Steward requests/Global/2014-12

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 December 2014, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Requests for global (un)block


Global block/unblock for [[User:93 #REDIRECT [[Insert non-formatted text here]] .94.246.24|93.94.246.24]]

Status:    Done

Crosswiki nonsense. There's also wikt:vec:File:Clipboard.svg to delete, I can't find the speedy deletion template--Dr Zimbu (talk) 03:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Melos (talk) 17:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 41.68.189.22

Status:    Done

Xwiki spam on ptwikis. Eurodyne (talk) 01:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Done by Billinghurst. Eurodyne (talk) 01:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for User:ENT 70

Status:    Not done

The user:ENT 70. has been blocked in english wikipeida for vandalism and harassment and insulting here, so he went to the Arabic wikipeida and continue in vandalism look it here and harassment and personal attacking in user pages his personal attacking has been hidden since its a dirty words.

Can you block his IP. Thank you and have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 00:54, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

There is no global block, and there is no obvious requirement for a checkuser. This is better managed by local communities at this point of time, and that seems to be what is happening.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block/unblock for 5.9.40.162/16

Status:    Done

It was blocked on 3rd July 2012 and mask /16 covers all 5.9.x.x addresses while it seems that only one address should have been blocked. Our adresses 5.9.70.154(main one),5.9.70.133,5.9.91.150,5.9.70.152,5.9.70.153 are not hosting spambots but still match the block. Mask should be modified.

removed  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 113.204.136.66

Status:    Done

Crosswiki nonsense--Dr Zimbu (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Spambot  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block/unblock for 121.205.200.19

Status:    Not done

Likely a spambot--Dr Zimbu (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Dynamic ip, block might not have any effect now--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 76.72.165.17

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. Érico Wouters msg 06:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 143.233.204.28

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. Érico Wouters msg 06:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:07, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Unblock for 212.156.67.30

Status:    Done

Hi; I am a student in Başkent University. ip 212.156.67.30 is used by Başkent Üniversitesi in Turkey. But it was blocked in Turkish wikipedia for unlimited time. block begins: 23:15, 6 Feb. 2011. Since that time whole university can not make any edits in Turkish wikipedia. We university students want to edit turkish wikipedia. Local adminstrators say they are very angry with an old time user and they dont unblock th i.p. and they punish a whole university. It has been a long time and probably the person that makes them angry is graduate by now. Thank you for help. --212.156.67.30 07:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

We cannot unblock on tr.wiki, since that is a local issue. There doesn't seem to be any global block on this IP, so nothing we can do. The block is for anonimous users only, so it should be possible for you to create an account from your home IP adress, and then log in at your university. However, feel free to e-mail the blocking admin, explaining the issue. Savhñ 09:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
The admins do not seem to help. Creating account that is created from home ip address automatically gets blocked when we login at school. We can not solve the problem in local base thats why we are writing here. Pls show us a way to solve the issue. Thank you sir.
There is nothing that we can do to unblock the IP address. The best that you can do is to contact one of their admins here at meta, and seek their help that way.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
I am not good here enough here to find the exact true person. Can you help us in person please. I dont know who is their admin at meta. And once again the admins in TR wikipedia are not likely to help. Is not there anyone over them that can help. Banning an whole university for years is insane. Thank you.
  • Hi, the block no longer seems to be necessary and has been removed. --Khutuck (talk) 12:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much.

Global unblock for 192.91.171.36

Status:    Done

This is a shared IP address (corporate proxy server). Plenty of legitimate users make edits from this address, either registered or otherwise. I checked several edits using the cross-wiki-contribs link above, and while one was definitely vandalism, plenty more were not. --Fru1tbat (talk) 14:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for -jkb-

The following request is closed.
Status:    Not done

This user expose my the location of my user IP without my permission and preventing me from unblocking from de.wikipedia.org. I tried many times to require his/her location, but all my IP addresses blocked without reasons.

My Region has been exposed to the public without my permission, and that is from using IP trace website, my privacy harmed and his behavior tends to be illegal at https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sperrpr%C3%BCfung&oldid=136708045#Benutzer:Janagewen_.28erl..29

Blocked IPs by his/her without improper reason: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:-jkb-&action=edit&undoafter=136911599&undo=136911619

You exposed the IP yourself: de:Special:Contributions/119.53.115.62DerHexer (Talk) 00:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Exposing my IP is without guilt, but expose the region to the public should need the permission of this user. But you guys first do not require my permission, second using the IP trace website to expose my IP region. Those two behaviors tend to be illegal on internet privacy protection. Janagewen (talk) 00:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
This seems like nonsense. You personally exposed your IP (any user editing from IP is warned he will expose this, "Du bearbeitest diese Seite unangemeldet. Wenn du deine Änderung speicherst, wird deine aktuelle IP-Adresse in der Versionsgeschichte aufgezeichnet"), thereby accepting that the information of your ISP will become public. He has not exposed your location, merely the location where your IP is registered to. The IP registry is public, it is not an "IP trace website", your IP has not been traced. In any case, not a steward task. Savhñ 00:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I think you misunderstand or misinterpret what you referred here. Exposing the IP address to the public does not mean and is not equivalent to exposing the region through IP-Trace Website (third party provider) to the public. Janagewen (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I think you misunderstand the functioning of IP registrars, and the role of stewards. Nothing for us to do here, and I suggest you read the article on IP adresses on the wiki. Nothing has been "traced". Any further irrelevant and absurd comments will simply be removed. Savhñ 01:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 114.41.34.37

Status:    Done

Likely a spambot--Dr Zimbu (talk) 14:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Snowolf How can I help? 15:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 91.200.12.102

Status:    Done

Spambot --Dr Zimbu (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Tegel (Talk) 15:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for Claw of Slime

Status:    Not done

After my user account has been blocked on en.wikipedia.org, I try to prove my .net template is reasonable, but this user adds comment like "You have been blocked on enwp because of "Not being here to build an encyclopedia". What you should do is to be unblocked on enwp, but not to do disruptive edits on other projects. --Claw of Slime" on de.wikipedia.org, fr.wikipedia.org, ja.wikipedia.org and ru.wikipedia.org, and trapped me blocked from de.wikipedia.org and ja.wikipedia.org. The following are the links:

https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E3%83%8E%E3%83%BC%E3%83%88:.NET_Framework&oldid=53630821

https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion:.NET&oldid=136122770

https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5:.NET_Framework&oldid=66963536

https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion:Framework_.NET&oldid=109381742

All those are not disruptive edits, https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/145e8605-899e-4014-934a-0d1f877410b0/which-table-is-more-reasonable?forum=netfxsetup this page might say something.

For all my reputation, and all the good reputation of Wikipedia.org, I request this user block globllly. Janagewen (talk) 04:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done and any Meta admin should feel free to block the filer should these disruptive requests continue. --Rschen7754 04:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Just because I said I am user Janagewen on my user page, this user reported me and blocked me from en.wikipedia.org. So this case might need reviewed. Password Saeba Ryo (talk) 08:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

This user also report me on ja.wikipedia.org, https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E8%80%85%E4%BC%9D%E8%A8%80%E6%9D%BF/%E6%8A%95%E7%A8%BF%E3%83%96%E3%83%AD%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF/%E3%82%BD%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%83%91%E3%83%9A%E3%83%83%E3%83%88&oldid=53918893

I should not judge it as an illegible behaviour, but just curious why I said "Um, this is the user page of Janagewen." on my user page of en.wikipedia.org, then minutes later my user account blocked and I was patrolled. And this question still turn back to the block of user account Janagewen, what is the exactly reason? Why this user account blocked on en.wikipedi.org, but normal on simple.wikipedia.org? "Not contribute to Wikipedia.org", what does it mean? And why if anybody said "I am Janagewen", or "This is Janagewen", and the like, would be blocked immediately? I feel this is a puzzle, or something like a bug in a programme, I need enough and clear reasons to block me on en.wikiedia.org. Password Saeba Ryo (talk) 10:32, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Warning Anyone who use a sockpuppet to bypass a block will be blocked immediately and indefinitely. If you continue to be disruptive on meta wiki or English wiki, it is you who need to be globally blocked.--114.81.255.40 11:14, 27 December 2014 (UTC) @ Chinese wiki
Sorry, If blocking me from the entire Wikipedia.org would make you happy, I am wish you happy, and do it! Password Saeba Ryo (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

English Wikipedia has their own processes that are completely independent of this page. If anyone wishes to seek an unblock at English Wikipedia they need to follow the instructions at w:en:Wikipedia/UTRS  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Password Saeba Ryo (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

request: unblock 62.75.239.21

Status:    Done

Bitte gib die folgenden Daten in jeder Anfrage an:

   Sperrender Administrator: Itti
   Sperrgrund: Nutzung eines offenen Proxys: Schreibrecht gemäß offizieller Richtlinie entzogen
   Beginn der Sperre: 16:18, 2. Jul. 2014
   Ende der Sperre: 16:18, 2. Jul. 2015
   IP-Adresse: 62.75.239.21
   Sperre betrifft: 62.75.239.21
   (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Beitr%C3%A4ge/62.75.239.21)
   Block-ID: #1024820

Blocking this IP cutting of the user space of public town library of Wuppertal (Germany). thx </sarcasm> --62.75.239.21 10:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Reviewing the existing DNS information shows that the range is recorded as components which makes the existing /17 block redundant. You have successfully removed the global block #39787 on the IP address 62.75.128.0/17.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for Janagewen and Password Saeba Ryo

Status:    Not done

Since last month I've been blocked from en.wikipedia.org, I made many emails to Wikipedia.org or Wikimedia.org to require my unblock, all the replies declined. And I've also trapped and blocked from ja.wikipedia.org and de.wikipedia.org only for my .net framework template. Claw of Slime called my suggestion as disruptive and wanted me blocked from the entire Wikipedia.org. For my template I've posted to community of Microsoft to evaluate, https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E8%80%85%E4%BC%9D%E8%A8%80%E6%9D%BF/%E6%8A%95%E7%A8%BF%E3%83%96%E3%83%AD%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF/%E3%82%BD%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%83%91%E3%83%9A%E3%83%83%E3%83%88&oldid=53918893. And today, another user account of mine, Password Saeba Ryo has been blocked again. Nothing this user account written was removed, only for the information about that link has been stroked out by Claw of Slime,as https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8E%E3%83%BC%E3%83%88:.NET_Framework#Suggest_A_Table_For_.Net_Framework and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:.NET_Framework_version_history too.

I've requested Wikimedia and Wikipedia to review this case, blocking me from en.wikipedia.org, again and again, but ignored. There is no fairness at all, the users who broke the rules of Wikipedia.org without reasonable punishment, only block me so easily, treat me as a shit or coward. So frankly, visiting and posting on Wikipedia.org is my greatest shame for this unfair treatments to me. So for I request to block my user account from Wikipedia.org globally to protect my own reputations. I've tried my best to protect reputations of Wikipedia.org contributing suggestions to correct so many main articles, but eventually I am warned, threatened and punished again and again! I've already lost all my faith on Wikipedia.org. Block me from globally is the wish of all those guys, so I do them a favour, require this block request myself. Janagewen (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Stewards are not here to resolve your battles. If you cannot edit, or cannot edit effectively, walk away and find something else to do. FWIW there is no such thing as a global block, and global locks are ineffective for what you are trying to achieve.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
What such an excellent reply! Do you have any right to tell me what to do and how to do? Who the hell do you think you are? I swear I would never fund Wikipedia.org. This is the reply from Janagewen! Janagewen (talk) 11:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for 64.183.42.90

Status:    Done

Insults in multiple wikis--Dr Zimbu (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

    • 31 hrs, to be repeated if necessary. --M/ (talk) 22:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Global lock/unlock for Rikara

Status:    Not done

Persistent sock puppetry, plus vandalism; user must be locked globally. --2602:306:CC2E:EFB0:9187:7AA0:1446:8272 23:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done There is no global account--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock for Londonlawdfw14

Status:    Done

Advertising on Simple English Wikipedia; user must be locked globally. --108.194.238.251 04:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block/unblock for 109.73.73.58

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism; IP must be blocked globally. --2602:306:CC2E:EFB0:A0F6:77A5:88FD:D5EB 03:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for unypoly

Status:    Done

Unypoly. — Revi 12:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Unylocked. --M/ (talk) 12:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for Janagewen

Status:    Not done

Cross wiki vandal. He blocked in enwp, duwp and jawp. And zhwp etc. vandal.--アルトクール(jaWN / jaWP) 18:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Subsequent edit history shows lock unnecessary.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block/unblock for 50.112.38.7

Status:    Done

IP was indefinitely blocked globally because Amazon Web Services was used for Trojan and spam attacks, but wants to be unblocked locally. --54.146.164.16 04:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Removed though suggest editing be done from an account, as if problems are seen from the IP range, the block will be reimposed with an anon only block.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for 대우건설

Status:    Done

대우건설. — Revi 06:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for 대우건설(2)

Status:    Done

This is a 대우건설's user too. This user is blocked in kowiki, jawiki, and enwiki--장영재탐험단 (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Melos (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Global vandalism

Status:    Done

vandalism on en, es, pt, it, ru. --Torin (talk) 16:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Already done by Melos and billinghurst--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Spambots

Status:    Done
IslaHardiman
JudiBreton
AlexisI24sp
LilaMcReynolds
FrankFlanigan
EdnaGuerard

Spambot accounts; cf. COIBot report (full data report of usernames in progress). -- M\A 12:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Done :)--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Spam Accounts

Status:    Done

The accounts above have been determined to be socks of Mishtidoon through checkuser evidence on the English Wikipedia. Mishtidoon was globally locked by Ajraddatz about 2 days ago. Mike VTalk 00:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Global Lock For 대우건설 and Dokdo is republic of korea

Status:    Done

대우건설

Dokdo is republic of korea

This is a 대우건설 and Dokdo is republic of korea's sock puppet users. Vandalism-only account and LTA.--Jangyeongjae Tamheomdan (張榮在探險團) (talk/profile) 02:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Melos (talk) 10:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for AntonioCormack

Status:    Done

Spambot. Alan (talk) 15:09, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Locked Locked. Snowolf How can I help? 18:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for Unypoly

Status:    Not done

This is a Unypoly's Sock Puppet user. LTA.--Jangyeongjae Tamheomdan (張榮在探險團) (talk/profile) 15:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid I am really not familiar with Unypoly, but maybe Mathonius could help? Snowolf How can I help? 21:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
I blocked this user in the kowiki, because i can confirm that is is unypoly. however I think 장영재탐험단 (Requester) may not rush to do global lock. -DangSunM (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Decline please (for now). RfCU/RfUnblock regarding this user is ongoing, waiting for local CUs to perform the check. — Revi 16:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done per revi's request. -Barras talk 14:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock Jasmine nile

Status:    Done

Spam-only account, active in multiple wikis --Dr Zimbu (talk) 02:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras talk 14:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Request for RRRR8888 to be unblocked

Status:    Not done

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RRRR8888 (talk)

This request page is for global locks only. Your account is not locked however. --MF-W 22:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Best-Mobile-Phone

Status:    Done

Hi, please lock the above account for cross-wiki spamming. See meta, arwiki, arwikisource. Thank you. -- M\A 22:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 22:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for "Shell Put A Spell On You"

Status:    Not done

Vandalizing on Simple English Wikipedia. 54.163.8.244 01:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Local issue, locally managed at simpleWP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for Sals104

Status:    Done

Yes check.svg Done Requested on IRC by MoiraMoira, crosswiki vandal --Melos (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for Coldgdp

Status:    Done

Xwiki Spam-Only account. Alan (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Hoo man (talk) 18:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Global block for User:アルトクール

Status:    Not done

This user ever reported me and wanted me blocked globally without reasonable reason at all, at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=10646917

And I've been blocked on ja.wikipedia.org, and my user page there be removed by this user too, without any reasonable reason.

Obvious, I've no written any article or modified anything on ja.wikipedia.org. So the block to my user account there is unreasonable, and discrimniation.

So for those reasons, for the good reputation of the entire Wikipedia.org, I request to block this user from Wikipedia.org globally. Janagewen (talk) 04:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done --Rschen7754 04:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for heubergen

Status:    Not done

I, the account owner from the global account heubergen, request to block my account globally permanently and irrevocably. I will never ever have access to this account. If you can not follow my wishes I have to spam cross-wiki and that is not a thing that I want to do. I would really appreciate if you can do that for me. If I have to discuss that with a wikimedia employee, just give me there mail-adress --Heubergen (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Accounts are not locked. Simply walk away and stop editing. A global lock achieves nothing, you can just as easily create a new account. If you have an issue at a wiki, then speak to them about local blocks which can be effective, especially if you have static IP address.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Its not that, I just don't want have any connection more with the wiki-project. For that reason, want to lock my account.--2A02:168:4C73:0:448:CE2D:EA75:CD4D 21:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Set Wikibreak Enforcer on your global.js with end date 2099-12-31, and it will log-out when you login (as long as your js is enabled.) — Revi 08:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Just reset your password to something extremely complex, then delete your password and walk away. No need to have any further association.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
You don't understand what I want: I want that my access to the account are lock for me public. So anyone who look for my account, see that it is lock. I think the best solution for this case would be to delete my account what not work, okay. But you can lock my Account!!! If you can really not do that, please lock my on every wiki (in there I'm active) indefinitely (see: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=heubergen) In the most cases there are probably no local admin that understand english so I think it would be easier.--2A02:168:4C73:0:987E:BBD5:D7F4:9E9A 17:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this is outside our scope of action. Please see the wikibreak enforcer linked above. Ajraddatz (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Global lock for William y Chesterfield

Status:    Done

bullying users with blatantly language in several wikis --Matiia (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Previously Yes check.svg Done by Bsadowski1.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


Global lock for Joel y Aracely

Status:    Done

Bullying users with blatantly language in several wikis. --Matiia (talk) 01:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Melos (talk) 02:13, 31 December 2014 (UTC)