Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-05

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



There are also these accounts:

大魯閣打擊練習場、CCFJBKZMB、蟲ㄈㄟ得武漢肺炎、大魯閣號。--海の向こうは敵だ! 11:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

FYI: this LTA are that CU request group2 listed accounts and that CU request listed accounts. Also, below accounts are the same LTA too (i.e. their blcok reasons were written that "确认为傀儡或真人傀儡 - 根据用户贡献确定,千村狐兔" :
Thank you. SCP-2000 11:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 八十 and Wormflyfly

  • Only account that is not blocked is listed above.
  • It is believed that the accounts you presented is not a single user.
  • One of these is believed to have used fake information and VPNs for attacking.
  • I don't think it makes sense to group these accounts.
  • The ranges they used is already blocked.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Easterlies (talk) 05:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Ejdjfkfkk, Rddddkdkd, Tcttctftftftftf, A2525258tt, Mdmdofmtofn == Aotmfkl (2021-02, 2021-02(2)).

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Easterlies (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Cung4 cung4 fei1@zh.wikipedia

曰人民報 is another suspected (and currently ducked as) sock of 千村狐免 (who I am also suspecting if they are Yage Wu).
Cung4cung4fei1laam6jung6faai3leoi5 is, as per their username, ducked as a sock of 千村狐免 and presented here for comparison. Itcfangye (talk) 04:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Perhaps you are confused about the 3 LTAs(千村狐免, Yage Wu, 冏). A little interesting, but here are the results.

  •  Confirmed Group 1: Cung4 cung4 fei1, 檯灣尼亞諸史多, Mr.Choqqers, 無齒的金正日, Issacsze
  • Unrelated Unrelated Cung4cung4fei1laam6jung6faai3leoi5, 曰人民報

  • 2 Unrelated Unrelated used VPN/OPs and Unrelated Unrelated to each other.
  • The user in group 1 is different from the information in 千村狐免, which you can find on zhwiki LTA page.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


X mark.svg Not done See their CA. It has already been confirmed on enwiki, so there is no need for investigation. Therefore, mark it as not done. --Sotiale (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Zon6 zon6 fi1@zh.wikipedia

  • Let me explain, the first two account have vandalism edit into Chiang Kai-shek related article, which is similar to this. The third one also have vandalism edit like the second and third, but its name is similar to sock of LTA:QCHM. Check to see if second and third/fourth are related.--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Adding 2 more, they also have vandalism edit into Chiang Kai-shek related article, but community doubt these 2 are this group. Would like to request a check--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 09:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Please be considerate of steward handling this. Another user has attached the reason for this request, but simply saying "zh wiki reuqest" will prevent us from processing the request. Anyway, I have some questions regarding the request:

  1. At local, discussion began with 2 accounts, so whether other users also agreed to the investigation
  2. Whether the third and fourth accounts have similar editing patterns to the first and second accounts
  3. Whether the fifth and sixth accounts have similar editing patterns to the first and second accounts
  4. Why aren't they DUCK (ex. Zon6 zon6 fi1* series)
  5. Who you suspect to be these users: you are presenting multiple users

Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

  1. The first three are approved by other, and the rest do not have any objections.
  2. The first four have "vandalism edit into Chiang Kai-shek related article" pattern like this
  3. All except fourth(Bsegrrtjhfheue) have similar account naming which mocking zh sysop 蟲蟲飛, one of the possibility is LTA:QCHM but recent checkuser result show that it could be another LTA which is not QCHM.

--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Regarding these socks:
  1. At first, the local requester would like CU to find if there are more recent socks/sleepers of (w:zh:LTA:C7) other than Zon6 zon6 fi1/蟲飛進鼻孔怎麼辦?, due to their frequent vand behavior and sleeper use (thus it's highly unlikely they only use two socks recently).
  2. But while behaving like w:zh:LTA:C7, the usernames of Zon6 zon6 fi1, 蟲飛進鼻孔怎麼辦? and Zon6 zon6 fi1 le6 yon6 khue1 le6 are similar with w:zh:LTA:QCHM. (This was first discovered by Sidishandsome. Special thanks to them.)
  3. Thus we need to find out who they really are. (I bold this because it is, in my opinion, most important.)
  4. Bsegrrtjhfheue is another user who behaves like w:zh:LTA:C7 recently.
  5. In our last CU, it is confirmed that some LTAs are trying to impersonating other LTAs. We would like to see if 蟲飛胡亂段封禁 and Cung3 cung3 bi2 lon1 iung1 kui1 lui4 are also such cases (since Yage Wu declared that they will keep vanding on zhwiki).
I personally think the last two accounts may be a different case. They may relate to the first four or not. -- Itcfangye (talk) 07:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

The desire to know who they are is that I know well, but that's something I don't know either. There is not only one user associated with CCF you post recently, and it is also impossible to distinguish between them. And even if LTAs pretend to be each other, the fact that they are LTAs does not change. Block and ignore is the only answer.

  •  Confirmed Group 1: JhbFTFJYFjytfJY, OIUuysegfuN, OHULIhulihlhNJN, 蟲飛進鼻孔怎麼辦?
  •  Confirmed Group 2: OUHLOnknhkHR, LKIAUHJIhiulh, Zon6 zon6 fi1, Cung4 fei1 laam6 jung6 faai3 leoi5, Vanrdjdwt1qQ, Bsegrrtjhfheue
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive 蟲飛胡亂段封禁, Cung3 cung3 bi2 lon1 iung1 kui1 lui4

  • They used VPN/OPs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Scottcesc, Minmincontent, Summerhanim

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Easterlies (talk) 13:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


I have locked everything not already locked that I felt comfortable was a sockpuppet and I tagged it in the log as 110.29 per your note. Anything left is possibly not related. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


@Lost in subtitles:Please fill the template and identify infomation in section title. --Hamish 19:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
@Hamish: Like this? Sorry. I wasn't sure what failed and being a bit of a global thing (the locked one never participated in the Spanish), I wasn't sure it was needed.--Lost in subtitles (talk) 19:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Afterwards it's been requested this check [1]. May be noticed that if the connections with the rank 85.84 are confirmed, some (if not many) of the pages created on other wikis may have been affected being created by that rank. [2]--Lost in subtitles (talk) 20:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
I'd say it's in range of eswiki's local CU as Sorginak left a log there in Last November. You may want to wait for stewards. --Hamish 22:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
@Hamish and AmandaNP:. All right. I'll inform of the local result. Global check was suggested due to the puppeteer having been locked globally, with no actions (as such) on the local site but the registry Hamish mentioned.--Lost in subtitles (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Things would still be stale anyway from a global perspective (loginwiki) because it only logs the creations. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done There is a local process for this and stewards can't intervene. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... Please explain in detail next time. If you only post a brief overview, we will have no choice but to dismiss the request as unfounded. For example, sharing some similarity[citation needed], not enough to confirm[citation needed]. I think this is what you can find on the local HAM. Few stewards can understand Chinese, so I would like to ask you to be specific so that other stewards can understand your request. I've asked you this many times, but I'm still reading the local HAM and looking for evidence myself. --Sotiale (talk) 02:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed 爱国爱党, 維基大人, 我係香港人, 嘉傑

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Easterlies (talk) 03:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

BobTheBuilder696966s Army Rises@en.wikinews

I've changed "wn" into "en" in title according to the template content. --Hamish 05:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
According to the locks, I say yes, but no sleepers exist. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


Did they ask to unblock? And who is that LTA? --Sotiale (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
The answer to the first question is negative, as of now. --Hamish 19:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
The answer to the second question is that it is an assumption from the original requestor at local. There are no actual LTA(s) identified that could be similar to the users listed above.
Regardless, given that these users are unable to duck, @Sotiale: please assist our community through conducting the checkuser request. -- Little Thor () 17:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
I've been watching this since it popped up. Something must be lost in communication with the original request. I am reading it as the community things they are different people. Can someone clarify and provide some evidence that suggests they are the same? I'd be happy to action if we got this. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Their editing pattern is slightly different: HeheSB added random characters to w:zh:平方数, 777w made sneak vandalism. The local requester suspect if they are socks of some LTAs, but are uncertain who they are. Itcfangye (talk) 04:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Not an LTA, no sleepers. Yes check.svg Done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


  •  Confirmed 坚不可摧的心!, 南翔挖掘机 , 松鼠飞, 蚩尤油, 哈密瓜油

No other accounts. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@AmandaNP:These mean 油泡哈密瓜 is unrelated?(just want to confirmed it.)--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

It seems it would be, though that seems odd. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)


  •  Confirmed Group 1: DIIWORLD, Leonclinic
  • Likely Likely Cherryissogood and Bangbang8787

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and Likely Likely accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 01:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


  •  Confirmed(Globally, not just enwikinews) CommunistSithApookykorah, ApookykorahRussia, Как дела Сука, Привет сука, CommunistSith, BigNoobAnon, SCP3199

--Sotiale (talk) 00:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

TDKR Chicago 101@haw.wikipedia many others

  • Unrelated Unrelated TDKR_Chicago_101

  • No evidence that they were using multiple accounts.

I can't say much, but they are technically unrelated and in my experience, it is very likely that they are different users. I suspected the xwiki fake troll that was there before, but it seems to be different from that as well. --Sotiale (talk) 00:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


  •  Confirmed Rarewing, LuciferianThomas2 == Wen Ng Ng

Of course, the contributions are quite suspicious that they are the same user[4], [5] or [6],[7](love for LuciferianThomas). --Sotiale (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't need that love XD -- LuciferianThomasTalk 13:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale:I would like to request for global block of LuciferianThomas2 as this one impersonating LuciferianThomas.--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

If you want, I can do it, but note that the locking doesn't lead to the expansion of the global lock for this user. --Sotiale (talk) 00:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks!--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


  •  Confirmed 不管是, 不知道吧, Dkddndkkeke, Tcttctftftftftf, Dfgghbggkfkfk, Rddddkdkd, Ejdjfkfkk, Rĺfnffkfnddkd

Well.. Maybe you know. --Sotiale (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)


Unlikely Unlikely --Sotiale (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Sino Renaissance@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Sino Renaissance, 漫遊生活, Chaser1912, Flying Machine, 線上英雄, 霹靂流星
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Cangjie6, Tvb10data
  • Unrelated Unrelated TNTErick

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2
  • If users in Group 1 are identified with the editing pattern, they are likely to have additional accounts potentially.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks~ --Easterlies (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Allen asd123, Jimyeh19710512, Wikiman-cn, Jimyeh1971tw

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated. --Super Wang (Chinese Wikimedian since 2009 | Greetings from Dalian) 14:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Murrkfjsty, Dunnligfyt, Willpubelicane, 建立知了天知道, 聖誕老人的雪館, 天外楼宇, 欧陆风云小狐狸, 鲨鱼吃青鱼, M2suisdea-d, 洛麗塔小奶茶, 多羅多羅迷, 中结婚大议员, Valaadthenm, Aegisgundam3001, YournameisAab

  •  Confirmed

From a technical point of view. All accounts are just locked by me. In the future, please separate the accounts for reference or the locked accounts. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 10:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks~ --Easterlies (talk) 10:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


  • Also, in community some argue that should they be blocked indef as they only create 1 Copyright violations article for each account.--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Per AGF, one can't be blocked indefinitely only due to creating an article that infringes copyright. If the check shows that these accounts are controlled by someone, there is no doubt about such blocks. --Easterlies (talk) 06:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Jjhsgdazzs, Xzcsdfxc, Usdzdffzz, Mjuygfdllez, Weerppzzs

--Sotiale (talk) 14:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Little Thor () 18:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Unlikely Unlikely Stalislansko and Pepe33025

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 Confirmed. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 14:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Danial2703kurdistan, ئیلامی, احمد ۲۶۲۱, ورووگڕ, سەرۆکایەتی, ملتیا

@Aram: From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Pakho provides@zh.wikipedia

  • By saying "block locally", Cmsth11126a02 meant that these users (Pakho provides, Pakho man, etc.) are blocked locally. And I think by "as" Cmsth11126a02 meant "with". Itcfangye (talk) 09:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This request will be reviewed and processed tomorrow. --Sotiale (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Pakho bull Finding, Pakho really good, Pakho provides, Pakho Tunisia, Pakho Word, Pakho Linda, Han come(See 2021-04), Pakho bull Finding, Pakho received, Pakho man, 絕望的我, Ghostly trick For Me, Music of the day
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Ec91611, Annie Chan 1

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and 2

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 14:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


  •  Confirmed(Global, Group 1): Vistablue12, Laterica04, Perris389, Perris3, Elize80, Adrena45, Suheye69, Independence1, Lluliana1, Dov521, Malika40
  •  Confirmed(enwikisource, Group 2): CindaCandler8, JaclynHough85, DorineBueno93, RickieTown15, RoslynBenes5717, FabianAble08859

It makes no sense to classify them, but at least it can be considered as certain that they are of the same kind. The remaining non-grouped accounts are one or two accounts, so the accounts are locked without listing them separately. Yes, these are found in enwikt, enwikisource, frwikisource, etc. Discovered accounts are locked. --Sotiale (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

followup accounts
Done; accounts locked, another hidden items locked, OPs blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 06:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)


  • Likely Likely Chingfa and 好想去
  • Unrelated Unrelated Babygogolove

  • Some user used OPs/VPN.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks~ --Easterlies (talk) 13:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

@Sotiale:I would like to ask if Babygogolove used OPs/VPN or not--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Please explain why you need the answer. --Sotiale (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
@Sotiale: 蟲蟲飛 stated that "CU shows that this user used VPN". Itcfangye (talk) 11:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
This may have been all of them using VPN or OPs, or it may have been used by users in the Likely Likely group. Please note that I have not made any clear statements about it. What I can tell you is, this technical result means that none of the data match, even considering their VPN usage. So, to block them, need to cite other evidence, not cite technical results only. --Sotiale (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I have informed CCF about this. Itcfangye (talk) 06:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)


Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 02:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Windy 0410, Peach windy 1226, Windy20101226, Htsdiyjgddigudyigdjyd
  • Unrelated Unrelated MilkTea1998, Person0607

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 02:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)