Steward requests/Checkuser/2021-10

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests

James_Dirant@zh.wikipedia

Could you please check the status of your local request? I see this status word: 未转交. --Sotiale (talk) 13:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have fixed the link, there arewere two sections for the same users. An admin who blocked the user and closed the first discussion now agrees that CU should be performed.--Kuailong (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 09:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: The Itaccinio, 银澜, James Dirant
  •  Confirmed Group 2: Lanthanum1839, 北斗2003

  • Possible Possible Group 1 and 2
  • If the editing patterns of the two groups of users match, it is highly probable that they are the same user.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks~ Easterlies (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

代价竟是我自己@zh.wikipedia

Isn't this more likely to be meatpuppets in this case? For meatpuppets, checkuser doesn't help. In my opinion, it is possible to process locally rather than checkuser. Or can you explain another reason why this investigation should be conducted? --Sotiale (talk) 03:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: The first user (代价竟是我自己) shows unusual familiarity about Chinese Wikipedia community, so I don't think it is a meatpuppet. They may be undisclosed accounts of established accounts (using undisclosed accounts in internal discussion is prohibited), or socks of recently WMF-banned users.--GZWDer (talk) 04:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If so, I think blocking them is a good choice. If it is clear that they are sockpuppets or single purpose accounts, you can handle them locally. --Sotiale (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In my opinion, it is meaningful to know 1. Who is operating them 2. How are them related and whether they are more accounts. If they are operated by WMF banned users they should be globally locked.--GZWDer (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm still wondering why the first account(代价竟是我自己) isn't blocked. And if the first account is familiar with zhwiki community and its operation, are the rest of the accounts the same? I wonder if it's the same pattern as the first account. Thanks for your reply. --Sotiale (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: There are not many edits to determine, but #2 and #4's comments seems not constructive (i.e. somewhat trolling).--GZWDer (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have main account in chinese wiki. The purpose I use this sockpuppet is to prove 城市君 isn't innocent and prevent revenge from WMC. I am not sockpuppet and meatpuppet of user name #1,3,4, and promise will not use this account to edit chinese wiki anymore. Pkease block my account. You can ckeck me if you don't trust me.

@Shanyuni: No matter who you are, it is prohibited to use undisclosed accounts to participate in internal discussion.--GZWDer (talk) 13:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • they are not the same user; individual users (4 accounts above; This does not mean that these are not socks)
    • this suggests the possibility that they may have a main account. However, from my point of view, they are highly likely not banned users.
  • I would recommend that you block all these accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since their contributions are small, it is difficult for me to prove fully who they are. Typically, we don't list them in this case. However, users in the ranges adjacent to their IPs were not banned users. --Sotiale (talk) 11:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Louie1566, G1080039@zh.wikipedia

It is not easy to make a determination here. For me, I would say this is Unlikely Unlikely and I'm seeing only small bits that may connect them, but it's more likely that they are all in different locations. @Sotiale: in case they have a differing viewpoint based on my lack of knowledge. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Due to a lot of delayed work (RL), I will handle it by 2 October. --Sotiale (talk) 22:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: G1080039, Bbb52272005, Maggie53192008
  • Unlikely Unlikely Louie1566
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive Windy8786

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your help--Jonathan5566(talk) 11:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

幹大事@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 12:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 更改大師, Ray321ray
  • Possible Possible 師生 and Group 1
  • Unrelated Unrelated 阿我好帥, 幹大事

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jimmy1010123@zh.wikipedia

Local HAM seems to have more explanations, so please be a little more specific. --Sotiale (talk) 11:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry for that. Chanteltvb change nickname in article zh:姚焯菲 for several times, and Jimmy1010123 join two days after Chanteltvb been blocked, and have same kind of nickname change with that page. Jonathan5566(talk) 11:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Unlikely Unlikely Chanteltvb and Jimmy1010123

  • One of these users is estimated to have used the IP of public institution.

There is little data for investigation, so for now this is the best. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

星辰傳@zh.wikipedia

Per local discussion, please also perform CheckUser block for their underlying IP ranges. --無聊龍 (talk) 15:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed 專家名人傳, 龍飛少年, 校園足跡官方網頁, 牽手的理由, 吹晚風, 星夜之, 星辰傳, 司徒亦荫, 愛你就像玫瑰花, 甜甜的蛋糕

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 00:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. --無聊龍 (talk) 00:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alexander Windsor@zh.wikipedia

Hello. There seems to be little explanation as to whether Alexander Windsor has anything to do with them. Could you please explain why they are the subject of this investigation? --Sotiale (talk) 23:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
--Lt2818 (talk) 03:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 陈文清是清, 德阳山, 独行的黑影, Where is spring?
  • Unrelated Unrelated Alexander Windsor and Group 1

  • They used VPN IPs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ginkos520isthebest@zh.wikipedia

Same as above thread. --Sotiale (talk) 13:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: No worries. I understand that today can be very exhausting for you. Thank you for your commitment for doing this request tomorrow. --) 22:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Babygogolove777, Babygogolove444, DDD91991, Babygogolove222, Babygogolove888
  • Unrelated Unrelated Ginkos520isthebest

  • I can only see their latest data, so I don't know if they've been hacked if they haven't used their account for a long time.
  • What I can guess from the data(Ginkos520isthebest) is that at least the same user from July 22nd to the present (October 10th) are using it.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Paklin Chris@zh.wikipedia

  • A sleeper check is also required if they are confirmed, since Jacky 1122 uses socks continuously. Itcfangye (talk) 04:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Today was a very busy day for me. I'll take care of it tomorrow. --Sotiale (talk) 13:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Pakiln Chris, Paklin Chris, Would be a great addition, Class Is Going Back, .What The French, 反省的我, 天羯座, 藍色的宙宇, Reduce the amount, Chillam Blue Tram, Chillam Shaw, Brian Chaw

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your help. Jonathan5566(talk) 13:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

爵崴@zh.wikipedia

Are there any differences in their contribution patterns? Why is the admin hesitant to block? Perhaps there is a reason for doing so. --Sotiale (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I did not see differences in their contributions, actually. I do not know why no admins blocked them. Maybe no admin noticed that report (it sometimes happens in Zhwiki). I am considering discussing with trusted local admins in their own talk pages to see if they are willing to block. Itcfangye (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Local admin AT blocked 爵崴 after I directly reported the case to them. (I did not prefer reporting to local admins in their talk pages because such method has been abused before by now-WMF-locked 蟲蟲飛.) Itcfangye (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed 爵崴, 吐露決

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

C64 is the best computer@incubator

  •  Confirmed Gifnk dlm 2020 + C64 is the best computer
  •  Confirmed Pc98isthegreatestsystemevermad + Justanothergenericusernamenothingtoseehere
  • Both sets are Possible Possible to each other, editing on different ranges of the same ISP in the same city. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
@Gifnk dlm 2020, since I have interacted with you quite a bit: Any comments on this evidence? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
22:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Muciddin@az.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Nuray Balakən, Nuray Balçı, Muciddin

  • Since the two requested users accessed from the same place at the same time, it is highly probable that the two users are the same user or one is a mobilized user.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Venusloveandbeautyshock@zh.wikipedia

  • Likely Likely Venusloveandbeautyshock and Godistakingcare
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive BlendedSmoothie

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nuray Balakən@az.wikipedia

Ceyhun Balasov was created less than 7 days ago, how can they get back to vote in a few months? --Sotiale (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, for misspelling. Just copy-pasted same argument. There is a user just overcreating lots of accounts. I cant deal with it . Sotiale - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I took a look over possible votestacking concerns, which regularly warrants a CU. The only thing that is the same is that they are editting out of the same city. Different devices and different networks on all accounts. So your meatpuppetry concerns may be correct, either way, CU can't keep helping with this. If you think it's meat puppetry, please do not request CU. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Muciddin@az.wikipedia

Most of the data here is going to be stale, and if you think it's a meatpuppetry case, there is really no investigation to be done by CU as we can't prove that type of case. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Since this request cannot be realized(per AmandaNP), I mark it as not done. --Sotiale (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Atelier123@zh.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Haaappppy, Yurong01, RY122333, LittoR, TANG Ying Studio, YY199600
  • Stale Shiyurong, Atelier123, Atelier LU Hang
  • No registered: Yurong01Haaappppy

  • Note Note: Please exclude stale accounts and unregistered accounts.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 11:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zanoido@pt.wikipedia

  • X mark.svg Not done They have 5 local checkusers. Stewards can't intervene. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kyzqy@zh.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Group 1: Bngfjfg, Kuangyang2021, Uhjjhgkghkirt
  • Possible Possible Kyzqy, Piuqi

  • Unrelated Unrelated Group 1 and Possible Possible group
  • They used VPN/OPs.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 09:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

改過自新@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 改過自新2.0, 改過自新

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Un34803481@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Whiskacute, Henriavila, Shadowstricker, Un34803481
  •  Confirmed Group 2: 泛美馬史, Nddvirus
  •  Confirmed Group 3: Parkliner7 and Parkliner1 case Group 2 (2021-07)
  • Cavildelve - No other hidden accounts.

  • Un34803481 used VPNs.
  • Stale Parkliner5, Parkliner2
  • Relationships between groups are Possible Possible at best, but I recommend that you analyze their behavioral patterns.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Koniangpo@zh.wikipedia

Also other socks of 冏:

Symbol wait.svg Doing.... Please use {{Srcu}} instead of {{Checkuser}}(for metawiki template). --Sotiale (talk) 10:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • All accounts found to the extent they can be found are locked.

--Sotiale (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

卵 卵 美跳羽@zh.wikipedia

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 11:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Group 1: 卵 卵 美跳羽, 故里 素晴, Jtjutgamtpgadm0808, Komtdmnj, ᏆᏆᏓᏆᎾᏍᏜᎾᎹ, 英英国派内, はらみろる, Uuikjhuijhgg, Ujdwxt, Tlddnpk, Molto vicino, とロッピー!, Super buyer man

From a technical point of view. Maybe today's work will be over with this, haven't you sent too much at once? :p --Sotiale (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AFUHANWANSUI@zh.wikipedia

  • If these accounts get confirmed, a sleeper check is also required. Itcfangye (talk) 09:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Boom114514, AFUHANWANSUI, Huami666, 刘心洋, Xuqinxian, Xuqunxian, 李晋毅, 王后雄, Тюлнь, 蒸發星期六, Wenhuadageming, Gaigekaifang

  • They are on VPNs and bridges you use often.

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

蟲蟲飛@zh.wikipedia

I will review this tomorrow. --Sotiale (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: User:Enjoysee has been locked by WMFoffice already because of "Globally banned user: #19286". SCP-2000 05:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
注意:基金會之前試過誤判,封錯了人。不肯定這次是否有人胡亂舉報,所以最好也查一下CU。--14.0.173.185 06:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Translation of the IP statement: Note: WMF also misjudged before, did a wrong lock. Not sure whether someone anyhow reported this time round, so best to do a CU.
To the IP: Do know this is a request page, all discussions need to be done locally at HAM. Not here. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

X mark.svg Not done. Since the account has already been taken action by WMF, there is no further action to take. A steward cannot reinstate this action, if you have any questions, please contact WMF. --Sotiale (talk) 12:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sotiale: Are you able to find other abusive accounts or IPs?--GZWDer (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, such investigations are possible. Note that when I mention that a steward cannot reinstate the actions of the WMF, I do not mean that investigation is impossible or it is impossible to derive the results of an investigation within the limits of the technical data I can ascertain. It just means that there is nothing I can do about their actions, and that inquiries should be made there. The information T&S and I have is different and it is likely that T&S has much more information than the global community stewards. --Sotiale (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: From the information you have, do you think if they are confirmed/likely/possible? (User:SCP-2000 shared their findings on behavior patterns with me and I would say highly likely from these findings) Itcfangye (talk) 15:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, I guess I didn't express exactly. Blame my English skills. "The information T&S and I have is different" means "may be different". As a community steward, the data I have access to is not as much as theirs. Therefore, it must be said that WMF's analysis was based on more data than mine. I haven't reviewed the data yet and I don't think this checkuser is necessary as WMF has already banned the account. However, as previously stated, if there are any suspicious accounts in the future, you are free to post them in this request box. --Sotiale (talk) 02:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiiu1234th@zh.wikipedia

@Itcfangye: Please explain why 許博閔 does not become a duck unlike other accounts. --Sotiale (talk) 09:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: 許博閔 is still, and currently only adding 陳秋榮-related contents, and their contributions look like continue doing what Wiiu1234th was, though this may also lead both enough to be duck?! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why not explain it to zhwiki? I'm not the admin of zhwiki so I can't help. --Sotiale (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: I would suggest mark this request not done since the 3rd account is duck-able. --) 01:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Then, not done. If necessary, please discuss and request again. --Sotiale (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sundayservice2021@zh.wikipedia

@Itcfangye: What is similar content? Please elaborate on why you suspect they are related. --Sotiale (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
From my point of view, most of their contributions are around works of w:zh:陳德政, the rest seem to be around people related to 陳德政. It does seem strange for three users to contribute to these contents only. Itcfangye (talk) 04:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have also informed local requester about your question and await their reply. Itcfangye (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Reason from original requester: All the three users added similar soft advertisements to the following articles: w:zh:給所有明日的聚會, w:zh:神在的地方, w:zh:爛頭殼. Itcfangye (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For example, in w:zh:Special:Diff/66730503, Sonicvelvet added back contents that was first added by Atpsy and removed by local patroller. Itcfangye (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed Sundayservice2021, Atpsy, Sonicvelvet

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

卵 卵 美跳羽@zh.wikipedia

  • After our last checkuser, 中华人民 愛 was immediately registered and ducked. Local consensus is that the IP range(s) they are using need to be blocked if possible. Itcfangye (talk) 07:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Confirmed China boy 114541, 宇宙男及び日本男子最強男の帝国の皇帝, 中华人民 愛

  •  Confirmed 卵 卵 美跳羽 account group

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These are not simple ranges, so I'm considering a suitable method. In any case, action will be taken, so don't worry. --Sotiale (talk) 10:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pavlov2@zh.wikipedia

Anyone can have pros and cons for OA2021. Investigations for these reasons are therefore sensitive, and the reasons or evidence must be clearly stated. I hope you can be more specific about what similar editing behavior is. --Sotiale (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: The person who requested this check was blocked on 10/24 for two weeks, and it seems to me that there are no other evidence that other users can provide to support this check. Maybe X mark.svg Not done and come back two weeks later? --) 12:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, the request can't be processed if no one can give us an answer. Please request again if necessary. --Sotiale (talk) 11:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Блинов Рюрик Петрович@ruwiktionary

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Блинов Рюрик Петрович (talk) 12:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you have any reason to make yourself the subject of investigation? Also, you are not giving us any reason. --Sotiale (talk) 12:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Q-bit array: Hello. Sorry for pinging you. If you know anything about this user, could you please let me know? Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 12:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Seems disruptive. OP is indeffed in ruwp and temp blocked in another ru project. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: Hi! I guess Блинов Рюрик Петрович was blocked on ruwiktionary as a suspected sockpuppet of Энциклопедист свободного контента. And now he surely wants the CUs to disprove this accusation. As I had the "pleasure" dealing with the both users in the past, I can say that Блинов Рюрик Петрович and Энциклопедист свободного контента are two different people, but working together - advocating for each other. P.S.: Блинов Рюрик Петрович was indeffed by me for systematic disruptive behavior on ruwiki. Disruptive behavior was also one of his block reasons on ruwiktionary ("флуд" - disruptive behavior). IMHO we should consider a global lock for him. -- Q-bit array (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed. He makes that kind of statements on his talk page: [2]. Partial ranslation: Please unblock user Блинов Рюрик Петрович and allow him to dislose somebody's personal data <...> (I want this person to be killed). [sic!] <...> I want to disclose personal data without consent and unbeknownst to subject, and that's all! I can't edit Wikipedia without bypassing the ban. Please take care of him. 46.191.232.62 19:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
+ this edit. 46.191.232.62 19:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Sotiale: they want to prove that they are different users because they have already been blocked for sock-puppetting. Infovarius (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Я не участница A.Vajrapani, не администратор и не преследовал участника-чекъюзера Ле Лоя, поэтому прошу ко мне глобальную блокировку не применять. Бесспорно я бы хотел глобальный флаг, но я хочу стать стюардом, а не глобально заблокированным участником. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Блинов Рюрик Петрович (talk)
Когда меня разблокируют @Q-bit array?--Блинов Рюрик Петрович (talk + contributions) 13:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Думаю, что очень скоро прилетит глобальная блокировка. -- Q-bit array (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Я не сокпаппет. Я создал в викисловаре 74 страниц из которых только 10 удалено, поулучшал множество страниц, отменял вандализм и сообщать о нём администраторам (они блокировали потом вандалов на 3, 6, 12 месяцев). Мне жалко Энциклопедиста свободного контента и я хочу, чтобы его разблокировали в википедии и викиданных и дали права стюарда на Мета-Вики (я о нём переживаю даже больше, чем о себе).--Блинов Рюрик Петрович (talk + contributions) 14:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

X mark.svg Not done In general, checkusers that they request against themselves are not allowed, and this is also difficult to use as a means of proving their innocence in the current situation; This should appeal to the sysops there. --Sotiale (talk) 11:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

攻撃精神@zh.wikipedia

  •  Confirmed Group 1: 5th protocol, Bcxfu75kk, Deathandwiki8886, Demetrios1939, Echatama, Fahdi Khaled, Ffhhgrrr, Fgfghghf, Gghgfg, Help 0333, Hongkonger5000, Istudio2021622, La Violencia, Lubang Island, Mffdgffd, Nnnnnnnn45435435, ONE Light Heavyweight, Pggddf444, Rrrtghf, Sihvonen, To help 202172, Ttyytrr44, Vcxvxggg, どこの軍隊でも最後の 1 兵最後, ムエタイの美学, ムエタイの首相撲, ムエタイの前蹴り, ムエタイの肘打ち, 攻撃精神, 攻击精神旺盛, 欧州戦ノ教訓カ我カ歩兵ノ訓練ニ及ホスヘキ影響, 国家総動員研究序説, 大21322, 大圣盒子, 対手は支那兵以下の弱虫で, 大意失荆州, 大正十四年度部隊兵器検査の実施及所見竝希望, 大阪そんな雨降ってるのか, 大阪武道祭, 大阪市は24時間降水量, 大和魂の復興, 大和魂を復興, 联合国52个国家支持国安法, 李赣大战孙笑川, 晚高峰, 没有墨水, 白兵戦銃剣をかざして肉弾戦, 比智慧更强大的是意志, 三角关系, 常に最後の一兵まで戦うだろう, 昭和17年3月,大东亚战争进入炙热阶段,米国的介入使皇心愤忧, 随着苏联恢复欧洲军事大国地位, 广州黑人独立, 日本人は最後の一人になるまで戦うというのが, 第二次世界大战结束后, 珠穆朗玛峰在长高, 中国警察之父袁世凯, 支持香港政府嚴懲那些亂港暴徒, 策士统领袁世凯, 天军, 滩头, 回し蹴り(トルリョチャギ), 後楽園ホール
  • Unrelated Unrelated Disney magic 0805 and Group 1

  • They used VPN/OPs.
  •  Confirmed Disney magic 0805 and 卵_卵_美跳羽 accounts group

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 12:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]