Steward requests/Permissions/2010-12

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in December 2010, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Administrator access

Bunyk@ukwikibooks

Anatoliy (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Andre Engels 20:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Ilya@ukwikibooks

Anatoliy (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Andre Engels 20:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Samurai Bruxo@ptwiki

Once we don't have local crats at this moment, grant admin flag to this user per clear community consensus obtained in a RfA.

Note: don't forget to remove his eliminator flag, due to redundancy. To do so, stewards need to assign themselves temporary bureaucrat right on ptwiki.

Thanks in advance. Ruy Pugliesi 22:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg ALL DONE Mardetanha talk 22:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Elvis @ pfl.wikipedia.org

Holder 19:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 19:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Claus Ableiter @ pfl.wikipedia.org

Holder 19:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 19:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Salamat@ptwiki

Don't have bureaucrats local. Please grant sysop status by consensus in this discussion. Salamat disc 05:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

I see you have 28 votes for and 11 against. Does ptwiki have rules regarding admin appointment? Shanel 05:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Yes we have, a candidate needs at least 75% of votes to receive the flag. He don't have that (he have 70%), so I ask you to close the discussion (the bureaucrats used to do that, but since we don't have crats anymore...) Béria Lima msg 07:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
No, we don't have such rules, Shanel. Those 75% was never decided, and even proposed, in the project. All we have is here. Examples: 55%, 69%, 71%, 74,6%. Salamat has 72%. CasteloBrancomsg 08:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Sales and Reynaldo here elected in 2006, João Felipe in 2007, and in FilRB case (of 2009), by math, 74,6 ≈ 75%. Béria Lima msg 09:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Béria, could you please show the page where we can see that rule?” TeleS (T PT @ C G) 09:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Please close the discussion as either successful or not successful locally before coming here. Until then, the request is X mark.svg Not done Laaknor 09:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

MalTsilna @ tt.wikibooks.org

Good day! Not if you could extend the term of my administration in the Tatar Wikibooks another 3 months. --Ильнар Шайдуллов 12:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Let's try 6 months this time. To expire on 4 June 2011. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 20:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Well, thank you :) --Ильнар Шайдуллов 11:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Peter Alberti@dawikisource

I am requesting permanent administrator access on Danish wikisource, after my previous, temporary one expired. I should probably note that while there is a local bureaucrat, da:s:Bruger:Christian S, he hasn't edited since 2007 and hasn't responded to requests for crat actions from back to 2008. Peter Alberti 16:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you know where the requests to that crat are? With that only bureaucrat being inactive for years, perhaps you would like to locally propose removing the bureaucrat flag, then tell us the local discussion.Jusjih 03:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
The requests to Christian S are on his talk page (da:s:Brugerdiskussion:Christian S#Bot flag request for Bruger:Computer and everything below). With regards to proposing removing his bureaucrat flag, I would prefer not to. It wouldn't help further the project in itself, and there are so few users that have contributed a substantial amount of content that I'd rather not do anything to make him feel unwelcome back, if he does turn up again. Peter Alberti 09:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done The request on dawikisource passed all suggestions allowing permanent sysops to small wikis in the discussions here: at least one week, at least 5 supports, at least 75/80%. The local crat has been out of circulation for over three years now (last edit 7 May 2007), so I have gone ahead and implemented the dawikisource consensus to grant you sysop rights there. -- Avi 15:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

user Nepaboy@newikipedia

Hi friends, few days ago his adminship has been expired and now he is unable to do some important work on Nepali Wikipedia. You may have seen his work here, if you think he is able to get permanent adminship then please accept him again. Thank you ne:user:parsu

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 20:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

S96s097@ko.wikiquote

This user made a request for Administrator before 8 month. But vigorous user of korean wikiquote is small. So, this requset is go along, now. And this user is get 6 votes for and 0 against the motion. Thus, I want close of this election(requset). Thank you. :D --Idh0854 06:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Fixed links. --Idh0854 13:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav)

Kaj@sv.wikiversity

Kaj is today temporary admin on recently started Swedish Wikiversity. With this nomination, he has support with 5 votes for permanent adminship on this project. -- Lavallen 11:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --dferg ☎ talk 11:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Tanzania@sv.wikiversity

Tanzania has been elected for permanent adminship by the community. //Kaj 07:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --dferg ☎ talk 11:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Gwendal@br.wikisource.org

At least, if we can’t have a crat, we really *need* sysops to open this project. If there no sysop, the extension are not install, without extension there is no users : it’s chicken or the egg… Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 14:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Mercy 14:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

VIGNERON@br.wikisource.org

At least, if we can’t have a crat, we really *need* sysops to open this project. See supra. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 14:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Mercy 14:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Fuadaj@mlwikiquote

Currently we don't have a local crat @ ml wikiquote, as per community consensus please grant him admin flag. Thank you Kiran Gopi 07:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 00:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Mayur @ sa.wikipedia.org

Hi i am a bureacrat on hindi wikipedia and also working with sanskrit wikipedia.But it is very difiicult to contribute there without transliteration tool and some other gadgets.I have already done it for hi wikipedia, but donot have sysop access on sa wikipedia.I requested there about one month ago but here are no active users, admins(not active for last 135 days) and bureaucrat(not active for last 70 days).So i am requesting here.Thank you--Mayur(TalkEmail)  04:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Comment Comment Mayur, as I heard, Shiju and Junaid are working on the translit tools for sa wiki. I would rather wait for that than duplicating the work. --Jyothis 21:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Comment Comment Ok, i am taking back my proposal, i was appllied for it one month back when this wiki got vector format. and how do you think i will make duplicate work, i have made transliteration tool for sanskrit seperately one month ago.there is very less difference between hindi devnagri and sanskrit devnagri script. But i also think that junaid work will be up to the mark so i have no interest left for adminship of sa wiki.However i didnot applied for installation of tool only, i wanted to work with that wiki and improve it quality but as far as i observe now its malyalam wikipedian who have taken the whole responsibility for indian languagges growth, So it will be better for me to work with my home project or if they want to reinstall transliteration tool in hi wiki i can left my crat and admin flag there.Thank you very much for your humble response--Mayur(TalkEmail) 

If I can be a pest, Mayur, I'd like to note that Jyothis has started an RFC at Requests for comment/Indic Sysop which may be of interest to you. Kylu 01:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done as the user withdrew the request.[1]Jusjih 23:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Saturni@sqwikiquote

no votes or comments yet Mardetanha talk 09:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done As Mardetanha writes, no reaction to the request. I also found that the user requested adminship less than half an hour after his first edit - see [2]. - Andre Engels 20:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Alex Demirci@gag.wikipedia

--Reality006 22:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Your wiki is almost new , some of the votes are from people who doesn't know the language also they are not member of community , so here also i suggest 3 month temporary adminship till community takes its very own shape Mardetanha talk 09:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
  • How you see appropriate.--Reality006 21:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Granted temporary sysop access for three months as per Mardetanha. To expire 26 March 2011. - Andre Engels 20:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Waihorace@zh.wikinews

Since it is not very active, only one support vote is given to me and the vote is ended. Waihorace 23:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

one vote is not enough for permanent adminship , only suggestion here is temp 3 month access Mardetanha talk 09:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I will ask for local active user for comment about the permanent permission. If it is possible, just give me temp access and I will re-request after another vote. --Waihorace 09:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Granted for 3 month, will expire on 23 March 2011Mardetanha talk 09:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Waihorace@zh.wikinews

Since it is not very active, only one support vote is given to me and the vote is ended. Waihorace 23:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

one vote is not enough for permanent adminship , only suggestion here is temp 3 month access Mardetanha talk 09:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I will ask for local active user for comment about the permanent permission. If it is possible, just give me temp access and I will re-request after another vote. --Waihorace 09:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Granted for 3 month, will expire on 23 March 2011Mardetanha talk 09:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Matteo55@hu.wikinews

The community approved his request with 2 supporting votes. - Xbspiro 17:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Two votes are not enough for permanent adminship , only suggestion here is temp 3 month access Mardetanha talk 09:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for 3 months through 2011-03-25.Jusjih 00:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

බිඟුවා@si.wikipedia

Please promote බිඟුවා as a sysop in our project. This is his second time on an admin vote and there are no oppose votes this time. --Lee 06:35, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. --Lee 04:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Tchoř@hsb.wikipedia

The discussion was announced more than week ago on the main community page and I believe the consensus has been reached. Tchoř 14:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --თოგო (D) 23:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. --Tchoř 23:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Roberto de Lyra@ptwiki

Once we don't have local crats at this moment, grant admin flag to this user per community consensus obtained in a RfA.

Note: don't forget to remove his eliminator flag, due to redundancy. To do so, stewards need to assign themselves temporary bureaucrat right on ptwiki.

Thanks in advance. Ruy Pugliesi 23:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, by Thogo. However, eliminator flag wasn't removed yet. Ruy Pugliesi 00:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done --dferg ☎ talk 08:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Junaidpv@mlwikt

Request for Permanent Adminship has been approved by users in the cited discussion page. Request to grant the flag. --Jacob 04:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

brest@mk.wikimedia.org

This wiki is official wiki for Wikimedia Macedonia and we need stronger control. I am the current president of WM. Best regards Brest 22:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 22:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Gwendal@brwikisource

The election will be closed the 2th December. As we really need this status on the project (we don't have bureaucrats local) and because there will probably be no change, I inform you now. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 07:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

The election is now closed. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 17:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

  • {{OnHold}} - Being discussed due to volume of participation. -- Avi 18:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
    • X mark.svg Not done The current practice is to consider six votes as too few to for the assignation of the bureaucratic toolkit on a given wiki. Should the project grow in membership, please restart the local discussion. Thank you for understanding and for volunteering to serve your project. -- Avi 04:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
      • Ok, I understand perfectly. We’ll try again (or not) in some months (or more). Thank you for your consideration of this request. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 09:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Tiptoety@metawiki

As local bureaucrat I have closed Tiptoety's RfCU as successful. User is already identified (diff). Leaving note here for transparency and archival purposes. --dferg ☎ talk 00:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Elfix@frwiki

Per ArbCom decision in the link above. User has been notified of identification requirements. Nakor 18:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

On hold till the office posts receipt of the identification.
--dferg ☎ talk 19:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

מתניה@hewiki

identification was sent. [3] מתניה 21:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Mentifisto@simplewiki

User is already identified to the foundation. sonia 21:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done -- Avi 03:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Dferg@enwiki

Editor is a scrutineer for the local Arbitration Committee Securepoll elections, and requires temporary CheckUser access for investigating potential vote fraud. Skomorokh 02:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • The English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee supports the access of these stewards, who have been identified by the Election Co-ordinating Committee, as temporary checkusers for the purpose of scrutineering the current vote. Risker 02:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done-- @lestaty discuţie 03:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Laaknor@enwiki

Editor is a scrutineer for the local Arbitration Committee Securepoll elections, and requires temporary CheckUser access for investigating potential vote fraud. Skomorokh 02:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • The English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee supports the access of these stewards, who have been identified by the Election Co-ordinating Committee, as temporary checkusers for the purpose of scrutineering the current vote. Risker 02:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done-- @lestaty discuţie 03:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Mardetanha@enwiki

Editor is a scrutineer for the local Arbitration Committee Securepoll elections, and requires temporary CheckUser access for investigating potential vote fraud. Skomorokh 02:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • The English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee supports the access of these stewards, who have been identified by the Election Co-ordinating Committee, as temporary checkusers for the purpose of scrutineering the current vote. Risker 02:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done-- @lestaty discuţie 03:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Millosh@enwiki

Editor is a scrutineer for the local Arbitration Committee Securepoll elections, and requires temporary CheckUser access for investigating potential vote fraud. Skomorokh 02:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • The English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee supports the access of these stewards, who have been identified by the Election Co-ordinating Committee, as temporary checkusers for the purpose of scrutineering the current vote. Risker 02:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done-- @lestaty discuţie 03:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

ماني@fawiki

per discussion above , as local crat , i closed the RFCU as successful , i also asked from the user to send identification to the foundation as soon as possible Mardetanha talk 17:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Progress report? --dferg ☎ talk 23:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
seems user is not interested any more Mardetanha talk 20:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Ok. Closed. --dferg ☎ talk 11:14, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

sir kiss@hewiki

identification was sent. http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Identification_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=2258856

Yes check.svg Done :) !ומזל טוב --Nick1915 - all you want 19:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
TODA!--Sir kiss 20:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Malatinszky@huwiki

Time2wait.svg On hold - awaiting for ID. Has the user been informed about the methods? --dferg ☎ talk 15:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
No one contacted me, but I went ahead and emailed a scan of my ID to secure-info@wikimedia.org. Looking forward to your response, either here or via email. Thank you! --Malatinszky 18:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. The office has confirmed the receipt of your identification.
Yes check.svg Done, access granted. Please do not forget to suscribe to checkuser-l. I'm informing the listadmins too. --dferg ☎ talk 19:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks very much! --Malatinszky 02:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Oversight access

Kansan@simplewiki

User has not identified to the wmf yet. --Barras 14:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

User is now identified prrof. -Barras 20:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Done by Guillom. Thanks, -Barras 20:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Removal of access

Viktorianec@ruwiki

The user is inactive a long time. I wrote him a letter and he agreed to the removal of the admin flag on his user page. --Obersachse 13:21, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 17:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Patrick@ptwikibooks

The user is not active at pt.wikibooks. His last edit was on 14/07/2006. --Helder 14:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 20:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

LeonardoG@ptwikibooks

The user is not active at pt.wikibooks. His last edit was on 09/08/2008 --Helder 14:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 20:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

João Jerónimo@ptwikibooks

The user is not active at pt.wikibooks. His last edit was on 15/07/2008. --Helder 14:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 20:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Dr. Shaggeman@dewikipedia

This sysop is about 1 year inactive. After the local policy please remove his permissions. --Liesel 15:35, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Andre Engels 19:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Lung@dewikipedia

This sysop is about 1 year inactive. After the local policy please remove his permissions. --Liesel 15:35, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Andre Engels 19:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Nir@hewikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights. thanks, Nir 19:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Andre Engels 19:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

egg@cswikisource

Inactivity, last edit on 19 Sept 2009 i.e. nearly 1 and a quarter of a year (15 months). In the months and years before the contributions are marginal as well. On the most Czech projects there is automatic desysop after 6 months of inactivity. On the Czech Wikisource ("Wikizdroje") there is a similar rule to be discussed (see here). This desysop has been shortly discussed here. The user Egg anounced several times his withdrawal from his activities in the WM projects like Czech Wikipedia etc., see e.g. his user page here, he also made a withdrawal from his positions in the Czech Chapter of the WMF (see here). Link to this meta request made on the community discussion page here). Thanks, admin (and formerly the first bct) on the project, -jkb- 19:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

It's rather strange that -jkb- didn't try to contact me at all. Nevertheless, I agree; please remove my sysop flag. My activity on the project has dropped to nearly zero and it won't change in the near future. --egg 08:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done --Mercy 08:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Ragimiri@cswikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights on Czech Wikipedia. Thank you. --Ragimiri 15:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Thanks for the service Mardetanha talk 15:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Ottava Rima@en-wv

Per Community Review. --mikeu talk 21:35, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Laaknor 22:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Comment Comment Discussion moved here. --WizardOfOz talk 14:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Teemeah@hu-wp

--Teemeah 17:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg removed Thanks for all your help Mardetanha talk 17:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Puckly@nlwiki

Yes check.svg Done Shanel 22:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

User SonicR@dewikinews

Please desysop me on de.wikinews. I won't be avtive on this projekt in the future and strongly disagree with some policies and developments on this project. One oft the two buerocrats has left the project, the other isn't really active. That is why I'm asking a steward on Meta. Thanks. --SonicR 17:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold - no SUL account. Local confirmation requested. --dferg ☎ talk 21:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done Per confirmation. Thank you for your service. -- Avi 02:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Niduzzi@mswiki & Didie@mswiki

These two users haven't been active for almost a year. In both cases, the community unanimously agreed to remove their sysop bits. --...Aurora... 02:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Niduzzi and Didie are both thanked for there service. -- Avi 02:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

kju@dewikinews

I have resigned from my positions as Bureaucrat and Administrator on dewikinews. Please revoke the associated flags from my account. I also operate the Bot SpongeBot on de.wikinews which also has administrator flag. How to have that removed? I can login as SpongeBot and post a request if required. -- Kju 02:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Thank you for your service. -- Avi 03:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Istvánka@huwiki

Hello all! I would like to give up my reviewer bit, I’ve got very tired, I won’t be active! --Istvánka 21:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Stewards can't remove this right, please ask one of local sysops. LeinaD (t) 23:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

SpongeBot@dewikinews

This bot was operated by User:Kju (see above). To be able to fulfill some tasks, it has administrator flag granted. Please remove that flag. -- SpongeBot 00:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Affirmed. -- Kju 00:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done-- @lestaty discuţie 02:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Sherurcij@en.source

As per Wikisource policy, all administrators must be confirmed by the community. Sherurcij was not confirmed, so we would like sysop priveleges removed from him.--—Zhaladshar (Talk) 18:34, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Sherurcij is thanked for his/her service. -- Avi 19:01, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

MF-Warburg@brwikisource

Temporary import+sysop rights were granted to me in order to import the project's pages from Old Wikisource. As local sysops now have been elected, please remove the rights from my account. --MF-W 21:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg removed Thanks Mardetanha talk 21:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Wolf@hiWikipedia

Hi, According to our local policy this user should have 250 edits atleast in last 1.5 year to sustain his bureaucrat and sysop flag, but this user has only 15 edits in last 1.5 year and inactive since a long time, So i would request you to remove his both flag as per our policy, Thank you--Mayur 09:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 21:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Hemanshu@hiWikipedia

According to our local policy this user should have 50 edits atleast in last 6 months to sustain his bureaucrat and sysop flag, but this user has only 7 edits in last 6 months and inactive since 5 months, So i would request you to remove his both flag as per our policy, Thank you--Mayur 09:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done removing both flags.Jusjih 23:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Mitul0520@hiWikipedia.org

According to our local policy this user should have 150 edits atleast in last 1 year to sustain his bureaucrat and sysop flag, but this user has only 0 edits in last 1 year and inactive since 13 months, So i would request you to remove his both flag as per our policy, Thank you--Mayur 09:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done -- Avi 04:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Adambro@enwikiversity

Please remove my admin rights on en.wikiversity. Thanks. --Adambro 20:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thank you for your service. -- @lestaty discuţie 20:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Adambro@enwikipedia

Please remove my admin rights. Thanks.--Adambro 21:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg removed tnx for the service Mardetanha talk 21:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Adambro@commons

Please remove my admin rights. Thanks.--Adambro 21:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg removed tnx for the service Mardetanha talk 21:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Adambro@meta

Please remove my admin rights. Thanks.--Adambro 21:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your service here! -Barras 21:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

putnik@ruwiki

Please remove my checkuser rights. Thanks. — putnik 22:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --FiliP ██ 22:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Koos Jol@nlwikibooks

I'd like my bureacrat and sysop status on the Dutch Wikibooks removed. The link where my message to the community is presented can be found here: click. The text there is in Dutch, but in short it says: In the past I was active, but things have changed. I don't leave Wikibooks and if I'll become more active and feel the need for sysoprights again, I'll try to get them in the normal way, but for now I don't need them. Koos ... 23:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Thank you for your service. -- Avi 01:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Eusebius@Commons

Please remove my checkuser flag on Commons. I just don't have enough time for this task. There are enough remaining CUs on the project. --Eusebius 15:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Thank you for your service. -- Avi 16:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. --Eusebius 16:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Adam Cuerden@Commons

I wish to resign my adminship because ACommons is racist, evil, abuses people, and I want NO DAMN PART IN IT, and it makes me physically ill that I ever contributed anything to this entire place full of misanthropist, cliquish, evil people. Adam Cuerden 02:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Done per request. Kylu 02:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Caiser@eswikibooks

As per inactivity policy linked above (2 full years without edits/log actions - last edit/log on 2005). As eswikibooks bureaucrat, please remove his sysop permissions. Thank you, --dferg ☎ talk 09:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 10:00, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Theus PR@pt.wikipedia

According to the local policy, administrator who make less than 50 administrative actions in the last 180 days is to have your sysop status automatically removed. He made less than 50 administrative actions in the last 180 days.Carlos99 16:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, by Mercy. Ruy Pugliesi 12:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Rui Silva@pt.wikipedia

According to the local policy, this administrator performed less than 50 administrative actions in the last 180 days. Ruy Pugliesi 11:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, by Mercy. Ruy Pugliesi 12:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Fantastic, how bureaucracy works well... Exactly on the very day i performed my last administrative action, i'm informed that a request is "pending" for my dismissal for administrative inactivity, and when i come to see - and comment, as requested - my dismissal proposal, the removal was already done! That is efficiency… Funny thing is, this happens just a week or so that i stated publicly that the stewards are inneficient - actually, incompetent - because they could not decide what to do with a sysop that was accused, by the same stewards (or by one of them) to abuse his statute as checkuser, excatly the same sysop that now proposes my removal, for administrative inactivity… It is sad to see the Wikipedia project transformed in a bureaucratic "project"! Of course i am not going to argue on why i didn't "perform my administrative duties" - i did them when i deemed they were necessary. I know i can renew my status, by proposing, or having another user propose me, as sysop. But i don't know if i want to be part of this "administrative machine", that blindly uses "local policy" to dismiss a sysop. Kindly regards. --Rui Silva 18:50, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

עמית אבידן@he.wiki

Please remove my sysop rights. Your remarks, etc. --עמית אבידן 21:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Thank you for your time as a sysop and we sincerely hope that you continue with us for long. --Jyothis 02:13, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Pablo.cl@eswikibooks

User has made no edits/log actions within a 2 years period. As per inactivity directive please remove his sysop and bureaucrat permissions. --dferg ☎ talk 10:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Envite@eswikibooks

User has made no edits/log actions within a 2 years period. As per inactivity directive please remove his sysop permissions. --dferg ☎ talk 10:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

עוזי ו.@hewiki

Requesting to remove my own sysop access; I will keep my CheckUser access for now. עוזי ו. 22:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Thank you for your work. Wutsje 09:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Kbthompson@enwikipedia

User is deceased. -FASTILY (TALK) 09:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

May God bless his soul, you may add his name here Mardetanha talk 15:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Ori@Hewikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Thank you. ---Ori 18:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. --dferg ☎ talk 22:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Rotemliss@hewiki

Please remove my sysop rights in Hebrew Wikipedia. – rotemlissTalk 12:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done !ותודה --Nick1915 - all you want 21:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Joe Gazz84@testwiki

Joe Gazz84 was granted temp 'cratship by myself. It has since expired, please remove only 'crat. --Tiptoety talk 17:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by Jyothis--Nick1915 - all you want 21:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Massimiliano Lincetto@itwikipedia

Unfortunately I don't have enough free time to spend on wiki anymore. I hope to come back one day :-) --Massimiliano 14:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Done, thank you for your work! LeinaD (t) 14:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Damzow@he.wikipedia

Please remove my Checkuser rights (but leave the sysop) in the he wikipedia Damzow 08:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done ותודה --Nick1915 - all you want 12:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
many thanks and בבקשה :-) Damzow 11:38, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Eusebius@commons

After two years of service, I would like to give back my sysop rights on Commons. Thanks in advance. --Eusebius 17:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your service, M/ 17:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Suguri F@jawiki

He/She is inactive for 3 months. According to local desysop policy (inactivity rules), I request the removal of his/her sysop access. --Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 09:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:33, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Marine-Blue@jawikiversity

Own request. Please remove my local sysop access. --Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 09:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done and thank you!--Nick1915 - all you want 10:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Nick. (grant and remove :-) )--Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 12:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Jurkal@plwikisource

This sysop is about 2 year inactive. After the local policy please remove his permissions. Awersowy 19:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 19:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Blidu@frwiki

Local policy states that administrators that have been inactive for more than 6 months should be removed their sysop access. Thanks, Elfix 16:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 19:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

KKoolstra@nl.wikipedia

Own request: given my low level of activity, I would like my local sysop/adiministrator rights (moderator) to be removed. KKoolstra 21:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Done, thank you for your work! LeinaD (t) 21:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Lavallen@svwikiversity

I would like to have the confirmed-flag on recently started sv.wikiversity to help with page-moves. At present, a lot of pages are positioned as they were on Beta. --Lavallen 13:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, rights will expire in a week (28-11-2010). By that time you'll probably have autoconfirmed status. If not please poke us again. Archiving copy in SR/AT shortly. --dferg ☎ talk 21:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank You! -- Lavallen 09:20, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Removed. --dferg ☎ talk 13:34, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Kaj@sv.wikiversity.org

I'm requesting temporary sysop on the newly created swedish wikiversity to begin the transfer from Beta. I'm native speaking swedish and sysop at Beta. //Kaj 18:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

And the vote in betawikiversity for its sysop status. For moving by the best way, I propose the "importupload" temporary rights to upload at once all sv-page in the betawikiversity. And i think that right allow to decembre 31th seem to be good, time to lauch a sysop-community-vote.Crochet.david 18:59, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
In order to import you must have the importer right as well. I might volunteer (I know how to use MediaWiki well) Frozen Windwant to be chilly? 22:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
This is really great! It will be big time fun to add content to the new swedish wikiversity. Please give Kaj the sysop status or help us move the pages from beta. We are all anxious to get started! --83.253.237.213 17:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Kaj is well known in the swedish projects. Are there any problems with this request? -- Lavallen 15:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Granted temp adminship till 20th Feb 2011. Looks like you have not completed your SUL process. Kindly do that as well. --Jyothis 16:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

As the import is finish from betawikiversity to sv.wikiversity with the import xml file, change Kaj@svwikiverstiy from Administrators and Importers to Administrators as [requested] . Crochet.david 14:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Jyothis 14:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Removed temporary permissions, set permanent ones as per election --dferg ☎ talk 11:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

BarkingFish@tpiwiktionary

Request made to facilitate reawakening of an almost dead project - with Tok Pisin not being so well known, an active Wiktionary for the language would be a net positive. BarkingFish 20:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Message on local project just left. Need to wait a week. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, expires: 4-12-2010 please remember to translate the interface at betawiki: only and to upload images preferably to commons:, please come back a few days before the status expires to prolong it or hold a local voting if the community grows, thanks --dferg ☎ talk 09:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
access removed previously--Nick1915 - all you want 11:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

ssr@ruwikinews

Please consider giving Ssr sysop status per the discussion linked to above. The request has been open for almost two weeks now; there are only three supports, but that should be enough in this case as there is practically nobody editing there actively. Thanks - Tempodivalse [talk] 01:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Granted temporarily for half a year; expires December 5. - Andre Engels 17:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
status removed--Nick1915 - all you want 11:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Seb az86556@nv.wikipedia

(Not sure if this is the right procedure/place to post it. Currently temp-admin.)
I was given temporary adminship with the advice to start a discussion/public request before it expires on Dec 15. I did so, and after my initial "trial-period," I now have the support of the two most active contributors (see link -- basically "our community"; I hope it will grow somewhat over time). Thank you so much/Ahehee' nitsxaago Seb az86556 22:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

We like to see a few more comments before making adminship permanent but you have the support of the other active admin there so I think this seems reasonable. What do my fellow stewards think? In any case we certainly could extend your temporary again. ++Lar: t/c 23:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
uhm, I'd extend his temp flag, 2 supports are not enough ... not even in a small community--Nick1915 - all you want 17:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I'd also say extend the temp flag, until the community is a bit more robust. — Dan | talk 20:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, I suppose. It's a "chicken or egg"-question. It has me wondering how Node_ue gets to retain permanent status for 4 years without any support or any community at that time. Effectively, the only permanent admin is inactive, and anyone who is willing to become active and do something will be told... Anyways --- How many people would it take? Seb az86556 03:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Hold a local vote to remove adminship from said person, who was apparently added during a period of looser standards. Kylu 03:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for that answer. The second part was about the number of votes; it would be nice for all of us if somebody could tell me something for future reference along the lines of "Don't bother showing up again before you have 100 votes" or something like that. I could not find the corresponding rule anywhere; maybe I was simply looking in the wrong places. Again, thank you. Seb az86556 16:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
You raise valid concerns. I'm not sure we do have a hard and fast rule (although it's certainly way less than 100 votes!), it's more common sense (although I could be wrong). 2 votes is very much on the low side of the line, although I tended to think that in this particular case it might be sufficient given that you had already shown your mettle, and you had the support of the other active admin. But I wasn't sure, which is why I asked my fellow stewards for their views instead of just saying yes. Since they are saying probably not, I tend to agree. As for a line... typically if we see 4 or 5 votes from regular contributors that's usually enough. There is a lot of difference between a community of 2 and a community of 5... 5 is trending towards a self sufficient community, while 2 is one person away from a one man show, which we know isn't sustainable. The line for 'crat is significantly higher than admin of course. In any case we are prepared to renew your temp without any question. I hope that helps. ++Lar: t/c 11:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
OK. I doubt we'll ever need a crat or anything beyond that. Thank you for the temp-flag, and I guess I'll be back again in a few months... :)
(PS: you should probably put some sort of explanation like you just gave me on the top of this page... all current request are below 5 votes as far as I can tell... saves time and energy for everybody...) Seb az86556 23:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Good point. Also, it appears we didn't set a specific expiration, I'm thinking another 6 months, set to expire June 15 2010. ++Lar: t/c 19:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
OK. sounds good. thanks/ahéheeʼSeb az86556 22:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done then... temp adminship extended to June 15 2010. Archiving this to the Steward requests/Permissions/Approved temporary shortly. Note that Stephen G. Brown did not ask for renewal (the previous request was here.) and will be removed. ++Lar: t/c 14:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

request closed and ready for archiving, replaced by another renewal req--Nick1915 - all you want 11:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Stephen G. Brown@nv.wikipedia

Lar mentioned that my adminship is expiring and that I need to make a request if I want to maintain it. Yes, I am requesting that my adminship be extended. Thanks. Stephen G. Brown 17:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC) It appears this request was placed on the wrong page. Stephen G. Brown 04:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

(Reference note: Admin rights removed 18Dec2009 Kylu 05:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC) )
Yes check.svg Done - expiring June 15, 2010.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:11, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Stephen G. Brown & Seb az86556@nvwikipedia

3rd temp. adminship (1st: October 15, 2009 - December 15, 2009. 2nd: December 15, 2009 - June 15, 2010). Ahéheeʼ. Seb az86556 09:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done extended for 6 more months. expires Dec 14, 2010 --Jyothis 19:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

request closed and ready for archiving, replaced by another renewal req--Nick1915 - all you want 11:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Ikatz@euwiktionary

Hello, in the last six months I have been one of the administrators in Basque wiktionary and I would remain so. I'm the most active user so I can control better the banditry. I opened the vote yesterday but it has not voted anyone, because there are not many active users and those are not come every day so it is possible that they vote later. --EH-Ikatz answer here 12:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. We will simply wait a week to give the community a chance to vote if they want to. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 23:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, it has already passed a week and I think that anyone else isn't going to vote, because there aren't many active users. Bye. --EH-Ikatz answer here 13:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, expires: 2010-12-24 please remember to translate the interface at betawiki: only and to upload images preferably to commons:, please come back a few days before the status expires to prolong it or hold a local voting if the community grows, thanks — Dferg 14:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

თეკა@abwiki

HI, can you please grant me adminstrator rights on Abkhaz wiki? I was an administrator for three months. Definitely Abkhaz Wikipedia began to work. I would like to extend the status of administrator. If it necessary local administrator, Gaeser (whitch become an Admin yesterday), will support this request. Thanks in advance -Temuri 11:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done extended for six months - expires Dec 15, 2010

Removed--Shizhao 12:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikitanvir@bnwiktionary

Our only administrator is absent since April 5, 2008. So, we need a new sysop. There, my request for adminship have supported by three users, and opposed by none. As we have only 3/4 regular users (excluding me and bot accounts), I think it's enough for a permanent adminship. If the policy stand against this, i think a temporary adminship will suit me. I don't have a healthy healthy edit count in bn wikt, but as of today I have over 5,000 edits in bn Wikipedia, and i think this can help to approve my reqest. I need to be an admin because we need to delete some vandalized and encyclopedic page. We need to create and translate some mediawiki messages, and overall it needs proper maintenance also, so we need a regular administrator. — T@nv!r_ (Talk) 16:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Not enough votes to give permanent, so expires 2010-02-16. Laaknor 16:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Extended to 2010-06-16 Kylu 15:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Extended to 2010-10-16 Daniel Mayer (mav) 23:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I like to extend my temporary sysopship in Bengali Wiktionary. It's going to expire tomorrow. It's the third time I'm requesting the extension (my past requests). You guys may consider giving me a permanent sysopship. Now, I'm not only the active sysop but also the only active contributor in bnwikt. I've been an active contributor since October 12, 2009, and an admin since November 16, 2009. You can find my sysop activity and edit count. I'm also a regular contributor in Bengali and English Wikipedia, where I've over 11000 and 1200 edits respectively. If you think about granting a temp sysopship again, then I leave the extension time up to you good guys. Thanks. :) — Tanvir 17:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Permanent status looks warranted here. For now, I have extended temp adminship to 16 October 2010. We can make this permanent if other stewards agree. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 23:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay. Lets see. :) — Tanvir 06:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
It's been over 24 hours since I requested. Any progress fellows? My sysopship going to expire within next few hours. You better extend it for a couple of weeks, while you decide. Best regards, — Tanvir 08:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Tanvir, Mav extended you for three months. We will consider the permanent one asap. --Jyothis 16:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Didn't know. Thanks. :) — Tanvir 17:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Extending for 6 months, as we cannot approve permanent adminship at this time. New expiration would be Dec 15, 2010. We appreciate your continued contributions and please note that you can always request for additional help from Global Sysops and Stewards if needed. Thanks --Jyothis 14:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
request replaced by another one.--Nick1915 - all you want 12:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy@vi.wikibooks

Hello Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy. Please post a notice on the local requests page (village pump or b:vi:Thảo luận Wikibooks:Người quản lý) and leave it open for some days (~1 week) to gauge community consensus. Thank you. — Dferg (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
OK OK, I did there, thank you. But this project is too small, very few people interested --minhhuy*= 04:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, expires: 31/06/2010 please remember to translate the interface at betawiki: only and to upload images preferably to commons:, please come back a few days before the status expires to prolong it or hold a local voting if the community grows, thanks Note to stewards: archived note on SR/AT. — Dferg (talk) 22:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy@vi.wikibooks

As below --minhhuy*= 14:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done extended for 6 months. Expires Dec 31st, 2010. --Jyothis 14:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy@vi.wikiquote

Hello, I am currently doing sysop in this project. Previously, I had requested permissions and approved here, but the steward put the time expires in the year in June. I realize now my job here is not finished and I still love you your current position, so please extend the effective time to help me (if possible please extend indefinitely). Thank you so much! --minhhuy*= 14:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done extended for 6 months. Expires Dec 31st, 2010. --Jyothis 14:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Saper@wm2010.wikimedia - importer right

Hello, I am the organizer of the Wikimania 2010 and I am running the Wikimania 2010 site. and I'd like to request importer right to be granted to my account to move stuff across those wikis.  « Saper // @talk »  22:36, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

For how long will you be needing this tool? Thank you, --Dferg 14:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Hopefully to be done before Wikimania (July) but maybe we would like to archive some stuff later. Whole conference should be wrapped up financially etc. by the end of Q1 2011 (by the time the financial and tax reports of the org committee are due). So, realistically, no more than end-of-year 2010 (but should be way shorter). This is not a one-time migration.  « Saper // @talk »  20:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Okay. On this basis I'm grating you importer rights, to expire 31-12-2010. If by the end of the term you still need the tool, you can come here and request a prolongation. Best regards and good luck with WM2010! --Dferg 21:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Viniciusmc@ptwikipedia

Since pt.wikipedia doesn't have local bureaucrats at the moment, please close that request as "not granted". The procedure for closing is already here, here and here, you just need to follow what I did in my edits. Thanks. --viniciusmc 01:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I should ask you to grant this flag, 'cause the user has reached all the criteria for this status, as pointed in the discussion, and according to the policy. CasteloBrancomsg 09:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Castelobranco, I don't want the flag anymore, that's why I'm asking the closure of the request. Thanks anyway. --viniciusmc 12:10, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I got it, now. Sorry. CasteloBrancomsg 12:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I should have said that on my first message. --viniciusmc 12:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

So if I understand it correctly, this is a request to not grant you admin status? Not doing any request should have been enough for that... Yes check.svg Done or X mark.svg Not done depending on how you look at it. - Andre Engels 19:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

No, you don't understand, it's not admin status. I tried to close the request locally but was told that only bureaucrats can do that, and some users pointed me to this page. Anyway, the matter is already solved by a local admin, so forget this. --viniciusmc 20:05, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Infovarius@ru-wiki

I am sysop there. Please grant me import right in order to save deleted glossaries from sister wikipedia project (where I am also sysop). If it is possible I'd like to have import right also in ru-wikisource, may be temporary (there are a few original dictionaries to move on). Infovarius 20:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Infovarius, please provide us with a link to local community approval. Thanks. --Mercy 10:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Initiated: ru-wiktionary & ru-wikisource. There may be some delay in discussion (some days) because of small activity in projects. Infovarius 19:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
There's support in wiktionary, and I don't need in wikisource any more. So it may be summed up. Infovarius 16:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Granted for a period of one month. Please react if this is too short (or too long). - Andre Engels 19:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Roberto de Lyra@ptwikipedia

Please grant the status of "eliminador" to user Roberto de Lyra per community consensus. Obs.: we don't have local crats at this moment. Thank you, Lechatjaune 23:36, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done I had to assign myself temporary 'crat rights on PtWiki, but it is now done. -- Avi 01:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

User:M7

Prior to SUL deployment, an impostor tried to register my own username on several wikies. At present, as seen on toolserver, my account is still blocked on

I ask for this blocks to be removed, since they are no longer necessary, as my global account has been unified and local wikies attached long time ago. Thank you, M/ 00:04, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 10:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Nick. Buon Natale :)
--M/ 17:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Vinicius Lima@pt.wikipedia

Please, grant Vinicius Lima the flag of "Eliminador" per consensus obtained here. This request last for more than one week and he received 100% of support. Thanks.” TeleS (T PT @ C G) 15:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: To grant the flag of "Eliminador" you will first have to grant yourself the 'crat rights.” TeleS (T PT @ C G) 15:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Nick1915 - all you want 18:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)