Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-01

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



  •  Confirmed Group 1: SDTIER, じょーがん, 宮野裕史・小倉譲・湊伸治・渡邊恭史 (コンクリ事件の少年達), 宮野裕史サスティナブル, 女子高生コンクリート詰め事件の主犯格・宮野裕史, ばんばお, だいどうみゃく, Otonami, Hurants, だらくけー, ふくだまし, だりいはん, ムヨは無用, SURIRUI, ああかな, 宮野裕史・横山裕史, たいま, 1316mrmr, マリウス, 風呂ボチャン, Mindusle, みちみちん, 査読専門家, 植松聖サスティナブル
  • Unrelated Unrelated Machida060339 and Group 1

  •  Confirmed Group 1 == Sidowpknbkhihj (HEATHROW)

@Yo987: From a technical point of view. In my experience, Machida060339 doesn't seem to be Sidowpknbkhihj. Please let me know if this user is Sidowpknbkhihj after looking at contributions from other wikis. Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 03:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment Thanks. That's why I thought of Machida 060339 as LTA: HEATHROW. ウィキニュース:練習帳(deleted) is he edited from websites copy and paste. And I made the same edit in 茨城県北部でM5.1の地震 茨城、栃木、千葉、福島で震度4 津波の心配なし (deleted). This LTA often appears in articles related to earthquakes, and past sock puppets have written similar articles on ja:wikinews.--Yo987 (talk) 04:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes it can be a copycat. Technical information does not match any of their information or characteristics I have seen. Have you reviewed the edits on jawikisource? --Sotiale (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't participated in ja:wikisource, but posts on ja:wikisource don't seem to show a match with LTA:HEATHROW. Posting block in ja:wikinews will be unblocked once. And his post is carefully watched.--Yo987 (talk) 04:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like that this LTA is starting to get angry (seriously), based on their recent activities. MarioJump83 contributions on my home wiki 06:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: そらごみ, เชนไดร้ท์ฆ่าเอ็มซีซี214
  • Likely Likely ドデカイうーメン and Group 1
  • Unlikely Unlikely Izterlice and Group 1

  • Likely Likely Group 1 and Likely group
  • In some cases, they used VPN.

  • There have been other exploits in the VPN used by this user; As this is not the focus of this investigation, I have not fully investigated it, but you can simply check it as follows:
  •  Confirmed Usernamezh, Foodpractice, 西北地區, Sesejiji, Dontmisstry, Unimik, Ononoffoff, Wtfiswtf, 國破山河在, 中韓日台菲越, ログログログ
  • This user is, of course, a different user than the original subject of investigation.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yaga Wu@zh.wikipedia

Could you briefly explain their behavior patterns? Please describe how the users listed above are similar to previously confirmed users. --Sotiale (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale: They posted personal attack against other users, and used usernames that contain MediaWiki default texts. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 13:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Yaga Wu, 已經遭到
  • Possible Possible Xgocohchofoogkdsjggxivitddovi and Group 1

  • Possible Possible Likely group(2020-11) and Group 1
  • Personally, I think that if the behavior patterns are the same, they(likely group) can be viewed as the same user.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 08:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Request withdrawn——See above. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas 1120@zh.wikipedia

I am wondering if this user is LTA on zhwiki. I'm cautious of accepting this request as sleepers investigation is limited. Or even better if you have a suspicious account that has not yet been blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 00:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @Sotiale: Your words just inspired me to decline MCC214's endless requests. I've been scolding him for putting unneat and unneeded requests on HAM, but I hadn't got a good reason to refuse handing over here until you posted reply above. Let me mark this and the following request as "withdrawn". Sorry for wasting your precious time. :-) --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 00:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Yeung@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unrelated Unrelated Peter Yeung, StevenM69

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Please explain which part is similar to PXD. --Sotiale (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This account created the article and sent a wikilove message to other user soon after start editing (similar to Special:CentralAuth/Yeh_Le-pin and Special:CentralAuth/Neo_Zhao). Thank you. --SCP-2000 10:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed 在小提琴上爬 == PXD

  • This user used VPN.
  • No other sleepers found in VPN range.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --SCP-2000 12:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Yes check.svg Done and  Confirmed. Other socks:  Confirmed わんわんだ, あわおわ, LTA ISECHIKA, もじー, わじわ, Sukiyos. If you are sure about this user, I recommend posting directly to SRG, not SRCU. --Sotiale (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--Yo987 (talk) 11:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... The reason for the request is in HAM on zhwiki and the request is processed based on that. In the future, please attach details to SRCU. --Sotiale (talk) 12:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 人生打羊, 豬排蛋吐司
  • Unrelated Unrelated Coni0107, Winnielion, 馬來糕, Waterpigof

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will definitely do. --Hamish 12:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


X mark.svg Not done In general, requests to investigate yourself are not accepted. Request related to you has already been processed in here, so your block should be discussed on your localwiki. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed トラえ, 堯舜垂衣裳

  • No, it's not ドラえ.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed 神奈川隆二, 上善若水不是誰, ひらひらさやさや, 炸弹天师, No173thePINUT, 盧森堡大公爵, あの香りは頭いい, 韩锦衣卫, 白猫羊驼, 黑猫羊驼

  • It is very consistent with past 冏's technical information.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • They seem to have been edited in the same place.
  • It seems that different devices were used when editing in the same space.
  • However, note that this is information for reference only; Whether it is socks case or not should be discussed locally.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Please explain in detail what similar tendencies are. --Sotiale (talk) 09:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. First, as what I have said, they almost only make minor edits(although they were not marked as "minor edit"). Then, the subjects of the articles they edited are similar. --Yining Chen (Talk) 11:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What I'd like to hear from you is a detailed explanation of what subjects of pages they edited and why they were similar. "Editing pages in the same field" and "doing minor edits" is not enough explanation they are sockpuppets. On what subject, and how they edited, were there such doubts? I think there must have been an obvious reason for you to think of them as sockpuppets, even though it was possible by chance. I'm hoping you can elaborate on why you thought so. --Sotiale (talk) 12:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think these questions should be answered by MCC214(who submitted this request), shouldn't they? Because I'm the man who just translated the request to English, right? :-) --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content
Just some comments: MCC214 is still banned from editing this page by stewards, so they cannot answer here, someone had to ask them locally and help them post here. In addition, anyone who is transferring requests here should ideally be accountable to questions regarding their requests, and should be able to substantiate any requests. If in doubt, let us not transfer. Just my 2 cents. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Making it clearer, we should check with them what are the reasons they want to check, and then think is it valid / not valid locally. When there is a good reasons that we are convinced that a check is needed, and willing to answer any clarifications from stewards, we then will transfer the request from HAM to here. It's more than just translating by posting here since 2018. I hope this is clear enough. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment MCC214 had contacted me on my talkpage, asking me to assist in this. I am not going to risk being called proxying for banned user, but interested parties can see this section on my talkpage. They seems to say this is an LTA, and according to their words, they don't want to explain more, and its obvious is an LTA from zhwp. I then wonder if they are so sure that it's an LTA why not ask for local blocks and why need CU, did a local sysop decline the request or whatsoever? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • MCC214 has explained in w:zh:WP:HAM. He said: "They create many category, create redirect page that from English to Chinese, create some redirect page that have similar meaning and create/edit the articles about golf." Then one of the accounts above has been blocked because the sysop thought that is might be w:zh:WP:SuiMai, but for the other one, there isn't a very clear evidence to confirm that it is a sock puppet of w:zh:WP:SuiMai(or any other else) and block the account. --Yining Chen (Talk) 00:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I see, thanks @Yining Chen for the explanation. I collapsed my comments to make it neater. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before proceeding with this investigation, I would like to comment on a post that made me very frustrated.

  • 它們心裏就不太想幫我們查,不太想和我們協作去反對傀儡破壞。
  • They(stewards) do not want to help investigate, they don't want to cooperate to stop sockpuppets destruction behavior.

I've been trying to do the best I can to help solve the sockpuppets problem facing zhwiki community. And I tried to look more closely at and know about LTAs attacking zhwiki community. That's why I know the name of LTAs on zhwiki well. I know, of course, they are just parts, and just the frequent occurrences on SRCU. I think I have been trying to do it quickly and accurately so that there is no discomfort from you, and I think I have handled it well despite some difficulties. I have made it possible to help you without breaching the privacy policy. Nevertheless, my efforts seem to be distrusted like this. It seems that my capabilities were lacking. Anyone can say their own assessment of my work, yes. But this word is a great wound to me, and it feels like my year's efforts are meaningless. Anyway, I will handle this request tomorrow. Sorry, today I don't think I can properly handle this request. --Sotiale (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am sure this is just MCC214 POV, it surely didn't reflect the consensus of the community. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
According to a local comment from MCC, I see that they aren't meaning to say that to you, he was talking about another person. LuciferianThomasTalk 14:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He also apologizes to Sotiale apparently, he said he was just reminded about the period of revi..... Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to make you so upset. We have always been grateful to your contribution to Chinese Wikipedia. Some unfriendly words do not represent the community's attitude. --Easterlies (talk) 14:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MCC214 cannot represent the views of the community, which clearly recognises and appreciates your contribution to zhwiki. --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sotiale, your efforts are highly appreciated by our community. MCC214 is a Hong-Kong tad with limited writing capability in Chinese or English; we even do not understand his Chinese somehow. Ca11ist0 created and wrote some articles about Chinese biographies and universities by adding categories. I personally do not think these two accounts have similar tendencies.Walter Grassroot (talk)
I have no intention in getting involved into a meaningless quarrel but want point out something perhaps not so obvious to people who are unfamiliar with the editorial environment of ZH Wikipedia. It has been a practice for quite some time locally and is particularly true in this case that the accusation of sock puppetry is supported by a series of "Duck Tests". In my opinion, the low threshold of certain local admins may have resulted in the wrongful accusation of accounts in more than one instance thus linking these accounts one by one and all the way back to SiuMai may be a bit far fetched. Rather I would urge for the examination of the contribution history of Ca11ist0, ABX456 and any other accounts recently deemed related to see if there are in fact any evidence of destructive behaviour that would warrant indefinite blocking. Lastly, I just want to say it for the record that certain individuals have demonstrated a trait of ill-intent and they are making ZH Wikipedia an extremely unfriendly environment, so much so users like me who have done nothing but making genuine edits are being discouraged to continue participating.--ABX456 (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not discuss the request itself here. If you have any objection to this request, please discuss it in HAM on zhwiki. And thanks to everyone who gave me multiple comments. --Sotiale (talk) 10:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:Hello. I was wondering if it might be possible for me to ask that if you would like to handle this request. I would be appreciate it if you could answer. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to handle this request, but there seems to be a disagreement as above. Once above objection is resolved, I will make a decision on the progress. --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It covers a wide range of subjects, including artists [1][2][3][4], AV actress [5][6][7][8], towns [9][10][11], golf (like to write articles about golf) [12][13][14], road [15][16], playground [17].
  2. Appearing in notability reporting [18][19]
  3. Frequently using HotCat to add or remove categories of articles [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].
  4. Redirect the English title to the Chinese title [29].
  5. Redirect the other name title to the formal title [30][31][32].
  6. Creating category page [33][34][35][36][37][38].
  7. Adding CSD template [39][40].
--DavidHuai1999 (talk) 03:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MoreInfo Additional information needed Is discussion going on locally? I want the admin on zhwiki to confirm that there is local consent to the investigation. If there is no progress, I will handle this request as not done. If this is handled as not done, request again after the discussion is complete. --Sotiale (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yining Chen Can you find a local sysop to confirm this? As the submitter I ping you. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale and Camouflaged Mirage:Please give me one more day and I will ask some admins. Thanks. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help @Yining Chen Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I see no obvious objection to this request locally. All the comments on zhwiki are like "Stewards says more evidence is needed" and "Ok, we have evidence 1, 2 and 3", except for the discouraging comment by MCC214. Through most of the evidence is from DavidHuai1999, I can hardly say that other users engaged in this issue are expressing effective objection or even discussion. They are more like relaying messages between meta and zhwiki.--Tiger- (talk) 13:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To be more precise, I don't think there is currently a discussion ongoing locally.--Tiger- (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Confirmed ABX456, Ca11ist0

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  • Likely Likely Terganakis, Aberatakis

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mogoeilor @ incubatorwiki, lrcwiki

I wonder, if we should also list Hamed bahmaei, میوند بختیاری, Ernestoloriati and Omidmohammadi2021 or not? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Wim b 16:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sahh and Bluehamed are the same user;
  • Bardeshir there is not enough data;
  • Mogoeilor seems not to be involved with the others 3.

PS: Hamed bahmaei, میوند بختیاری, Omidmohammadi2021 and Ernestoloriati not checked, if you intend to add, discuss and then make request. --Wim b 17:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Hello. This is not the right place to process your request. Please request blocking of that account on enwiki for a good reason or contact Wikimedia Foundation if necessary. --Sotiale (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I alive@zh.wikipedia

Has this user ever appeared before or is this LTA on zhwiki? Or do you have a suspicious account that hasn't been blocked yet? As you may know, sleepers investigation is limited, and mishandling of this can make me the subject of Ombuds investigation. This is a question to address this request to the fullest, so please cooperate. Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's a bit complex. I'll email you shortly on this case. --TechyanTalk) 00:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... The mail was received well. I decide to proceed with the investigation for reasons of cross-wiki abuse along with the reason for the mail request. --Sotiale (talk) 10:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • No other sleepers found.
  • This user has used VPN.

Technical information cannot tell who they are. At least they seem to have basic experience in wiki activities? --Sotiale (talk) 11:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... I have accepted this request because I suspect this user is 110.29. In general, doing sleepers check for the reasons you gave me is fishing, so I can't.. --Sotiale (talk) 11:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 釋悟道邱秀雲林美秀張泳渝張秀絨林眉雀陳珠卿蕭秀卿朱蓉蒂, 黃子銘王可杰吳修瑋王樹杰鍾震寰羅傑王逸修王培修文傑, 蕭如芬櫻桃老師班級代理代課教師, 陳益財陳美鳳姜瑞英青翠眉翠江子翠, 鄧靜慈導師
  • Unrelated Unrelated 臺哥大
  • Stale 新北市立三重高級中學李余穎偉

  • As I expected, they(Group 1) are 110.29.
  • I am not sure who 臺哥大 is.
  • No other sleepers found; already blocked.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, I think the restriction about sleeper checking makes me a bit confuse. Anyway, I will be more careful next time. Then, I would like to apologize to you for troubling you and I would like to express my gratitude to you for handling the request. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Transferred to local HAM pageCamouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict. × 2)@SCP-2000:嘿,我英文着实不太好。所以如果可能的话,请找人翻译成英文。首先声明一下,呼尔奇兰是我最近刚注意到的一个账号。我本人认为呼尔更有可能是pxd反串我的,因为他在zhwiki的第2次编辑“带江草堂”我可以说是根本没听说过。另外,明天我要去英语补考,所以我要睡了,bye.--IN (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
这里不是讨论的空间。 请在SCP的讨论中进行谈话。 --Sotiale (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
其实也可以在本地HAM页面说不是吗?@IN Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
他在本地被封禁了。--Easterlies (talk) 13:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Easterlies 没留意到,可以帮忙转这段话去本地页面吗?我担心转会被视为协助绕过禁封。谢谢。 Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes check.svg Done. --Easterlies (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Easterlies: Thank you :) 我折叠这段吧。Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Time2wait.svg On hold Hold request processing for a day. --Sotiale (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I believe that the suspected account is not IN's sockpuppet but like PXD's. --Easterlies (talk) 13:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Likely Likely 呼尔奇兰 and PXD
  • Unrelated Unrelated 呼尔奇兰 and IN
  • Unrelated Unrelated Throwingbohe and PXD
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive Throwingbohe and IN

  • 呼尔奇兰 used VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale: And how about the 3rd listed 在小提琴上爬? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: Search for 在小提琴上爬(2021-01 SRCU archive). It is already declared as PXD. --Sotiale (talk) 04:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Давай давай@uk.wikivoyage

Symbol wait.svg In progress... --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely  Confirmed, but that's not a surprise. Placed a few local blocks, hope it helps. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


@Yining Chen: Can you add an account that is not stale yet? --Sotiale (talk) 10:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale:Hi. I think I have found two accounts :-) --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... Thank you and please don't ask for just one account in the future. --Sotiale (talk) 13:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: KamanWong1127 == 使用
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Extremely bus, Pkwy to, Tomy wory, Thomas 1120, Jacky 1122
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2

  • No other sleepers found with 使用
  • In the case of group 2, I accidentally discovered it during an investigation. It is not the focus of the investigation, so I list only found accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liberalus homo universalus@hr.wikipedia

No, if you request yourself to be investigated, it is generally not acceptable unless it is a special case. Have the admin who said it to you post the request directly with evidence. --Sotiale (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked this user based on very strong behavioural evidence that they are Lordluka99. Given that checkuser can't be used to provide exculpatory evidence, I don't see why a check would be warranted here. Appeals should be handled locally. Ivi104 (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
X mark.svg Not done @Liberalus homo universalus: I don't know who the admin suggested you checkuser is, but ask that user to post directly. --Sotiale (talk) 02:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That person wouldn’t do it. Also,why was I told to do this? That means Croatian wiki admins were lying to me, and again they try to lie to me. Što se tiče tebe @Ivi104, ne poznaješ me i ne možeš govoriti za mene da sam ja netko tko nisam, uostalom zašto vjeruješ onima koji me isto je poznaju? Kad me budeš upoznao onda možemo dalje razgovarati. A sada, ti stavi request da me se provjeri i dokaže moja nevinost, jer ja ne mogu učiniti ništa. Liberalus homo universalus (talk) 12:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Vds1216, Leborn2020, Bnk1668, Romanreigns1234, Johncena736, Randykobe2020, Stephenlaulau

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walker ho@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Walker ho, Zombie joke == Thomas 1120
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Sample user 100, Nnn1981, Qwertyuiop0501, Aaa1232, Pqr1234, Xyz1120, Lph2005, LF20010325, LF20010102, LF2001, Lplp0wjywh5ejyl6wk72kebunko2p0, HthYd7Grdg, Hyy1972, Lww2015, Lww2008, Lww2002, Lww1996, Lww1990, Lww1984, Lww1978, Lww1960, Lww1972, Lww1967, G7f7g87g76t8h88gg7f7, It is a good thing to have a good time and I will be there on a day, Are you going to be able to make it tomorrow or should I just wait?, Everything you have said about you is a bit boring, Eudueueuehvyevubqiqajakka
  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 1 and 2

  • No other sleepers found related to Group 1.
  • Group 2 is accidentally discovered in the ranges of Group 1.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you~ --Easterlies (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, I have several accounts to offer. They are not about Group 1 but Group 2.--Easterlies (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Group 3: Lwx0357, Lwx8789, Lwx8277, Lwx1972, Lwx1973, Lwx9546, Lwx2689, Lwx1970, Lwx0535, Lwx0199, Lwx0000, Lwx9999, Lwx5790, Lwx1277, Lwx1001, Lwx1360, Lwx1127, Lwx1393
  2. Group 4: Pqr2021, Zzz1929, And2021, Mno1990, Www2021
  3. Group 5: Just wanted you have a quick note about your details for more information, If I don't have any further questions or need anything else, please let me know, Either of you have a mistaken number or email to contact us, We have a mistaken number which I have received from you, Everyone else in this world will not have received any information from anyone, Regarding your details, I will not have any more questions about you, Very good news about this one though I have been thinking of going to give you a call, Do I have a conciliation to be able or not be able for general reasons?, 9th of the month for the named recipient and I am sorry for not getting in contact, 25th of this year is for more of the Act than expected, Unfortunately, I have received this email in error
All of above accounts have been blocked locally. You can see that Group 3 is similar to some accounts in Group 2 such as Lww2015 and so on. Group 4 is similar to some accounts in Group 2 like Aaa1232 (3 alphabet + 4 numbers). Group 5 is similar to some accounts with many words in Group 2. What's more, all of these accounts had the same way to register (mobile and via webpage). This is one of the main reaons why I can judge by  It looks like a duck to me. Therefore, why accounts I mention above haven't been checked should be considered. I hope the information may help you with future's check.--Easterlies (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The reason why not all accounts were found is simple. The ranges used by this user are very crowded and so wide. Also, it's not a request for Group 2 users. Sockpuppets found by chance are not completely investigated, since they are judged based on their association with the original requested accounts. If you need further investigation on them, please post new request after local discussion. This is the case, for example, if you cannot do DUCK, etc. --Sotiale (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want a new check request about these accounts. I just think that above information may be helpful to you. --Easterlies (talk) 14:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I will refer to the information you provided when I have the next request. Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Easterlies: Should I be worried about this person behind all these accounts? I have seen mass creation of accounts with patterns Lww[yyyy] from years ranging from 19th to 21st centuries on yue.wikipedia and yue.wiktionary. H78c67c (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Stupidwikibot, 露母龜投, 誠仁玩具文具店, 成人換具掌櫃, 夠膽封鎖我果個會斷檳周, 吊你魯姆明, 圍棋界 扯棋專家, 臨鄭月我, 殘酷一打叮, 亀頭仔, 亀頭露出小笑容, 嗅濱週, 轟炸機搞基, 宮保臭雞丁, 我的小維基要起機了, 我愛小維機, 城人大賓洲總統, 中國哈爾賓週創辦人大賓週, 歐美成仁玩具總動員, 成仁玩具掌櫃, 麻麻的小必廚, 胸維百科, 回歸頭好痛, 猴頭龜頭, 精神之液之精液, 電摩打飛機維修部經理

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. H78c67c (talk) 01:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Confirmed Group 1: Edamworla, Abetsbused, Sumpbrown
  •  Confirmed Group 1 and Hmvod9@zh.wikipedia(2020-12)

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вайсем куец@uk.wikivoyage

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 00:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Someone thought I was 呼尔奇兰 or 伟大的阿卡扎曼扎拉克, who were already banned. What I did was that I used some javascript to assist my edit (totally legal and generally distinguishable from 呼尔奇兰), which couldn't be done by 呼尔奇兰. And now I am banned, so I request CU myself. EdwardAlexanderCrowley (talk) 15:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can't exactly request CU on yourself, but anyways the actual requester is Techyan (a local admin) so yeah. LuciferianThomasTalk 23:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Confirmed Group 1: EdwardAlexanderCrowley and CrowleyBot
  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 1 and PXD

Who cares about group 1? Anyway, from a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lu tiwan@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 0789-GR, LKT-029, Loxa9991116
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 瓦爾加, 瓦沙克

  • Likely Likely Group 1 and Lu tiwan
  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sample user 100@yue.wikipedia

Done. At the request of SRG, 239 accounts of zhwiki, yuewiki and yuewiktionary have already been locked. --Sotiale (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Wait, isn't MCC214 saying in the local discussion they edited the same article, contributions overlaps. So local sysop blocked it and MCC214 want a sleepers check. I don't get the last part of "these isn't a clear edvidence to prove it". It isn't mentioned anywhere in the local discussion. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Camouflaged Mirage:Hi. First of all, the formulation of MCC214 is not clear enough. Then, MCC214 said "貢獻頁面互相重疊", I think it means "edited the same article". And I did make a few mistakes. The first account was confirmed that he is the sock puppet of 林建祥. But the other three are not. So I thought MCC214 might want to know the relationship of these accounts. But things may not be what I thought they were. --Yining Chen (Talk) 13:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yining Chen I see. Discuss with MCC214 more on HAM about this point will be good. Thanks. :) Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MCC214 just posted an update. He added that he just suspected some accounts still not blocked, and wanted a sleeper check based on this round of check. Nods and winks, I think. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note Note: Please, take care not to wait for something or discuss further on SRCU. The general condition for SRCU processing in zhwiki is to form a consensus. If consensus had been formed, I think there would be no such problem. At my discretion, I have handled requests that have not been discussed in less than a day, but it will be very difficult if there are frequent delays and other problems like this one. Please discuss a request fully in the future and post here. --Sotiale (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 曾俊銳, 阿掟, 鄺矮, 葉鎮輝, 關樹明, 姜耀坤, 唐中書, 梁耀堅, 秦博思, Jennylauk1

  •  Confirmed Group 1 == 林建祥
  • This user used VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


No. --Sotiale (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sotiale:Do you mean Unrelated Unrelated?Thanks.--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It means that No (HBN), No (other sleepers found). --Sotiale (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Sharonstone20991, Ariefsuditomo19881, Kindlymyers19885, Lianitaruchyat20995, Putranababan20995, Yunitasiregar20994, Tinatoon10993, Rezarahardian19922
  • Stale Jellysyakilla20993

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... Next time, please attach the content that they claim to be different users. Request processing may be delayed if you do not explain why confirmation is needed :( --Sotiale (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed 吕珂, BlueSky WW

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale: Okay, it's my fault this time, kind of reckless. Sorry for any inconvenience. --Hamish 14:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: PRC1927, KGB1917, CEPA649, ECFA539, ADIZ2020, TWD1025, JPY0206, USA1982, AIT1982
  • Likely Likely F0936244201, R125463268

  • Unlikely Unlikely Group 1 and Likely Likely Group

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]