recheck. --Sotiale (talk) 12:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK,thanks!--LClightcat Talk 14:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Time2wait.svg On hold Discussion regarding this request has been raised and will be processed thereafter. --Sotiale (talk) 02:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: Any update on this? --Rschen7754 02:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Recently, there have been many users who have contacted me for updates. This request is still under review; Upon completion of the review, the decision will be made immediately. --Sotiale (talk) 12:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is of course interesting to read Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the data that Vodomar published, which I have seen before they were hidden, I made my own analysis of the results. IMHO, it proves beyond reasonable doubt that these are indeed sockpuppets. You can find my analysis here: User:Lasta/CU38 (permalink). Please make an additinal check regarding day/night IP ranges and publish the results. --Lasta (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let me just add the following: the identity of the user behind these accounts should be absolutely certain based on the evidence made available to the stewards some time ago. While in my opinion the evidence is incontrovertible, its interpretation is not necessarily straightforward; if there are doubts about this, may the CU please contact me by email. GregorB (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I myself am straightforward user and contributor on (see my history) - nevertheless I must confirm above accusations against user Kubura. Sadly but trustworthy. See recent changes and accusations on - for translation, if needed I am more than glad to assist. Kind regards --Mark7747 (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I updated User:Lasta/CU38 with first part of the story - about what made me suspect those 37 users in the first place. Please read the whole story, make additional checks and finally decide do you find these arguments convincing or not. --Lasta (talk) 10:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, it cannot be confirmed that these users are indeed socks. What I can say, however, is that there is concrete technical evidence supporting the suspicion of either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. This is because of a series of coincidences that are very hard to believe. If you were to ask me what are the odds that these users are linked to Kubura strictly from a technical point of view, I would answer as it follows:

  • Likely Likely: Anfiets, Arraque, Cvicang, Dvastaorla, Fleezer, Hergel, ImeldoMax, Kartervaen, Kumordinar Žorž, Neadin, Radion, Rikovers, Šedrvan, Stijenor NGC, Tobaccobox, Tomec, Uršul, Verud, Zerukruhaivina
  • Possible Possible: Demet, Gjiuh, Gretim, Jarebika, Leteći oleandar, Malatrad, Orašnik, TekstViler, Vinko Ml.
  • Unlikely Unlikely: XaneZeggi
  • Unrelated Unrelated: Umuthi GayndeGi
  • Stale: Donher, Hari Tre, Kutni Rez, MairMoon, Pantagana, SkelaLeop, Soljenko

It should be noted that the distinction between possible and probable is based on more than just the underlying IP addresses, and is meant to reflect, to some extent, a lack of meaningful data. Given that the deceptive use of such a large number of accounts may well undermine the usual community processes, it is my recommendation that especially all the above users who are likely to have a connection with Kubura be treated accordingly.--Sakretsu (炸裂) 13:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sakretsu: Short & straight: Thanks! On behalf of community. Best --Mark7747 (talk) 20:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sakretsu. Let me just note two more things. There was also a check reportedly done in mid-May, so cross-checking the results might be of benefit, if it wasn't done already. Second, the accounts in question took part in the 2020 steward election as well as in the Croatian Wikipedia RfC, so this may qualify now as cross-wiki sockpuppeting, with potentially more severe repercussions. GregorB (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cartierul dnj@ro.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Cartierul dnj, Simpopa, Mafia dnj gang, Organizatia DNJ.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed 高級成人玩具掌櫃, 牛歡喜成人玩具掌櫃, 高級印度成人玩具神油掌櫃, 高級歐美成人玩具掌, 高級日系成人玩具掌, 打汀九橋, 條撚仲長過青馬大橋, 歐美玩具掌櫃, 性玩具掌櫃, 情趣用品公司掌櫃
  • Likely Likely FXCK YOU MAMA BEACH

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Xmips, ブリタニカン, もようがえ, 検閲削除, 核族, ウィキへの貢献, PLUMHOU, いせち力, 大きな卵, マイクロジャパン, あすぺり, 贅沢者, 일본일본, しいん, Frytzh, フラック, 申板, っーん, きひょん, 舞成, ミシンー, 中国23, 満2, 東京大阪名古屋, たいま, Yorusiyy, ボーリー, 代理, ドラゴニア, デンデン虫, すそうほく, にび, Mindusle, いセちか, 栃木県, 近江出, 執筆者, 曰本, Sorisy, Kgxx, アカウントを作成するとこうなる, マイヤー, 織波

  •  Confirmed as Sidowpknbkhihj

From a technical point of view. All locked now. --Sotiale (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. It's hard to believe that posting on SRCU in less than an hour has been enough discussion. And there seems to be a user in your local requesting additional information. Please make a request after some discussion. This request will be held until tomorrow. --Sotiale (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale:Hello. There have been a discussion in the page:w:zh:Wikipedia:当前的破坏#Niki0327, and these users' conclution is that Niki0327 is probably the sockpuppet of LHKS. However, it is also OK to wait for one more day. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yining Chen: The discussion as usual must be on HAM page. And since someone disagree, it's good to hold for one day. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale:Excuse me, is it the proper time for the CU? --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Confirmed Group 1: Niki0327, Sprewell2222000

  • Unrelated Unrelated Ansono o and Group 1
  • Unlikely Unlikely Stupidbuteasytoremember and Group 1

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. --Yining Chen (Talk) 12:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely Likely Marrovi, Pixankay

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ο Λαός δεν ξέχνα τη σημαίνει δεξιά@el.wikisource

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Ο Λαός δεν ξέχνα τη σημαίνει δεξιά, Alexandros15, Προσεκτικός βικιπαιδιστής

All locked now. --Sotiale (talk) 14:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DORIA 2006@el.wikiquote

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 06:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed DORIA 2006, Alexandros15, Προσεκτικός βικιπαιδιστής

All locked. --Sotiale (talk) 07:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely Likely Jong94, Wiop90, Annop Nakabut

  • The findings of this investigation were based on cuwiki archived data.

--Sotiale (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Jjwisdom9, Ezenmaster

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Lunarmourn, Rolestogas, Blestnites, Moundwring, Swamiwoods, Angstdebt, Muckssnob, Harmpork, Rulergybe, Putswires, Romeobeans, Minisannul, Swagmerle, Curlsclerk, Loewiiliad, Carloloath, Carlysixty11, Gypdfsdgsgsyadam, Mangeteas, Diracdolt, Oinkomsk, Aspensemis

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,thanks!--LClightcat Talk 12:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


That are lies. Citatelj is my cousin, and of course we have same IP adress. That is not proof for sockpupetry. And I never used such excuses. ~ Lordluka99
Are Nekitip88, Mpizza99, Hrvatkatolik91, and Hrvatkatolikdomoljub also your relatives? ;) --Aca (talk) 13:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not, they were my sockpuppets. I confessed it and I learned my lesson.~ Lordluka

Note Note: I don't simply judge  Confirmed just because you used the same IP. Please refrain from further discussion as I have already decided to process this request. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Macak87, Lordluka99, Citatelj77

From a technical point of view. In my experience, it is difficult to think of their technical information as two users. --Sotiale (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale: Thank you! Could you issue a CU block to those users? Lordluka99 has already been CU blocked, and this is block evasion. Is there a way to prevent this from happening again? --Ivi104 (talk) 13:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked. I think it won't be easy to prevent this from happening again. --Sotiale (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Open lifetime, 老子瘋狗的外號
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 此時以被封鎖, 薛聖哲, 田程委
  • Stale 111111111jaypeter

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and Fang000000, 薑母鴨, 大灣高中
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 2 and Fang000000, 薑母鴨, 大灣高中

  • Users in Group 1 used IP of public facilities, but they are very likely to be the same user on their log-timeline.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed 打王國皇帝, I have big dick, 打丁王國國王, 大丁王國皇兒, 大丁王國皇后, 大丁王國皇帝

From a technical point of view. Previously confirmed accounts omitted. --Sotiale (talk) 23:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Marco Lun, 馬健倫

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CCP Winnie@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed CCP Winnie, Yes2LOLKuso, 1147vds

  • It was difficult to find sleepers because they used devices in public facilities.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All right, thanks. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Without commenting on the merits of this request, I note that the requestor is currently blocked indefinitely on sq.wikipedia. That makes me unease to continue with the analysis as I don't think we should honor CheckUser requests for wikis in which their requestors are not in good standing. This request is therefore provisionally denied unless an administrator or other established user from sq.wikipedia in good standing asks that this check be indeed performed. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Notifying administrators Liridon and Olsi for their opinion. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't been active recently, but I just had a look at their edits and they have similar edits, such as replacing ç and ć with q without prior discussion or changing article titles to less known ones. Saklanan gerçekler has been warned twice about that by an admin but never stopped, so I guess it would be good to check if these accounts are managed by Goelia. --Olsi (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Results based on technical data (ping @Olsi):
  • Goelia is Stale.
  • Saklanan gerçekler, Nuggln, Lojl and Hajods are  Confirmed.
MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Olsi (talk) 11:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patlabor Ingram@zh.wikisource

Please explain the context in detail. You have to tell us exactly what happened and why they are suspicious. --Sotiale (talk) 12:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: Only in my POV, what Jusjih said in the past days:
  1. "Longway22的言行酷似Patlabor Ingram,所以要预防性请各位注意不要招募和操作真人傀儡。" (lit: The statements of Longway22 are damnly like Patlabor Ingram, so we should ask every one to refrain from recruiting and controlling the meatpuppets.)
  2. "预防性请各位注意不要招募和操作真人傀儡,不是指责谁。查核用户是避免一人滥用多账户,不同真人傀儡。" (lit: As a refrain warning to every one, please do not recruit and control the meatpuppets, I'm not pointing anyone. Checkuser is to avoid someone to abuse many accounts, not avoid meatpuppets.)

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

off topic discussionCamouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions:It seems that the local discussion you have given is only about the removal of the administrator's name. I haven't seen any discussion about the check user in the discussion. Maybe I read it wrong. I hope you can give us the position of the discussion on check.--LClightcat Talk 13:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @LClightcat If I am not wrong only zhwp there is a mandatory discussion, but for other zh language project there isn't a need to discuss, but rather a discussion is encouraged (in any wiki also - but zh project more). They seems to say that there are vote pandering for the removal, which the best would be for Jusjih to explain, as we outsiders cannot fully understand what happen on zh wikisource. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Camouflaged MirageOh, I see. I think every wiki needs to be discussed before it is forwarded. Then let him talk about what happened. After all, we don't know much about the situation, and we haven't discussed it.--LClightcat Talk 13:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @LClightcat Not every wiki needs a discussion, but zhwp need one for sure. This is the practice, but of course there are exceptions and zhwp people know when. I am just repeating what -revi said two years back. This is what stewards require of us from zhwp. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Camouflaged Mirage:Yeah... Maybe I'm used to the discussion before zhwp forwards the request. In a word, thanks for reminding me!--LClightcat Talk 13:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @LClightcat No issues. For almost a year, I am the only few who deal with submitting zhwp CU request here, I also have the confusion at times. Anyway, collapsing this as it's off topic already. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this investigation is necessary, I hope that Jusjih will directly explain the need to us. Depending on whether this is MEAT or multiple accounts, the need for investigation will vary. --Sotiale (talk) 12:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • cc@Jusjih: --SCP-2000 09:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    When we did not yet have clear policies to remove an administrator, Patlabor Ingram claimed that negotiation has failed, thus starting a vote against Zhxy 519 on 2020-10-15. Our policy would be voting for or against a candidate for 14 days. On 2020-10-29, I questioned if the consensus has been built to remove with 6 supports, 5 oppositions, and 3 being neutral [2], and on the same day Midleading as my fellow sysop advised temporarily keeping Zhxy 519's adminship [3]. Yet Patlabor Ingram and Longway22 would keep pushing their propaganda and think that only removing Zhxy 519 will be acceptable, especially after 2020-10-29 in an "unapproved extension", thus assuming bad faith. Then I support someone else requesting this check as my preventive warning about paid edits and against meat-puppets did not work.--Jusjih (talk) 03:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... I may not cover all accounts, but I do partial investigations on suspicious accounts. --Sotiale (talk) 04:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I couldn't find enough connections to judge each other as the same user on zhwikisource.
  • Some seem to be using the same IP bridge, but other than that, the information does not match at all.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 04:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Victor Blacus: Hello, Victor Blacus. In the case of VladMihai1, the last activity seems to be January 2020. In this case, the investigation is not possible because there is no data left to proceed with the investigation. Do you have any records of VladMihai1's activities elsewhere? --Sotiale (talk) 09:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: w:ro:Special:Contribuții/VladMihai1 -- Victor Blacus (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Blacus: The data for January 2020 has expired and cannot be viewed by me. Or don't you have another account recently? --Sotiale (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: Does this help? w:ro:Special:Contribuții/Danielaarmani. -- Victor Blacus (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Blacus: Is Danielaarmani a suspected user of Anmamayor's sockpuppet, right? --Sotiale (talk) 10:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: Right! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then, Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive Anmamayor, Danielaarmani

  • There is not enough data to judge.
  • If simply compare data from two accounts, it is Unlikely Unlikely

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Victor Blacus (talk) 11:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@LClightcat:  It looks like a duck to me. Did admin decline the block request? --Sotiale (talk) 12:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale::No.The administrator has finished the blocking, only because we think that there may be other accounts as soon as the account is created. Just checking sleepers.--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 12:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The informant has no report, but can duck. As soon as the account is created, we think there may be other sleepers.--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 12:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is this user LTA or a block evader who has previously created an account? It is difficult to investigate just that there may be another account. --Sotiale (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh... Obviously they don't belong. I think we can put them aside first?I'm terribly sorry!--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 12:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In principle and in a general case, investigating to find sleepers is called 'Fishing'. This is generally not allowed. However, exceptionally, there must be LTA that creates many accounts, or a block evader who previously created and operated multiple accounts to evade blocking, or there must be sufficient reasons to justify investigation. So this request is handled as not done. If you find another account you suspect to be this user, you can request it again. --Sotiale (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I got it. I am very sorry for this request and hope to understand.--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 12:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@LClightcat One more thing, the link in the discussion is incorrect, it should be towards the HAM page. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I made the request for several reasons. Firstly, above accounts with contributions did the same editing as well as an IP address which has been confirmed as OP and blocked by an admin. Secondly, the reason why I didn't send the accounts to AIV first is that they made pranks in user pages and I think it's not enough to make them blocked. Hovever, if it is confirmed that many accounts are created by this IP and still some accounts are sleeping, we can make sure that the IP abuse the function of creating accounts and they can be blocked. --Easterlies (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the request isn't fishing because we all know that open proxy always makes vandalism and is not good for wikipedia. So I think it is necessary to find the sleepers created by the IP.--Easterlies (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Easterlies Firstly, if possible local blocks should be preferred over SRCU request. But if local admins are unsure, here is always the last resort for zhwp. If you think they aren't enough to be blocked based on behavior, why you think they can be blocked via CU? And hope you understand, wanting to search for sleepers without evidence is fishing, so if you say there are many accounts, what are the accounts? Hope you can clarify. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Camouflaged Mirage:我就直接打中文了。我认为原因比较简单:因为这是开放代理,如果开放代理的影响不严重,或者说没有什么影响的话,那为什么就算是没有进行破坏的开放代理也要直接封禁两年或很长一段时间呢?为什么对待它们不像对的普通IP一样呢?上方和IP有着相同编辑的帐号在IP被封禁之前就已经注册了,所以有理由怀疑IP在未被封禁之前创建了更多的账号,一部分进行了编辑,一部分变成了沉睡账户。--Easterlies (talk) 13:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Easterlies I understand, the reason why we block open proxies for 1 - 2 years is due to No open proxies. You are suggesting IPs can create more undetected accounts, but without concrete proof, this is fishing in the eyes of CU. If you have sufficient accounts to compare with, then list it out here will be much useful. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely Likely 常見咔咔咔咔咔, Xia'an'an4tt214, Yage Wu
  • Possible Possible Kengoodgoodair7639
  • Unlikely Unlikely Jimbobo697
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive 1147vds, CCP GODIE

  • 1147vds and CCP GODIE are useless for comparison; The reason was stated in a previous request.
  • This is an analysis based on Likely Likely group accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It must be hard work. --Easterlies (talk) 15:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. What is your account? It seems that your account(Tutmad) is not your main account. I think I need the confirmation of sqwiki admins to process this request. --Sotiale (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: Another user already mentioned his vandalism here and here, but although some of his accounts are blocked indefinitely, at least two admins seem to back or encourage him (one of the admins didn't react at all). He is known for his nationalist, Islamophobic bias, obsession towards Ismail Kadare and adding of POV content (like changing the description from "leader of a uprising" to "analphabetic villager" in the article of Haxhi Qamili). Currently he keeps editing in this way with two IP adresses and has some "reserve" accounts (see above). With them, he frequently asks unaware user for approving his edits to make it more "blue" (here and here). This user might be a symptom for the nationalist bias in the smaller wikipedias.--Tutmad (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This request is oddly similar to this one here made two years ago, by user:Amarakuja, a sockpuppet of Goelia/Saklanan Gerçekler (See here), whose sockpuppets I reported here recently.--Udha (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: Most of the users listed here are blocked on sqwiki (,, Udha1,, Tllja rikes, while others haven't edited for at least 2 years, so in my opinion there's no need to process this request. --Olsi (talk) 20:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: The problem is that Udha keeps editwarring and using open proxies with different IPs and accounts like here and here. His global account exists only for stalking and hounding against his "enemies" in order to abuse this wikipedia as a BATTLEGROUND.--2003:E6:2F2B:8E00:64C8:4DFE:D290:183A 21:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder, why not just close this case as {{duck}}? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

X mark.svg Not done The local admin(Olsi) has stated that there is no need to proceed with this request. This is where the checkuser request is made. Therefore, other claims not related to the checkuser request are not accepted. Someone's wrongdoing must be handled locally. And if it spans multiple wikis, visit SRG. At least not here. --Sotiale (talk) 09:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I cannot process this request because incubatorwiki is one of my homewikis. To other stews, please process this request. Data for reference is in here. --Sotiale (talk) 11:52, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ValtteriLahti12 has gone and had tried to have his nick changed to Poro20042 ‎(Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/70220) in the middle of all of this. -Yupik (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even if The-electronex doesn't prove to be the same user, it's a clearcut case of meatpuppetry by his own admission (as are the other users in the previous CU.) -Yupik (talk) 17:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed: ValtteriLahti12 = Водь. Unrelated Unrelated: The-electronex. On technical evidence only. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for checking this. -Yupik (talk) 18:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted a namechange because of personal reasons, i am ashamed of what happend. I will never edit wikipedia again. Can i please have the namechange because i don’t want my real name to be seen. ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Part of growing up is learning to take responsibility for your mistakes and own them. We all do stupid stuff and it's rarely comfortable to have to face the consequences of what we might have done, but it does get better. You might want to take the time to reflect on why you did what you did instead of trying to hide it. Right now we are still trying to ascertain if you have yet more accounts that you have not been forthcoming about and just how much damage has been done, so IMO your username should remain the same until they are all found. -Yupik (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sanon myös näin suomeksi: älä tee mitään harkitsematonta. Huomenna on uusi päivä. -Yupik (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t try to do damage on purpose. And can i change it after all accounts are investigated ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 22:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t remember more of my accounts, except informasjuunimasjiini which i made on my school computer because i didn’t want to log in on the main. ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 23:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed HyperionSI, ClaudiuDWiki, ValLupu

--Alaa :)..! 23:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your prompt answer. --Pafsanias (talk) 23:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Pafsanias. All accounts locked now --Alaa :)..! 23:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed TAN2527, Khampirat

From a technical point of view. No other sleepers found. Ping @Horus:. --Sotiale (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Horus (talk) 12:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Alaa :)..! 13:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely Unlikely technically. No sleepers --Alaa :)..! 13:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chico tv ohdoyc@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely Likely Yega Wu, EasterIies
  • Possible Possible Chico tv ohdoyc
  • Unlikely Unlikely Easterlles

  • This is based on Likely Likely group.
  • Easterlles used VPN/OP.
  • These are obviously not HBN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 01:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 01:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sotiale: Thanks. And I wonder if there is any sleeper found in Likely Likely group? Itcfangye (talk) 01:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked sleepers in all my investigation. At least that means there were no sleepers in the adjacent ranges. --Sotiale (talk) 02:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Could you check Ppkalabika and Parkijolli too? --AntanO 03:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please make a new request for the user you presented. Thank you. --Sotiale (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Tjfwgq999, Kboomika33
  • Unlikely Unlikely Eswnav and Group 1
  • Unrelated Unrelated Thilakshan

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --AntanO 03:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 最萌身高差, 千葉と千尋, 叜, 醃, Apollo John 123, 叶倩彤, 37楼的敲门声, 生化危机战神再生, 三日月蹴
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Wikikiki Wu, Yoga Wu, Chico tv ohdoyc

  •  Confirmed Group 1 == HBN
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  • Possible Possible Group 2 and EasterIies
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and EasterIies

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Enjoy your holiday! --Easterlies (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One more question. Does Group 2 belong to any LTAs in Chinese Wikipedia?--Easterlies (talk) 13:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No one comes to mind right away because it's ranges with so common devices and too many users. It can be said that it is not a famous LTA or someone who appeared recently. --Sotiale (talk) 13:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@AntanO: The two accounts you presented have already been declared on English Wikipedia as the same user. Are their other accounts on tawiki? --Sotiale (talk) 03:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have already blocked some IDs. These two wasn't check. --AntanO 03:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Added one more. Is it possible to check cross connections? --AntanO 03:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Parkijolli, Ppkalabika, Mahayanvga
  • Possible Possible Yamihtherocks and Group 1

From a technical point of view. Possible Possible is based on data from tawiki, but it is confirmed on enwiki so you can safely block. --Sotiale (talk) 09:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --AntanO 16:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed 桃原奈月, 陶姓大輝, SE00135, Liao03328

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Srijemski Hrvat@hr.wikipedia

Unrelated Unrelated Those two users edit from different countries. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:53, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]